Singer Billie Eilish used her moment at the Grammys to declare how she really feels about ICE and immigrants in America — which BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” points out was a blatant display of her “white savior complex.”

“No one is illegal on stolen land,” singer Billie Eilish said as she stepped up to accept her Grammy, before adding, “It’s just really hard to know what to say and what to do right now. And I just, I feel really hopeful in this room, and I feel like we just need to keep fighting and speaking up and protesting, and our voices really do matter, and the people matter.”

“If I had a dime for every liberal white woman who has a white savior complex and thinks that it is her duty to save the brown people, I just, you’d never see me again, I’d be so rich. I would move out into the boonies, and no one would ever hear from me again, because they seem to be totally obsessed with protecting illegal criminals with brown skin,” Gonzales comments.

However, one social media user, Drew Pavlou, took to Instagram to post a reel of himself claiming he plans to test out Eilish’s theory.

“Big news, everybody. I’ve decided today to move into Billy Eilish’s $6 million Malibu beachside mansion. She announced today at the Grammys that no human being is illegal on stolen land,” Pavlou said into the camera.

“So, I’m going to be making the trip to America. I’m packing my bags right away, and I’m looking forward to just taking possession of her $6 million Malibu mansion. No human being is illegal, so I want to thank everybody who’s believed in me on the journey. I really can’t wait to move in,” he continued.

“It’s now my house. I want to thank Billy Eilish as well for her generosity. Thank you so much,” he added.

“It’s worth mocking. It’s really worth mocking,” Gonzales says, stifling a laugh. “These people don’t actually believe the drivel that they say. They’re like, ‘Oh, there should be no borders. No human being is illegal.’”

“Like, OK, why do you have armed security? Why do you have a gate that people have to type in a code?” she asks. “That seems oppressive to all of these people, these indigenous people, if no one is illegal on stolen land.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Video, Video phone, Camera phone, Upload, Sharing, Free, Youtube.com, Sara gonzales unfiltered, Sara gonzales, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Billie eilish, Ice protests, The grammys, No one is illegal on stolen land, Immigration, Illegal immigration 

A confrontation at a Minneapolis gas station involving a U.S. Border Patrol commander has reignited debate over whether private businesses should deny service to federal law enforcement officers based on opposition to immigration enforcement.

Video circulated online by FreedomNTV shows Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino being followed out of a Speedway convenience store by a man believed to be a store employee or manager. In the footage, the man tells Bovino, “We do not support ICE. Get off our property.”

‘It’s shameful conduct to try to penalize men and women who are enforcing federal law.’

Bovino does not respond in the video and exits the store without engaging.

The incident, which occurred in late January, is the latest in a series of encounters in which Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and Department of Homeland Security officials have been turned away from private businesses, particularly in Minnesota, amid heightened anti-ICE activism.

RELATED: LAPD defies Newsom: Chief refuses to enforce mask ban on ICE

Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Similar refusals have been reported at hotels and retail locations, including a Hampton Inn-branded property in Lakeville, Minnesota, where ICE agents were denied accommodations and had reservations canceled. That episode drew national attention after Hilton removed the hotel from its brand. The General Services Administration likewise removed it from its federal lodging programs.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was also denied entry to a building in a Chicago suburb earlier this year while attempting to use a restroom, according to DHS officials.

The Speedway video has fueled renewed scrutiny over the line between private business discretion and refusals of service aimed at federal agents performing official duties.

RELATED: Klobuchar running for Minnesota governor on anti-ICE platform

Photo by Jamie Kelter Davis/Getty Images

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Zack Smith said that while private businesses generally control access to their property, singling out law enforcement officers because of their role raises serious ethical concerns.

“It’s shameful conduct to try to penalize men and women who are enforcing federal law,” Smith said. “Even if a business technically has the authority to refuse service, that doesn’t make it right.”

Smith added that similar incidents emerged during periods of unrest following 2020, when law enforcement officers increasingly became symbolic targets of political activism.

Following the Speedway incident, criticism of the convenience store chain spread rapidly online, with calls for consumer boycotts aimed at Speedway and its parent company, 7-Eleven.

7-Eleven and the DHS did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

The Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement have not announced whether further action will be taken.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Ice, Anti-ice, Anti-ice protests, Anti-christian, Police, Ice agents, Politics 

Democrats have worked overtime to demonize and delegitimize the men and women of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — those whom Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz branded as “Trump’s modern-day Gestapo,” Sen. Tina Smith (Minn.) called a “clear and present threat,” Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) dubbed “terrorizing bandits,” and Democrat anchor-baby Rep. Delia Ramirez (Ill.) called a “terror force.”

In addition to Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, and other Democrats threatening lawfare against ICE officers, some radical officials have turned up the heat by suggesting that it may be reasonable to shoot masked federal immigration agents.

‘He is openly calling for people to shoot federal law enforcement.’

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) claimed this week that it would be “justified” to shoot those he characterized as “masked hoodlums.”

“What is really the major problem in this country today is the fascism in our streets, the attacks on American citizens by masked hoodlums,” said Nadler, going off-topic during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday. “If you were attacked by a masked person, you might think you were being kidnapped. You’d be justified in shooting the person to protect yourself.”

“We see people being shot, for what? For driving a car?” he added, possibly referring to Renee Good, an anti-ICE radical who was fatally shot while driving her SUV into an ICE agent. “We see the ICE goons break into people’s homes without a warrant.”

Vice President JD Vance was among the many critics who blasted Nadler over his incendiary remarks, noting, “Jerry Nadler is one of the highest ranking Democrats in the House of Representatives and he is openly calling for people to shoot federal law enforcement.”

“This is despicable behavior from an elected official and I’m sure the leftwing media will cover it extensively,” added Vance.

RELATED: ‘He is no victim’: Sister of man shot by Border Patrol in Arizona tells anti-ICE protesters to stop defending him

Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu via Getty Images

Stephen Coughlin, an American lawyer and former Joint Chiefs of Staff intelligence analyst, wrote that from a “Counter-State POV, could this be considered ‘open communications’, sanctioning targeted violence against federal officers when conducting their statutory mission? It should be taken as a given that when the far left (Marxist) designates a group as ‘fascist,’ it is the same as putting them on a target list.”

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton noted, “The Left is murderous.”

According to the Department of Homeland Security, ICE agents faced 68 vehicular attacks, representing a 3,300% increase in such attacks against ICE law enforcement. During the same stretch, Customs and Border Patrol officers faced 114 vehicular attacks.

“Sanctuary politicians with their rhetoric comparing ICE to the Nazi Gestapo, slave patrols, and the secret police and encouraging illegal aliens to evade arrest have incited violence against law enforcement,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement on Tuesday.

“We have seen more than 180 vehicle attacks against law enforcement since President Trump took office,” continued McLaughlin. “In addition to these vehicle attacks, our officers are also facing a more than 1,300% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats as they risk their lives to arrest murderers, pedophiles, rapists, gang members, and terrorists.”

In an attempt at damage control Tuesday evening, Nadler claimed that he was “not calling on citizens to shoot ICE” but rather “calling on ICE to stop shooting citizens.”

‘It’s kind of a recipe for disaster.’

“ICE is a rogue agency hellbent on terrorizing our neighbors and instilling fear in immigrant communities,” Nadler continued in his non-apology. “They should stop wearing masks, put on a uniform, and start wearing body cameras. Get a judicial warrant, too.”

Nadler’s rationalization of shooting ICE agents greatly resembles that provided by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) in her interview last month with KPNX-TV’s Brahm Resnik.

After alleging that ICE officers are engaged in “thuggish, brutish behavior” and claiming that “real cops don’t wear masks,” Mayes told Resnik with a smile both that Arizona is a “stand-your-ground state” and that “we also have a lot of guns in Arizona.”

“You know, it’s kind of a recipe for disaster, because you have these masked federal officers with very little identification, sometimes no identification, wearing plain clothes and masks, and we have a stand-your-ground law that says that if you reasonably believe that your life is in danger and you are in your house or your car or on your property that you can defend yourself with lethal force.”

Despite the interviewer providing Mayes with ample opportunity to clarify her meaning, the Democrat proceeded to give what appeared to be a retroactive excuse for would-be killers, stating, “How do you know they’re a peace officer?”

“If there’s a situation where somebody pulls out their gun because they know Arizona is a stand-your-ground state, then it becomes ‘did they reasonably know that they were a peace officer?'” said Arizona’s top law enforcement officer.

When Resnik once more pressed her for clarification that she was not “telling folks you have license if you are threatened,” Mayes said, “Well,” and smirked.

“No,” she continued, “but again, if you’re being attacked by someone who is not identified as a peace officer, how do you know?”

Like Nadler, Mayes faced widespread criticism for her comments. Republican Arizona Rep. David Schweikert, for instance, characterized them as “freelancing a scenario where bullets start flying and then shrugging it off as ‘just the law.'”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Immigration and customs enforcement, Ice, Department of homeland security, Dhs, Jerry nadler, Nadler, Congress, Incitement, Violence, Immigration, Ice agent, Illegal aliens, Assassins, Politics