The Federal Bureau of Investigation announced the arrest of a suspect in the shooting and killing of Charlie Kirk, and there is a flurry of speculation about the man’s motivations.

Here’s what we know so far about 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.

The messages engraved on the bullets appeared to refer to anti-fascist slogans, leading some to speculate that he was a part of the Antifa movement.

Robinson lived in Washington, Utah, which is about 260 miles away from the location where Kirk was shot. He has two younger brothers, and his mother works as a social worker.

Early reports said his father worked for the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, but the office has denied the claim on social media. Other reports indicated he works in construction. A spokesperson from the sheriff’s office told Blaze News that the father of the suspect was not employed there and had never been employed there at any time.

Robinson was last registered to vote in 2021 but had no party affiliation and is listed as inactive, meaning he did not vote in recent elections. He had reportedly become interested in politics over the last few years.

Robinson attended Utah State University, where he was enrolled as an engineering major, but he got a leave of absence after attending for only one semester. He had been enrolled at the Dixie Technical College in St. George in the electrical apprenticeship program.

Law enforcement officials say that he arrived at Utah Valley University at about 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday and was caught on surveillance video arriving as well as leaving.

Robinson allegedly discussed the murder plot on Discord under the name “Tyler” in messages provided by his roommate to law enforcement officials. The messages reportedly included talk of his obtaining a rifle left at a “drop point,” as well as references to the unique scope on the gun and the engraving on the bullets.

The messages engraved on the bullets appeared to refer to anti-fascist slogans, leading some to speculate that he was a part of the Antifa movement.

“If you read this you are gay LMAO,” read one of the messages, according to Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R).

Another bullet inscription referred to a “bulge,” which many say comes from a popular meme mocking “furries” as well as transgender people.

He had reportedly told his family that Kirk was “full of hate and spreading hate” at one point before the shooting, Cox said.

Robinson was arrested without incident on Thursday evening by U.S. marshals at about 10:30. He was wearing clothing that matched clothing worn by the shooter on footage from UVU. He had allegedly told his family he would rather die than surrender, but they persuaded him to turn himself in.

He has a limited digital footprint, and some of the content on a family Facebook account has been scrubbed from the internet.

Robinson faces a charge of aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, and obstruction of justice, and if convicted he could face the death penalty.

RELATED: ‘It’s the death of free speech!’ Jay Leno expresses his shock at killing of Charlie Kirk

An image on social media showed Robinson with a Donald Trump costume for Halloween in 2017, when he would have been about 14 years old. However, the image documented at the Daily Mail appears to show him costumed to appear as if he’s riding on Trump.

His arrest was announced by the president on Fox News.

“I think, with a high degree of certainty, we have him — in custody,” he said. “Everyone did a great job. We worked with the local police, the governor. Everybody did a great job.”

This is a developing story.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Tyler robinson, Charlie kirk assassination, Who killed charlie kirk, Social media imprint, Politics 

Charlie Kirk’s assassination was an atrocity — for his family, his friends, his supporters, and America. I haven’t been this shaken by the death of someone I didn’t personally know in a long time.

As an ex-U.S. Army Special Operations sniper, I’ve seen a lot of speculation online, and I want to cut through some of the noise. Even following the arrest Friday morning of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson for the crime, people are throwing around claims that this was “state-sponsored” or a “hired hit man paid by a political group.” We don’t know that, nor do we have any evidence pointing to that. In fact, we had ample evidence pointing to somebody just like Robinson: a leftist college dropout.

Charlie Kirk wasn’t taken down by a sniper, or a covert team, or a shadowy state actor. He was killed by a bitter amateur with a rifle and a desperate need to matter.

I won’t call this shooter an “assassin.” That word carries a mystique. It gives a pathetic loser like this validation. He doesn’t deserve the title. He wasn’t an assassin. He wasn’t a sniper. He wasn’t a pro. He was simply an amateur shooter who decided to take a life better than his own and become a killer.

The shot

The facts are simple. The distance was under 200 yards. He used a bolt-action .30-06 Mauser with a scope of at least 8x power. That’s a very easy shot — so easy that I could teach a child to make it in under an hour, and I am not exaggerating at all.

You don’t need military training, hunting experience, or any special skill. The .30-06 is a powerful round, and if you watched the sad, horrific video of Charlie being hit, you saw how devastating it is.

The round appeared to strike Charlie in the neck. Maybe it hit his chest and exited near the neck, but what it didn’t do was hit his head. A professional would have gone for the head. If this killer wanted maximum shock value — which he clearly did — a head shot would have given him that. Either he missed low or he aimed for the chest because he didn’t have the skill level for a headshot.

Either way: amateur hour.

The gun and the tactics

The rifle says it all. A Mauser .30-06 bolt-action is the tool of a casual hunter, not a professional killer. Even on a budget, a serious shooter would have picked better gear. To call that weapon “professional” is laughable. It’s like rolling up to an F1 race in a Honda Accord.

Even more ridiculous than his gear choice were his tactics or lack thereof. He positioned himself on a rooftop in black, wearing a tactical vest. That’s straight from the “Call of Duty in Mom’s basement” playbook. A professional wouldn’t be spotted on camera by kids on the ground asking, “Should someone be up there?”

A pro would have been invisible. Or, if seen, instantly forgettable. He would have used proper urban hiding techniques (I won’t detail them here). He wouldn’t have stood out in black tactical gear. He would have looked like a student or like someone with a legitimate reason to be where he was.

And then there’s the footage — clear, high-quality video of him at the school and hopping fences in a neighborhood. The FBI and local police had his face, which meant, in due course, they had him. This wasn’t a state-sponsored operator or “hit man.” It was an angry lone amateur.

Who he is

When I wrote this column Thursday night, I speculated that the shooter would turn out to be a lonely, angry kid desperate to be somebody. A nobody who wanted attention, validation, fame. He thought killing someone hated by one side of the political spectrum would make him loved by the other. This was about belonging. About being noticed.

And that’s where the media and social media come in. They amplify these monsters. They hand them the spotlight. And for a young man like this, that’s gasoline on the fire.

Sound familiar? Donald Trump barely survived an attempt when another college kid fired at him. Add Luigi Mangione, and that makes three young men in recent memory trying to kill or successfully killing public figures. We’re watching a disturbing trend.

Political assassination — or something new?

Yes, Kirk was killed for his political beliefs. But he wasn’t a politician. He held no office. That’s why this atrocity might mark something new: the first assassination of an influencer.

Think about that. Kirk wasn’t targeted for power, or for policy, but for his ability to influence. If that’s where we are now — where speech alone makes you a target — we’ve stepped into very dangerous territory.

The slippery slope of ‘hateful rhetoric’

Almost immediately, politicians and pundits said, “This is what happens when you use rhetoric like his.” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) went as far as accusing Kirk of posting “hateful rhetoric,” as if that justifies what happened. That logic is as dangerous as the act itself.

If hateful rhetoric makes someone fair game, then by her own standard, someone could make the same judgment about Omar’s words. Would she see her own assassination as justified? Of course not. And that’s the slippery slope: When violence is framed as acceptable because someone decides speech is hateful.

That’s exactly why the First Amendment exists — to protect all speech, even the speech you hate. Because once a group can ban “hateful” speech, they can ban anything they dislike. That’s how dictatorships start. And it’s not a coincidence that the loudest calls to ban “hateful speech” come from people who want more control.

RELATED: Antifa, gay furries, and bomb codes? What the engravings on the Kirk assassination bullets may mean

Photo by MELISSA MAJCHRZAK/AFP via Getty Images

Bottom line: Charlie Kirk wasn’t assassinated by a professional. He wasn’t taken down by a sniper, or a covert team, or a shadowy state actor. He was killed by a bitter amateur with a rifle and a desperate need to matter.

That makes his death no less horrifying — but it should change the way we understand it. Because this wasn’t just about politics. This was about influence, attention, and validation. And it signals a very dark turn in where we are headed.

​Opinion & analysis, Opinion, Charlie, Charlie kirk assassination, Charlie kirk, Charlie kirk assassination attempt, Murder, Sniper, Delta force, Rifle, Leftist, Antifa 

Best-selling author Stephen King was forced to walk back and apologize for troubling comments he made about Charlie Kirk just hours after the conservative juggernaut was gunned down in cold blood.

Kirk was assassinated on Wednesday at Utah Valley University while the Turning Point USA founder kicked off his college campus tour.

‘Hey Stephen King, you are more monstrous than any of the characters you ever came up with.’

As Blaze News reported, numerous leftists made repugnant remarks regarding the murder of Kirk.

King wrote on the X social media platform, “The motivation of the man who shot Charlie Kirk isn’t clear (although he’s probably mentally unstable — duh). What is clear is it was another example of American gun violence.”

King — an outspoken liberal and donor to the Democratic Party — then stoked division by attacking Kirk after the conservative commentator died from being shot in the neck.

King claimed of Kirk, “He advocated stoning gays to death. Just sayin’.”

King’s scurrilous remarks about the deceased married father of two ignited a firestorm, including threats of a lawsuit.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) proposed, “Please share if you agree that the estate of Charlie Kirk should sue Stephen King for defamation over this heinously false accusation. He’s crossed a line. It will prove costly.”

Fox News host Laura Ingraham replied, “Stephen King is a sad, bitter man.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) declared, “You are a horrible, evil, twisted liar. No, he did not. Your party — which you shamelessly shilled for — sent $100 billion to the Ayatollah … who does routinely murder homosexuals. Why are you so dishonest & filled with hate?”

Conservative commentator Dave Rubin added, “Hey Stephen King, you are more monstrous than any of the characters you ever came up with. Charlie was never anything but kind to me and my husband. We broke bread many times, and he never treated us with anything other than respect. He even came to our house not too long ago, and plot twist, didn’t throw rocks at us. Write about that sometime, you hack.”

RELATED: New York Times continues SPLC demonization of Charlie Kirk, accuses him of provocation

Kirk believed that marriage should be between a man and a woman, but he did not have hate toward the LGBTQ community.

Kirk said in November 2019, “I believe marriage is one man, one woman. Also, gay people should be welcome in the conservative movement. As Christians, we are called to love everyone. I will always stand against people who wish to establish their own personal values as a reason to kick others out of our movement.”

Kirk applauded the Trump administration for launching a “worldwide effort to decriminalize homosexuality in 70+ countries where it’s still illegal.”

Kirk slammed Saudi Arabia for allegedly executing LGBT people and openly opposed the stoning of homosexuals.

The Turning Point USA founder proclaimed in July 2016, “Remember: when Hillary says she supports LGBT issues, she accepted millions from countries that stone and kill and imprison gay people.”

Kirk wrote in April 2019, “Will Ilhan Omar condemn the gays being stoned to death, sanctioned by the government in Brunei under Sharia Law? The left claims it is hate speech to even ask that question. Why is she so silent on this?”

King was likely referencing a video clip from 2024, when Kirk read a Bible passage from Leviticus to illustrate how passages in the Bible can be cherry-picked to present a certain narrative.

King admitted that he made a mistake of “reading something on Twitter without fact-checking” the claim, and he promised that it “won’t happen again.”

King made several apologies on social media.

“I apologize for saying Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gays,” King stated. “What he actually demonstrated was how some people cherry-pick Biblical passages.”

“I have apologized. Charlie Kirk never advocated stoning gays to death,” King said.

The horror author added, “I was wrong, and I apologize. I have deleted the post.”

Gad Saad — an evolutionary behavioral scientist — told King, “Dear Stephen King, while it is laudable that you have apologized for your post, I would urge you to do the following: Examine why you had the impulse to post such a reaction when a young man had been assassinated. That you succumbed to your dark impulses speaks to your having been parasitized by ideological capture. Your hate for Republicans was greater than your empathy for a wife and two young children who had lost their anchor. Charlie was a lovely human being that did not deserve your nastiness. Never let your humanity be overridden by your orgiastic tribalism.”

You can keep up to date with the latest developments in the assassination of Charlie Kirk here.

RELATED: MSNBC analyst Matthew Dowd fired over Charlie Kirk comments

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Charlie kirk, Charlie kirk assassination, Rip charlie kirk, Twitter reactions, Charlie kirk reactions, Stephen king, Mike lee, Ted cruz, Laura ingraham, Dave rubin, News 

President Donald Trump is continuing his crime crackdown in blue cities across the country after a successful 30-day run in the nation’s capital.

Trump announced he will be deploying the National Guard to Memphis, Tennessee, a crime-ridden, Democrat-run city in a deep-red state. Despite the often partisan divide on Trump’s crime crackdown, the president said that both Republican Gov. Bill Lee of Tennessee and Democratic Mayor Paul Young were on board with his decision.

‘I would have preferred going to Chicago.’

“We’re going to Memphis,” Trump said on “Fox & Friends” on Friday. “Memphis is deeply troubled.”

“The mayor is happy, he’s a Democrat …” Trump added. “The governor’s happy. Deeply troubled. We’re going to fix that just like we did Washington.”

RELATED: Mainstream media turns a blind eye to vicious stabbing of young Ukrainian woman

— (@)

As Trump noted, both Lee and Young seemed open to ameliorating crime in Memphis and have vowed to work alongside federal law enforcement to ensure that safety improves.

“Earlier this week, I was informed that the governor and the president were considering deploying the National Guard and other resources to Memphis,” Young said in a statement. “I am committed to working to ensure any efforts strengthen our community and build on our progress.”

“For months, I have been in constant communication with the Trump administration to develop a multi-phased, strategic plan to combat crime in Memphis, leveraging the full extent of both federal and state resources,” Lee said in a statement.

Lee outlined the changes that will be enacted by Trump’s crime crackdown with Young’s support. At the same time, Young said additional funding is the most pressing issue for the crime-ridden city.

“The next phase will include a comprehensive mission with the Tennessee National Guard, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Memphis Police Department, and other law enforcement agencies, and we are working closely with the Trump administration to determine the most effective role for each of these agencies to best serve Memphians,” Lee added.

“We agree with Governor Lee that effective support for Memphis comes through focused initiatives that deliver results like we have seen with the FBI, state troopers, and other law enforcement partnerships,” Young said. “What we need most are financial resources for intervention and prevention, additional patrol officers, and case support to strengthen MPD’s investigations.”

RELATED: Jasmine Crockett’s jaw-dropping defense of criminals: ‘They literally are trying to survive’

Photo by Joshua Lott/Getty Images

The crime crackdown was originally expected to take aim at Chicago, Illinois, which boasts some of the highest crime rates in the country. Trump himself admitted that Chicago would have been his first pick.

“I would have preferred going to Chicago,” Trump said.

Despite Trump’s willingness to reach across the aisle and help crime-ridden Chicago, Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker of Illinois repeatedly refused the offer.

“It’s disturbing that the President is hellbent [sic] on sending troops onto America’s streets,” Pritzker said in response to Trump sending the National Guard to Memphis. “Using those who serve in uniform as political props is insulting. None of this is normal.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Donald trump, National guard, Memphis, Chicago, Jb pritzker, Crime crackdown, Washington dc, Iryna zarutska, Bill lee, Paul young, Politics 

A law enforcement operation involving agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Chicago led to serious injuries for one officer and the fatal shooting of a suspect on Friday morning.

‘We are praying for the speedy recovery of our law enforcement officer.’

A Department of Homeland Security press release obtained by Blaze News revealed that an ICE officer was “seriously injured” during a traffic stop. The department described the stop as a targeted operation to arrest Silverio Villegas-Gonzalez.

The suspect was described as “a criminal illegal alien with a history of reckless driving” who entered the U.S. at an unknown date.

Villegas-Gonzalez allegedly “refused to follow law enforcement’s commands” and attempted to flee the scene in his vehicle, driving toward ICE officers. One officer was struck and dragged “a significant distance,” the DHS stated.

“Fearing for his own life, the officer fired his weapon,” the department said.

RELATED: Trump eyes National Guard deployment in Chicago — but is it constitutional?

Photographer: Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The FBI was at the scene where the shooting occurred.

The DHS noted that there has been a 1,000% increase in assaults against immigration agents.

“We are praying for the speedy recovery of our law enforcement officer. He followed his training, used appropriate force, and properly enforced the law to protect the public and law enforcement,” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. “Viral social media videos and activists encouraging illegal aliens to resist law enforcement not only spread misinformation, but also undermine public safety, as well as the safety of our officers and those being apprehended.”

Both the agent and the suspect were transported to the hospital for treatment, where the suspect succumbed to his injuries, CBS News reported.

RELATED: ‘Operation Midway Blitz’: Trump administration launches Chicago ICE surge

Image source: Blaze Media

Meanwhile, leftist protesters gathered outside an ICE facility in Broadview, Illinois, on Friday afternoon. Blaze News’ Julio Rosas was on the ground as the activists blocked the driveway to the facility for over four hours, forcing federal agents to come outside to clear the road when federal vehicles come in. Local police are helping keep the protesters off federal property, but that is the extent of their help.

Protesters have been heckling and accosting the agents who come outside the building. When the agents go back inside, the protesters’ ire is then turned on Broadview police for “helping the kidnappers.”

This is the second time a larger crowd has appeared outside the ICE building. Last Friday, the organizers declared victory because ICE vehicles reportedly turned around after seeing the crowd in the road.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Illegal immigration, Illegal immigration crisis, Immigration crisis, Immigration, Chicago, Illinois, Immigration and customs enforcement, Ice, Protest, Politics 

Charlie Kirk was killed on September 10, 2025.

Like all conservatives, I think I must have seen hundreds or maybe even thousands of Charlie Kirk videos over the years. On YouTube, on Twitter, on Instagram. Videos of him being interviewed on Fox, videos of him hosting his show in his studio, and endless clips of him talking with students on college campuses.

You can’t go out, sit at a table for hours and hours over and over again, talking with anyone who comes up to you, without revealing that you, too, are human.

I don’t remember the first time I heard about Kirk, but it was early on, when he — and I — were much younger. Before he had kids and before I had kids.

Over the years, I, along with many conservatives of our generation, watched Kirk evolve and his impact grow — usually via the particularly intimate medium of our phones. His killing — no, murder; no, assassination — hits home in a close and terrible way.

Endless stream of mourning

I’m not alone in that feeling. To scroll through X Wednesday afternoon into the evening was to encounter an endless stream of shock, anger, and mourning. I read lots of posts from young people reflecting that it’s hitting them harder than they thought something like this could.

There were posts from parents noting how broken up their high-school and college-age kids were. There were abundant tributes from just about every big name in conservative politics praising Kirk for everything he did. Ben Shapiro wrote that when he met the 18-year-old Kirk, he predicted he would be the head of the RNC one day.

Kirk wasn’t a politician; he never held office. There’s a distance between us and politicians. They aren’t so real; everything is kind of an artifice to keep up an image and satisfy constituents.

Kirk was an activist, speaker, and a strong advocate for the good and the American people. He was human, and we who watched him on our little screens felt that. You can’t go out, sit at a table for hours and hours over and over again, talking with anyone who comes up to you, without revealing that you, too, are human.

‘I can’t stop thinking about it’

Thursday morning, I woke to a text from my sister, a normal, not terribly online conservative with a 10-month-old son. “I can’t stop thinking about it,” she wrote.

As I was writing this column, a DM came in from a friend: “Just no words. It’s hitting me like crazy. He was my exact same age and stage [of life].”

So many young conservatives are hit so dreadfully hard by the killing of Kirk because, in some way, they felt like they knew him. They saw him express just what they believed — or what his words made them realize they believed — hundreds and hundreds of times.

For many, Kirk was them, a representation of their hopes and their collective sense about the world and the future. Kirk did everything we are supposed to aspire to, or everything we as parents would want our children to aspire to. He advocated for what he believed in; he stood up for what was right; he was a husband and a father.

RELATED: Why Charlie Kirk’s assassination will change us in ways this generation has never seen

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

A deeply American value

How many minds did Kirk change during his time on earth? How many people watched him debate on college campuses and then start to question what lies they previously thought they believed? I’m not sure it’s possible to accurately calculate the tremendous impact he had.

It takes a lot of bravery to go out, sit on a chair, and answer any question any person brings up to the open mic. Would you be able to do it? I don’t think I could. He fielded questions from people — often pretty nasty people — from all over the spectrum, but he never lost sight of the good and was never dragged down to the bad, as all too many have been. He devoted his life to trying to change people’s minds (and the world) with words and debate. It’s a deeply American value, and he was killed while he was doing it.

Leave a legacy

On Wednesday, I saw a post from Charlie dated July 27, 2025. It was a video of his young daughter running up to him as he sat on a couch in a Fox News studio. She jumped on his lap; he hugged her and smiled. The text accompanying the video read: “Get married, have kids, and stop partying into oblivion. Leave a legacy, be courageous. Happy Sunday. God Bless all the parents out there.”

Kirk believed in something, and he devoted his life to it. He didn’t sit around speculating, he didn’t spend his time waiting, he didn’t see a problem and decide not to do anything. He wanted to make a difference in the world; he wanted to make it better, and so he did. He changed American politics in the 2020s and invigorated young conservatives in a way few others have, and he did it all while raising a family. He did exactly what his post on July 27 called for the rest of us to do.

Charlie Kirk got married, he had kids, he was courageous, and he left a legacy.

God bless his soul in eternal rest.

​The assassination of charlie kirk, Charlie kirk, Culture, Political violence, Turning point usa, Family, The root of the matter 

Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo made an odd comment about the possible death of Elon Musk, as well as his own.

On his show, “The Chris Cuomo Project,” the host reflected on the shock of Charlie Kirk’s murder, which happened September 10 on a university campus in Utah.

‘I don’t know what it’s about with him, and I don’t give a s**t, to be honest.’

Cuomo was remarking on how he believed social media has become a “tool of destruction” in America when he went after X owner Musk for a recent post Musk made in which he called the political left “the party of murder.”

“When the richest man in the world, who controls the most powerful platform in our media, writes that ‘the Left is the party of murder’ and then decides — Elon Musk, I’m talking about — the stupidest genius I’ve ever been around,” Cuomo ranted without returning to his point.

Cuomo stated he will not “excuse” Musk’s remarks “because he’s autistic,” while adding that he believes Musk is “morally bankrupt.”

The insults toward the X owner continued, and along with more harsh rhetoric, Cuomo began discussing the idea that Musk could get murdered.

RELATED: Elon Musk pledges $1 million to honor the memory of Iryna Zarutska — and bring down the media blackout

Autistic people “don’t all say the stupidest thing at the worst time,” Cuomo said about the South African. “All right? I don’t know what it’s about with him, and I don’t give a s**t, to be honest. He has, in my opinion, exhausted his usefulness.”

Despite dismissing Musk as no longer useful, Cuomo followed up those statements with, “Does that mean he should be murdered? No. Because that’s not how I see the value of human life.”

Strangely, Cuomo followed that by saying he would not be surprised if Musk were assassinated.

“But would I be surprised? No. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s me. I mean, that’s where we are. It’s who we are. That’s who we are.”

RELATED: Antifa, gay furries, and bomb codes? What the engravings on the Kirk assassination bullets may mean

— (@)

The former nightly CNN host continued with an overall message that America has become a place hell-bent on fomenting “division and hate.”

“There are not one or two; there are many people who do not see the murder of this young man as wrong. And there are just as many, or more, who see his murder as something to be avenged,” Cuomo said, opposing both sentiments.

“That word [avenged] usually means, ‘I’m now going to kill one of yours,’ right?” he asked rhetorically.

Charlie Kirk speaking at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. Kirk was assassinated that day. Photo by Trent Nelson/Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images

Cuomo took issue not only with Musk’s words about other political ideologies, but about the entrepreneur’s claim that some media outlets are “anti-White.”

“He goes on this thing about why black is capitalized and why white is not,” Cuomo said.

Musk had asked the New York Times on X, “Why is ‘white’ always in lowercase, but Black is uppercase” in its articles.

While Cuomo’s issue with Musk’s question was unclear, the format directive comes directly from the Associated Press, which guides writing standards for media in the United States.

The AP announced in 2020 that “black” should be capitalized, but not white.

“White people generally do not share the same history and culture, or the experience of being discriminated against because of skin color,” the organization wrote as a justification.

The Chicago Manual of Style, however, which is often used for historical journals, decided it would capitalize both “black” and “white,” due to what it considers a cultural shift in meaning for the words, but it also wanted to remain consistent.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Charlie kirk, Elon musk, Chris cuomo, Cnn, Associated press, Black, White, Assassination, Politics 

BlazeTV host Glenn Beck is calling on his audience to say “thank you to Charlie Kirk.”

Kirk was murdered on Wednesday, September 10, during a campus speaking tour stop in Utah.

On Friday’s episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Beck decided to turn back the clock and use his 9-12 Project to benefit Kirk’s family, his loving wife, Erika, and their two children.

‘Every donation reflects the strength of this community and its resolve to stand together.’

“Charlie came from this audience,” Beck explained, noting that Kirk was a fan from a young age.

“He was a kid when he started watching me on Fox and listened to me on the radio,” the host continued.

Beck then recalled conversations he had with Kirk, remembering that the activist was always “gracious” and kind to him. In return, Beck said he wants to do everything he can to say “thank you back to him.”

This spawned the launch of a fundraiser on GiveSendGo under the 9-12 Project banner. The project was originally started in 2009 and was designed to honor the spirit of Americans coming together the day after September 11, 2001, regardless of their political affiliation.

The fundraiser is meant to be a way for supporters to express gratitude for Kirk’s commitment to freedom of speech, liberty, and the United States.

“Every donation reflects the strength of this community and its resolve to stand together,” it reads.

RELATED: Glenn Beck’s poetic tribute to Charlie Kirk sparks the next phase for fearless leadership

— (@)

The original 9-12 Project included a series of nine principles and 12 values inspired by the founding fathers. Among the principles were the ideas that “America is good” and that God is the center of life. Honesty, family, and the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were also included.

The 12 values are as follows:

HonestyReverenceHopeThriftHumilityCharitySincerityModerationHard workCouragePersonal responsibilityGratitude

RELATED: Charlie Kirk: Loving father, fearless communicator, happy warrior — 1993-2025

Beck further recognized that while there are other fundraisers and safeguards in place for Kirk’s family, they have “a long life and road ahead of them,” and so does Kirk’s operation at Turning Point USA.

Beck stated that should Kirk’s wife feel she does not need the money, the 9-12 Project donations could be put toward Turning Point USA’s mission.

“It’s going to provide for the family and his children, but also, at his wife’s discretion, to the Turning Point USA mission as well. They’ve lost their biggest fundraiser in Charlie, and they are just broken up,” Beck continued. “They’re just broken up, and God bless them. I want you to know we’re thinking about you. We love you so much. And we’re very, very grateful.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Charlie kirk, Glenn beck, Fundraiser, 911, 912 project, Politics 

Despite recent efforts by Republicans across the country to shore up election integrity, Maine has been under scrutiny about its voter rolls. Now, the Republican National Committee is demanding accountability.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has allegedly been stonewalling RNC and federal efforts to obtain up-to-date voter role information as required by the National Voter Registration Act.

‘Despite admitting that noncitizens are registered to vote in Maine’s elections, Shenna Bellows continues to block efforts to clean up the voter rolls.’

In a complaint letter obtained by Blaze News addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, RNC chief counsel Mandy Lester accused the Maine secretary of state of violating the requirements of the NVRA.

Dating back to March 25 of this year, the RNC requested that the secretary of state, who is the chief election officer of the state, provide records pertaining to Maine’s voter list maintenance system.

RELATED: 16 noncitizens apparently voted in Michigan in 2024 — and liberals are cheering about it

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Bellows’ office acknowledged the request on May 4 but apparently failed to provide any of the requested information. Following two months of silence and a reminder from the RNC on July 23, Bellows’ office responded that the records could be provided within “’36 to 48 months’ provided that the RNC was willing to pay $23,000.00 for the requested records,” according to the complaint.

The letter noted that these conditions were “intentionally prohibitive and contravene the NVRA’s clear commitment toward transparent government and public accountability.”

Perhaps central to transparency concerns raised by the RNC and Department of Justice was the secretary’s assertion that her office could not fulfill the request for voter information between the window of the November 2022 general election through the close of registration for the November 2024 general election because “the Department conducted its last list address confirmation mailing in June of 2022,” per the complaint.

The complaint also cited a clip of an interview on lawyer Marc Elias’ podcast in which Bellows admitted that she was “sure” that there were noncitizens on the voter rolls: “And guess what? There are duplicates on the voter rolls because people don’t tell their clerks when they move. Not duplicate voters, but duplicate registrants. … I’m sure there are, in some isolated instances, some noncitizens […] on the rolls. And that’s what the election officials do every day is verify the integrity of the voter rolls.”

“Despite admitting that noncitizens are registered to vote in Maine’s elections, Shenna Bellows continues to block efforts to clean up the voter rolls,” said RNC Chairman Joe Gruters. “Bellows is undermining Maine’s elections and betraying the trust of every Maine voter.”

Bellows framed the federal government’s scrutiny of Maine’s voter rolls as an encroachment of power: “So are they looking for that one or two or three cases to try to impinge and just attack the integrity of our elections? Are they trying to create a pretext for more federal involvement in our elections? Are they trying to take down secretaries of state they don’t like? Or is it a combination of things?”

The RNC letter concludes with an urgent request for an “immediate federal investigation within the Department of Justice’s statutory authority,” emphasizing that this matter requires the DOJ’s “prompt attention.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Politics, Shenna bellows, Maine, Doj, Rnc, Maine secretary of state, Marc elias, Joe gruters, Nvra, Election integrity