blaze media

Thug picks wrong victim to allegedly point weapon at, chase — and the tables painfully turn on him

Deputies from the Oneida County Sheriff’s Office in upstate New York responded to a reported physical altercation involving a weapon in Vernon on Monday evening, officials said. Vernon is about 40 minutes east of Syracuse.

It was reported that an individual in the 3300 block of Simmons Road was acting erratically and pointed what was believed to be a handgun at two victims, officials said.

‘That didn’t work out so well for him apparently.’

The two victims tried to retreat into a nearby residence, but the suspect advanced toward them with the weapon, officials said.

A fight then broke out between the suspect and one of the victims, officials said, and the victim managed to get the weapon away from the suspect.

Arriving deputies took the suspect into custody without issue, officials said.

RELATED: Video: Woman pulls male intruder out of her car, throws him to the ground with ease — while her amazed husband watches

Image source: Oneida County (N.Y.) Sheriff’s Office

The suspect was identified as Glenn A. Wallis, 40, of Vernon, officials said, adding that Wallis was taken to the Kurt B. Wyman Law Enforcement Building.

Wallis was charged with two counts of menacing in the second degree — a class A misdemeanor — along with one count of harassment in the second degree, which officials defined as a “violation.”

However, officials said a member of the Criminal Investigation Unit also charged Wallis with one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, which is a class D felony.

According to WUTR-TV, the weapon that Wallis was brandishing was a pistol-style pellet gun.

Wallis was then taken to and held at the Oneida County Correctional Facility to await a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday, officials said.

Wallis was still behind bars Wednesday morning, according to the jail record Blaze News reviewed. The jail record also indicates that Wallis’ criminal possession of a weapon charge is a “previous conviction.”

Comments under WUTR’s story about the incident on Yahoo News were none too kind to the arrestee:

“He appears to have brought a toy gun to an old-fashion[ed] beat down,” one commenter said.”Normal behavior for those a little further down the evolutionary ladder,” another commenter wrote.”A pellet gun? He should thank the Good Lord it didn’t happen in some areas of Texas! He also looks VERY good for the circumstances, ’cause those two victims had mercy on him. There are folks who would’ve beat him TWICE as hard because it was a pellet gun!” another commenter stated.”That didn’t work out so well for him apparently,” another commenter said.”This is what FAFO looks like!” another commenter declared.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Crime thwarted, New york state, Arrest, Physical attack, Gun threat, Turning the tables, Attacker beaten, Vernon, Menacing, Criminal possession of a weapon, Harrassment, Crime 

blaze media

Rookie Patriots running back calls out global persecution of Christians: ‘Will you stand with them?’

New England Patriots running back TreVeyon Henderson decided to bring attention to the worldwide persecution of Christians while on the field Monday night.

The rookie from Virginia decided to promote his faith through the NFL’s My Cause My Cleats program, which allows players to champion a cause or nonprofit of their choosing on their cleats during games.

‘I’m living proof of what the mercy of God can do.’

On “Monday Night Football,” Henderson rushed for 67 yards on just 11 carries in a 33-15 win over the New York Giants. During the game, the 23-year-old wore cleats dedicated to persecuted Christians around the world.

Henderson partnered with the Global Christian Relief Fund to promote messages like, “Pray for Persecuted Christians,” “Faith Endures,” and Bible passage Matthew 5:10: “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

The shoe design featured raised crosses, praying hands, and blood drops to symbolize the blood of Christ and the blood of martyrs. Additionally the cleats featured a map highlighting regions around the world where Christians are persecuted, including Central America, Southeast Asia, and most of Africa.

RELATED: Rookie NFL QB declared the new Obama — and the ‘most powerful black man since 2009’

FOXBOROUGH, MASS. – DECEMBER 1: A detailed view of the My Cause My Cleats worn by TreVeyon Henderson #32 of the New England Patriots prior to the game against the New York Giants. (Photo by Kathryn Riley/Getty Images)

The same day, Henderson shared a video on X from Global Christian Relief with the caption, “Will you stand with them?”

The video showcased Christian suffering from around the world.

The Ohio State alumnus has not been shy about showing his faith publicly. The pinned post on his X page from 2024 came at the height of his college career and focused on a strong Christian message.

“I’m living proof of what the mercy of God can do, for all the things I’ve done and the choices made that I regret I would still be lost,” Henderson wrote last July.

“But Jesus took the old me and he made it new, that’s what the mercy of God can do,” the star added, before citing Ephesians 2:4-5, “But God is so rich in mercy, and he loved us so much, that even though we were dead because of our sins, he gave us life when he raised Christ from the dead. (It is only by God’s grace that you have been saved!)”

RELATED: Army, Navy release stunning uniforms ahead of historic matchup honoring America’s 250th birthday

The support for persecuted Christians has gained mainstream momentum recently, even from the likes of platinum-selling rapper Nicki Minaj.

At the beginning of November, she shared a post from President Donald Trump and wrote that she felt a “deep sense of gratitude” that she can “freely worship God” in the United States. The president’s post said that Christianity was under threat in Nigeria with thousands of Christians being killed.

Minaj, whose real name Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, took her cause to the United Nations at an event organized by U.S. entities.

“In Nigeria, Christians are being targeted,” Minaj said, according to the BBC. “Churches have been burned, families have been torn apart … simply because of how they pray.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Faith, Fearless, Nfl, Football, Christianity, Cause, Nonprofit, Nigeria, Sports 

blaze media

‘I’m giving up pretending to be a man’: Methodist pastor tells churchgoers he is ‘transitioning,’ throws on a wig

The woke pastor of the North Chili United Methodist Church in Upstate New York recently surprised his congregation with the news that he plans to masquerade as a woman full-time and take cross-sex drugs.

No longer sporting the beard he wore in his headshot photo on the United Methodist of Upper New York website, Rev. Phillip Phaneuf, 51, donned rainbow stoles and told his congregation on Nov. 23, “I am inviting you to join me in a season of creative transformation for myself and, I think, for all of us.”

‘They do not support me.’

“I’m transitioning. I’m affirming and saying to all of you that I am transgender,” continued Phaneuf. “The best way to put this is that I’m not becoming a woman; I’m giving up pretending to be a man.”

The Methodist pastor, who is hardly the UMC’s first transvestite pastor, called for the Holy Spirit’s involvement in the process and cautioned his parishioners about the “fear of the unknown” in such circumstances.

In an apparent attempt to assuage such fear, Phaneuf told churchgoers that while he’s changing his name to “Phillippa,” they could still call him “Phil”; that his personality wouldn’t change; and that he would continue to prioritize “belonging.” He noted, however, that he was now identifying as an “asexual” and that his face, name, body hair, voice, and clothes would change — adding that there is no such thing as “girls’ clothes or boys’ clothes.”

Phaneuf — who claims his pronouns are now “she, her” — said that he wouldn’t become the “pronoun police,” as he expects that no one will “misgender or mispronoun out of malice.”

The legacy media appears keen to respect Phaneuf’s wishes, with even the New York Post playing along and Fox News Digital refraining from using his correct pronouns.

RELATED: ‘Not medicine — it’s malpractice’: Trump HHS buries child sex-change regime with damning report

Photo by Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The Methodist pastor claimed during his sermon that the scriptures, Methodist theology, his district superintendent, his bishop, and the UMC are “okay” with his transition.

At the expense of alienating thousands of congregations, the United Methodist Church has accommodated LGBT activists’ demands in recent years. For instance, the 2024 General Conference removed the church’s 40-year ban on non-straight clergy last year and dropped the prohibition against performing same-sex weddings.

While the pastor claimed that his superiors were receptive to his transvestism, he told his congregation that his parents were “absolutely not.”

“They texted me this morning and asked for me to tell you all that they do not support me and that they have chosen their convictions and their beliefs over supporting their child,” said Phaneuf.

Despite his parents’ alleged rejection of his lifestyle choice, the pastor was quick to lean into his superficial female role-play, getting his ears pierced, wearing makeup, and throwing on a wig.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​United methodist church, Methodist, Christian, Lgbt, Transgender, Trans, Leftism, Gender ideology, Philip phaneuf, Politics 

blaze media

Do birth control pills make women all think the same?

Could hormonal birth control be turning women into NPCs?

That’s “non-player characters,” by the way. You may remember the meme, which reached the height of its popularity a few years ago and has largely disappeared now.

Only now, many decades after it was unleashed on the world, are we starting to understand hormonal contraception’s effects more fully.

The NPC is a person who lacks any kind of unique identity. Who they are is completely determined by their social circumstances and by the values and information fed to them by a narrow range of approved sources: the government, scientists and “experts,” the mainstream media, Hollywood and Netflix, handpicked celebrities and influencers.

The NPC exercises no independent judgment, no free-thinking of their own. They simply do as they’re told, and they get very angry if you don’t do the same.

The NPC is represented by a special Wojak — a cartoon person — with grey skin and generic facial features: pindot eyes, a semi-triangle nose, and a horizontal line for a mouth.

During the pandemic, for example, the NPC meme was used to mock everyone who chose to “trust the science” unquestioningly. It was also widely used in Donald Trump’s first presidency to describe devotees of the mainstream media who repeated its various platitudes and mantras ad infinitum — “orange man bad,” “diversity is our strength,” and so on.

That sync-ing feeling

A new study suggests that hormonal birth control reduces the “functional individuality” of women’s brains, making them more alike with one another. Making women NPCs, in other words.

Researchers analyzed the brain activity of 26 users by means of MRI scans. They looked in particular at something called “functional connectome fingerprinting,” a method of identifying patterns of brain connectivity that are distinct to each person.

They found that while each woman’s brain patterns remained identifiable, the overall distinctiveness of those patterns was reduced by hormonal birth control.

In basic terms, there was a general “dampening” or “normalizing” effect on the brain as a whole.

The changes affected certain networks more than others, though: networks involved in executive function, muscle control, perception and attention, and the so-called “default mode network,” which is active during various kinds of introspection, including daydreaming, thinking about oneself and others, remembering the past, and planning for the future.

The default-mode network is central to the creation of an “inner self” and a coherent “internal narrative.”

In other words, a distinct identity.

RELATED: Time for RFK Jr. to expose the dark truth about the pill

Rattankun Thongbun via iStock/Getty Images

Mood for thought

In truth, I might have been exaggerating just a little bit when I said birth control could be turning women into NPCs. Yes, we’ve seen changes in particular regions of the brain that are associated with particular functions, but the researchers didn’t investigate the actual effects of these changes — I’ve simply inferred what they might be.

The researchers did note evidence that the changes were associated with increases in negative moods, which many of the participants recorded, but we can’t say much more than that, at least not yet.

What we need is more research. This might look at direct evidence of the effects of hormonal birth control on female behavior, preferences, and character: things like individual decision-making processes and personality traits like conformity.

Brainsplaining

There are plenty of studies that already do that kind of thing with hormones, especially testosterone. Some have shown that a dose of testosterone will make a man more likely to stand up for himself and defend a minority opinion, even in the face of disapproval from the majority. Studies have also shown that testosterone makes men more comfortable with inequality and hierarchy, which is usually couched as an “antisocial effect,” but when you remember that virtually every society in history has been hierarchical, except our own — at least in principle — that doesn’t really make much sense.

Still, we have every reason to be concerned about the effects of hormonal birth control on women’s brains and their behavior. As the study notes, more than 150 million women worldwide use hormonal birth control, and if it is changing the way their brains work, that obviously could mean significant effects in the aggregate, with the potential to touch more or less every aspect of life, from personal relationships to politics.

Retrograde research

Of course, this is a controversial stance to take, even as evidence mounts. The drug makers don’t want to lose money if women stop taking hormonal birth control, and the champions of “liberation” don’t want women to stop either. The entire sexual revolution was kickstarted by the pill, and “equality” as we understand it is predicated on women having total conscious control over their bodies.

Anybody who says women shouldn’t take hormonal birth control, or just that they should think carefully before they do, is immediately denounced as retrograde, sexist, or, as we’ve seen with recent viral social-media trends, a purveyor of dangerous “medical misinformation.” And that includes women who’ve been on hormonal birth control themselves and quit, and female medical professionals like Dr. Sarah Hill, the author of the very well-reasoned and evidenced book, “This Is Your Brain on Birth Control.”

My new book, “The Last Men: Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity,” is a call to get serious about the effects of hormones on politics. Deadly serious. Testosterone, in particular, is rapidly disappearing, in large part because we’ve created a world that’s reliant on thousands of chemicals and substances that mimic the “female” hormone estrogen. We had created that world long before we even knew what many of those chemicals are, let alone what they do to us.

The same is true of hormonal contraception. Only now, many decades after it was unleashed on the world, are we starting to understand its effects more fully, having built a world that is reliant upon it to function.

Our hormonal interventions remain clumsy and short-sighted. In truth, we’ve not come all that far from the first bright spark who decided to lop off a bull’s testicles to bring it under control. In that first brutal act, endocrinology — the science of hormones — was born, a science still very much in its infancy.

​Maha, Birth control pills, The pill, Hormonal birth control, Testosterone, Health, Lifestyle, Women, Rfk jr, Make america healthy again 

blaze media

How Texas slammed the gate on Big Tech’s censorship stampede

Texas just sent a blunt message to Silicon Valley: You don’t get to censor Texans and then run home to California.

In a world where Big Tech routinely decides who may speak and who must be silenced, Defense Distributed v. YouTube, Google, and Alphabet has become a defining moment in the national fight over digital free expression. The shock isn’t the censorship at issue; it’s the fact that Big Tech — for once — lost.

In a time when Americans are desperate for leaders willing to stand up to media and tech conglomerates, Texas showed what real resolve looks like.

Defense Distributed, a Texas company, committed the unpardonable offense of promoting the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Our videos and ads — some of them simply announcing court victories — were throttled, suppressed, or removed by YouTube and Google. None of this surprised us. These platforms built vast empires on controlling information and burying viewpoints that fall outside their ideology.

Texas prepared for this fight

The surprise is that Texas saw this coming and armed itself for the conflict. HB 20 — now Chapter 143A of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code — directly prohibits viewpoint-based censorship by major platforms. The law doesn’t hint, suggest, or politely advise. It states outright: Social media companies may not censor Texans for their viewpoints, and lawsuits brought under this chapter stay in Texas courts no matter what boilerplate corporate contracts say.

So when Defense Distributed filed suit, YouTube and Google reached for their favorite escape route: forum-selection clauses that force nearly every challenger into California courts, where Big Tech enjoys home-field advantage. It’s a delay tactic, a cost-inflation tactic, a shield against accountability — and it almost always works.

But Texas slammed that door shut before they reached it.

No escape

HB 20 doesn’t merely frown on these clauses; it voids them. The statute declares that any attempt to waive its protections violates Texas public policy — public policy the law describes as “of the highest importance.” The legislature anticipated Big Tech’s usual playbook and locked the gates years in advance.

The federal court recognized this. Judge Alan Albright ruled that transferring the case to California would directly undermine Texas’ strong public policy. Under federal law, courts cannot enforce a forum-selection clause that contradicts a state’s deeply rooted interests — especially when the legislature spells those interests out with the clarity found in HB 20.

Silicon Valley does not hear the word “no” very often. Big Tech’s money, influence, and political allies usually clear the path. But in a federal courtroom in the Lone Star State, Texas’ commitment to protecting its citizens from ideological censorship outweighed Silicon Valley’s customary dominance. The court refused to let YouTube and Google drag the case back to California.

The fight stayed in Texas — exactly where the legislature intended.

A national shift and a model for states

The timing matters. Americans now understand that Big Tech can shape elections, suppress dissent, and curate truth itself. HB 20 was mocked by the press, attacked by activists, and targeted by corporate lobbyists from the moment it passed. Yet today, it stands as one of the most potent legal tools in the country’s fight against digital censorship.

HB 20 is no longer just a statute; it is proof that a state with conviction can push back and win.

RELATED: Big Tech CEOs should leave policy to the politicians

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

This victory is more than a procedural ruling. It affirms that Big Tech’s era of unchallenged authority is not inevitable. Defense Distributed didn’t merely keep our lawsuit in Texas; we preserved the principle that powerful corporations cannot hide their censorship behind “terms of service” fine print.

Texas drew a line in the sand, and — for once — Silicon Valley stopped.

In a time when Americans are desperate for leaders willing to stand up to media and tech conglomerates, Texas showed what real resolve looks like. This ruling promises that citizens still have a fighting chance, that speech still matters, and that even the world’s largest corporations remain subject to the laws of a state determined to defend its people.

​Texas, Big tech, Censorship, Opinion & analysis, Defense distributed, Second amendment, First amendment, Youtube, Google, Alphabet, Hb 20, Legislature, The courts, Silicon valley, Elections, States