The president answered with important details on Monday about the possibility of U.S. troops on the ground to “eradicate” the Hamas terror group if it continues to threaten the peace deal negotiated with Israel.

President Donald Trump took questions from the press while seated next to the prime minister of Australia at the White House.

‘They have to be good, and if they’re not good, they will be eradicated.’

The president gave a fierce warning to the Hamas terror group for continuing attacks on Israelis.

“They’re going to behave. They’re going to be nice. And if they’re not, we’re going to go and we’re going to eradicate them if we have to. They’ll be eradicated. And they know that,” said Trump.

“They got very rambunctious, and they did things that they shouldn’t be doing,” he added. “And if they keep doing it, then we’re going to go in and straighten it out. And it’ll happen very quickly and pretty violently, unfortunately.”

Rebeka Zeljko of Blaze News asked him to clarify whether that action might include the U.S. military.

“When you say, ‘We are going to eradicate Hamas,’ who is ‘we’?” Zeljko asked. “Does that include American boots on the ground?”

“No. It won’t be on the ground at all,” Trump replied unequivocally.

“We don’t need to because we have many countries, as you know, signed on to this deal. The way I view it, 59 countries … that four months ago didn’t like each other and now they’re all aligned together,” he added.

“I mean, we’ve had countries calling me when they saw some of the killing with Hamas, saying, ‘We’d love to go in and take care of the situation ourselves,'” Trump continued. “In addition you have Israel would go in in two minutes if I asked them to go in. I could tell them, ‘Go in and take care of it.’ But right now we haven’t said that. We’re gonna give it a little chance, and hopefully there will be a little less violence, but right now, you know, they’re violent people. Hamas has been very violent.”

He went on to point out that Hamas had lost the backing of Iran and anyone else.

“They have to be good, and if they’re not good, they will be eradicated,” he added.

RELATED: Trump praises Blaze News reporting during Antifa roundtable at White House — and slaps down MSNBC, CNN

The peace deal negotiated by Trump has already led to the release of the remaining hostages and the remains of hostages to Israel from the terror group.

Critics of the U.S. backing Israel in the conflict have strenuously objected to the possibility of U.S. military troops being sent to help the U.S. ally in the fight against Hamas.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Us troops on the ground, Israel peace deal, Hamas vs israel, Eradicate hamas, Politics 

An ex-Pennsylvania state police trooper — who is white — is suing his former agency for firing him after his viral arrest of a black Philadelphia LGBTQ leader.

Andrew Zaborowski arrested Celena McLean — then Celena Morrison — and McLean’s husband in a March 2024 traffic stop on the Schuylkill Expressway, WPVI-TV reported.

‘It’s cause I’m black.’

Zaborowski claims in his lawsuit that state police fired him because of his skin color and that he was falsely accused of racial profiling, the station said.

At the time of the traffic stop and arrest, McLean was Philadelphia’s executive director of the Office of LGBT Affairs, WPVI reported.

The station said it reached out to state police for comment but did not hear back.

RELATED: 9 arrested after transgender activists clash with police at ‘Let Women Speak’ event in NYC

As Blaze News previously reported, the March 2 incident — some of which was caught on video — took place on Interstate 76 near the downtown part of the city.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, citing state police, at the time reported that the trooper pulled over Celena Morrison for driving with an expired and suspended registration, driving without headlights activated in the rain, illegally tinted windows, and driving too close to another car.

After the traffic stop, Celena Morrison’s husband, Darius McLean, pulled up behind them, the paper said, adding that state police said McLean “became verbally combative” and “refused multiple lawful orders” after the trooper approached him.

The trooper attempted to arrest McLean, and Morrison tried to intervene, the Inquirer said, adding that Morrison also was arrested.

In Morrison’s video of the arrest, Morrison was heard yelling, “I work for the mayor! I work for the mayor!” as McLean was laying on the shoulder of the freeway, the paper said.

“Please, just stop. No! It’s cause I’m black,” McLean was heard saying, according to WPVI-TV.

“It’s not ’cause you’re black,” the trooper replied, according to the station.

The trooper then told Morrison to “turn around” and “give me your hands, or you are getting tased,” WPVI reported. At one point, Morrison was heard saying, “He just punched me,” the Inquirer said.

More from the station:

“This was a simple traffic stop cause you didn’t have your lights on. You’re tailgating,” the officer explains to the couple. “Then, I don’t know who you are. I don’t need somebody rolling up on me.”

“There was no need at all,” one person is heard saying.

“You were about to tase me. You pulled your gun on me,” another voice says.

“You were fighting with me,” says a third voice.

“No, I wasn’t fighting you,” someone responds.

RELATED: The Zizians’ violent spiral: A trans group tied to killings across America

State police placed the trooper on restricted duty after the incident, the Inquirer reported.

In addition, while state police charged the couple with resisting arrest, obstruction of justice, disorderly conduct, and summary traffic citations, the paper said the office of Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner declined the charges, and Celena Morrison and Darius McLean were released from custody on the evening of March 2.

Blaze News reported in January 2020 that then-Mayor Jim Kenney appointed Celena Morrison to run his Office of LGBT Affairs — and that Morrison was the first-ever trans-identifying individual of color to head up the agency.

“While Philadelphia is known as a progressive, LGBTQ-friendly city, we still have work to do,” the far-left Kenney said in a statement. “I look forward to working with Celena to build a more inclusive city for our residents.”

Morrison added to KYW-AM that being transgender and black will be an asset when it comes to the job’s demands of dealing with issues of race and gender.

“Trans folks are not being accepted,” Morrison told KYW. “They are not accepted within the LGBT community. They are also not accepted within the black community. That double marginalization calls for a different type of support.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Crime, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania state police, Trooper, Trooper fired, Lawsuit, Traffic stop, Arrest, Lgbtq, Racism allegation, White, Black, Politics 

An ex-Pennsylvania state police trooper — who is white — is suing his former agency for firing him after his viral arrest of a black Philadelphia LGBTQ leader.

Andrew Zaborowski arrested Celena McLean — then Celena Morrison — and McLean’s husband in a March 2024 traffic stop on the Schuylkill Expressway, WPVI-TV reported.

‘It’s cause I’m black.’

Zaborowski claims in his lawsuit that state police fired him because of his skin color and that he was falsely accused of racial profiling, the station said.

At the time of the traffic stop and arrest, McLean was Philadelphia’s executive director of the Office of LGBT Affairs, WPVI reported.

The station said it reached out to state police for comment but did not hear back.

RELATED: 9 arrested after transgender activists clash with police at ‘Let Women Speak’ event in NYC

As Blaze News previously reported, the March 2 incident — some of which was caught on video — took place on Interstate 76 near the downtown part of the city.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, citing state police, at the time reported that the trooper pulled over Celena Morrison for driving with an expired and suspended registration, driving without headlights activated in the rain, illegally tinted windows, and driving too close to another car.

After the traffic stop, Celena Morrison’s husband, Darius McLean, pulled up behind them, the paper said, adding that state police said McLean “became verbally combative” and “refused multiple lawful orders” after the trooper approached him.

The trooper attempted to arrest McLean, and Morrison tried to intervene, the Inquirer said, adding that Morrison also was arrested.

In Morrison’s video of the arrest, Morrison was heard yelling, “I work for the mayor! I work for the mayor!” as McLean was laying on the shoulder of the freeway, the paper said.

“Please, just stop. No! It’s cause I’m black,” McLean was heard saying, according to WPVI-TV.

“It’s not ’cause you’re black,” the trooper replied, according to the station.

The trooper then told Morrison to “turn around” and “give me your hands, or you are getting tased,” WPVI reported. At one point, Morrison was heard saying, “He just punched me,” the Inquirer said.

More from the station:

“This was a simple traffic stop cause you didn’t have your lights on. You’re tailgating,” the officer explains to the couple. “Then, I don’t know who you are. I don’t need somebody rolling up on me.”

“There was no need at all,” one person is heard saying.

“You were about to tase me. You pulled your gun on me,” another voice says.

“You were fighting with me,” says a third voice.

“No, I wasn’t fighting you,” someone responds.

RELATED: The Zizians’ violent spiral: A trans group tied to killings across America

State police placed the trooper on restricted duty after the incident, the Inquirer reported.

In addition, while state police charged the couple with resisting arrest, obstruction of justice, disorderly conduct, and summary traffic citations, the paper said the office of Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner declined the charges, and Celena Morrison and Darius McLean were released from custody on the evening of March 2.

Blaze News reported in January 2020 that then-Mayor Jim Kenney appointed Celena Morrison to run his Office of LGBT Affairs — and that Morrison was the first-ever trans-identifying individual of color to head up the agency.

“While Philadelphia is known as a progressive, LGBTQ-friendly city, we still have work to do,” the far-left Kenney said in a statement. “I look forward to working with Celena to build a more inclusive city for our residents.”

Morrison added to KYW-AM that being transgender and black will be an asset when it comes to the job’s demands of dealing with issues of race and gender.

“Trans folks are not being accepted,” Morrison told KYW. “They are not accepted within the LGBT community. They are also not accepted within the black community. That double marginalization calls for a different type of support.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Crime, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania state police, Trooper, Trooper fired, Lawsuit, Traffic stop, Arrest, Lgbtq, Racism allegation, White, Black, Politics 

An outage on Amazon’s web hosting service caused a sweep of app outages after the company faced issues at an east-coast operations center.

AWS hosts about 6.3% of all websites, but some of the biggest brands’ communications platforms also rely on the service.

‘I don’t trust Signal anymore.’

When reports started rolling in around 3 a.m. Eastern Time, Amazon said it was dealing with an “operational issue” that was affecting 14 services at its northern Virginia center.

Snapchat, McDonald’s, and even Ring doorbell cameras were among some of the applications affected. Even gaming platforms like Roblox and Fortnite were affected, as were messaging and communications programs like Zoom and Signal.

According to NBC News, about 6.5 million reports piled up that said over 1,000 sites and services had gone offline.

After 6:30 a.m., AWS said it had “fully mitigated” the issues; that was until 10:14 a.m., when it confirmed “significant API errors and connectivity issues across multiple services in the US-EAST-1 Region.”

The widespread outage sparked conversations about the fragility and dependency of major companies and even institutions, as the blackout affected the U.K. government’s HM Revenue and Customs department, which handles tax services.

With Signal affected, purporting to be an encrypted chat, X owner Elon Musk jumped on the opportunity to cast doubt on the app and direct readers to his own version, X chat.

RELATED: Amazon invests $500M in mini nuclear reactors to power AI operations

“I don’t trust Signal anymore,” Musk wrote on X, responding to a user alarmed that Signal was not working.

Just over 20 minutes later, Musk started promoting his own messenger: “The messages are fully encrypted with no advertising hooks or strange ‘AWS dependencies’ such that I can’t read your messages even if someone put a gun to my head.”

This is a contrast from May 2024, when Musk openly praised AWS for developing generative AI that helps write website code.

“Impressive. My hat is off to what Amazon has accomplished with AWS,” Musk wrote at the time.

RELATED: AI isn’t feeding you

— (@)

This is not the first time Signal has been accused of being insecure. In a 2023 interview with the popular online influencer group Nelk Boys, conservative host Tucker Carlson claimed the NSA had hacked his Signal account around the time he was attempting to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Carlson said he got a call from someone in Washington, D.C., who sat down with him and had knowledge of his conversations about planning an interview with Putin because the NSA had allegedly read Carlson’s messages.

An NGO called Article 19, which describes itself as a group “defending freedom of expression and information around the world,” told NBC News that the organization felt the disruptions were “democratic failures.”

“When a single provider goes dark, critical services go offline with it — media outlets become inaccessible, secure communication apps like Signal stop functioning, and the infrastructure that serves our digital society crumbles.”

According to Wojciech Gawroński, who runs the website AWS Maniac, Amazon has suffered one to two major outages per year between 2011 and 2021.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Return, Amazon, X, Jeff bezos, Signal, App, Messenger app, Tech, Elon musk 

An outage on Amazon’s web hosting service caused a sweep of app outages after the company faced issues at an east-coast operations center.

AWS hosts about 6.3% of all websites, but some of the biggest brands’ communications platforms also rely on the service.

‘I don’t trust Signal anymore.’

When reports started rolling in around 3 a.m. Eastern Time, Amazon said it was dealing with an “operational issue” that was affecting 14 services at its northern Virginia center.

Snapchat, McDonald’s, and even Ring doorbell cameras were among some of the applications affected. Even gaming platforms like Roblox and Fortnite were affected, as were messaging and communications programs like Zoom and Signal.

According to NBC News, about 6.5 million reports piled up that said over 1,000 sites and services had gone offline.

After 6:30 a.m., AWS said it had “fully mitigated” the issues; that was until 10:14 a.m., when it confirmed “significant API errors and connectivity issues across multiple services in the US-EAST-1 Region.”

The widespread outage sparked conversations about the fragility and dependency of major companies and even institutions, as the blackout affected the U.K. government’s HM Revenue and Customs department, which handles tax services.

With Signal affected, purporting to be an encrypted chat, X owner Elon Musk jumped on the opportunity to cast doubt on the app and direct readers to his own version, X chat.

RELATED: Amazon invests $500M in mini nuclear reactors to power AI operations

“I don’t trust Signal anymore,” Musk wrote on X, responding to a user alarmed that Signal was not working.

Just over 20 minutes later, Musk started promoting his own messenger: “The messages are fully encrypted with no advertising hooks or strange ‘AWS dependencies’ such that I can’t read your messages even if someone put a gun to my head.”

This is a contrast from May 2024, when Musk openly praised AWS for developing generative AI that helps write website code.

“Impressive. My hat is off to what Amazon has accomplished with AWS,” Musk wrote at the time.

RELATED: AI isn’t feeding you

— (@)

This is not the first time Signal has been accused of being insecure. In a 2023 interview with the popular online influencer group Nelk Boys, conservative host Tucker Carlson claimed the NSA had hacked his Signal account around the time he was attempting to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Carlson said he got a call from someone in Washington, D.C., who sat down with him and had knowledge of his conversations about planning an interview with Putin because the NSA had allegedly read Carlson’s messages.

An NGO called Article 19, which describes itself as a group “defending freedom of expression and information around the world,” told NBC News that the organization felt the disruptions were “democratic failures.”

“When a single provider goes dark, critical services go offline with it — media outlets become inaccessible, secure communication apps like Signal stop functioning, and the infrastructure that serves our digital society crumbles.”

According to Wojciech Gawroński, who runs the website AWS Maniac, Amazon has suffered one to two major outages per year between 2011 and 2021.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Return, Amazon, X, Jeff bezos, Signal, App, Messenger app, Tech, Elon musk 

Liberals and others keen to signal their adherence to post-colonial theory for years started their meetings and conferences in Canada with land acknowledgments, thanking the descendants of those warring semi-nomadic, Stone Age peoples present at the time of European civilization’s exportation to North America “for allowing us to meet and learn together on their territory.”

Owing to a consequential court ruling on Aug. 7, some Canadians in Richmond, British Columbia, might ultimately have to acknowledge that their land is no longer legally their own — and get packing.

‘The judge doesn’t seem to have fully considered the panic her judgment would cause.’

Members of the Cowichan Tribes, an Indian band in B.C. comprising around 5,500 souls, brought a legal action several years ago against the Canadian federal government, the Province of British Columbia, the City of Richmond, and other parties, seeking a declaration of aboriginal title to 1,846 acres of land in Richmond.

After a 513-day trial with hearings spanning over 11 years, Justice Barbara Young of the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that:

the Cowichan have aboriginal title to the land in question; the Crown grants of basic property ownership in the area, “and the Crown vesting of the soil and freehold interest in certain highway lands in the Cowichan Title Lands, unjustifiably infringe the Cowichan’s Aboriginal title”;”Canada and Richmond’s fee simple titles and interests in the Cowichan Title Lands are defective and invalid”; andmembers of the Indian band have a right to fish the south arm of the Fraser River for food.

While the judge did not order restitution, she tasked the federal and provincial governments with negotiating “in good faith towards reconciliation of Canada’s fee simple interests in the area with Cowichan Aboriginal title.”

This decision — which has been appealed by the province, the City of Richmond, and a pair of other Indian bands — could have major implications for those landowners in the area as well as for similar land disputes across the country.

RELATED: Ashes and accountability in the aftermath of Canada’s unmarked Indian graves sham

BC Premier David Eby. Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dwight Newman, a professor of law at the University of Saskatchewan and author behind the Law for Breakfast Substack, told Blaze News that the full implications are “not yet certain.”

“The ‘Supreme Court’ in B.C. is a confusingly named trial-level court, and the decision is being appealed. If appellate courts maintained the same thing, it would directly mean that some City of Richmond land and some federal land in the city would be owned by the Cowichan,” said Newman. “Indirectly, though, the decision implied that private property within aboriginal title areas was also vulnerable. That has widespread implications in areas where treaties have not resolved land claims, which differs in different parts of Canada.”

While the Cowichan plaintiffs successfully sought a declaration that the land ownership titles held by Canada, the city, and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority were invalid, they did not seek the same declaration with respect to privately owned lands.

The Times Colonist reported that the court did, however, indicate that the Crown’s granting of private property ownership rights needs to be resolved through negotiation, litigation, or purchase.

Newman told Blaze News that while the plaintiffs in the case have “tried to give the impression” that they would not evict residents from the disputed territory, “if the law from this decision were maintained, it would be possible for them to pursue a claim against private residents too. Private residents might have some different defenses, but we don’t know how that plays out.”

When asked what could change for non-Indian homeowners on the affected parcel of land, Newman said, “The fact I can’t give you an answer with any certainty is maybe the most concerning part. This could all play out in various ways.”

“That’s an uncomfortable situation for non-indigenous homeowners,” continued Newman. “The judge doesn’t seem to have fully considered the panic her judgment would cause.”

Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie noted in a recent letter to homeowners in the area that the decision “could negatively affect the title” of their properties — echoing the judge’s statement that “a declaration of Aboriginal title may give rise to some uncertainty for the fee simple title holders and it may have consequences for their interests in land.”

Referring to the map contained within the B.C. court’s ruling highlighting the Indian band’s territorial claim, Brodie wrote, “For those whose property is in the area outlined in black, the Court has declared aboriginal title to your property which may compromise the status and validity of your ownership — this was mandated without any prior notice to the landowners. The entire area outlined in green is claimed on appeal by the Cowichan First Nations.”

“I believe it is one of the most consequential rulings in the history of the country,” the mayor told CTV News on Sunday, adding that it potentially “undermines the entire land system that we have in this province, and for much of the country itself.”

Brodie noted further that the homeowners in the area are “just starting to wake up to what is going on.”

Blaze News has reached out to the Cowichan Tribes and to Brodie’s office for comment.

John Rustad, leader of the Conservative Party of B.C., asked the province’s leftist premier, David Eby, in an Oct. 19 letter to “immediately pause all negotiations between the Province of British Columbia and First Nations until the Supreme Court of Canada has provided clarity.”

Rustad emphasized that continuing negotiations, especially in the absence of clarity about the property rights of landowners in the affected area, “risks compounding the harm and further deepening public division.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Canada, Canadian, Liberal, Land, Land acknowledgement, British columbia, Bc, Richmond, Indian, Native, Cowichan, Politics 

Liberals and others keen to signal their adherence to post-colonial theory for years started their meetings and conferences in Canada with land acknowledgments, thanking the descendants of those warring semi-nomadic, Stone Age peoples present at the time of European civilization’s exportation to North America “for allowing us to meet and learn together on their territory.”

Owing to a consequential court ruling on Aug. 7, some Canadians in Richmond, British Columbia, might ultimately have to acknowledge that their land is no longer legally their own — and get packing.

‘The judge doesn’t seem to have fully considered the panic her judgment would cause.’

Members of the Cowichan Tribes, an Indian band in B.C. comprising around 5,500 souls, brought a legal action several years ago against the Canadian federal government, the Province of British Columbia, the City of Richmond, and other parties, seeking a declaration of aboriginal title to 1,846 acres of land in Richmond.

After a 513-day trial with hearings spanning over 11 years, Justice Barbara Young of the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that:

the Cowichan have aboriginal title to the land in question; the Crown grants of basic property ownership in the area, “and the Crown vesting of the soil and freehold interest in certain highway lands in the Cowichan Title Lands, unjustifiably infringe the Cowichan’s Aboriginal title”;”Canada and Richmond’s fee simple titles and interests in the Cowichan Title Lands are defective and invalid”; andmembers of the Indian band have a right to fish the south arm of the Fraser River for food.

While the judge did not order restitution, she tasked the federal and provincial governments with negotiating “in good faith towards reconciliation of Canada’s fee simple interests in the area with Cowichan Aboriginal title.”

This decision — which has been appealed by the province, the City of Richmond, and a pair of other Indian bands — could have major implications for those landowners in the area as well as for similar land disputes across the country.

RELATED: Ashes and accountability in the aftermath of Canada’s unmarked Indian graves sham

BC Premier David Eby. Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dwight Newman, a professor of law at the University of Saskatchewan and author behind the Law for Breakfast Substack, told Blaze News that the full implications are “not yet certain.”

“The ‘Supreme Court’ in B.C. is a confusingly named trial-level court, and the decision is being appealed. If appellate courts maintained the same thing, it would directly mean that some City of Richmond land and some federal land in the city would be owned by the Cowichan,” said Newman. “Indirectly, though, the decision implied that private property within aboriginal title areas was also vulnerable. That has widespread implications in areas where treaties have not resolved land claims, which differs in different parts of Canada.”

While the Cowichan plaintiffs successfully sought a declaration that the land ownership titles held by Canada, the city, and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority were invalid, they did not seek the same declaration with respect to privately owned lands.

The Times Colonist reported that the court did, however, indicate that the Crown’s granting of private property ownership rights needs to be resolved through negotiation, litigation, or purchase.

Newman told Blaze News that while the plaintiffs in the case have “tried to give the impression” that they would not evict residents from the disputed territory, “if the law from this decision were maintained, it would be possible for them to pursue a claim against private residents too. Private residents might have some different defenses, but we don’t know how that plays out.”

When asked what could change for non-Indian homeowners on the affected parcel of land, Newman said, “The fact I can’t give you an answer with any certainty is maybe the most concerning part. This could all play out in various ways.”

“That’s an uncomfortable situation for non-indigenous homeowners,” continued Newman. “The judge doesn’t seem to have fully considered the panic her judgment would cause.”

Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie noted in a recent letter to homeowners in the area that the decision “could negatively affect the title” of their properties — echoing the judge’s statement that “a declaration of Aboriginal title may give rise to some uncertainty for the fee simple title holders and it may have consequences for their interests in land.”

Referring to the map contained within the B.C. court’s ruling highlighting the Indian band’s territorial claim, Brodie wrote, “For those whose property is in the area outlined in black, the Court has declared aboriginal title to your property which may compromise the status and validity of your ownership — this was mandated without any prior notice to the landowners. The entire area outlined in green is claimed on appeal by the Cowichan First Nations.”

“I believe it is one of the most consequential rulings in the history of the country,” the mayor told CTV News on Sunday, adding that it potentially “undermines the entire land system that we have in this province, and for much of the country itself.”

Brodie noted further that the homeowners in the area are “just starting to wake up to what is going on.”

Blaze News has reached out to the Cowichan Tribes and to Brodie’s office for comment.

John Rustad, leader of the Conservative Party of B.C., asked the province’s leftist premier, David Eby, in an Oct. 19 letter to “immediately pause all negotiations between the Province of British Columbia and First Nations until the Supreme Court of Canada has provided clarity.”

Rustad emphasized that continuing negotiations, especially in the absence of clarity about the property rights of landowners in the affected area, “risks compounding the harm and further deepening public division.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Canada, Canadian, Liberal, Land, Land acknowledgement, British columbia, Bc, Richmond, Indian, Native, Cowichan, Politics