A female cop in Massachusetts and her husband are facing serious allegations that they raped a boy for years, beginning when he was 14.

Around 6 a.m. on Thursday, Samantha Pelrine, a 31-year-old officer with the Plymouth Police Department, and husband Daniel Forand, 37, were arrested without incident in connection with the allegations.

‘We hold our officers to the highest standards and expect them to uphold their sworn duty both on and off.’

Earlier this month, a 21-year-old male who previously lived with the couple claimed to Massachusetts State Police that they had repeatedly sexually assaulted him up until 2025. The man also submitted an affidavit with similar allegations, claiming that “both sexually assaulted me until 2025” and that Forand had physically assaulted him.

“They are looking for me and I am scared for my safety,” the man wrote, seeking a restraining order. He said he moved out of the couple’s home last month.

According to CBS News, Plymouth Assistant District Attorney Jim Duffy told the court, “The allegations are that the sexual abuse started when he was 14 years old and continued up until last year. Another term for that is ‘grooming.'”

During the hearing, defense attorneys cast doubt on the credibility of the accuser. “He had accused someone falsely of sexually inappropriate behavior when he was in high school,” claimed Joseph Krowski Jr.

Tamari Kovach added that “his stories are inconsistent.”

RELATED: Retired police sergeant lived double life as a prolific rapist in Detroit, police say

Reports say Pelrine has been charged with at least three counts of aggravated rape of a child, while Forand has been charged with assault and battery and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon as well as multiple counts of indecent assault and battery and aggravated child rape. The charges related to alleged incidents that took place in 2019, CBS News reported, citing court records.

Pelrine and Forand both pled not guilty on Thursday afternoon and were released on bail. They are scheduled to return to court for a probable cause hearing on June 8.

Pelrine has since been placed on paid administrative leave, CBS News reported. On Thursday, the Plymouth Police Department issued a statement, claiming her “duty status is currently under review.”

“We are appalled and deeply disturbed by the allegations. We hold our officers to the highest standards and expect them to uphold their sworn duty both on and off,” the statement said in part.

“The conduct alleged is in violation of our values and of our basic principles as police officers, to serve and protect.”

Three years earlier almost to the day, the department issued a statement about Pelrine of an entirely different sort, highlighting her service as part of National Women’s Month 2023.

“We are so proud of our female Officers and the incredible job that they do under sometimes extraordinary circumstances,” the department said.

In the post, Pelrine said she always dreamed of becoming a police officer and joined the force in April 2022.

“I believe I picked the right career for my personality and what I wanted from a job because while the range of emotions from this job can vary drastically, I know that in some instances I’m truly able to make a difference in someone’s life,” she said.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Plymouth, Massachusetts, Samantha pelrine, Daniel forand, Politics 

In this day and age, technology is no longer just about efficiency. It’s about pushing the limits, regardless of the consequences.

Earlier this month, a scientific breakthrough occurred when neurotechnology company Eon Systems took a complete digital map of a fruit fly’s brain and ran it inside a virtual fly body in a simulated world. The digital fly started walking, grooming itself, and behaving just like a real one — all from its brain wiring alone.

But Eon Systems isn’t stopping there. The company plans to do the same for a mouse brain next — and eventually for a human one. If successful, it could ultimately allow the human consciousness to live on in perpetuity in a digital format.

The spiritual implications of this are massive, says BlazeTV host Rick Burgess. On this episode of “Strange Encounters,” he explores the growing theory that our quest for technological dominance is inextricably linked to the end times.

This kind of “digital consciousness” that fuses the real and virtual worlds is very “dangerous,” Rick warns.

“[Eon Systems is] trying to reflect a version of God creating things,” he says.

When the original blueprints for God’s good creations are tampered with, biblical history paints a terrifying picture of what follows: divine wrath.

Rick points to Genesis 6, which documents the mysterious Nephilim, which many believe were a race of human-demon half-breeds that resulted from fallen angels reproducing with human women.

“One of the most plausible theories about the Nephilim is [that] when God became so angry when demons — fallen angels — were able to reproduce with human women … he killed everybody except for Noah and his family,” says Rick.

Satan’s specific crime in this particular scenario, he argues, was attempting to “mimic God” creating the perfect “God-man” in Jesus by creating his own counterfeit god-man in the Nephilim.

While Satan’s evil plot was foiled by the great flood, his desire to spawn his own dark creations will live on until his final defeat. Rick wonders if some of our modern technological advancements — especially those that seek to rewire what is natural — are linked to Satan’s ultimate plot to unleash unmitigated darkness across the earth in the final days before Christ’s second coming and the final climactic pouring out of God’s wrath on the earth.

“Can Satan find himself in this technology, working with these people — unbeknownst to them, I’m sure — to take modern technology and the whole AI world and begin to use it for the things he’s still going to do in the future?” he asks.

While Rick thinks it’s plausible that dystopian technology will play a role in the end times, he doesn’t subscribe to the theory that the Antichrist prophesied throughout Scripture will be some kind of half-human, half-robot cyborg.

“I think it’s pretty obvious in Scripture that Antichrist will be a human being,” he says.

But that doesn’t mean the Antichrist won’t be dependent on modern technology. In fact, Rick suspects that he will be.

He refers to Revelation 13, in which it is prophesied that the Antichrist — or “the beast” — will appear to be resurrected after a “mortal head wound,” leading many blind followers marveling at his supposed divine power.

Rick envisions a scenario in which this prophecy comes to fruition through modern technology.

“You think you couldn’t take AI technology and fake a mortal head wound and a resurrection? You could do that easily,” he says.

As for the scientists striving to fuse human life with technology, Rick still believes they very well could play a role in Satan’s sinister plot — even if nothing more than creating another race of “hybrids” that are abominations to God.

“I do think this is going to be an attempt for mankind … under demonic direction to start trying to play God and create animals and create human beings, which is extremely dangerous territory,” he warns.

While Eon Systems is still a ways off from experimenting on human brains, others are already doing it. In the next part of this episode, Rick dives into another dystopian tech story involving a biotech startup that built a computer using living human brain cells and is now teaching it to play the video game Doom. To get the full story, watch the episode above.

Want more from Rick Burgess?

To enjoy more bold talk and big laughs, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Strange encounters, Strange encounters with rick burgess, Rick burgess, Modern technology, Spiritual warfare, End times, Blazetv, Blaze media 

Everyone has a solution until he is the one who must pay for it.

After every crisis come cameras, microphones, and outrage. Commentators fill TV panels, politicians rush to social media, and fundraising emails arrive within hours. What rarely arrives is something harder: ownership.

Christianity does not pretend evil vanishes through better language or finer intentions. It proclaims that the cost is real and has been paid.

Criticism is easy. It assigns responsibility, demands action, and carries moral urgency. But it rarely answers the most important question: Who pays for this? Or, more plainly, where are the receipts?

That question clarifies things. It separates serious people from performers by exposing the difference between assigning a cost and carrying one.

We see it everywhere.

Recently, actor Mark Ruffalo argued that the federal government should tax the rich more, assuring us “they can handle it.” Perhaps. But his argument would carry more weight if he showed receipts.

Nothing stops him from demonstrating that principle himself. The federal government already accepts voluntary contributions to reduce the public debt. Those convinced we are undertaxed remain free to lead by example.

Few do, because saying it costs nothing. Telling someone else to pay is always easier than writing the check yourself. It is theater, and it is a luxury reserved for people who do not have to live with the consequences.

That same pattern appears far beyond Hollywood.

For decades, Iran has made its position clear, not only in words but in deeds. “Death to America” has echoed for years. I remember watching the embassy takeover in high school. For my entire adult life, I have heard those words and seen the regime’s receipts. I am 62.

Much of the West, meanwhile, treated the threat as rhetoric to manage rather than something to confront. Entire careers were built on discussing the problem with panels, policies, negotiations, and warnings. A great deal was invested in talking about the problem. Very little was invested in ending it.

That is the difference between posturing and payment.

Right now, we are no longer discussing the cost. We are paying it in blood and treasure. The risks are real. So are the instability and the possibility of escalation. But given what this regime has said, done, and promised for decades, the price we pay now may prove a bargain compared with the price of waiting.

Ignoring a threat does not eliminate it. It allows it to metastasize and hands the bill to someone else later, with interest.

RELATED: Stop chasing rockets

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

We see the same pattern at home. For years, Americans were told the southern border was too complex to secure without sweeping reform. That phrase became a substitute for action. Yet when enforcement priorities changed, crossings dropped.

Clearly, the problem was not “complexity.” It was resolve.

Borders can be secured when a government decides to secure them. Which brings us back to the question too often left unanswered: Where are the receipts?

If confronting Iran is reckless, what replaces it? If border enforcement is wrong, what protects the system? If taxes must rise, who is willing to lead by example?

These are serious questions that deserve serious answers. But our culture rewards performance more than responsibility.

There is always a cost. The only question is whether we face it or pretend it is not there until it grows. Some assign that cost to others. Some ignore it and hope it disappears. Others delay it until it becomes unavoidable.

But every now and then, someone steps forward and pays it.

That is what decisive action looks like. Not posturing. Not signaling. Not commentary. Payment. The receipts that follow are rarely tidy. They do not arrive as statements or sound bites. They come as scars.

That truth is not political. It is inescapable. And at Easter, it is impossible to ignore.

Christianity does not offer a cost-free answer to the human condition or the wages of sin. It does not pretend evil vanishes through better language or finer intentions. It proclaims that the cost is real and has been paid.

Not assigned. Not deferred. Paid.

And the receipts were not theoretical. They were visible and costly: nail-scarred hands.

RELATED: The most honest phrase you’ll hear all week

Brendan SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

That is why Christianity leaves us without excuses. Once you see that, you can no longer pretend solutions come without sacrifice or that responsibility can always be shifted to someone else.

Isaac Watts captured it plainly: “Love so amazing, so divine, demands my life, my soul, my all.”

We recognize truth when we see it because deep down, we know it is true: Someone always pays.

The only question is whether you trust the One who paid it or insist on bearing it yourself.

​National debt, Tax the rich, Mark ruffalo, Hypocrisy, Christianity, Iran, Accountability, Opinion & analysis, Taxes, Spending, Action, Caregivers 

A generation came of age on Chuck Norris “facts.” When the boogeyman goes to sleep, he checks under his bed for Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris counted to infinity — twice. He doesn’t do push-ups; he pushes the Earth down. Superman owns a pair of Chuck Norris pajamas.

These lines have been repeated so often that they have become their own mythology. And they point — sideways, lovingly — at something true. The man was singular. Which is why his death on March 20, age 86, deserves more than a eulogy dressed in silly jokes. It deserves honesty about what he actually represented.

A life that could have been reduced to folklore and fists and an endless loop of roundhouse kicks is best remembered as a love story.

A Hollywood star who kept his soul, a conservative who kept his convictions, and a son whose life was saved not by fists, but by faith.

That is the real story. Not the kicks. Not the films. The knees.

His mother’s knees, specifically. On the floor, in prayer, while her son was becoming an American icon.

A man’s man

Chuck Norris was a man’s man, a legitimate martial artist, not a choreographed facsimile. The fight community knew it then. They know it still. Chael Sonnen — former UFC title contender, sharp-tongued analyst, not a man given to sentimentality — recently paid homage to Norris’ genuine ability. Fighters don’t flatter easily.

Norris wasn’t a stuntman in a gi. He held black belts in Tang Soo Do, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, and judo. Bruce Lee, who distributed respect like the IRS distributes refunds, cast him as the sole opponent worthy of a final fight in “The Way of the Dragon,” a scene that remains one of the most watchable moments in martial arts cinema.

Norris was a genuine Hollywood star, too. “Walker, Texas Ranger” ran for eight seasons and made Saturday nights like a civic duty. “Missing in Action” made $26 million on a $2 million budget. “Code of Silence.” “The Delta Force.” “Lone Wolf McQuade.” He owned a particular frequency — the man of few words who doesn’t start trouble but finishes it decisively, who stands for something every red-blooded American recognized instinctively. Movie theaters filled up. The lines entered the cultural lexicon. The legend was self-sustaining.

And yet.

Prayer warrior

Hollywood has a metabolism all its own. It rewards those who adapt , who update their beliefs like software, who stay elegantly vague on anything that costs them. Norris didn’t. His conservatism required no management, no spokesperson, no careful framing for a hostile room. It was constitutional, not cosmetic.

Success, he would later acknowledge, had done what success tends to do. It offered enough to make a man comfortable and comfortable enough to make him careless. The faith grew distant. Hollywood filled the space that God had occupied. His mother, however, didn’t move an inch. She prayed through his success. Through the excess that follows success. Through the gradual erosion of whatever lay beneath the action hero. Back home, while the credits rolled and Roger Ebert wrote rave reviews, she was petitioning a higher power.

She never stopped. Not when he was an infant fighting for his life, not when he was yielding, by degrees, to what fame asks of those it favors, not when the distance widening between the man she raised and the man Hollywood was making seemed irreversible. She simply kept praying — stubbornly, faithfully, across decades.

Norris never forgot it. “My mother has prayed for me all my life, through thick and thin,” he wrote. The scope of that sentence deserves a moment. All his life. Not a season of intercession. Not a crisis response. A lifetime of it.

Nonnegotiable faith

When Norris returned to God, he did so completely, without a hint of reservation. Faith was not compartmentalized, managed, or diluted for public consumption. He said what he believed, to whoever was listening, without apology. On abortion, he rejected the path of least resistance that Hollywood had so generously paved. It was not, in his view, a policy question or a political calculation. Not a matter of preference, nuance, or personal freedom conveniently defined. A moral line, absolute and non-negotiable.

In an industry that treats the unborn as an inconvenience and their defenders as embarrassments, Norris stood apart. He understood that confusion about life is downstream of confusion about God. Lose your sense of the divine, and you lose your sense of limits. Lose limits, and life becomes conditional — weighed, assessed, and discarded when the calculus demands it, by people who have never once doubted their own right to exist. Norris saw that trajectory clearly, because he had briefly walked it himself.

A life that could have been reduced to folklore and fists and an endless loop of roundhouse kicks is best remembered as a love story — between a son who wandered and a mother who wouldn’t let him stay lost. Chuck Norris is gone. But the America he embodied — patriotic, God-fearing, and entirely unembarrassed about both — is still here. Still worth defending.

​Faith, Lifestyle, Christianity, Converts, Chuck norris, Bruce lee, Martial arts, Movies, Delta force, Enter the dragon, Walker texas ranger