When five armed males forced their way into a residence in Los Banos, California, late last month, the homeowner also got himself a gun — and won the confrontation, shooting two of the intruders.

Police Chief Ray Reyna told KFSN-TV that “the homeowner approached the intruders with a gun he legally owns,” after which the chief said a shoot-out ensued at the dwelling near the area of Edward Street and San Luis Street.

‘It was very scary.’

The homeowner shot two of the suspects, Reyna added to the station.

A dispatcher on police scanner audio indicated that one suspect was wounded in the leg and another was wounded in the stomach, KFSN reported.

The two suspects were in custody at a Modesto area hospital, where they were expected to survive, the station said. Los Banos is about an hour south of Modesto.

KFSN said police are searching for the other three suspects, who escaped the home through a bedroom window and then took off in a car.

The chief told the station that at least four people were inside the home at the time of the incident, and they weren’t hurt.

Reyna added to KFSN that he has reason to believe the intruders are not from the area, and he said police are looking into a possible motive.

“It was very scary,” Sergio Juarez told the station before adding that the neighborhood usually is quiet.

KFSN noted that hours after the shoot-out an apparent bloody handprint had stained a gate.

“I moved here because it was a safe neighborhood,” Juarez added to the station. “But looking at it right now, it’s very scary.”

Reyna added to KFSN that there is no outstanding threat to the community, but he’s asking for more information from the public.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Home invasion, California, Los banos, 2nd amend., Guns, Gun rights, Protecting home, Protecting loved ones, Self-defense, Homeowner shoots intruders, Armed intruders, Crime 

Archaeologists believe they have uncovered new evidence of the ancient biblical battle of “Armageddon.”

A significant
archaeological discovery has reportedly been made at the historic site of Megiddo in northern Israel, roughly 18 miles southeast of Haifa.

‘The encounter between Josiah and Necho at Megiddo in 609 BCE was a fateful event in biblical period history and theology.’

The Megiddo excavation site is said to contain over 30 layers of various settlements, dating back from the Copper Age up until World War I, according to
Fox News.

Recent digs at the excavation site unearthed Egyptian and Greek pottery remains from the late 7th century BCE, which may be the evidence to confirm the biblical account of a battle between Judah’s King Josiah and Egyptian Pharaoh Necho II over 2,600 years ago.

According to the Hebrew Bible, King Josiah’s military force battled the Egyptian army at Megiddo in 609 BCE.

King Josiah was killed during the battle.

“There are several clues in the Bible to the participation of Lydians from western Anatolia in the killing of Josiah. One of them is the story of Gog; some scholars think that Gog refers to Gyges, the king of Lydia who, according to the Assyrians, sent mercenaries to serve in the Egyptian army in the 7th century BCE,”
said professor Israel Finkelstein, head of the School of Archaeology and Maritime Cultures at the University of Haifa and longtime director of the Megiddo Expedition.

Gog is a descendant of the prophet Joel in
1 Chronicles 5:4. However, Gog and Magog are described as allies of Satan in the battle against God, according to Revelation 20:7-9 in the New Testament.

The word “armageddon” is
allegedly derived from “Har Megiddo” — the Hebrew word for the “mound” or “mountain” (har) of Megiddo.

The
Oxford English Dictionary notes that “armageddon” in Christian eschatology means “the last battle between good and evil before the Day of Judgement, to be fought (according to Revelation 16:16) in the place of this name. Hence: any dramatic, final, or catastrophic conflict, especially one seen as likely to destroy the world or the human race; (sometimes more loosely) the end of the world.”

Megiddo is mentioned
12 times in the Bible.

The archeological discovery of a noteworthy amount of 7th-century BCE Egyptian pottery at Megiddo suggests that the infamous battle took place there, according to an academic paper published earlier this year in the
Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament.

“The encounter between Josiah and Necho at Megiddo in 609 BCE (2 Kings 23:29) was a fateful event in biblical period history and theology,” the paper states. “Yet, the archaeology of the site failed to supply information about this affair.”

The discovery of unexpected
archaeological artifacts from Egypt and East Greece in Megiddo could point to a crucial military alliance that defeated King Josiah.

“The finds in this layer include an exceptional number of Egyptian-made pottery vessels as well as a significant number of East Greek pottery, usually interpreted as representing Greek mercenaries in the service of the 26th Dynasty,” the paper explains. “These finds shed light on the population of Egyptian-governed Megiddo and hence on the background of the 609 BCE event.”

Dr. Assaf Kleiman of Ben-Gurion University — a senior lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and senior member of the Megiddo Expedition staff who led the studies — stated these archaeological findings suggest the presence of Egyptian military forces rather than traders.

“The exposure of so many Egyptian vessels, including fragments of serving bowls, cooking pots, and storage jars, is an exceptional phenomenon,” Kleiman stated. “We, therefore, understand it as representing Egyptians who settled at Megiddo in the late 7th century, maybe as part of an army force that arrived at the site following the collapse of the Assyrian Empire.”

“Service of Greeks, probably from western Anatolia, in the Egyptian army of the 26th Dynasty is referred to in both Greek [from Herodotus] and Assyrian sources,” Kleiman explained. “The possibility of the participation of such mercenaries in the killing of Josiah may be hinted in prophetic works in the Bible.”

Kleiman noted that there’s no non-biblical proof of King Josiah but asserted that his existence “has never been doubted in biblical and historical scholarship.”

Archaeologists said they plan to do more research into the site’s Bronze Age roots.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Archaeological artifacts, Archaeological discoveries, Archaeological finds, Archaeological news, Archaeologists, Archaeology, Bible, Archaeological discovery, Christianity, Israel, Faith 

Former NCAA swimmer Lia (William) Thomas said athletes should be able to decide which gender category they compete in.

The former swimmer was infamously ranked 554th in the 200-yard freestyle for men before achieving fifth in the nation against women. Thomas was also the top-ranked swimmer in the country for the women’s category for the 500-yard freestyle, with the distinct advantage of being a man.

Thomas was the keynote speaker at this year’s HiTOPS Trans Youth Forum, a gender activist group aimed at children that describes its mission as “empowering youth with sex education, social support, and affirming communities.”

During an hour-long session, Thomas claimed athletes should self-determine which gender category they compete in, implying that it could be discriminatory if done based on an athlete’s actual biology.

“It has to be the athletes deciding for themselves where they feel most affirmed and most comfortable,” Thomas said, according to the Daily Pennsylvanian. “Having routes that are safe and non-discriminatory, that allow them access to that.”

After graduating from the University of Pennsylvania in 2022, Thomas said he was “devastated” when World Aquatics barred transgender athletes from competing in elite events, including the Olympics.

“I felt so devastated and [felt] grief over losing this access to my sport,” Thomas recalled. “There was no doubt in my mind that I was going to fight this, that this is my sport too, and I’m not just gonna give it up to trans folks.”

Lia Thomas (left) and Riley Gaines (right), March 18, 2022. Gaines became America’s most recognizable advocate for female-only sports. Photo by Rich von Biberstein/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

‘I just wanted to step away and be able to transition and be myself.’

While at UPenn, Thomas explained that he felt declaring himself a woman might prevent his continued competitition in college athletics and claimed that he initially did not want to continue in sports.

“I looked up … the NCAA transgender policy [during freshman fall] and knew it might be technically possible. … I didn’t think that I could do it.”

Thomas then said the idea of having to confront that he might not be able to compete as a woman contributed to his gender dysphoria, because he had to “pick one,” either swimming or posing as a female.

“I didn’t want to swim. I just wanted to step away and be able to transition and be myself,” Thomas claimed. “But my love of swimming kept me going. … When I had transitioned, I felt more comfortable, and I said, ‘I can do this. I could do both.'”

The former swimmer said he felt more confusion seeing his name or image on social media as part of news stories, stating that he knew what was happening on “a conceptual level,” but was still confused because “on a personal level,” he felt he was “just another college woman competing.”

The HiTOPS organization called for activism following President Trump’s executive order to keep men out of women’s sports. The group said the president does not support the “science and the lived experiences of trans people” because he allegedly wants to remove access to gender procedures and hormones to minors.

The group called the president cruel, ignorant, and guilty of intentionally marginalizing transgender people.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fearless, Swimming, Ncaa, Riley gaines, Division 1, Transgenderism, Women’s sports, Sports 

Coastal Carolina University has begun a new era that will certainly have football fans across the country asking for reciprocal treatment from their programs.

The NCAA Division I school plays its football at Brooks Stadium in Conway, South Carolina, with a capacity of 21,000. That is the number of fans the Chanticleers plan on feeding multiple times this fall after the school announced ticket holders will have unlimited access to free concessions at home games this year.

The university made the announcement with a playful promo to show that no matter how much food a fan wants, they will get it.

“All games. All fans. Feast for free,” the caption read.

The details were not quite as muddy as fans may have initially thought; the school revealed in a press release that ticket holders will be able to get four items each during every visit to the concession stand. However, there is no limit to the number of times they can pick up food.

The available (free) concessions were announced as hot dogs, nachos, popcorn, fountain drinks, and water.

Chauncey the Chanticleer mascot at Brooks Stadium in Conway, South Carolina. Photo by Isaiah Vazquez/Getty Images

“Our fans are the heartbeat of Teal Nation, and we’re always looking for ways to elevate their game day experience,” said school executive Chance Miller. “With the CCU Kickoff Meal Deal, we’re excited to offer free concessions this fall as a way to say thank you for the energy, passion and support they bring to Brooks Stadium every game.”

With the offer seemingly too good to be true, fans online reacted with suspicion over the idea of free and unlimited access to goods that could easily total over $50 per person under regular circumstances.

“There is 100 [%] a catch behind this,” one fan wrote.

The only catch from Coastal Carolina seemed to be the required access through their custom app. Every time fans head to the concessions stand, they must “scan each trip through the line with the soon-to-be-launched Coastal Carolina Athletics App.”

At least one fan theorized that user data would be the key to the school making its money back through the app, while others wondered if the offer would raise the prices of all other concessions.

The school did not mention whether or not specialty items, like alcohol, would increase in price, rather they noted other concessions would simply remain available for purchase.

“Genuine question- how is this financially feasible?” a concern fan asked.

An Alabama fan offered an outsider’s perspective for the all-you-can-eat offer and cleverly described it as the “greasiest marketing strategy of all time.”

While it remains unclear if the promotion is temporary, the Chanticleers could simply be looking to draw more fans after a disappointing 3-5 conference record in 2024.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fearless, Football, Ncaa, Fans, Stadium, Carolina, Sports 

When protests erupt worldwide over an American staffing decision, it’s not outrage — it’s orchestration. And the people behind it don’t want you asking questions.

The recent wave of global protests against Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk, defies logic. Demonstrators have gathered outside Tesla showrooms worldwide, setting cars on fire and destroying lithium batteries. But what exactly are they protesting?

The protests are not about environmental concerns but about control.

Policy decisions can spark domestic outrage in the United States, but why are people in Germany, Sweden, or Ireland suddenly mobilizing against Musk? He is not pushing for global war or implementing trade tariffs that would impact European consumers. His involvement in U.S. government affairs concerns federal budgeting waste, fraud, and abuse. Why would anyone overseas care about this?

Historically, large-scale protests have erupted over issues like nuclear weapons, war, and climate change. Yet, no precedent exists for international demonstrations aimed at a domestic U.S. policy decision — particularly one centered on budget efficiency. So who benefits from this manufactured outrage?

Green hypocrisy

Tesla revolutionized the electric vehicle industry, making sustainable transportation mainstream. Musk developed solar panels, battery storage, and charging infrastructure — technologies environmentalists have long championed. Yet now, the same groups that once hailed electric vehicles as essential to combating climate change are actively working to cripple Tesla.

How does burning Tesla vehicles and terrorizing EV owners advance the fight against climate change?

This contradiction reveals a deeper issue. If climate change truly presents an existential crisis, why would activists seek to dismantle a company leading the charge in clean energy? The only logical explanation is that the protests are not about environmental concerns but control.

Musk’s real ‘threat’

Elon Musk faced little controversy when he pioneered electric vehicles or launched reusable rockets. The backlash began when he became a vocal champion of free speech.

His purchase of Twitter, followed by revelations of government-backed censorship, changed how information moves through digital platforms. That shift marked the moment the outrage machine targeted him.

Opponents have resorted to labeling Musk a “fascist.” But let’s examine this claim. Traditional fascism is defined by state control, forced conformity, and the suppression of dissent. Musk, on the other hand, advocates open dialogue, transparency, and reduced government interference. Calling him a fascist is not only inaccurate but also a deliberate attempt to stifle debate.

When people misuse the term “fascist,” they dilute its meaning. Just as overusing the word “racist” has numbed the public to actual instances of racism, the indiscriminate application of “fascist” shields actual authoritarian behavior from scrutiny. This tactic is not about accurately describing Musk — it is about silencing him.

Who’s behind the protests?

Ordinary citizens do not spontaneously organize coordinated protests across multiple continents in response to a U.S. federal staffing decision. These demonstrations require financial backing, media support, and strategic messaging. So who benefits from damaging Tesla’s brand or silencing Musk?

We live in an era where perception is power. A viral video can ruin a reputation, and a well-crafted narrative can influence elections. If a movement can turn a climate hero into a villain simply for challenging an entrenched system, then it can manipulate almost any public discourse.

Before accepting any narrative at face value, we must ask critical questions: Do these protests help or harm the environment? Are they organic expressions of outrage, or are they carefully orchestrated? Is the term “fascist” being used to expose truth or to suppress dissent? Most importantly, are we sabotaging progress simply because we dislike one of the people leading it?

The manufactured outrage against Musk is not about policy; it is about power. And if we fail to recognize that, we risk allowing those who seek control to redefine reality itself.

Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn’s FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

​Elon musk, Department of government efficiency, Doge, Federal workers, Layoffs, Tesla burnings, Tesla, Arson, Donald trump, Federal budget, Debt, Deficit, Budget cuts, Protests, First amendment, Fascism, Free speech, Power, Glenn beck, Opinion & analysis 

Fresh off
suggesting that their state could save money by funding abortion and killing 30% more unborn babies, Colorado Democrats are advancing legislation that would classify “misgendering” and “deadnaming” as child abuse.

Should the legislation pass the Democrat-controlled state legislature, parents who dare to refer to a transvestic child using the child’s given name or reality-based pronouns — “he” and “him” in reference to a boy, “she” and “her” in reference to a girl — could lose custody.

Lorena García, one of the Democrats
seeking to make all taxpaying Coloradans financially complicit in abortion, joined Democratic state Sens. Faith Winter and Chris Kolker and fellow state Rep. Rebekah Stewart in introducing House Bill 1312 on Monday.

State law
requires that courts making child custody decisions in accordance with the best interests of a child must consider reports of “coercive control” lodged against the parties involved. House Bill 1312 would modify the definition of one type of “coercive control” and add another.

‘Democrats are the party of delusion and child grooming.’

Among the forms of “coercive control” that courts overseeing custody battles must consider are threats “to publish the individual’s, or the individual’s child’s or relative’s, sensitive personal information, including sexually explicit material, or make reports to the police or authorities.”

The proposed legislation would modify this definition to include as an offense the publication of “material related to gender-affirming health care services.”

The bill would also add “deadnaming or misgendering” as another form of “coercive control.”

An example of “deadnaming” would be to call Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) by his original name, Tim.

In addition to putting those parents grounded in reality at a disadvantage in custody hearings, the Democratic bill would also:

prohibit local education providers from enforcing sex-based dress codes;
prohibit Colorado courts from “applying or giving any force or effect to another state’s law that authorizes a state agency to remove a child from the child’s parent or guardian because the parent or guardian allowed the child to receive gender-affirming health-care services”;
define “deadnaming and misgendering” as discriminatory acts in the “Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act”;
ban the use of transvestites’ original names and real pronouns in places of public accommodation; and
require public entities to use an individual’s chosen name on all forms if provided with the individual’s legal name.

The bill was assigned to the state House Judiciary Committee for its first hearing, where it was
advanced Wednesday in a 7-4 party-line vote.

Republican state Rep. Jarvis Caldwell, one of the four Republicans who voted against the bill’s progression,
underscored that the legislation is “radical.”

Referring to the proposed requirement that Colorado courts ignore the laws and court decisions of other states, Caldwell
asked, “How does HB25-1312 not violate the ‘Full Faith & Credit Clause,’ Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution?”

Kristi Burton Brown, a Republican member of the Colorado State Board of Education,
suggested that the bill amounted to “insanity.”

Libs of TikTok
noted, “Every Democrat voted for this, while every Republican opposed this. Democrats are the party of delusion and child grooming.”

Colorado Democrats
previously voted against a bill making indecent exposure to children a felony, in part because it could supposedly be used to “target” transvestites. Last year, state Democrats killed a bill that would have mandated minimum sentences for predators who buy children for sexual exploitation.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Transgender, Trans, Pronouns, Transvestite, Lgbt, Leftism, Colorado, Democrats, Groomer, Groomers, Child abuse, Lorena garcia, Politics 

U.S. District Judge Dale E. Ho on Wednesday dropped the federal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D).

In September, under former President Joe Biden, the Southern District of New York charged Adams with a five-count indictment, accusing him of bribery and fraud. It claimed that Adams received $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and other luxury travel perks from a Turkish official.

Adams pleaded not guilty.

‘The case against Eric Adams should have never been brought in the first place — and finally today that case is gone forever.’

Democrats appeared to turn on Adams after he called out the Biden administration for fueling the nation’s immigration crisis, which put excessive strain on the sanctuary city’s resources. The corruption charges were filed soon after Adams criticized the administration. Some of Adams’ closest staffers also became the target of similar investigations.

In February, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department moved to dismiss the case against Adams, which sparked rumors from the mayor’s critics that the mayor and Trump had engaged in a quid pro quo. The Trump administration and Adams have both denied the claims, insisting instead that the mayor, like the president, was a victim of the left’s lawfare.

Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, who previously represented Trump in his New York criminal case, argued that the indictments against Adams should be dismissed “based on well-founded concerns regarding weaponization, election interference, and the impediments that the case has imposed on Mayor Adams’ ability to govern and cooperate with federal law enforcement to keep New York City safe.”

In his 78-page decision to dismiss the case with prejudice, Ho wrote, “To be clear, the Court again emphasizes that it does not express any opinion as to the merits of the case or whether the prosecution of Mayor Adams ‘should’ move forward.”

“The Court notes only that it has no authority to require that it continue,” he stated. “Ultimately, because the decision to discontinue a prosecution belongs primarily to a political branch of government, it is the public’s judgment, and not this Court’s, that truly matters.”

Alex Spiro, Adams’ attorney, told Fox News, “The case against Eric Adams should have never been brought in the first place — and finally today that case is gone forever.”

“From Day 1, the mayor has maintained his innocence and now justice for Eric Adams and New Yorkers has prevailed,” he added.

Adams is now free to turn his attention to his re-election campaign, where he faces several Democratic challengers, including disgraced former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Eric adams, New york city, New york, Emil bove, Donald trump, Trump, Dale ho, Southern district of new york, Sdny, Biden, Joe biden, Biden administration, Biden admin, Trump administration, Trump admin, Department of justice, Doj, Justice department, Courts, Politics 

If you needed further proof that Big Pharma is rotten to the core — especially as it relates to vaccines — look no farther than Joe Rogan’s recent interview with Dr. Suzanne Humphries, author of one of Sara Gonzales’ most recommended books: “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History.”

“The creativity of the vaccine companies expanded” so that vaccine manufacturers could add “what we call adjuvants — things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine works better,” Humphries told Rogan. “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.”

Vaccine trials, she said, “have always been a bit of a joke, but they’re even more of a joke today than they were in the beginning.”

“We’ve never seen a vaccinated/unvaccinated study that is accepted by the powers that be,” she added, noting that the only studies that are accepted test vaccines against each other — so a measles vaccine vs. a diphtheria vaccine or a flu vaccine vs. a hepatitis A vaccine but never a vaccine against a true placebo.

“There’s no saline placebo because the few studies that exist with saline placebos show how bad the vaccine actually is and how it makes you not only not respond to the disease when it comes around but more susceptible to it in many cases,” Humphries said.

That translates to less money for the pharmaceutical companies, hence why we never hear about this handful of honest studies.

“Don’t take it from me; take it from a doctor much more qualified than myself,” says Sara, noting that Dr. Humphries has “nothing to gain” by publishing research that in this era gets you automatically deplatformed by the medical community.

BlazeTV contributor Matthew Marsden, who used to be a proponent of vaccines, says that his perspective shifted when “the COVID vaccine came out and all of a sudden they didn’t care whether or not you had natural immunity and then they told you that you had to vaccinate your kids.”

The silver lining of the pandemic, however, is that it “woke a lot of people up to not just listening to what the government tells you and not just listening to what your doctor tells you,” he says.

Over time, as we wade deeper into the fallout of COVID-19, doctors like Suzanne Humphries, Andrew Wakefield, and Jay Bhattacharya, among others, are now finding that their voices are valued. It may not be by the traditional medical community, but the everyday people who seek the truth certainly want to hear what they have to say.

To hear more of the panel’s commentary and watch a clip of Dr. Humphries and Joe Rogan’s conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Sara gonzales, Sara gonzales unfiltered, Blazetv, Blaze media, Suzanne humphries, Joe rogan, Vaccines 

Over the weekend, Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffery Epstein’s most public accusers, posted on Instagram claiming she was in a serious car crash with a school bus in Perth, Australia, and had only four days left to live. In the picture, Giuffre appears to be beaten up.

Western Australian police reports, however, don’t exactly corroborate her story. According to their documentation, there was a “minor crash” that matches the approximate date and general area Giuffre referred to, but no ambulances were called and no injuries were reported. Further, the East Metropolitan Health Service, which oversees Royal Perth Hospital — Western Australia’s main trauma center near where the crash allegedly happened — told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that the hospital had “no record” of Giuffre being admitted to any of its facilities.

The discrepancies between Giuffre and local authorities’ reports has ignited some wild rumors online — including that the crash was orchestrated by the FBI, which is trying to prevent Giuffre from testifying, or that Epstein is actually alive and somehow responsible for the collision.

Glenn Beck has several questions about this messy scandal.

As of today, there’s no official evidence or statement from authorities — specifically the Western Australia Police Force or local health services — directly naming Virginia Giuffre or validating her claims about the car crash and her dire medical condition.

“What could explain that?” asks Glenn skeptically. “What specific details are missing about the accident and why might they not be available?”

If Giuffre was indeed hit by a school bus driving recklessly, the next question is obviously “were there kids on board?”

“Is 70 miles an hour realistic for a school bus in a residential area?” is another question Glenn has.

These wild rumors, he says, are bound to happen when the official narrative is that Epstein “hung himself with a paper sheet.”

“This is what happens. People don’t believe anybody,” he says.

And now we have gossip circulating that Kash Patel, the current FBI director, was “driving a school bus in Perth” and hit Giuffre intentionally to prevent her from testifying.

“I can’t explain why Kash Patel and why Pam Bondi have not released [the Epstein files], but I don’t think I’m on [that] train yet,” he says.

“We don’t have any of the facts on this one, but we can say hang on, let’s ask some critical questions, and if you’re not using critical thinking, if you’re not asking questions, like why are all these things … you can jump to a conspiracy theory.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​The glenn beck program