Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and other law enforcement officers have been facing interference from the public, especially since the January 7 death of Renee Good after she nearly ran over an ICE officer with her vehicle during an immigration operation.

Not to be outdone with their spread of chaos and confusion, leftists have now apparently expanded their targets to non-ICE operations and putting other police investigations in jeopardy.

‘Deranged liberals are interrupting non-ICE police actions because Democratic leaders have whipped them into a frenzy.’

On Wednesday, the Brewer Police Department in Maine reported an incident in which a woman allegedly interfered with a police investigation into a threat at a school — an investigation that had nothing to do with immigration operations.

The investigation involved a threat involving a person of interest who “had communicated an intent to kill school staff and others.”

RELATED: More UNHINGED anti-ICE extremist footage: ‘I am a liberal, leftist, pagan, lesbian, transgender woman, and witch!’

Staff photo by Shawn Patrick Ouellette/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

According to the police department’s Facebook post, officers staged a meet-up at a residence to “safely contact the person of interest.”

However, “at approximately 8:16 a.m.,” an activist began interfering in the attempt to contact the person of interest, police claimed. She allegedly repeatedly sounded an air horn, refused lawful orders to leave, yelled expletives at the officers, and shouted that she “didn’t want ICE” in her neighborhood.

“Her actions interfered with legitimate law enforcement operations and created a real risk to the investigating officers,” the statement said.

Investigators later found that the person of interest was not responsible for the threats and that multiple schools had “received similar threats that morning, consistent with ‘swatting’ incidents.”

The Maine Wire’s Steve Robinson slammed the incident on X: “Deranged liberals are interrupting non-ICE police actions because Democratic leaders have whipped them into a frenzy. Today it was an unidentified white female using an air horn to disrupt an investigation into threats against a school.”

“When will these agitators get charged?” Robinson added.

In an update to the Brewer Police Department’s Facebook post, the woman suspected of interfering with the operation was identified as Mary Conmee, 63, of Orrington, a town just a few miles southwest of Brewer.

Conmee has been summonsed for the offenses of disorderly conduct and obstructing government administration.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Politics, Renee good, Brewer, Brewer maine, Brewer police department, Ice, Immigration and customs enforcement, Steve robinson, Maine wire, Mary conmee, Ice agitators, Police investigation 

An official of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration explained how they successfully performed a medical evacuation from space for the first time in space operations history.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman gave as many details as he could about the incident while being interviewed by Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck on Wednesday.

‘It was a very serious situation, something we had not seen before in space.’

Four astronauts returned to Earth on Thursday, including the ailing member of the crew. They splashed down in the Pacific Ocean near San Diego.

Isaacman touted the extraordinary training that U.S. astronauts undergo while offering some details about the historic incident.

“One of the greatest accomplishments that we’ve done at the International Space Station is the continuous human presence in space over a quarter of a century,” he told Beck.

He went on to say that the environment in space is extremely harsh on the human body and requires many safety precautions.

“This is why we do extensive training. Our astronauts are practically physicians; in fact, many of them are,” he explained.

“Everyone did an extraordinary job,” Isaacman said of the “unexpected health-related” incident.

“The Crew 11 astronauts, their other expedition mates on the International Space Station, the flight surgeons in mission control, they all responded accordingly. The incident was stabilized very quickly,” he added.

Isaacman was restricted by medical privacy rules from offering specific details on the incident.

“Clearly, it was a very serious situation, something we had not seen before in space but had accounted for the possibility. And that is why we put in motion the option to bring our astronauts home early, which I think really speaks to American leadership in space,” he continued.

RELATED: Director of Glenn Beck’s disaster response charity undermines Democrat attack on Trump admin’s response to Texas flood

“We can send our astronauts up more or less on command, which is what we’re going to do with Crew 12, is pull their mission forward,” Isaacman added. “And we can bring our astronauts home as required. And this is very important to President Trump and obviously his position on American supremacy in space.”

The four astronauts were transported to a medical facility in San Diego by NASA.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​First ever medical evacuation from space, Nasa administrator jared isaacman, Glenn beck interview, Mystery space evacuation, Politics 

In his final hours as New Jersey governor, Democrat Phil Murphy issued 97 pardons and 51 commutations.

Among Murphy’s more controversial recipients of clemency was Harris Jacobs, the killer son of Democratic fundraiser and Atlantic City powerbroker Joe Jacobs. Jacobs is a friend of Murphy who raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for the failed 2024 Senate campaign of the then-governor’s wife, Tammy Murphy.

‘When politics pervades justice, the rule of law becomes subordinate to influence and power.’

Orlando Fraga — a Cuban who moved to the United States in 1980 in pursuit of a better life — was fatally struck by a vehicle when walking along Atlantic Avenue on Sept. 4, 2022.

Harris Jacobs knew he had struck Fraga. Jacobs reportedly can be seen in surveillance footage pulling into a nearby Dunkin’ Donuts, then repeatedly inspecting his bloody victim before fleeing the scene.

Jacobs’ defense attorney Lou Barbone suggested to WCAU-TV that the recognition that Fraga “had expired” was “simply too much of an emotional trigger” for his client to stick around and face the music.

RELATED: ‘This is First Amendment activity’: Democrats give church-storming mobs their stamp of approval

Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images

Prosecutors noted during Harris’ first trial that between the time of the hit-and-run and Harris’ arrest, the killer had called his father 10 times after the crash but not the police.

Although jurors were unable to reach a unanimous decision last May in Harris’ first trial, they reached a verdict on Tuesday, finding the 28-year-old guilty of second-degree knowingly leaving the scene of a fatal motor vehicle accident, reported WCAU. The conviction would have carried a sentence of five to 10 years.

Barbone revealed that his client knew in advance that the jury’s efforts to mete out justice were in vain.

“My client received a call from the governor’s counsel at 7:30 a.m.,” Barbone told BreakingAC. “The pardon was issued but not in our possession. We know it was issued before the verdict.”

Barbone indicated he is filing a motion to vacate the conviction on the basis that the pardon was granted prior to the jury’s verdict.

Murphy claimed that “each pardon and commutation represents a story of accountability, growth, and redemption.”

“By offering second chances to individuals who have demonstrated rehabilitation and a commitment to their communities, we have strengthened not only individual lives, but our entire state,” added Murphy.

A spokesperson for the Atlantic County Prosecutor’s Office told WCAU, “Unfortunately, when politics pervades justice, the rule of law becomes subordinate to influence and power. … A conviction can be rendered meaningless not by the verdict of a jury, but by the intervention of political power and connections.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Crime, Hit and run, Harris jacobs, Phil murphy, New jersey, Atlantic city, Orlando fraga, Killer, Democrat, Pardon, Clemency, Joe jacobs, Politics 

The mullahs of Iran have resumed the familiar work of slaughtering their own people. (Again!) The United States can respond without firing a shot — and without waiting months for a traditional embargo to bite.

It can impose an electronic embargo.

An electro-embargo could do something sanctions often cannot: break the regime’s control quickly enough to matter while the killing is still underway.

Washington could pursue this approach unilaterally, or it could press the United Nations to authorize it under Article 41 of the U.N. Charter, which empowers the Security Council to order measures “not involving the use of armed force,” including the partial or complete interruption of “postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication.” The text already exists.

The question is whether anyone has the imagination — and the nerve — to use it.

The electronic advantage

In the context of Iran’s continuing humanitarian emergency, the United States, with a bit of diplomatic legerdemain from Ambassador to the U.N. Michael Waltz, could challenge the Security Council to act. China and Russia sit on the council. They will posture. They will threaten vetoes. But even a public debate would force them to explain why the world should tolerate a regime that murders civilian protesters in the streets.

If the Security Council approves an Article 41 action, the United States could then present its combatant commanders with something Iran has never faced at scale: an embargo not on goods but on electrons.

Physical embargoes remain a standard tool of statecraft. They also take time. Iran can evade, reroute, smuggle, barter, and stall. An electronic embargo moves at the speed of light.

Target Iran’s hardline regime — not the Iranian people — by degrading the communications infrastructure that allows the government to command and control its security forces and manage the extraction and export of oil, its primary source of hard currency.

Strike the regime’s hardened telephone and cellular systems, satellite communications, and broadcast television.

Cripple the internal nervous system that keeps the state coordinated, disciplined, and armed.

The effect would be immediate. A regime that cannot communicate cannot coordinate raids, deploy forces efficiently, jam dissident signals, or maintain operational tempo. It cannot manage a modern oil export apparatus without functioning networks. It cannot run a crackdown in real time if it loses the ability to issue orders and track compliance.

The ‘Venezuelan formula’

Just as important, an electronic embargo could reverse the regime’s favorite trick: cutting the Iranian people off from each other and from the outside world. Tehran has already tried to block the internet and throttle social media. A targeted electronic campaign could negate that control and unleash an information tsunami — one the mullahs cannot shape, censor, or contain.

That shift matters. When citizens can communicate, organize, document, and broadcast, repression becomes harder and riskier. The regime loses its monopoly on narrative. Fear starts to spread in the other direction.

RELATED: Memo to Hegseth: Our military’s problem isn’t only fitness. It’s bad education.

erhui1979 via iStock/Getty Images

One can imagine a greatly expanded “Venezuelan formula”: degrade internal communications, then use broadcast means to confuse and complicate the regime’s grip on what is happening — while simultaneously encouraging the population to resist theocratic authority. The goal would not be spectacle. The goal would be collapse: the steady unraveling of the regime’s confidence, coherence, and control.

In this mode, a combatant commander could employ SOFTWAR principles to engage and degrade the mullahs through coordinated, non-kinetic lines of operation. Properly executed, such a campaign would affect nearly every aspect of Iranian society — and it would do so without turning Iranian cities into ruins.

A greater strategic payoff: China

The strategic payoff for the United States extends beyond moral clarity. It comes down to oil — and to China.

The recent decapitation of the Maduro junta in Venezuela proved a point many analysts ignore. The key factor is not the quantity of oil in a given country. It is control of the flow of oil. Energy states matter because they can fuel, fund, and sustain adversaries.

If the mullahs fall, China loses a major energy supplier at a moment when it can least afford disruption. Beijing’s ambitions depend on stable inputs. Xi Jinping’s dream of Chinese communist hegemony runs on energy. Remove an important provider, and you squeeze China’s strategic bandwidth — again.

That result alone justifies exploring an electronic embargo.

This is not a call for war. It is a call to use power creatively, within the bounds of international law when possible, and in defense of a population being beaten, shot, and silenced by its rulers.

The mullahs survive by controlling the physical streets and the electronic space above them. Take away the second, and the first becomes harder to hold.

An electro-embargo would not solve every problem. But it could do something sanctions often cannot: break the regime’s control quickly enough to matter while the killing is still underway.

​Opinion & analysis, Iran, Donald trump, United nations, Un charter article 41, Electronic embargo, Softwar, Sanctions, Information warfare, Mullahs, Ayatollah, Theocracy, America first, China, Xi jinping, Revolution, Radio, Television, Internet, Venezuela, Nicolas maduro 

Last weekend, on Sunday, January 18, a group of roughly 40 anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protesters entered Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, during a morning worship service. They chanted “ICE out!” and demanded justice for Renee Good — the woman lethally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis on January 7 after she hit him with her vehicle while obstructing a federal immigration operation. The protesters targeted this particular church because one of its pastors, David Easterwood, is also the acting field director for the local ICE office.

The disruption deeply upset congregants and scared young children, resulting in multiple 911 calls. The U.S. Department of Justice is now investigating the incident for possible civil rights violations of the FACE Act, which makes it a federal crime to use force, the threat of force, or physical obstruction to intentionally injure, intimidate, or interfere with someone exercising or seeking to exercise their First Amendment right to religious freedom at a place of worship.

When BlazeTV host Steve Deace saw the video footage of the protest, he was enraged — not just with the protesters themselves but with the congregation’s weak response.

On this episode of the “Steve Deace Show,” Deace delivers a scathing critique of feeble churches and calls them to implement a four-step plan immediately to protect themselves from leftist revolutionaries.

For years now, Deace has been warning that if conservatives fail to develop a “mutually assured destruction deterrent” to defend themselves against the violent left, they will surely be wiped out.

“There is no trend line I am more concerned about in terms of where we are as a society than this one,” he says. “This is human nature 101: Whatever bad behavior you do not punish, you will get more of, and it will escalate, and it will get worse.”

For far too long, however, leftists’ growing extremism and violence have gone largely unchallenged, which only bolsters their confidence in continuing to push the line.

Comparing the left to a swarm of locusts, Deace says that “now that they have consumed every social institution … and civic institution that [matters], they will now go after the sacred ones,” which has always been the left’s “endgame.”

This is exactly what Satan wants, Deace says.

“He looks to our enemies on the left and says, ‘There’s no one here to stop you. You have no resistance. Do whatever you want. Fly every freak flag you have. Shove it right down their throats. No resistance. In fact, you are the resistance.”’

“And then he says to us, ‘Oh, look the people you vote for, look at what cowards they are. Look how treacherous and feckless they are. No one is coming to save you. When’s the shooting start?”’

And then Satan will revel in “the carnage of a once-great civilization.”

Deace warns that the clock to collapse is ticking — and Millennials and Zoomers will pay the highest price if older generations fail to “bring the sword of righteousness and be avenging angels against evildoers.”

What happened at Cities Church in St. Paul last weekend is evidence that our time is almost up. If we fail to act boldly now, the left will cross more lines until there are none left to cross.

“If they now feel emboldened to go into your churches, there’s nowhere they don’t feel emboldened, including your homes, and that will be next,” says Deace.

“So then what is a proper biblical response to [what happened in Cities Church]?” he asks.

“Number one: You need to teach people from the pulpit what power under control looks like — what Romans 13 really means. They have to be equipped with this in their hearts and minds, or they won’t act on it properly. We are not a rival lynch mob. … We’re not pushovers though either.”

“Number two: There should always be numerous armed men in the church every Sunday — numerous. There should be a sign posted outside: ‘There are men in this church who are weapons-trained, and if threatened, this congregation will use them.”’

“Number three: The men make a defensive posture between the radicals, the rioters, the criminals, the ne’er-do-wells, the knuckle-draggers, the shooters, and the women and children. And while doing so, the men make it known, ‘You are running out of time before we will act offensively.”’

Number four: “If that doesn’t work, you act — act!” Deace shouts.

“You have rights. You are an American. Paul used his rights as a Roman citizen. Use yours. That’s your land. Those are your loved ones. Those are your freedoms, your liberties. You have every right to defend them. In fact, I would argue you have a mandate to.”

To hear more of Deace’s fiery monologue, watch the video above.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Steve deace, Steve deace show, Minneosta, Anti-ice, Minnesota church protest, Anti ice protests, Renee good, Blazetv, Blaze media, Christianity, Weak pastors, Weak churches, Face act, Ice, Immigration, St. paul minnesota, Cities church 

The House Oversight Committee revealed Wednesday that it plans to depose Ghislaine Maxwell next month as part of the committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.

Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in a Texas prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse children, is scheduled to testify virtually on February 9 in a closed session.

‘Ms. Maxwell will invoke her privilege against self-incrimination.’

Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) stated during a Wednesday hearing, “We need to hear from Ghislaine Maxwell. We’ve been trying to get her in for a deposition, and her lawyers have been saying that she’s going to plead the Fifth. But we have nailed down a date, February 9, where Ghislaine Maxwell will be deposed by this committee.”

Comer stated that he hopes Maxwell changes her mind about invoking the Fifth Amendment.

David Oscar Markus, Maxwell’s attorney, wrote in a Tuesday letter to Comer, “Ms. Maxwell will invoke her privilege against self-incrimination and decline to answer questions.”

Markus claimed moving forward with deposition would serve “no other purpose than pure political theater and a complete waste of taxpayer monies.”

RELATED: Clintons defy Epstein subpoenas — but Glenn Beck says DON’T jail them. Here’s his shocking reason why.

James Comer. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

“That is not a negotiating position or a tactical choice; it is a legal necessity,” Markus stated. He claimed that his client’s “post-conviction litigation is far from over,” referring to a pending habeas petition seeking to vacate her conviction.

Maxwell filed the petition in December, arguing that her conviction must be voided because a juror gave false answers during the selection process, “concealing a history of sexual abuse directly relevant to ‘issues at trial.’” She also claimed that prosecutors concealed a detective’s grand jury testimony that “conflicted with his trial testimony.”

RELATED: ‘We need no such protection’: Clinton accuses Trump of selectively releasing Epstein files — and calls for complete release

Ghislaine Maxwell. Photo by Paul Zimmerman/WireImage

Democrats on the committee accused Comer of treating Bill and Hillary Clinton differently from Maxwell, claiming he was allowing Maxwell to avoid answering to lawmakers.

Comer disputed that claim, arguing that Maxwell has been willing to appear before the committee, while the Clintons have “refused to appear,” altogether ignoring the committee’s subpoenas.

“One of the proposals that Clinton made was, if we would let Hillary Clinton off, then Mr. Garcia and I could travel to Mr. Clinton’s house and bring one staffer and take notes, but no transcript,” Comer said, referring to the committee’s ranking member, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.). “That’s not even a thing, and you all know that.”

“What few counterproposals that the Clintons’ massive legal team has made aren’t acceptable,” Comer stated.

Comer noted that the committee has been negotiating with the Clintons’ lawyers for five months.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, James comer, Robert garcia, Ghislaine maxwell, Jeffrey epstein, Bill clinton, Hillary clinton, The clintons, House oversight committee, Epstein files, Politics 

A gun-control advocate apologized and claimed to accidentally accuse President Donald Trump of being involved in the Epstein trafficking ring.

Cameron Kasky made the comments while speaking on a CNN panel before posting his apology on social media on Tuesday. Many called on the president to sue the activist over the comments that could be considered slanderous.

‘I said that by accident and didn’t mean it.’

Kasky was confronted by commentator Scott Jennings during the segment, which led Kasky to repeat the claim. He was singing a far different tune the next day.

“I would like to retract my comments from CNN last night and truly apologize,” Kasky wrote.

“Donald Trump was obviously not involved with a giant international child sex trafficking ring where women and children were systematically raped by elites,” he added. “I said that by accident and didn’t mean it.”

Some online believed the tone of the message was sarcastic.

While the president had a past connection to Jeffrey Epstein, he has never been convicted of participating in Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking ring. The billionaire financier later accepted a plea deal where he admitted guilt to a felony state charge of soliciting a minor for sex.

Kasky became an advocate for gun control after surviving the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in 2018. He has since spoken at rallies and in the media about restricting gun rights.

RELATED: The Clintons refuse to testify in Jeffrey Epstein probe — GOP threatens contempt of Congress

Epstein was found dead in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial for additional sex-trafficking charges in 2019.

The allegations that he orchestrated an underage sex-trafficking ring for the wealthy and powerful have led to many suspicions that he was killed to avoid incriminating alleged co-conspirators.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Cameron kasky, Giant international child sex trafficking ring, Trump and epstein, Lies on cnn, Politics 

BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales appears to have uncovered a rash of possible H-1B visa fraud in the Lone Star State.

“If you thought Somalian day-care fraud was a problem, it turns out that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” said Gonzales. “There’s a whole new problem that it turns out is taking tens of thousands of jobs away from Americans and changing our communities forever that you probably haven’t even thought of. I’m talking about H-1B visas.”

The H-1B visa program enables U.S.-based employers to temporarily hire foreign workers into specialized positions that American citizens supposedly can’t do. H-1B specialty occupation workers are generally admitted for a period of up to three years, which can in most cases be extended for another three years.

‘I’m not buying it.’

While the H-1B is a nonimmigrant visa, it paves the way for foreigners to obtain permanent residency in the country.

Lawmakers from both parties have in recent years expressed concerns about H-1B visa fraud and abuse, proposing amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act that would reform or even abolish the program.

Amid chatter online about serial abuse of the program in Texas, Gonzales began scrutinizing H-1B employers operating in her region, two of which didn’t pass the smell test.

One of the two companies, which appears in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ H-1B Employer Datahub as Qubitz Tech Sysystems [sic] LLC, had 12 H-1B beneficiaries approved last year. The company, whose visa job contact is Hari Madiraju, has apparently been hiring “software developers” from abroad for years.

RELATED: Woke Whitmer appointee from Nigeria admits to day-care scam, stealing millions from Michigan taxpayers

BlazeTV

Gonzales went to the address listed for Qubitz in Frisco, Texas — a four-bedroom house in a residential neighborhood where a man responding to “Hari” answered the door.

In footage of the encounter, Hari appears greatly vexed by Gonzales’ presence and even more so when she asks about Qubitz and its H-1B visa workers.

The moment that Gonzales mentions Qubitz, Hari announces that he is calling the police.

“I would love for the cops to come out here,” says Gonzales.

“Are the workers in here? Are the 12 workers for your company in here? Do they work out of here?”

Hari indicates that the workers are located at his “company.” When Gonzales asks where his company is, Hari appears to tell the 911 operator, “Somebody is knocking on my door and then they are like threatening me. … Please, can you help me?”

Gonzales later paid a visit to the supposed Qubitz office Hari suggested was headquarters for his dozen or more workers only to find a prison-cell-sized room with a single chair and some folding tables.

“Pretty cramped working quarters for 12 H-1B workers,” said Gonzales. “I’m not buying it.”

3Bees Technologies Inc., which is listed as active on the Texas Comptroller website, similarly raised eyebrows.

According to the H-1B Employer Datahub, the company — whose agent, director, and president is Vamsi Krishna Vajinapally — had 27 H-1B beneficiaries approved in 2022 and 19 visa petitions apparently denied the following year.

While the visas approved in 2022 for Vajinapally’s foreign workforce — which at one time supposedly comprised software developers, software quality assurance analysts, and software engineers — are apparently no longer valid, Gonzales was nevertheless surprised to find little evidence the recipients had a legitimate workplace to leave behind.

The BlazeTV host visited the location listed as the company’s address in Irving, Texas. As with Qubitz, she found a house in a residential neighborhood.

After finding no discernible evidence of people working at the location during business hours and receiving passing insight from a neighbor that something shady was afoot on the block, Gonzales traveled to the recently updated Plano address on the 3Bees website.

At that location, Gonzales found a building under construction, devoid of signs of office workers and software development. Gonzales indicated that while the location is currently being transformed into a social club, the location was formerly a WeWork, a remote office space that anyone can rent.

Gonzales indicated that Vajinapally of 3Bees has attempted to hire H-1B workers for another supposed tech business whose alleged Texas-based office is another rentable virtual office in Lewisville.

Qubitz and 3Bees did not respond to Blaze News’ request for comment.

“Once you start scraping data from H-1B databases, you start seeing immediately all of these patterns,” said Gonzales.

“The biggest question I have right now is: If we were able to find this with just a little bit of Google-searching and follow-up, why hasn’t USCIS done anything to combat this?”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fraud, Scam, Sara gonzales, Blazetv, Somalia, Fraudsters, India, Indian, Texas, Irving, Plano, Frisco, H-1b, H-1b visas, Visas, Immigration, Politics 

After months of threats and recriminations, President Donald Trump announced that he has reached a “framework” of a deal on Greenland with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

The president made the announcement on social media Wednesday after speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

‘This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations.’

“Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region,” the president wrote. “This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations.”

He added that he would revoke the threat to impose tariffs on eight nations after reaching the deal. The tariffs had been scheduled to go into effect February 1.

“Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland,” he added, referring to a missile defense system proposal.

Earlier in the day, he argued that annexing Greenland was essential to U.S. security as well as that of the Western Hemisphere.

“Greenland is a vast, almost entirely uninhabited and undeveloped territory. It is sitting undefended in a key strategic location between the United States, Russia, and China,” he said in his speech.

“This enormous, unsecured island is actually part of North America — on the northern frontier of the Western Hemisphere,” he added. “That’s our territory. It is therefore a core national security interest of the United States of America — and in fact, it’s been our policy for hundreds of years to prevent outside threats from entering our hemisphere.”

RELATED: Bessent slaps down Newsom at Davos: ‘He’s here with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros’

The president said that Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and special envoy Steve Witkoff would lead the negotiations on the deal.

The president has also said he would focus less on peace in his tactics on Greenland after the Nobel Committee snubbed him for the Peace Prize.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Trump on greenland, Deal on greenland, Trump vs nato, Nato and greenland, Politics 

“I gotta start out with a confession,” Joe Allen said. “Human beings get on my f**king nerves.”

He paused for effect. “I think the only creatures on earth more annoying are mosquitoes, AIs, and robots.”

It was an unexpected confession from a man who has spent the post-COVID years as a sort of John the Baptist for the cause of the human race. Joe Allen, a contributor to Steve Bannon’s War Room and author of “Dark Aeon,” has been on a speaking tour, warning against the machinations of tech titans and how they intend to turn the human race into a sort of human/machine hybrid, a mix of genetically optimized meat meshed with artificial intelligence.

A comprehensive worldview where humanity either upgrades or disappears.

Here’s the thing: They really believe in this stuff, and Joe has the receipts. Heady stuff for a Thursday night in Nashville.

The Emperor and the Twink

Allen frames the transhuman future around two figures he calls “the Emperor and the Twink”: Elon Musk and Sam Altman. Augustus and Hadrian. The productive empire-builder and the more, as Allen puts it, “degenerate” aesthete.

Both are building toward the same goal through different paths: a future where humanity merges with machines or gets left behind. Maybe eliminated entirely.

Altman’s funding a start-up called Conception that would let two men produce biological children together through synthetic ova. He’s backing Genomic Prediction for algorithmic eugenics. Scraping embryos for height, IQ, looks, then selecting the “best” ones. “Sanitized eugenics,” Allen calls it. “At scale, it would be an algorithmic filter for humanity.”

Then there’s the AI work itself. OpenAI and ChatGPT aren’t just productivity tools. They’re the foundation for what Altman believes will be artificial superintelligence. First the little-g gods, then maybe the big-G God. Artificial general intelligence self-improving into something that makes humanity obsolete.

RELATED: Cash-starved OpenAI BURNS $50M on ultra-woke causes — like world’s first ‘transgender district’

Photo by AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images

To keep humans relevant in that future, Altman’s pushing World ID: biometric iris scans linking your eyeballs to a government ID and blockchain cryptocurrency. “One of the many tentacles,” Allen said, “of the vast digital beast system slowly strangling the life out of everything we once knew to be human.”

He’s also invested in Merge Labs, ultrasound systems to read brain waves and create higher-bandwidth communication with AI. A chance for some biological humans to keep up when the machines take over.

The South African car dealer

Musk presents himself as the alternative. The “based” option. xAI is the competitor to OpenAI’s “woke” ChatGPT, because when we’re all consulting chatbots to determine what’s racist or sexist, you’ll want “maximally truth-seeking” AI that hasn’t been neutered by progressive ideology.

Fair enough. But the destination’s the same.

Neuralink is the centerpiece. First sold as healing technology, helping the paralyzed walk and the blind see. But Musk’s open about the long-term plan: hundreds of millions of normal humans drilling holes in their skulls to install high-bandwidth interfaces with AI. “If I’m not to be emperor,” Allen said, “I’ll at least be cooler than the gaybies wielding drones and flamethrowers around me.”

Then there’s Optimus: the humanoid robots Musk promises will outnumber humans three or four to one within a decade or two. “Algorithmic immigrants,” Allen calls them, “coming across the border from the platonic realm of mathematical possibilities and swarming into reality.”

Right now, they can barely fold laundry. But if the vision succeeds, we’ll be surrounded by entities that can do everything we can do, only better. Which raises an obvious question: What are we for?

Race, robots, and religion

Allen organized his talk around three concepts: race, robots, and religion. Or as he rephrased it: bloodline, cultural transmission, and cosmic worldview. Genes, memes, and spirit.

The bloodline question is straightforward enough when it comes to Altman’s synthetic reproduction technology. But it applies more broadly. Who continues? What survives? The transhumanist vision explicitly embraces what Allen calls “cultural and perhaps even biological genocide”: the gradual or rapid replacement of biological humans by superior cyborgs and AI.

“First the coders, then white-collar workers, then blue-collar workers,” Allen said, echoing Musk and Altman’s own predictions. “We’re left completely economically unviable. Obsolete.”

The robots are the mechanism. They’ll do our work. They’ll fill our needs. They’ll provide “radical abundance.” A world where no one has to labor, where everything is taken care of, where we live as pets or preserve species while the AI spreads through the solar system and beyond.

Or we get turned into biofuel. “Better to reconfigure our atoms into robot components,” Allen notes, “than keep us around using up resources as pets.”

The religion part is where it gets really dark. This isn’t just technology. It’s theology. The conscious creation of artificial gods to rule over us or replace us entirely. A “sacred canopy” that fills the void in a godless universe.

Allen quotes Bryan Johnson, whom he describes as a vampire who injects his son’s blood to stay young, laying out the five goals every ambitious man should have: Found a company, found a country, found a religion, don’t die, become God.

“It’s a bold claim,” Allen said dryly. “I am somewhat skeptical.”

The war against humanity

Championing humanity doesn’t come naturally to Allen. He grew up in the hollers of Appalachia, developing “a keen sense of misanthropy and technophobia,” where he related better to the trees and streams than to people.

But we have to put that aside for what Allen sees as a war. “If we’re not going to be replaced by machines, if we are not to become robotic entities ourselves, it’s going to require a certain degree of tolerance for humanity.”

He means accepting human messiness. Human imperfection. The “dirtiness and nastiness of humanity” that makes us frustrating but also makes us us. Because the alternative is accepting that machines really are superior. That Silicon Valley’s wealthiest men, backed by the most powerful governments on earth, are right about where we should go.

“Everyone is going to have to make a choice,” Allen said. “Accept the status quo or reject it outright.”

The rejection requires something most of us aren’t good at: forgiving people we disagree with. Looking past differences. Banding together. “When you are fighting a hyper-cooperative superorganism,” Allen said, “you’re going to need a gang.”

Allen argued that human solidarity, even with people whose beliefs or lifestyles or sins we can’t stand, is the only viable resistance to algorithmic replacement.

“That person is a human being,” he said, “and you will have to put humans first.”

The prophets

At one point, Allen pitched a satirical product: transhumanist trading cards. Each card would feature a prominent figure in the movement (or occasionally an anti-transhumanist). Statistics like net worth, number of concubines, humans replaced. A small stick of gum “alternately dosed with LSD or nanobots.”

It was a bit. But like good satire, it made a point: These people have names. Sigmund Freud, who prophesied humanity becoming “a kind of prosthetic God.” Julian Huxley, who coined the term transhumanism to describe a human race taking control of its own evolution through technology. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the priest who saw technological civilization as the face of Christ incarnating on earth.

Then the modern saints: Ray Kurzweil and the singularity. Peter Thiel, the accused vampire with rumored interest in young-blood transfusions. Ben Goertzel with his leopard print cowboy hat, giving “dire prophecies of machines taking over with a kind of jolly glee.”

And of course, Yuval Noah Harari. “Looking like the demonic dark elf that he is,” Allen said. “So often quoted, almost never understood, but probably the greatest anti-tech propagandist of our time. Which goes to show you how stupid people are that they believe he’s a transhumanist himself.”

The point isn’t the cards. It’s that these aren’t random technologists tinkering in garages. They’re building toward a vision. A comprehensive worldview where humanity either upgrades or disappears.

We’re already transhuman

Allen’s message is bleak enough that you want to dismiss it as paranoia. Nobody’s actually going to drill holes in billions of skulls. Sam Altman’s not really going to create algorithmic master races. This is science fiction, not policy.

Except they’re building it right now. They’re funding it. They’re selling it. They’re openly stating these goals.

Allen compared it to communism. An insane vision that seems impossible until you realize people really believed it and acted on it and reshaped the world trying to achieve it. The reality that emerged wasn’t the utopian dream, but it killed tens of millions of people and enslaved hundreds of millions more.

“These futures that these guys are putting forward,” Allen said during the Q&A, “some approximation already exists. A greater degree of approximation will exist, and you just simply have to draw your lines where you will.”

Here’s the uncomfortable part: Most of us have already crossed some lines. We’re already cyborgs, as Allen admits. Smartphones, wearables, the constant digital interface with our brains. The question isn’t whether to engage with technology. It’s where the sacred boundary sits. How much is too much.

Allen compared it to having “a pristine, simple cyborg on one shoulder and a very smelly Amishman on the other. And you’re never going to be either of those things, but they’re always vying for your decisions, trying to steer you one way or the other.”

Fair enough. But the cyborg has enough cheerleaders. We need more people willing to LARP as armed Amishmen.

The middle path

Allen was asked: Is there a peaceful way to interface with these technologies? Some middle path between full rejection and full adoption?

“I’m no fundamentalist,” he said. “These sacred boundaries are really important, but they’re always going to be bound against.”

His line for himself: zero use for AI in creative work. Anyone using AI to write, compose music, or create images should list the model alongside their name “as a mark of shame for being a hack and basically a vessel for an algorithmic parasite.”

That’s harsh. But it’s a clear boundary. And it matters because the question isn’t just about capabilities. It’s about what makes us human and what makes work meaningful. Whether the polished precision of algorithmic output is worth losing the messy, opaque, human quality of actual creation.

Allen mentioned reading “Paradise Lost” and finding the confusing passages charming “because they’re self-evidently the personal creation of John Milton.” The alternative is flawless, efficient, and utterly dead.

Allen mentioned James Poulos, a tech thinker he respects, who takes a different approach. Poulos argues we need to “identify the tools that are of use to you to protect against this sort of nightmare future” while cultivating deeply religious life and communities. But crucially, “not to reject technology out of hand and see it as somehow inherently evil.” It’s a middle path that acknowledges we’re already compromised but still draws meaningful boundaries based on what actually serves human flourishing.

What happens next

Allen’s not optimistic about avoiding horror. “I don’t suspect maybe that won’t be the case,” he said when asked about preventing a high-tech repeat of 20th-century atrocities. He sees deepfakes and AI erosion of trust requiring “a hyper-vigilant posture in which we don’t trust anything at face value.”

His advice: Cultivate human relationships with people you trust. Develop channels where the person on the other end is verified. “Hope for the best. I’m not going to say all of us are going to make it. But enough of us are going to make it.”

But here’s the thing he said that stuck with me: “This war against humanity, this war in favor of machines and more particularly in favor of the men who own the machines — this isn’t something that will be solved or concluded in our lifetimes. This is something that began long before we were born, will continue long after we die.”

If you care about your children or other people’s children, you have to accept this isn’t ending anytime soon.

Allen closed by urging us to write our own futures. Not to accept the vision laid out by Musk, Altman, and the rest. “Write it boldly,” he said. “Write it without apology. Write it beautifully. And for God’s sake, write it in a way that is not cliché or irritating.”

Then he added, “Because I don’t think I can take any more.”

The question now is what we do about it. Whether we have the will to resist the most powerful technological and financial forces on earth. Whether we can tolerate each other enough to band together. Whether we can draw our sacred boundaries and hold them.

Allen’s asking us to make a choice. I don’t know what mine is yet. But I know that men like Altman and Musk aren’t waiting for us to decide.

They’re building the future right now. Whether we like it or not.

Memento mori

You might expect Joe to be an angry misanthrope, but nothing could be further from the truth. I’ve known Joe for a few years now, and he’s quite possibly the most upbeat, happy-go-lucky guy I know. Always the life of the party, always a joy to hear speak, and a walking encyclopedia of esoterica.

After his talk, I was talking to folks in the crowd who would ask, “How did he memorize all that?” The thing about Joe is that he is always “on.” What you see on stage is what you see in person: a happy warrior riding full bore into existential dread with a grin and a devil-may-care attitude.

I asked Joe how he’s able to retain such a sunny disposition in the face of seemingly insurmountable darkness. “Memento mori: In the end, it’s all a momentary drama,” he told me.

​Tech, Sam altman, Elon musk, Transhumanism