New York City just took a sharp left turn, voting for Muslim communist Zohran Mamdani over Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary.

And in a recent speech to conservative insiders, Vice President JD Vance succinctly explained how this happened — and why it signals a dangerous new phase for the American left.

“A 33-year-old communist, running an insurgent campaign, beat a multimillion-dollar establishment machine politician in the New York Democratic mayoral primary,” Vance said, noting that his win drove home “just how much the voters in each of the respective parties have changed.”

“If President Trump’s victory in 2024 was rooted in a broad, working- and middle-class coalition, Mamdani’s coalition is almost the inverse of that,” he continued, explaining that his voters reflect “a left that has completely left behind the broad middle of the United States of America.”

“This is a guy who won high-income and college educated New Yorkers … but he was weakest among black voters and weakest among those without a college degree. That’s an interesting coalition. Maybe it works in the New York Democratic primary. I don’t think it works particularly well in the United States at large,” he added.

Vance then called Mamdani’s voters “the party of highly educated but downwardly mobile elites.”

Blaze media senior politics editor and DC correspondent Christopher Bedford is impressed by Vance’s analysis.

“It was so spot-on,” Bedford tells BlazeTV hosts Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson on “Blaze News: The Mandate.” “A lot of what drives and unites them, if anything unites them much any more, is mutual loathing.”

“This is a coalition that’s not even largely driven by values. The working-class values, the green values, have gone by the wayside,” he continues, noting that their view of the world has become very observably bleak, as demonstrated by their response to the floods in Texas.

“A literal children’s doctor in Houston, Texas, earlier today posted on Facebook about how these children who were washed away from a girls’ Christian summer camp, from all ethnicities by the way, deserved it, because of the way their parents voted,” he explains.

“That is hate. That is pure, pure hate,” he adds.

Want more from ‘Blaze News: The Mandate’?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Video, Video phone, Free, Upload, Camera phone, Sharing, Youtube.com, Blaze news tonight, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Zohran mamdani, Jill savage, Jd vance, Nyc mayoral primary, Andrew cuomo, Christopher bedford 

It has been five years since fans of Washington’s NFL team were robbed of their beloved moniker Redskins. Now, with new ownership since 2023, the team seems closer than ever to bringing the name and famous logo back.

In 2020, the franchise announced it would bend the knee to activism and retire the Redskins name as well as their logo, which bared the likeness of Blackfeet Chief John Two Guns White Calf.

It was even reported that the team would avoid using any Native American imagery at all. Now, as the walls of wokeness crumble all around, the team is slowly creeping toward a reintroduction of the old tradition.

‘We are excited to celebrate Washington’s incredible history.’

Washington’s NFL franchise used the embarrassing interim name of the Washington Football Team for 2020-2021, until becoming the Washington Commanders in 2022. When Josh Harris bought the team in 2023, the fire in fans to bring back the old name quickly started burning again.

For the upcoming 2025-2026 season, the Commanders took a step in that direction when they announced they would be bringing back their “Super Bowl Era” uniforms for three separate games. Celebrating their 1982, 1987, and 1991 Super Bowl wins, the team will bring back their iconic burgundy, white, and gold uniforms.

In a promotional video, the franchise showed off old footage featuring the Redskins logo, reliving the “grit” and the “glory” the fans felt in the 1980s and 1990s. Although, there was one obvious catch.

RELATED: Residents of Navajo reservation are asked if ‘cultural appropriation’ bothers them. Leftists won’t like their answers.

While mostly obscuring their “W” Commanders logo, the promo did make a point about embracing the future and will not feature the Redskins logo alongside their new jerseys.

The good news is that pressure, timing, and public opinion is definitely on the right side of history.

In April, the team announced plans to move back to the heart of D.C. with a new stadium. Then in early May, President Trump and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that D.C. would host the 2027 NFL Draft.

These moves coupled with the fact that the Blackfeet chief’s family actually wants the team to bring back the old logo, and it certainly seems like the momentum is moving in a positive direction.

In a press release about the throwback uniforms, team president Mark Clouse even said the team was trying to find ways to connect the past to the present.

RELATED: ‘The fans want him back’: Family of Blackfeet chief, the inspiration for Redskins’ logo, calls for logo’s return

Red Mesa Navaho High School, Teec Nos Pos, Arizona. Photo courtesy of Rob Eno.

“Ever since Josh Harris and our ownership group acquired the team back in 2023, they’ve placed great value in finding ways to connect the past and present and honor those that made the burgundy and gold what it is today,” Clouse said in a statement.

“These uniforms recognize the most successful era of our franchise — one that reflects a culture of excellence and encompasses many historical moments and special memories amongst our fanbase. Our coaches, players, and the entire organization could not be more excited to celebrate our team’s legacy while creating new memories in these uniforms this season,” Clouse added.

At the same time, these comments could be interpreted as the team being willing to address the past, without making it a future reality.

For instance, during a 2024 preseason press conference, owner Harris said that the old Redskins name “can’t come back.”

“We’ve been very clear, we can’t, for obvious reasons, the old name can’t come back,” Harris explained, per sports radio station the Team 980 AM.

Noting that he wanted to “honor” the team’s heritage and past, Harris said he was focusing on unity and “not things that might drive people apart.”

In 2025 and beyond, though, bringing back the old name seems to be exactly what would bring fans back together. Hopefully for Redskins supporters, a new stadium, the draft, and President Trump can be big enough catalysts to make their wishes come to fruition.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fearless, Washington redskins, Dc, Bowser, Football, Nfl, Woke, Natives, American indians, Sports 

Score one for Adam Sandler.

The “Saturday Night Live” alum appears, by all accounts, to be a genuine good guy in the Hollywood ecosystem. He proudly shares his Jewish faith on screen, something you don’t typically see in blockbuster comedies.

When it’s time to make a new project, he calls upon his famous pals. He and Rob Schneider are rarely seen apart on screen. Loyalty matters.

Now, we’re learning how Sandler defied Hollywood ageism on his newest project. “Happy Gilmore 2” reunites much of the 1996 film’s cast, including Christopher McDonald (Shooter McGavin). It’s also set to feature Sandler’s squeeze Virginia Venit, played then and now by Julie Bowen.

The 55-year-old “Modern Family” alum expected the sequel to cast a younger, hotter actress opposite Sandler this time ’round. That’s just how Hollywood rolls.

Instead, Bowen got the call to reprise her “Happy Gilmore” character. And while she doesn’t have as much screen time as in the original, Sandler assured her how vital she is to the project.

“You’re the heart of the movie,” Sandler told her.

While the “Jack and Jill” star may seem an unlikely crusader against the industry’s double standards, it should come as no surprise to those who know anything about Sandler’s personal life.

The SNL alum has been married to wife, Jackie Titone — with whom he shares two daughters — since 2003. And not a whiff of sleazy scandal.

Which is more than we can say for many an outspoken Hollywood “male feminist.”

Perry’s scary stage SNAFU

Can things get worse for Katy Perry?

Her latest album got crushed by critics, and clips of her current tour drew social media mockery. She dipped a manicured toe in space, a trip that also generated a digital drubbing. Plus, she and her longtime steady, Orlando Bloom, just split.

Her latest indignity? A stage prop misbehaved, leaving her clinging for life midair. Her stop in Adelaide, Australia, hit a snag when a stunt involving a suspended sphere went haywire. She clung to the sphere’s bars while technicians rushed to fix the issue.

She emerged unhurt, but her ego took another hit along the way …

Star Trek: Trump Derangement Syndrome

Oh, my!

George Takei has finally cut the cord on his iconic Sulu character from the original “Star Trek” series and multiple feature films. How? He’s now a full-time Trump critic, and he proved it anew with a pathetic performance on the immersive liberal holodeck known as CNN.

He compared ICE’s deportation efforts to the Japanese-Americans rounded up during World War II by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

They’re not remotely similar, of course. The worst part? Takei was one of those Japanese-Americans swept up in the country’s anti-Japanese fever in the 1940s. He even wrote a play about those memories.

Now, all he can do is summon them to smite Orange Man Bad. Set phasers on “stunned” …

RELATED: The technology of ‘Star Trek’

Sunset Boulevard/Getty Images

We’d ‘Rather’ not

The very last person who should speak out about CBS’ $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump over a selective editing scandal is Dan Rather.

The disgraced newsman used the “60 Minutes” brand to peddle fake news about then-President George W. Bush to sway the 2004 election. It failed, in part, because an army of citizen journalists rose up and debunked it step by step.

Rather never backed down, despite losing his plush anchor chair. A 2016 movie about the incident asked audiences to believe both that the newsman got the basic story right — and that he could be convincingly played by Robert Redford.

The title? “Truth.” That’s Hollywood.

So, naturally, Variety turned to Rather to weigh in on the Trump settlement.

“It’s a sad day for journalism. … It’s a sad day for ‘60 Minutes’ and CBS News. I hope people will read the details of this and understand what it was. It was distortion by the president and a kneeling down and saying, ‘Yes, sir,’ by billionaire corporate owners,” Rather said.

Variety couldn’t bother to tell readers who didn’t live through “Rathergate” why the Texas newsman is, to be kind, an unreliable narrator.

Then again, if anyone knows about fake news, it’s Danny Boy …

Putting the man in ‘romantic’

What can’t the patriarchy do?

Director Celine Song of “Past Lives” fame is blaming men for the death of the rom-com. Her latest film, “Materialists,” isn’t as frothy as most romantic comedies, but it loosely falls under that banner.

And it’s good!

That doesn’t mean Song’s approach to the subject is admirable. She says Hollywood stopped making rom-coms due to the patriarchy. Toxic men dismiss the genre as “chick flicks” and nothing more.

Except we never stopped loving rom-coms. The rom-com giants (Tom Hanks, Meg Ryan) aged out of the genre. The newer versions offered up strained, gimmick-laden plots (“How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days”), and some focused on lust, not love (“Friends with Benefits,” “No Strings Attached”).

And when young, attractive stars get a chance at rom-com glory, they often hit the bull’s-eye. “Anyone But You” wasn’t “good,” but it boasted the attractive duo of Glen Powell and Sydney Sweeney. And it made a whopping $220 million in global theaters.

Scapegoating the patriarchy is always a woke winner, but this time, the blame falls squarely on Hollywood’s stooped shoulders.

​Hollywood, Entertainment, Culture, Adam sandler, Fake news, Donald trump, George takei, Star trek, Tds, Dan rather, Katy perry, Toto recall 

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas could not resist another opportunity to shine the spotlight on herself.

In the midst of the Texas floods that have claimed the lives of at least 120 loved ones, the Democratic rising star posted a video pointing the finger at President Donald Trump and talking about how the tragedy will most affect her. Notably, Crockett’s district is roughly 300 miles away from where the floods raged through Kerr County, which is about the same distance between Boston and Philadelphia.

Despite her long history of tone deaf remarks, Crockett has emerged as one of the most popular Democrats in her party.

Crockett starts the video by saying her “heart is truly heavy for all these families,” before immediately making it about herself and how Trump is working around the clock to “hurt us.”

“The sad part is I think that my heart is going to carry a level of weight that will continue to weigh me down as we have to continue to do our best to survive an administration that literally is against us,” Crockett said in a post on Instagram. “An administration that is doing everything, in my mind, to hurt us and not help us, and it feels like we’re fending for ourselves.”

RELATED: Here are the top 3 LEAST patriotic members of Congress

In the same post about the Texas flooding, Crockett made sure to give a shoutout to her hairstylist.

“My staff said y’all are commenting about my BOB!” Crockett wrote in the post. She thanked her stylist for “orchestrating the look” followed by a kissy face emoji.

RELATED: Jasmine Crockett says Trump impeachment inquiry ‘absolutely’ on the table

Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Court Accountability

Despite her long history of tone deaf remarks, Crockett has emerged as one of the most popular Democrats in her party.

In a hypothetical Senate primary, Crockett is leading with 35% support among Democratic voters, followed by former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas), who polled at 20% support, according to a poll conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee. Failed presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke and Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) were also tied for 13% in the poll.

Although Crockett has secured a healthy lead in the primary, she has not formally announced or publicly signaled her interest in running to unseat Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Jasmine crockett, Texas floods, Texas flooding, Kerr county, Texas, Democrats, Nrsc, Colin allred, Beto o’rourke, Joaquin castro, Texas senate race, John cornyn, Ken paxton, Politics 

The Trump administration, to its credit, is prioritizing the development of mining and critical minerals to protect U.S. economic and defense interests and secure a reliable domestic supply.

At the center of this effort is President Trump’s recent executive order “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.” The Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, now known as the Permitting Council, spearheads these administration efforts.

America needs to get real about sourcing its domestic critical mineral supply and supporting reliable mining partners in their operations abroad.

Thankfully, it’s now increasing “transparency, accountability, and predictability for the permitting review process for … critical mineral production projects.”

Abroad, the administration is also pursuing strategic deals, particularly by supporting mining operators in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A newly signed minerals agreement between the Congo and Rwanda — brokered as part of the U.S.-backed peace treaty — marks “a success for Trump against the backdrop of U.S.-China competition over critical minerals.”

With all this activity in the global mining sector, it’s essential that the U.S. government adhere to the following principle: Support and partner with real — and reliable — mining operators.

America can’t afford to gamble with startups backed by tech billionaires with no mining experience nor mining companies that are backed by China. We need to be realistic about supporting the mineral needs of “USA Inc.” Moreover, policymakers must not fall for the slick PR and flashy AI claims currently inundating the industry.

It’s time to stop the madness.

Flashy ‘mining’ startups

So who are the culprits driving this frenzy? The first is KoBold Metals, a California-based startup backed by Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Michael Bloomberg. The company’s trio of green activist billionaire backers should raise significant concerns within the administration. Gates, for instance, was in Singapore recently touting the ill-advised return of support for “climate reform.”

A deeper problem lies in KoBold’s misleading image. The company calls itself a mining firm, but it has never run a mine.

Its strength lies in artificial intelligence and data harvesting, not excavation, logistics, or engineering. KoBold claims to lead “the world’s largest exploration R&D effort” using AI and novel hardware. The language sounds impressive. The reality is far less so.

KoBold lacks the infrastructure, operational know-how, and supply chain muscle needed for serious mineral exploration and production. At its core, it’s an AI platform masquerading as a mining company.

RELATED: Graham says Ukraine has trillions of dollars of ‘critical mineral assets’ and could be ‘the best business partner’

Temizyurek via iStock/Getty Images

Even more troubling, the administration appears to be assisting KoBold in advancing a lithium mine in the DRC. According to Bloomberg, the announcement came after the DRC’s President Felix Tshisekedi met with Massad Boulos, Trump’s senior adviser for African affairs, to discuss potential American investment and security assistance in the DRC’s fight against a rebel group in the east, which is backed by neighboring Rwanda.

I am confident Boulos, who also happens to be the father-in-law of President Trump’s youngest daughter, will soon come around and realize what’s real and what’s not.

Lining China’s pockets

Given the stakes, the administration must weigh reliability when deciding which mining companies to back. Rio Tinto doesn’t make the cut.

Yes, Rio Tinto is a real mining company. It’s been around since 1873 and operates on a global scale. But it doesn’t serve U.S. interests.

The Aluminum Corporation of China Ltd., or Chinalco, holds a 14.56% stake in Rio Tinto. Chinalco is a Chinese state-owned enterprise. That makes Beijing the company’s largest shareholder — and that alone should disqualify Rio Tinto as a potential partner.

Propping up Rio Tinto would only tighten China’s grip on the world’s critical minerals supply — at America’s expense. As international policy and trade analyst Dewardric McNeal recently wrote:

The United States must now treat critical minerals not as commodities but as instruments of geopolitical power. China already does. Escaping its grip will require more than mine permits and short-term funding. It demands a coherent, long-term strategy to build a complete supply chain that includes not only domestic capabilities but also reliable allies and partners.

Exactly right. The U.S. needs a strategic, grounded approach — not one riddled with internal contradictions.

America needs to get real about sourcing its domestic critical mineral supply and supporting reliable mining partners in their operations abroad. The clock is ticking, and neither flashy startups nor Chinese-backed companies are the keys to solving this puzzle.

​Opinion & analysis, Mining, Rare earth minerals, Deal, Treaty, China, Congo, Bill gates, Executive order, National security, Economy, Michael bloomberg, Jeff bezos, Artificial intelligence, Kobold metals, Startups, Business, Partnership, Felix tshisekedi, Massad boulos, Rio tinto, Aluminum, Strategy 

President Trump snapped at a reporter who asked him about Jeffrey Epstein on Tuesday.

Trump is massively misreading his base on this one — and it could cost him the midterms.

President Trump should not underestimate how much goodwill he’s lost among his base due to Pam Bondi’s mishandling of the Epstein files.

People care about the Epstein story, not only because of his sickening crimes against children but because evidence exists of a government cover-up.

Evidence like Epstein’s autopsy showing injuries incongruent with suicide; evidence like Buckingham Palace’s response to ABC’s nuked report on Epstein, Prince Andrew, and President Bill Clinton; evidence like former federal prosecutor Alex Acosta saying he was told to back off because Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and then discovering his Justice Department emails had mysteriously disappeared.

And now, government officials are telling us to ignore the evidence in front of our eyes and believe them — without evidence. Nope. Not happening. We voted for radical transparency and justice. We’re not letting it drop.

The president should not underestimate how much goodwill he’s lost among his base due to Attorney General Pam Bondi’s mishandling of the Epstein files. People are furious. I would know — I was collateral damage in Bondi’s infernal Epstein binder debacle. She should have been fired on the spot.

Country singer John Rich tells a story about eating dinner with Trump, who turned to him and asked — genuinely curious — “Why do people boo at my rallies when I brag about the COVID vaccine?” And then Trump listened to Rich’s answer: People were hurt by that jab.

President Trump should listen to his base about Epstein, too.

We have been hurt by the deep state weaponizing the government against us: calling us terrorists, censoring us when we questioned the outcome of the 2020 election, or the origin of COVID, or rejecting transgender ideology. Trump’s base has been insulted, targeted, subject to violence, arrest, and political persecution for supporting him and our America First agenda.

RELATED: The Epstein case proves one thing: The elites are protected

Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

Forgive us if we refuse to believe government officials now who are asking us to accept a narrative that contradicts the evidence we can see. We will no longer be subject to gatekeepers. Don’t insult our intelligence. Don’t belittle us.

We voted for President Trump because he promised justice.

Justice for COVID.Justice for January 6 and the mysterious RNC and DNC pipe bombs.Justice for Russiagate.Justice for the phony Ukraine impeachment.Justice for the lawfare against Trump.Justice for censorship and Big Tech collusion.Justice for jailed pro-lifers.Justice for journalists targeted by the FBI.Justice for parents labeled domestic extremists.

Justice isn’t dismissing those crimes and moving on. Justice means arresting the swamp creatures who perpetrated the crimes and dismantling the corrupt institutions that enabled them to do so.

That’s why the Epstein case is foundational. That’s why Trump’s base has a visceral reaction to being told we would get the Epstein files — and now we are told we’re getting nothing.

Bondi didn’t tell us the truth. She seems more interested in being a Fox News star than keeping promises. Something is fishy about the Epstein stuff — his racket, his death, his friends, his alleged intelligence agency connections. Patting us on the head and telling us “nothing to see here” is infuriating. It will not do.

President Trump should not underestimate the significance of this moment. He’s losing goodwill by the day — and Bondi is to blame.

Trump is smart. He cares about his base. He listens. He should listen now, so that it doesn’t cost him the midterms.

​Opinion & analysis, Donald trump, Trust, Credibility, Pam bondi, Kash patel, Dan bongino, Fbi, Department of justice, Jeffrey epstein, Suicide, Truckload, Evidence, Autopsy, Cover up, Prince andrew, Bill clinton, Epstein island, Blackmail, Justice, Truth, Transparency 

Earlier today, BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” made an appearance on Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s show to, in his words, “articulate and channel some of the frustrations that the base and the audience is feeling” in the wake of the DOJ and FBI’s announcement that the Epstein client list we were promised doesn’t exist.

Kirk picked the perfect person. Liz was hot out of the gate with her scathing condemnation of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case.

“This has been an unforced error due to choices that Attorney General Pam Bondi has made,” Liz tells Kirk.

Back in February, Liz was invited to an exclusive White House event, during which she, along with other prominent conservative personalities, was given a binder by Pam Bondi labeled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1.”

Unfortunately, this file contained virtually no new information. Bondi admitted to the group that the binders didn’t have any “juicy, dirty details” because the “SDNY [was] hiding truckloads of documents,” per a whistleblower’s report, but that she had sent FBI director Kash Patel a formal request to release the complete files, promising Liz and the others that the full story was coming down the pike.

Months later, now we’re told there is no story, meaning there will be no accountability for the untold numbers of elites who were complicit in Epstein’s trafficking of underage girls.

Liz is furious at what she perceives as a bald-faced lie from Pam Bondi. During the White House meeting, “she actually bragged about creating that [binder] cover sheet,” which read “the most transparent administration in history,” she scoffs.

This performative act in tandem with her February appearance on Fox News claiming that the Epstein list was sitting on her desk pending review simply doesn’t square with the DOJ’s final verdict that “there’s no Epstein client list; there’s no blackmail operation; Epstein definitively killed himself … and [Americans] are not getting any more of these documents,” says Liz.

“The reason that the American people are having such a visceral reaction to this … is because we voted for justice when we voted for President Trump,” she tells Kirk. “This does not seem like justice.”

“We have this evidence [of Epstein’s crimes] before our eyes, and then we’re being told by government officials … that we should discount and ignore what we’re seeing … and instead believe them, and they’re telling us things that contradict the evidence that we’ve seen,” she explains. “The simple fact of the matter is Pam Bondi said she had the client list on her desk and she promised to release it, and then she didn’t do it.”

“What could make this right in your estimation?” Kirk asks.

“She’s a liability to the Trump administration. It’s costing him tremendous goodwill among his base,” says Liz, “and I say this sorrowfully because there’s a lot of things Pam Bondi has done that I like and that I agree with, but it’s time to not allow her to have this be something that tarnishes President Trump’s legacy and office. It’s time to move on from her.”

“Are you calling for her resignation?” asks Kirk.

“Yes, I believe President Trump should give her the option to resign because she didn’t tell the truth to the American people,” she says. “It’s the right thing to do.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​The liz wheeler show, Liz wheeler, Charlie kirk, Turning point usa, Pam bondi, Jeffery epstein, Epstein case, Fbi, Doj, Blazetv, Blaze media 

The catastrophic floods in Central Texas have claimed the lives of at least 120 people, including 46 children. As officials and volunteers continue their search for the 173 still believed missing, liberals continue to spin the tragedy, exploiting Texans’ loss and grief for political ends.

This was especially clear Wednesday on CNN, where talking head Dana Bash and Bill Nye “the Science Guy” suggested that the Trump administration and American energy were somehow culpable for the flooding in Texas and North Carolina as well as the rains in Chicago.

At the outset of the interview, Bash insinuated both that floods are becoming more frequent and that they are the result of climate change — even though in the case of Texas, they took place in a region that earned the nickname “flash flood alley” with a pattern of heavy flooding that apparently predates the combustion engine by many centuries.

Political scientist Roger Pielke Jr. recently directed the attention of USA Today to a 1940 historical text on American floods that indicates “the same region of Texas that experienced this week’s floods has long been known to be a bull’s-eye for flash flooding.”

A century before that text was published, German immigrants in New Braunfels, Texas, reportedly had to contend with the same problem — and faced a Guadalupe River that would consistently rise 15 feet above its normal stand following heavy rains.

“The documented record of extreme flooding in ‘flash flood alley’ goes back several centuries, with paleoclimatology records extending that record thousands of years into the past,” said Pielke.

RELATED: Liberal women quickly learn what happens when you say vile things about little girls killed in the floods

Photo by RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images

“It’s terrible,” said Bash, referring to footage of flooding. “You keep hearing ‘once in a lifetime,’ ‘once in a hundred years,’ ‘once in a thousand years.’ At this point, it’s not any more. It’s just where we are with the climate and the environment.”

After suggesting that “warm weather events are actually easier to tie to climate change,” Nye — who for all his honorary doctorates has not earned a doctorate in any scientific field — said, “‘What are we going to do about it?’ is the ancient question. And [the answer] would be to stop burning fossil fuels.”

“When you’re in a hole, stop digging, and so on,” continued Nye. “But the fossil fuel industry has been very successful in getting organizations like the U.S. Congress to think that it’s really not happening.”

After Nye smeared a critical source of American energy, Bash proved eager to tie its survival to President Donald Trump, stating, “And the first six months of the Trump administration, we’ve seen an end to some of the federal efforts on not just fossil fuel but other efforts that had been in place government-wide to promote alternative energy.”

‘If we harness our outrage and come together to fight like hell for our collective future, we will win.’

Failed presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg noted in a Tuesday op-ed that elected officials owe the Texas families who lost love ones “a sincere commitment to righting their deadly wrong, by tackling the problem they’ve turned their backs on for too long: climate change.”

RELATED: NY newspaper nailed with backlash over cartoon mocking MAGA victims of Texas floods: ‘Twisted, vile, and shameful’

Photo by Jim Vondruska/Getty Images

“The latest episode of horrific flooding isn’t just about a natural disaster in one state,” continued Bloomberg, who has poured cash into various climate alarmist initiatives. “It’s also about a political failure that’s been happening in states across the country, and most of all in Washington. The refusal to recognize that climate change carries a death penalty is sending innocent people, including far too many children, to early graves.”

Ben Jealous, the executive director of the Sierra Club and former CEO of the NAACP, claimed in a Chicago Sun-Times piece that the Texas disaster “was a crisis written by the climate crisis and made far worse by the types of policies being pushed by this administration everyday [sic].”

Jealous, like Bloomberg and Nye, appears to think the flood a good enough excuse for Americans to join their war on fossil fuels, stating, “If we harness our outrage and come together to fight like hell for our collective future, we will win.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Cnn, Dana bash, Texas floods, Floods, Climate, Climate change, Bill nye, Leftism, Bloomberg, Donald trump, Trump, Weather, Politics 

Over the course of George W. Bush’s entire presidency, 12 nationwide injunctions were issued by federal judges, halting or preventing the enforcement of executive branch policies. During Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s presidencies, 19 and 28 nationwide injunctions were issued, respectively.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the first Trump administration was slapped with 86 nationwide injunctions.

Meddlesome U.S. district court judges proved more than willing this year to oblige liberal litigants in arresting the MAGA agenda by slapping the second Trump administration with scores of additional universal injunctions — 25 in Trump’s first 100 days back in office and dozens more in subsequent months.

The U.S. Supreme Court finally put its foot down on June 27, determining in Trump v. CASA Inc. that the nationwide injunctions weaponized against the Trump administration by district court judges “likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts.”

It didn’t take long — just hours, actually — for liberal litigants to seize upon a potential alternative means of achieving similar results, and once again, largely Democrat-appointed district court judges appear ready to deliver.

Dr. John C. Eastman, founding director of the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, told Blaze News that the new undemocratic game played by liberal activists and sympathetic U.S. district court judges will likely prompt further action from the U.S. Supreme Court.

While Eastman reckons the Trump administration will ultimately prevail — and a White House official told Blaze News that the administration is prepared for “all possible legal options” — its challengers will nevertheless attempt in the meantime to deny or postpone what Americans voted for in November.

RELATED: Even Sotomayor bewildered by Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissenting opinion

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In CASA Inc., the Supreme Court indicated that the nationwide injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh recognized in his concurring opinion, however, that district courts may still be able to “grant or deny the functional equivalent of a universal injunction — for example, by granting or denying a preliminary injunction to a putative nationwide class under Rule 23(b)(2).”

‘They’ve got to pay close attention to the guardrails that go along with the rule 23 class certification process.’

Hours after the high court’s ruling, CASA, the immigrant advocacy group involved in the litigation, filed a motion requesting that the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland certify as a class all persons born in the U.S. on or after Feb. 19 who would be ineligible for birthright citizenship under President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14160 and asked in an amended complaint that the court issue an injunction against the order on behalf of this supposed class.

In a corresponding request for a preliminary injunction, CASA noted that the “Supreme Court’s recent stay opinion acknowledges that courts may award injunctive relief beyond the named parties when the case is brought as a class action.”

CASA referred to both Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion and Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissenting opinion, in which she noted that “the majority leaves untouched one important tool to provide broad relief to individuals subject to lawless Government conduct: Rule 23(b)(2) class actions for injunctive relief.”

“Justices Alito and Kavanaugh, in their concurring opinions, both tried to send a warning sign to the lower courts that this shouldn’t be an automatic brand of class certification; they’ve got to pay close attention to the guardrails that go along with the Rule 23 class certification process,” said Eastman. “One of those is commonality. You know, the members of the class have to have common issues, and with the preliminary injunction, that’s just not true.”

RELATED: Justice Alito issues reminder of what SCOTUS must do, even if unpopular

Photo by Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images

The government punched holes through CASA’s request on Monday, and among the issues it raised was precisely this: The plaintiffs cannot meet the requirements of Rule 23 because of a lack of commonality — “three plaintiffs have a pending asylum application; another is present in the United States on a tourist visa; another has TPS status; another is on a student visa; another is on an H-1B visa; and another fails to articulate her immigration status.”

Eastman, a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, stressed further that one of the key requirements for a preliminary injunction is irreparable harm.

It is certainly a giant leap to say all parties in the class are at risk of irreparable harm.

“If you stand back and ask yourself, ‘What’s the irreparable injury here?’ it’s hard to find one,” said Eastman. “If a baby is born and it’s a year or two before the litigation is resolved, and in the meantime they’re not deemed a citizen, but if Trump’s executive order is ruled illegal or unconstitutional, then they’re retroactively deemed a citizen, what’s the harm? Okay, they’ve lost some financial benefits as a citizen in the meantime. Well, financial benefits are by definition not irreparable harm because they can all be compensated after the fact with interest.”

“So the only way you get to irreparable harm is if, say, the parents are members of MS-13 and they’re going to be deported and the child will be deported with them because he’s not a citizen — then that could be an irreparable harm. But that’s very idiosyncratic, tied to each individual,” stressed Eastman. “There’s no commonality.”

‘The more they can throw barriers in the way of Trump accomplishing things, the more likely it is that they won’t have as much to rebuild after they ride it out.’

Regardless of whether CASA succeeds in this attempt, it’s clear that others will lean on class actions as an alternative. It has already begun.

The American Civil Liberties Union challenged Trump’s asylum ban in February on behalf of three radical activist groups and a handful of foreigners denied asylum.

Last week, the Obama judge overseeing the resulting case, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem, certified all border-jumping asylum-seekers “who are now or will be present in the United States” as a protected class, then barred the administration from expelling members of the class — a ruling the government quickly appealed.

Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the ACLU who brought the case, told Reuters, “I think there’s going to be a lot more class actions.”

A senior White House official told Blaze News that in the wake of the CASA decision, “the Trump administration pushed aggressively against the nationwide injunctions by filing supplemental filings in the appellate courts and in the district courts,” requesting that the courts narrow the scope of the injunctions to the parties before it. As this is sure to prompt desperation on the part of the plaintiffs, the official added, “Of course, the parties involved are going to try and seek the biggest sort of net they can by filing class actions.”

The official noted, however, an inherent weakness in this strategy: “Class actions take a very long time — classes take a long time to certify.”

“So they’re going to be pushing, but that’s not a standard process,” continued the official. “Justice Alito discussed the dangers of sort of trying to create a nationwide injunction via class action, and so that’s not necessarily going to be a solution because the Supreme Court will push back to the extent that it’s not covering the affected party.”

Eastman anticipates another Supreme Court intervention.

He told Blaze News that the lower-court judges are likely going to ignore Alito’s warning — not to view the decision in CASA “as an invitation to certify nationwide classes without scrupulous adherence to the rigors of Rule 23” — and “we’ll be back up to the Supreme Court, now with just the same issue but under a different name: not a nationwide injunction but a nationwide class injunction. It’s kind of a game of whack-a-mole, and it’s really causing great harm to the rule of law.”

Eastman outlined a likely course that will prompt action from the Supreme Court:

What I expect we’ll see in short order is a nationwide class action certified and then an injunction issued to every member of the class, and the Department of Justice will seek a stay of that. The court of appeals will deny it, and then [the government] will seek an emergency stay in the Supreme Court.

When asked about the likelihood of this going back to the Supreme Court, the senior White House official said, “It totally could. Obviously, we would hope not for that to happen. But you know, Justice Alito made clear to litigants that they shouldn’t abuse class certification in order to circumvent this CASA decision, so it’s kind of indicating that the Supreme Court would not take lightly if district courts were doing the same thing that they were just doing, but it’s totally possible.”

If the class action strategy does become a pattern, the senior White House official indicated the Trump administration is apparently “ready to go immediately. We’re prepared for every outcome.”

Concerning the broader campaign to neutralize the Trump agenda in the courts, Eastman stressed to Blaze News that the American left doesn’t “have the White House, they don’t have either branch of Congress, they don’t have the Supreme Court, but they do have a lot of activist judges that were appointed on the lower courts.”

RELATED: Vance identifies the perfect mascot for the Democrats — then outlines what America actually needs

Photo by Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

“They’re using that base of power to thwart the agenda of the president that the American people overwhelmingly elected,” continued Eastman. “What’s most interesting is they claim that Trump is undermining democracy when they are trying to thwart the results of the last democratic election.”

While Eastman figures the Trump administration will come out on top in court, these efforts by activist judges and leftist litigants may nevertheless delay implementation of the president’s agenda long enough for the left to recapture power and neutralize his executive actions by other means.

“They hope to be able to slow it down enough that they run out the clock, at least until after the midterm elections, with their hope that they will then control one or both branches of Congress to be able to stop them legislatively rather than judicially — but at the very least try and run the clock out all the way through the next term,” said Eastman.

“Their view is that millions of people that work in the federal government are so overwhelmingly on the left-of-center side of the political aisle that once they get past the four years of Trump, it’ll be back to business as usual, and they just need to ride it out,” he continued. “The more they can throw barriers in the way of Trump accomplishing things, the more likely it is that they won’t have as much to rebuild after they ride it out.”

The White House official noted that “if the judicial branch doesn’t collect itself and get better, then it’s going to be the detriment of the American people who wanted these policies implemented.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​National injunction, Injunction, Class certification, Class action, Class action lawsuit, Maga, Donald trump, District judges, Politics 

New video shows a teen attempting an armed carjacking in crime-ridden Baltimore, but the intended victim — a prominent pastor — fought back and turned the tables on the crook.

Rev. Kenneth Moales Jr. — pastor of Cathedral of the Holy Spirit in Bridgeport, Connecticut — was in Baltimore for a funeral in late June.

‘I knew my life was at stake.’

Moales parked his car outside a seafood restaurant in the city’s Upper Fells Point neighborhood just before 9 p.m. June 29, WBAL-TV reported.

A teen wearing a ski mask approached Moales’ vehicle while the pastor was still inside it, the station said, adding that the teenager allegedly asked the pastor for help regarding his dead cell phone.

The teen — armed with a gun — ordered the pastor to exit his vehicle, WBAL said.

“When I looked at him, I knew like something about this wasn’t right. I was looking to kind of drive away, and he immediately pulls up his ski mask,” Moales told WBFF-TV. “Puts it up over his face, whips out the Glock, points it at the car, like, ‘Get out the car.'”

Moales added to WJZ-TV, “He’s placed materialism over my life, and unfortunate[ly] for him, he picked the wrong car.”

The pastor made a split-second decision to fight back against the young carjacker.

“I immediately got into a fight. So I just punched him in the face. I reach out for the gun,” Moales recalled to WBFF.

Surveillance video shows Moales tackling the teen and slamming him on the wet pavement for approximately 20 seconds.

Moales also told WBFF, “I really believe I was fighting for my life and, more importantly, trying to get home to my wife and children.”

Citing charging documents, WBAL reported that the carjacker pistol-whipped the pastor in the head.

RELATED: Watch a California family unleash a paintball barrage to thwart thieves from stealing catalytic converters from cars in their driveway

During the melee, Moales recounted to WJZ that he was able to wrestle the gun away from the teenager.

What’s more, the pastor offered the teen an opportunity to get away.

Moales recalled to WBFF, “I realize how young he is, and that’s when I tell him, ‘Hey, I’m a pastor. Relax, calm down. I’m a pastor. I’m not going to press charges. You know, I’m going to let you go, but you’ve got to get out of here.'”

However, the carjacker didn’t accept the offer — and proceeded to steal the pastor’s vehicle.

“I told him, ‘I’m a father, a husband, and a pastor, and you can just go now, and I won’t press charges,'” Moales recounted to WVIT-TV. “But even after all of that — after I had let him go and given him a chance to not face charges — he still drove off in my car.”

He added to WBFF, “You would think once I let him know I was a pastor that there would be, in one way or another, some level of remorse, and there was neither, none at all. He [couldn’t] care less. And that’s what’s left me hurt — I’m not going to say broken — [but] hurt, concerned, and knowing what my new mission is.”

The pastor suffered non-life-threatening injuries, according to a statement from his congregation.

WJZ reported that within hours of the carjacking, officers with the Baltimore Police Department located the pastor’s vehicle with three suspects inside — ages 15, 16, and 19.

All three teenagers were arrested and charged with auto theft, WBAL said.

The two minors were not identified because they are underage, but WBAL identified the 19-year-old suspect as Mehkai Tindal, according to charging documents. It isn’t clear which of the three attacked Moales.

RELATED: Alabama churchgoer in his 70s hailed as a hero for bludgeoning, apprehending gunman in deadly church shooting

The harrowing experience provided the pastor with an eye-opening perspective — and a new mission.

Moales told WVIT, “I have forgiven the young man — but this violent crime just shows me that I need to work even harder to help young people right here in Bridgeport, because a lot of these kids are hopeless and this problem is not unique to Baltimore.”

The pastor added to WBFF, “If we don’t commit to educating this generation in a significant way, what happened to me is just a beginning. If they’ll, if they’ll pistol-whip a pastor, you about know what they’ll do to my members.”

Moales noted to WBAL, “My prayer today is, ‘God, thank you for covering me. Thank you for my life.'”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Self defense, Baltimore, Baltimore crime, Gun violence, Crime, Fighting back, Pastor, Faith, Abide, Christianity, Carjacking, Teen suspects, Arrests