St. Paul City Attorney Irene Kao — a warrior against what she calls “structural racism” — announced this week that she won’t bother bringing state charges against those radicals who stormed into Cities Church in January.

Kao’s apparent tolerance for militant leftist agitation has left the church’s lead pastor, Rev. Jonathan Parnell, and others wondering whether the woke prosecutor’s purported “commitment to protect religious people includes evangelical Christians.”

A mostly peaceful church invasion?

Don Lemon — the former CNN talking head who suggested in October that “black people, brown people” should take up arms against Immigration and Customs Enforcement — apparently joined radicals from Racial Justice Network, Black Lives Matter Minnesota, and BLM Twin Cities for a so-called “ICE Out Action” in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Jan. 18.

‘The law will bend for those whose cause aligns with the politics of those in power.’

Rather than interfere with federal law enforcement operations, this motley crew of leftists stormed into Cities Church, doing their apparent best to drown out sounds of Sunday worship.

Nekima Levy Armstrong, founder of the Racial Justice Network and former president of the Minneapolis chapter of the NAACP, claimed responsibility for the disruption and indicated that Cities Church was targeted because “David Easterwood is a Pastor at this church and the Acting Field Director for the ICE office in St. Paul.”

RELATED: Detroit priest administers righteous beatdown to suspected car thief: ‘Just another day’

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

The radicals refused requests from church officials to leave the premises and instead hectored churchgoers and screamed in the aisles and pews.

The Trump Justice Department took the matter seriously, securing indictments against all 39 individuals suspected of disrupting the church service, including Lemon, Armstrong, and Jamael Lydell Lundy — a radical who previously worked for Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum; has served as the right-hand man for Mary Moriarty, Hennepin County’s Soros-backed prosecutor; and is married to St. Paul City Councilwoman Anika Bowie.

Whereas the DOJ appears keen on holding the suspected church invaders accountable for federal civil rights violations, Irene Kao is evidently of a different mind.

Decision, backlash

Kao, the leftist daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, announced this week that her office will not bring state-level criminal charges against Don Lemon and his comrades.

“Our office has a legal and ethical obligation to file charges only when the available evidence establishes probable cause and supports a reasonable likelihood of conviction beyond a reasonable doubt,” Kao said in a statement.

“Following a careful evaluation of the video footage, investigative reports, and other available materials, prosecutors determined that the current evidence is insufficient to meet that standard for criminal charges under Minnesota state statutes,” continued the woke prosecutor.

After noting that her decision should not be read as an endorsement of illegal behavior, Kao wrote, “The right to peacefully protest is protected, as is the right to exercise one’s religious beliefs.”

“Balancing these equally important rights is paramount to our decision today,” continued the leftist prosecutor.

Doug Wardlow, director of litigation for Truth North Legal and representative for Cities Church, said, “The St. Paul city attorney’s decision treats the church like it’s a public sidewalk — as if the sanctuary were an open forum that anyone may seize mid-service, rather than private property where a congregation has the right to worship undisturbed.”

“By wrongly characterizing the invasion and takeover of a worship service as First Amendment-protected conduct, the city attorney’s office sends an unmistakable signal: The law will bend for those whose cause aligns with the politics of those in power,” added Wardlow.

Rev. Jonathan Parnell said in a statement, “According to the St. Paul city attorney’s logic, it is perfectly fine for agitators to invade a mosque, a cathedral, or a temple, intimidate the families and children inside, and shut down their religious gathering. Just call it a ‘protest.'”

The Cities Church pastor noted further that “City Attorney Irene Kao’s decision not to charge the agitators who invaded our church on January 18, 2026, leaves us to question whether her commitment to protect religious people includes evangelical Christians.”

In addition to facing criticism for setting a dangerous precedent, Kao has been questioned over her possible self-interest in the case.

After all, Jamael Lydell Lundy, one of the radicals whom Kao let off the hook, is married to a member of city council — the very council that confirms the mayor’s city attorney appointments.

KSTP-TV has doggedly — but so far unsuccessfully — pressed the offices of Kao and Democratic Mayor Kaohly Her about whether the case should have been handled externally to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.

David Schultz, professor of political science and legal studies at Hamline University, told KSTP that Kao’s handling of Lundy’s case creates the “possible appearance of a conflict of interest.”

“Send it outside City Hall, not even move it to a different attorney in City Hall, but to basically hire an outside firm, review the file, and make their own independent decision regarding whether or not to prosecute or not,” said Schultz. “That way it would clearly have addressed any of the concerns about the appearance of conflict of interest, and again, assured the public that there was no favoritism going on here.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Don lemon, Peaceful protest, Black lives matter, Ice, Christian, Church, Minnesota, St paul, Woke prosecutor, Politics 

Protesters have spent nearly two weeks outside a federal detention facility in Newark — forming human chains, blocking vehicle exits, and clashing with officers in riot gear. A U.S. senator got caught in a cloud of pepper spray, and New Jersey’s sitting governor, Democrat Mikie Sherrill, was turned away at the gate.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin called those incidents “nothing more than a political stunt … for fundraising clips.”

Now the state has turned to the courts.

‘A better gym than the one I go to.”

New Jersey Democrat Attorney General Jennifer Davenport announced Tuesday that she had filed suit against GEO Group Inc., the private company operating Delaney Hall under a $1 billion federal contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The suit seeks to compel GEO Group to grant state health inspectors full access to the facility.

The suit alleges that on Thursday, inspectors were permitted to examine only the food-service area and were blocked from the medical unit, sleeping quarters, and bathing and toileting facilities.

The broader allegations — worms in food, no toilet paper, inadequate medical care — are sourced to detainee accounts relayed through lawyers, family members, and advocacy groups. A University Hospital doctor also reported a confirmed tuberculosis case, the lawsuit claimed.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D) separately announced that the city was filing its own suit to close the facility, citing an unverified report that a detainee suffered a miscarriage without proper care.

The DHS wasted no time dismissing the litigation as “frivolous.”

“This is a frivolous lawsuit,” the department posted on X. “ICE is committed to transparency, and Delaney Hall complies with all required state and local laws.”

“Just last week on May 28, four representatives of the New Jersey State Health Department arrived at approximately 11:00 AM. They entered the facility and inspected the foodservice department. The inspection of the kitchen was completed and they departed around 12:30 PM.”

The DHS has also flatly disputed the hunger strike claim: “FACT CHECK: there is NO HUNGER STRIKE at Delaney Hall.”

One Republican member of Congress, Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), toured the facility and pushed back on the narrative, describing a library, an outdoor soccer field, and what he called “a better gym than the one I go to.”

RELATED: ‘Violent agitator’ savagely bit ICE agent during riots in New Jersey, says DHS

Selçuk Acar/Anadolu/Getty Images

Movimiento Cosecha’s New Jersey chapter, Cosecha New Jersey, has been present at the protests — a group that has called for an end to the entire immigration detention system — alongside ICE Out of New Jersey, Eyes on ICE New Jersey, and other radical groups.

The DHS said protesters arrived “carrying anti-ICE signs and Antifa flags” and physically blocked federal vehicles.

Security expert Lora Ries told NTD the protesters were “organized, funded, and trained” — a characterization that echoed New Jersey’s own attorney general, who noted that some demonstrators arrived “armed with helmets, shields, or gas masks” and deliberately refused to leave.

Critics have also pointed to the closure last month of the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, the primary federal watchdog for immigration detention. The DHS said, “Congress did” it, not the department.

Newark lifted its nightly curfew Tuesday evening, and family visitation was restored. The state and city lawsuits are pending.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Attorney general, Delaney hall, Dhs, Hunger strike, Ice, Markwayne mullin, New jersey, Newark, Politics 

Let us give thanks to America’s ultra-rich from a bygone era. Without them, our world would be poorer in beauty.

That sounds like I’m making a joke, doesn’t it? The received opinion in America today is that the ultra-wealthy are slavering predators bent on “capitalisming” poor Gen Z coffee shop employees into penury.

That’s one of the best parts about the Shelburne Museum — very little is behind velvet ropes.

Well, I’m not joking, and the received opinion is baloney.

Tour de force

Whereas the anti-wealth advocates generally make their points by taking to the streets and screaming like lunatics, I’m going to try a different approach. I trust you’ll find it more pleasant.

Allow me to take you on a short tour of one of the finest civic legacies bestowed upon my state of Vermont: the Shelburne Museum. I hope this product of one socialite’s generosity inspires you to see what treasures may have been bequeathed to your town by a philanthropist of old.

I thank God for the ultra-rich of the past who practiced the lost art of noblesse oblige. Scottish-American industrialist Andrew Carnegie built more than 1,600 public libraries in the U.S. alone. Your town may have one. You know them by their quality, their gracious architecture, their built-in hardwood book cases and grand stairs.

Compare a Carnegie library to a modern concrete, glass, and steel monstrosity such as the Seattle Public Library.

American Versailles

Vermonters have Electra Havemeyer Webb to thank for the idyllic paradise on the shores of Lake Champlain called the Shelburne Museum. The 45-acre property has 30 buildings, one of the last steamships to ply the lake, a preserved general store and apothecary, and more. The footpath through the property is about a mile, and it takes you through rolling hills dotted with original buildings from the colonial era through the 19th century.

I imagine that it’s a bit like the Queen’s Hamlet at Versailles. Marie Antoinette constructed a working toy village at a short distance from the main palace, an idealized country village with a mill, a dairy, and charming bridges over streams. She liked to retreat from the frenetic court, and she used the Hamlet as a sort of proto-Montessori school to teach her children.

The Shelburne Museum is like an American version. All the old buildings are actually old buildings, not replicas. Most were transported to the museum grounds from other parts of Vermont and New England.

As you walk by the original saltbox-style house from the 1700s, you see the town jail built in stone on the other side of the path. It’s just two cells with doors of iron bars, but at least they gave the prisoners (likely just the town drunks) a stove for winter heat.

Josh Slocum

Up the path a bit you’ll find a working printshop that still uses an old Heidelberg press. The docents will ink up plates and press flyers right in front of you to show how events were advertised and how news was printed for distribution before the digital age, all on working antique machines.

Josh Slocum

Full steam ahead

Heiress to a sugar refining fortune, Webb was raised among the upper crust of New York City and taught to appreciate high European culture. But at a young age it was American craft that caught her eye. She devoted her time and fortune to amassing a vast collection of early American antiques, art, and everyday objects. By founding the museum in 1947, she opened that collection to the people of Vermont.

What she left is a true gift in the best philanthropic spirit of America’s old money. Mrs. Webb saved one of the last steamships to traverse Lake Champlain and had it hauled by rail onto dry land to be preserved. If you’re ever in town, bring your kids. Imagine the sense of magical whimsy when you crest a hill and see a 19th-century steamship over the horizon.

Josh Slocum

Go aboard, and find yourself immersed in Edwardian splendor. This is what travel used to look like.

See those chairs? You can sit in them. That’s one of the best parts about the Shelburne Museum — very little is behind velvet ropes. You get to touch most things, and you get to watch old machines come to life and do the job for which they were built.

Josh Slocum

The place is a paradise for boys who love mechanical toys. Go downstairs below the waterline, and you’re next to the towering vertical beam steam engine that turned the red paddle wheels and propelled the Ticonderoga at a brisk-for-the-time 17 miles per hour.

Josh Slocum

Keeping the flame

RELATED: Kerosene lamps: Your escape from the sickly glare of LEDs

The Print Collector/Getty Images

Let’s walk on to the general store. Again, this is no twee recreation of Ye Olde Time Store.

It’s a real general store, and everything inside it is from the period. The enormous cast iron stove sits in the middle of the room. On either side are goods behind the counter: tobacco, canned vegetables, molasses from a barrel, hardtack for the sailors.

Josh Slocum

The docent, a gentleman in his 80s in natty tweed, conducted me to the back room where the barber shop is preserved. Beyond that is the small tavern room where men would come after work to drink ale and rum while playing cards.

Beyond that is what may be one of the most perfectly preserved and extensively stocked apothecary shops (a forerunner of the drugstore) in the United states. Look at these cabinets full of what must be almost the entire range of patent medicines sold in the U.S. at the turn of the 20th century.

Josh Slocum

And that lamp is one of the best-preserved examples I have seen of the most sought-after and expensive kerosene lamp of its day (I’m a collector).

The Angle Lamp was so named because it placed the wick burner at an angle, rather than vertically. Combined with the specially shaped milk glass shades, the Angle Lamp was the first oil-burning lamp designed to throw light downward and outward. It became a mainstay of workshops, where good lighting was a necessity.

The docent told me the museum officials had no idea of the lamp’s history or its place in commercial lighting, and they were delighted to note down more detail about a part of their collection. That’s another charming aspect of the Shelburne Museum; the people who work and volunteer there love what they do and are happy to learn as much from visitors as they teach.

And wouldn’t you like to get your hands on some of the remedies that can no longer be legally sold?

Josh Slocum

A doll’s house

Do you have girls who love dolls and life in miniature? Be sure to take them to the third floor of one of the last buildings on the path. The exhibit of dollhouses and dioramas is magical.

Here’s the lobby in one dollhouse set up as a late 19th-century hotel.

Josh Slocum

Some of the others are so detailed you could fool yourself into believing you were looking at a full-size room.

Josh Slocum

No collection of doll-related ephemera would be complete without That One Cursed Doll, and the Shelburne does not disappoint.

Josh Slocum

Good luck sleeping.

De gustibus

Your correspondent finds it difficult to write a column without finding something to mock, and fortunately Mrs. Webb provided for this with her collection of Impressionist paintings. The main home on the property features at least two Monets, and I’m here to tell you they look worse in person than they do in museum catalogs.

I mean, look at this:

Josh Slocum

My friend is an artist who made a beeline for the Monets. We stood in front of this representation of some primitive huts, and she didn’t say anything. I did.

“Well, it’s s**t, isn’t it?” I said.

“Yeah. That’s really ugly,” she replied.

Not all fine art is actually fine. Sorry.

But noblesse oblige is very fine indeed. It is, in fact, noble. Without the Mr. Carnegies and Mrs. Webbs, our country would be impoverished in beauty and the ability of the public to experience it. It takes robber-baron levels of wealth to collect, to curate, and, eventually, to bequeath to the public examples of the finest uplifting, aspirational, and enchanting machines and objets d’art that show the best of what man and woman can create.

This is something only the rich can do for us. Let’s hear it for Mrs. Webb.

​General store, Kerosene lamps, Shelburne museum, Electra havemeyer webb, Lifestyle, Philanthropy, Culture, Early americana, American history, Steamships 

Big Tech companies helped censor Americans during COVID. Now many of the same interests pillaging rural America for surveillance data centers want to suppress debate over their next great project. This time, they are not merely trying to censor speech. They are helping create the pretext to criminalize it.

Federal and state law enforcement should have their hands full with real threats: jihadist networks, political assassinations, attacks against ICE, and the growing culture of left-wing violence that led to Charlie Kirk’s murder. Yet last week, Wired obtained documents showing a coordinated effort among the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis, and roughly 80 regional fusion centers to monitor supposed anti-tech and anti-data-center violence.

It is disgraceful to watch law enforcement silence Americans on behalf of Big Tech.

More than 1,000 pages of internal DHS, FBI, and fusion-center reports describe “anti-technology extremism” as an emerging domestic threat based largely on a handful of unverified threats against politicians. No one should excuse genuine threats or violence. But the idea that data-center opponents have created a domestic threat requiring this level of federal coordination is absurd. It is gaslighting dressed up as intelligence work.

This is the same logic behind the Trump administration’s decision to station marshals with surveyors for data-center transmission lines in Carroll County, Maryland. The point was not to respond to credible threats. The point was to frame opposition — especially in one of Maryland’s most conservative counties — as dangerous before the debate even began.

Which brings us to Dixon, Illinois.

Last week, resident Harley Delander organized a Facebook protest outside the home of former state Rep. Tom Demmer (R), who is now promoting a 387-acre data-center site through the Lee County Industrial Development Association. People can debate the prudence of protesting at an official’s residence, though such protests have become common in local disputes. But police produced no credible evidence that Delander or his friends planned violence.

Delander was arrested outside his home 12 hours later and charged with two felonies: intimidation and stalking. Police said his communications “knowingly and willfully” caused fear for Demmer and his family’s safety. Delander recorded the arrest.

This reflects a growing trend: criminalizing sharp public debate based on how a public official claims to feel rather than what a citizen actually did.

A Massachusetts resident was sentenced to prison and spent a full year behind bars before trial for writing angry emails to a local Michigan politician. The emails were ugly — the sort of language elected officials receive every day — but they contained no personal threats or even veiled threats. He was extradited to Oakland County, Michigan, in December 2023 and charged under Michigan’s law against intimidating public officials, which hinges on whether the “victim” felt “terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.”

RELATED: After fierce debate, Trump opts for federal controls in AI development

Arvitalya/Getty Images

We have reached the point where heated political debate — a tradition as old as Adams and Jefferson — can become grounds for abridging the First Amendment. What a way to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence!

The crackdown is not limited to nasty emails or home protests. Across the country, law-abiding rural residents, many of them seniors, are getting roughed up or arrested for speaking too long or objecting too loudly at data-center hearings.

On February 17, Oklahoma farmer Darren Blanchard exceeded his three-minute speaking limit by a few seconds at a Claremore City Council town hall on “Project Mustang,” a proposed AI data center backed by Beale Infrastructure. Once his time expired, he stopped speaking and walked to the rostrum to give the city manager a written copy of his remarks. For that, police handcuffed and removed him, transported him to Rogers County Jail, and booked him on criminal trespassing charges.

In April, Imperial County, California, resident Ismael Arvizu was arrested and charged with trespassing, disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, and threatening a public official. Did he attack an official? No. After speaking during his allotted time at an Imperial County Board of Supervisors meeting, Arvizu applauded when another resident threatened to start a recall petition against the supervisors. The Los Angeles Times reported that an officer led him out and arrested him, and prosecutors charged him with threatening a public official.

In Midland, Texas, video shows a resident calmly calling for a point of order under meeting rules at a data-center meeting. He was immediately grabbed and removed from the room. He does not appear to have been arrested or charged, but the point remains: Police increasingly seem prepared to remove data-center opponents before their speech, outbursts, or objections would traditionally qualify as disrupting a meeting.

RELATED: Self-driving trucks are about controlling the roads — not making them safer

Dylan Hollingsworth/Bloomberg/Getty Images

This is happening in deep-red counties across America. It is disgraceful to watch law enforcement silence Americans on behalf of Big Tech.

Recently, the Intercept obtained a law-enforcement bulletin from a fusion center housed within the Philadelphia Police Department showing that federal authorities were monitoring anti-data-center social media posts for “domestic violent extremists.” The bulletin warned that “domestic violent extremists” were “likely interested in targeting artificial intelligence data centers,” posing physical and cyber threats to infrastructure in the Philadelphia region. Then it conceded that authorities lacked “specific information on plans to target AI data centers in the Philadelphia area.”

That is the whole game. Invent a vague threat, inflate it into a domestic extremism category, and use it to justify surveillance, intimidation, and arrests. Then pretend ordinary citizens are dangerous because they object to surrendering their land, power, and communities to Big Tech.

The irony is hard to miss. Governments at every level are deploying censorship, surveillance, and criminal enforcement to service an agenda built on surveillance, data extraction, and control.

Talk about paying for the rope to hang ourselves!

​Data centers, Ai, Big tech, Covid, Dhs, Fbi, Trump administration, Law enforcement, Ismael arvizu, Opinion & analysis, Artificial intelligence, Surveillance, First amendment, Protest, Domestic terrorism 

The cultural obsession with — and corresponding private-public support for — all things non-heterosexual is waning, having apparently reached its zenith sometime earlier this decade.

New Gallup polling shows that support for homosexual “marriage,” non-straight relations, and so-called transgenderism is collapsing.

‘Those pro-LGBTQ+ attitudes peaked about five years ago.’

Whereas in 2023, 71% of American adults said that homosexual “marriages” should be valid — up from 27% in 1996 — that number has since dropped to 65%.

After reaching an all-time high in 2022 of 71%, the percentage of U.S. adults who regard homosexual relations as “morally acceptable” fell to 62% this year, the lowest it has been in a decade. This decline shows no signs of stopping.

Gallup started asking Americans in 2021 whether “changing one’s gender is morally acceptable.” That year, 46% of respondents said “yes,” but this year, only 38% of Americans said the same.

Just 5% of Republicans and 42% of independents said that “changing one’s gender” is morally acceptable.

RELATED: Just 1 MLB team opts out of Pride Night as league shifts toward LGBT ‘package’

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

The polling outfit credited Republicans with the declining support for the LGBT agenda, noting that some of the most drastic changes in attitude regarding non-straight issues have taken place on the right.

In 2022, for instance, 55% of Republicans said that they support legal homosexual “marriage,” but over the past four years, that number has plummeted 18 percentage points.

Independents are similarly pumping the brakes on the rainbow train, with their support for same-sex “marriage” having fallen six percentage points.

While Democrats predominantly remain on board with the LGBT agenda, there are some signs of fatigue. This year, 81% said that homosexual relations are morally acceptable — down five points from 2025 — and 60% signaled support for transgenderism, down seven points since 2021.

“For about two decades, Americans grew more accepting of LGBTQ+ people and more supportive of their civil rights,” said Gallup. “However, those pro-LGBTQ+ attitudes peaked about five years ago and have since edged downward, mostly among Republicans.”

Coinciding with the change in attitude about non-straight issues, there has been a precipitous decline in the proportion of students identifying as “transgender” and “non-heterosexual,” as detailed in a study last year from the University of Buckingham’s Centre for Heterodox Social Science.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Lgbt, Gay, Homosexual, Trans, Transgender, Gallup, Poll, Opinion, Normalcy, Social contagion, Politics 

On June 2, Zach Lahn won the Iowa Republican gubernatorial primary. Campaigning as an “Iowa First” outsider focused on water quality, reducing corporate influence, and core conservative issues, the political newcomer and farmer/businessman pulled off a shocking upset, earning about 38% of the vote in a crowded five-candidate race and narrowly beating Trump-endorsed Rep. Randy Feenstra.

On this episode of the “Steve Deace Show,” Deace extracts “8 lessons” the political right can learn from Lahn’s stunning victory.

Lesson #1: Christian conservatives are changing from being profile-driven to issue-driven.

Deace explains that historically, Iowans have voted for people that look the part.

“We’re flyover country, and a lot of times the rest of the country just kind of wants to look down and sneer at us. So understanding us — being from us, one of us — is a big thing,” he says, noting how Iowa’s longtime senior Senator Chuck Grassley has been running successful campaign ads showing him “driving a tractor” for his entire political career.

But Lahn’s victory proved that voting based on profile is “no longer the model.”

“We can now see it’s a paradigm shift — that issues now matter more than the profile does,” says Deace, highlighting how Lahn “spoke to the issues” and defeated opponent Adam Steen who “represented the profile.”

Lesson #2: MAHA and Christian conservatives are the coalition of the future.

Lahn’s success was largely a result of his ability to appeal to Make America Healthy Again supporters. Endorsed by RFK Jr.’s MAHA Action PAC, his campaign zeroed in on Iowa’s cancer crisis, water toxicity, and use of chemicals and pesticides in farming.

Deace predicts that the union of MAHA advocates and conservative Christians will be the right’s strongest weapon in future elections.

“You see this especially with our mamas and our nanas,” he says, noting how the government’s handling of COVID-19 created a deep skepticism that will surely continue to influence voting.

Lesson #3: Issues still trump everything.

Just days before the primary, Deace — who had earlier endorsed Adam Steen — released a last-minute video endorsement for Lahn, which he says was the “last spackle of frosting on the cake” that pushed him to his razor-thin victory.

But that’s not a pat on his own back. Lahn, Deace argues, was only in the position where he could be nudged to victory because he ran on “hard-right issues.”

“If I put that video out about Zach Lahn, but he hasn’t been running all the issue ads they did the last few weeks, does it work? No,” he declares.

“They baked the entire cake. I helped them with the frosting.”

Lahn’s victory, he argues, is proof that “the number-one thing our people want to vote on is issues.”

Lesson #4: This wasn’t a ‘loss’ for President Trump, but one of his most impressive shows of force yet.

Many political observers and media outlets are interpreting Lahn’s win as a notable loss or setback for Trump, who endorsed Feenstra.

But Deace pushes back on that narrative. “Folks, this was actually one of the most impressive shows of force that Trump’s ever had with an endorsement,” he counters.

Deace marvels that Trump was able to “[take] a candidate that his own base did not like, who saw his negatives go up by 20 points in the last three months” and “in less than four days with no major media in our state” made him jump “at least 10 points.”

“He got people to vote for a guy they didn’t like because they like him more,” he says, calling it an “incredibly impressive feat.”

Even more impressive is that Trump was able to accomplish this despite rural Iowans suffering the most from the rise in diesel prices thanks to the U.S.’ ongoing conflict with Iran. The fact that Feenstra only narrowly lost to Lahn is proof of how deep Iowa’s Trump loyalty runs.

Lesson #5: The generational divide is real, and it’s here.

“What we saw is Feenstra won the oldest of voters, and Zach Lahn won every other group,” says Deace.

“If you’re 65 or older, you narrowly voted for Randy Feenstra, and if you were under 65, you narrowly voted for Zach Lahn,” he continues, noting that this same dynamic played out in the Thomas Massie-Ed Gallrein race.

Deace interprets this as proof of the “generational divide” within the Republican voter base.

Lesson #6: Reports of the demise of TPUSA continue to be greatly exaggerated.

Since the atrocious assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk in September 2025, several outlets have reported that the nonprofit, which is heavily credited with helping Trump get re-elected in 2024, is losing influence.

But Deace says Lahn’s victory debunks this claim.

Immediately after Trump endorsed Feenstra, TPUSA formally endorsed Lahn, which Deace speculates was not a counter-endorsement but rather coincidental timing.

Even though this was the first time TPUSA has ever gone against Trump, the organization stuck with the endorsement and went “all in,” with door-knockers and full effort the weekend leading up to the primary, proving TPUSA is still a strong, committed organization.

Deace calls it “a helmet sticker for TPUSA.”

Lesson #7: If you don’t come in with your money or already have high name ID, you probably can’t beat the establishment in a statewide election.

Deace argues that in today’s environment, it’s almost impossible for a first-time candidate like Adam Steen to win a statewide race unless he comes with wealth (like Lahn) or already has high name recognition — because campaigns are very expensive.

The other factor at play is Trump’s “king” power. His endorsement holds so much weight that major donors and organizations are scared to back anyone else, fearing that Trump might endorse an opponent and make the investment worthless.

That’s why Feenstra, who was “as dead as Star Wars” on the Thursday before the primary, almost won, says Deace. Trump’s last-second endorsement was powerful enough to boost him from hopeless to the narrow runner-up.

Lesson #8: Nominate candidates who energize and unify the base.

Deace argues that Lahn is a much stronger general election candidate than Randy Feenstra because Iowa Republicans have a huge built-in advantage: “over 200,000 more registered voters than Democrats.”

Feenstra, he says, “disappointed” and “dissed” the conservative base as a congressman, which would negatively affect voter turnout. At the same time, Democrats would do what they always do and call him “the worst, most Nazi, most homophobic, transphobic, racist that’s ever racisted and transphobited.”

With Lahn, however, the base is actually excited and unified, meaning more Republicans will actually show up to vote in November.

“With Zach, we have a chance to control what we can control — mobilize, unite our base, inspire our base with messaging they want to vote for, not branding they want to vote against,” says Deace.

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Steve deace, Donald trump, Steve deace show, Randy feenstra, Zach lahn, Iowa 

A disturbing discovery was made by police at a Minnesota home after a 14-year-old girl was reported missing from her school on May 26.

The parents of the girl called the Maplewood Police Department to report her missing, and the girl’s father told police the girl might have been at her friend’s home in Oakdale.

‘Her whole top half is out, and I’m like, “Whoa, what’s going on here? Why are you naked in front of a child?”‘

Police said they investigated the home and spoke to a woman named Angeline Olson. She told them the girl was not at the home but that she would take the girl home if she showed up there.

Police then said they returned to the home after a disturbing report from a neighbor at about 1:30 a.m.

“I came outside to smoke, and I’m minding my own business, and all of a sudden this little girl comes running past out her house, right in front of me, half naked,” said Teaira Vennes, the woman who called police.

“Next thing you know, Angel’s out the bushes, and Angel comes out naked. Like, her whole top half is out, and I’m like, ‘Whoa, what’s going on here? Why are you naked in front of a child?'” she added.

Police said the Olsons were argumentative and defied orders, so they were detained.

When police searched the home, they found the girl in a cardboard box that was under a pile of clothes in the Olson couple’s bedroom.

Police then obtained warrants to search the couple’s digital devices and found sexually explicit videos with the Olsons and the victim.

The couple was arrested, and 47-year-old Angeline Olson was charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Andrew Olson, 49, was charged with three counts of possessing child sexual abuse material.

Their neighbors, who were outraged and terrified by the incident, told KARE-TV that Child Protective Services had taken away their teenage children prior to the incident.

“It’s not just another story; it’s another f**king victim. It’s another little girl,” Vennes said. “After going through this, I couldn’t never imagine that happening to my daughter.”

RELATED: Indiana teen targeted victims across several states for child sex abuse through social media, cops say

“My client is presumed innocent and looks forward to clearing his name where it counts: in court,” said John Chitwood, the lawyer for Andrew Olson.

Andrew Olson faces up to 18 years in prison if convicted, while Angeline Olson faces up to 30 years if convicted.

“They need to be locked up. I hope that they are locked up for a very, very long time,” Vennes added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Sexually explicit videos, Missing teen, Child sex abuse, Crime 

This week, as critics lined up to call Steven Spielberg’s June 12 film “Disclosure Day” the best thing he has made in 20 years, Glenn Beck made a point on his program that matters more than the movie.

The real story, Beck argued, is not whether Spielberg is running a quiet psychological operation for the Pentagon. The real story is that we have entered what Beck calls “the death of free will” — an age in which the device in your pocket studies what frightens you, flatters you, and keeps you watching, then feeds each of us a private version of reality until no two Americans can agree on what is true.

A faction that insists on deciding how much reality you can handle and an algorithm that quietly decides which reality you will see are two versions of the same problem.

He is right. I would push the point one step further.

That is precisely why the fight over UFO disclosure matters more than it appears.

I am an attorney by training and a California public school science teacher of 19 years. I have published 20 books, all on governmental and corporate corruption, and none of them touched anything I would have called fringe. Two and a half years ago, I co-wrote “Catastrophic Disclosure: The Deep State, Aliens, and the Truth” with documentary filmmaker Michael Mazzola.

I came to the subject as a skeptic. What convinced me something serious was being hidden was not a sighting or a leaked photograph. It was a congressional hearing.

On July 26, 2023, three credentialed witnesses — Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch and Navy pilots Ryan Graves and David Fravor — testified before the House Oversight Committee. Anyone who has covered Capitol Hill knows witnesses are vetted exhaustively before they testify under oath.

Grusch described an active military program of UFO crash recovery, reverse engineering, and the retrieval of “biologic” remains. He said he was denied access when he asked for it. Either the witnesses were lying, or the government was. As a lawyer, my instinct was to look for what we call best evidence: the earliest accounts, made before anyone had reason to shade the truth.

That brings me to the documents.

RELATED: Pentagon publishes first tranche of ‘hidden’ UFO files

AFP/Getty Images

On May 8, the Pentagon began releasing what it calls “never-before-seen” files on unidentified anomalous phenomena under a new program called PURSUE. The first tranche, roughly 162 documents, includes Apollo-era astronaut sightings, decades-old military records, and pilot encounter reports over the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. More tranches are promised on a rolling basis. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called it “the first in what will be an ongoing joint declassification and release effort.”

One document, dated December 19, 1947, is a letter from H.M. McCoy, the Air Force chief of intelligence, transmitting reports on what were then called “flying discs.” McCoy wrote that continued reports from qualified observers still made the matter one of concern.

A second document — a September 23, 1947, assessment by Lt. Gen. Nathan Twining of the Air Materiel Command — is blunter. Twining concluded that “the phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.” He described disc-shaped objects roughly the size of manned aircraft, with metallic surfaces, maneuvering in ways that suggested intelligent control at estimated speeds above 300 knots.

That was the Air Force’s own view in 1947. In 2026, our best and brightest still cannot give the public a credible answer. We have walked on the moon. We have edited human DNA. Yet, we still cannot explain what military pilots record on infrared cameras over the Persian Gulf.

Credit where it is due. The May 8 release would not have happened without the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), and the persistence of Reps. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) and Eric Burlison (R-Mo.). President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth deserve credit for the directive that made it possible. This is real progress and the kind of transparency that should not be a partisan question.

But it is a first step, not a final one.

When I started the book, my co-author described a quiet war inside the national security state between two factions. One wanted “controlled” disclosure, a careful release at a pace the public could absorb. The other wanted “full” disclosure, the entire record at once. The first faction feared the second would trigger what it privately called catastrophic disclosure — a revelation severe enough to disrupt the basic institutions of public life.

RELATED: The real mystery isn’t UFOs — it’s what the government won’t explain

Moor Studio/Getty Images

What that faction fears the public will learn, I do not know. I will not pretend I do.

Here is where Beck’s warning and my book meet. A faction that insists on deciding how much reality you can handle and an algorithm that quietly decides which reality you will see are two versions of the same problem. Both take away the same thing: the right to look at the evidence and judge it for yourself.

Beck worries that the machine will hand each of us a custom world and convince us we discovered it on our own. The defense against that is not a better algorithm. It is a shared, documented, public record — primary sources and sworn testimony any citizen can read and weigh.

That is exactly what disclosure produces. It is also exactly what the “controlled” faction wants to ration.

In an age when truth is splintered into a million private feeds, a common set of facts is not a small thing. It may be the only thing.

On June 12, Spielberg releases “Disclosure Day.” He has spent his career telling stories about contact, from “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” to “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.” He is a serious filmmaker with serious sources. The question is whether the disclosure he puts on screen looks like what the government released May 8 — or like something larger it is still holding back.

I hope it is the larger one.

Beck asks what is real. In a free country, the answer starts with the documents.

The American public can handle them. We have earned them.

​Ufos, Steven spielberg, Disclosure day, Aliens, Pentagon, Glenn beck, Extraterrestrial life, Opinion & analysis