Category: blaze media

Chaos erupted at an illegal “fight club” in New York, which resulted in teens being shot and 13 people arrested, police stated.

Officers from the Suffolk County Police Department’s Seventh Precinct responded to a report of possible gunshots fired around 6 p.m. Sunday at the Brookhaven Aquatic Center parking lot in the hamlet of Shirley in Long Island.

‘An example needs to be set.’

Once police officers arrived, they discovered that a “scuffle had broken out among several people who were attending an unauthorized fight club event,” the Suffolk County Police Department told Blaze News.

RELATED: South Carolina daycare employees accused of running child fight club, encouraging 14 toddlers to assault each other

Photo by Denys Yelmanov via iStock / Getty Images Plus

The Suffolk County Police Department said one of the participants in the alleged fight club “brandished and discharged a blank-firing gun during the scuffle, which injured a 17-year-old male and a 19-year-old male.”

The two teens were rushed to a local hospital for treatment of non-life-threatening injuries, police said.

Suffolk Police Chief of Detectives William Doherty noted to WABC-TV that “the gun was designed to fire blanks. It wasn’t a firearm that expelled the projectile, but the blanks were fired close enough to two individuals to injure them.”

Detectives with the Suffolk County Police Department charged 25-year-old Devine Brown of Mastic Beach with assault in the second degree, menacing in the second degree, prohibitive use of a weapon, and unlawful assembly. Brown was held at the Sixth Precinct jail.

The other 12 suspects, all from Suffolk County, were arrested and charged with unlawful assembly and were issued field or desk appearance tickets. They include:

Jehsiah Williams, 23, of Mastic Devin Black, 20, of Mastic BeachTariq Nix, 20, of Mastic Alejandro Hightower, 20, of HolbrookMalachi Leftenant, 19, of ShirleyHonest Thompson, 19, of Middle IslandJason Alvarez, 18, of RiverheadHenry Thompson, 18, of MorichesLorenzo Whyte, 18, of ShirleyKyron Deer, 18, of CoramThomas Zuzierla, 18, of Mastic A 16-year-old boy; police did not name him because of his age

Brookhaven Town Supervisor Dan Panico told News 12 Long Island that he’s seeking tougher laws to penalize those who profit from criminal activity.

“An example needs to be set because the good people of Mastic, Shirley, Mastic Beach, and elsewhere have had it with all this stupidity,” Panico stated.

The investigation into the alleged fight club incident is ongoing. Detectives with the Suffolk County Police Department are urging anyone with information on the incident to contact the Seventh Squad at 631-852-8752.

RELATED: Students from prestigious high school caught running MMA-style fight club — then one gets charged by cops for something even dumber

This is actually the second time an unauthorized “fight club” was recently exposed in Suffolk County.

Last month, approximately 70 people attended an illegal “fight club” at Walt Whitman Park in Melville, according to Newsday.

Police said they were tipped off about the brawl at the park after the melee was publicized on Instagram.

The spectators watching the rumble — mostly young adults in their early 20s — scattered when cops arrived. However, police arrested two combatants.

Finley McCloskey and Jake Zimilies — both 19-year-old Northport residents — were issued appearance tickets and charged with unlawful assembly, according to the Suffolk County Police Department.

Police noted that the Instagram account that promoted the “fight club” was deactivated after the bust.

The premise of a “fight club” was first popularized by the 1996 novel “Fight Club” by Chuck Palahniuk, which was based on his own experiences participating in secret brawl rings.

The book was adapted into the 1999 Oscar-nominated movie of the same name, which starred Edward Norton and Brad Pitt.

The most popular quote from the “Fight Club” film is regarding the secrecy of the underground fight club: “Gentlemen, welcome to Fight Club. The first rule of Fight Club is: You do not talk about Fight Club. The second rule of Fight Club is: You DO NOT talk about Fight Club!”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fight club, Long island, Long island fight club, Fight, Shooting, New york crime, Crime, New york, Arrests 

Stephen Colbert has been vaporized, canceled by CBS. Donald Trump is celebrating. Liberal Hollywood is outraged! Regular folks don’t care.

Goodnight, everybody!

New ownership at CBS is looming, and Skydance Media evidently doesn’t want a leftist pep rally every night.

But not so fast. This is a fascinating story when you examine the power angle. The once-dominant network television media is completely falling apart. According to the Nielsen folks, fewer than 20% of Americans now watch any network programming. Why? Because it’s largely boring, and traditional Americans resent the liberal culture the networks embrace all day and all night. Woke on parade. Political correctness run amok.

I have a unique vantage point here. Because of my bestselling books and controversial demeanor in general, I have appeared on late-night shows an astonishing 75 times. I know all these guys and the world they inhabit.

Colbert basically committed performance suicide. When he took over for David Letterman 10 years ago, he was coming off the red-hot satire of Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show” and his own “Colbert Report.” Yes, the boys were left-handed pitchers, but they tamped down the malice — at least somewhat. I had a lot of laughs debating Stewart.

Over the past five years, Stephen Colbert has lost more than one million viewers; his numbers descended to just above two million households daily. Profits crashed.

The primary reason for this runaway train is Colbert’s hatred for Trump and the MAGA brigades. Eighty million Americans voted for the president. Few of them can stomach Colbert’s schtick. Ideological zealotry at midnight can be tedious. The all-time king of late night, Johnny Carson, understood that. Old Johnny got his zingers in, but he rarely tried to demean anyone.

All the late-night hosts have talent. It’s impossible to do the job if you don’t. Letterman was very quick and edgy. My debates with him are legendary, especially the one where he called me a thug but couldn’t back it up when I challenged him.

On my final appearance with Dave, his audience gave me a standing ovation.

Letterman was cranky but rarely displayed overt hatred. He invited me on 16 times and wrote me a gracious note after every appearance.

Jay Leno was essentially a stand-up comedian, not deeply invested in promoting politics. Same with Jimmy Fallon, although he understands the far-left culture at NBC. Remember the heat Fallon took when he good-naturedly messed up Donald Trump’s hair?

RELATED: Farewell to Stephen Colbert, fake laughs, and lame late-night bias

Photo by Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images

Jimmy Kimmel has drifted into the political swamp mostly because he despises the president. I like Kimmel personally. But he’d be wise to spread the satire around. ABC will be the next place to purge extremists.

My old adversary, Stewart, a brilliant talent, has also succumbed somewhat to strident presentations. Although when I sparred with him last August, the mischievous glimmer was back, at least for a night.

So Stephen Colbert leaves the CBS stage. New ownership is looming, and Skydance Media evidently doesn’t want a leftist pep rally every night. Hollywood will take care of Colbert, so we will see him again.

I bet Donald Trump can’t wait.

Editor’s note: A version of this article appeared originally at billoreilly.com.

​Opinion & analysis, Woke hollywood, Cbs, The late show with stephen colbert, The late show, Late night, Comedy, Stephen colbert, Jimmy kimmel, Johnny carson, Maga, Donald trump, Skydance, Jon stewart, David letterman, The daily show, The colbert report, Jay leno, Politics, Liberal bias, Funny, Ratings, Wokeness, Woke, Political correctness 

The FBI has launched a criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey for perjury and potentially other crimes related to the Trump-Russia hoax. This comes shortly after a CIA tradecraft review revealed their manipulation of a December 30, 2016, intelligence community assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin favored Donald Trump in the 2016 election. And on Friday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reported that former President Barack Obama, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Brennan, and others participated in the deception.

Gabbard said:

The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people. … As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.

In the words of President Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright, the chickens may be finally coming home to roost.

The report and documents issued by Gabbard demonstrate that the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia probably was not using cyber means to influence the election.

On December 9, 2016, Obama’s National Security Council principals, including Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, and others, met to discuss Russia. After the meeting, Clapper directed an email to intelligence agency leaders, instructing them to work up an intelligence community assessment “per the president’s request” that detailed the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

The tradecraft review and the information released by Gabbard on Friday show a systematic breach of oath, duty, and honor by Barack Obama and the nation’s highest-ranking intelligence officials.

Even before the assessment began, Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets that the IC had “definitively concluded” that Russia had used cyber means to intervene in the election, specifically to help Trump win.

Responding to Gabbard, Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, issued the following statement:

The years-long Russia investigation carried out by the Senate Intelligence Committee reaffirmed that the ‘Russian government directed extensive activity against US election infrastructure’ ahead of the 2016 election, and that it ‘used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign’ in order to benefit Donald Trump. This conclusion was supported on a unanimous basis by every single Democrat and Republican on the committee.

The rushed preparation of the intelligence community assessment ordered by Obama, conclusions reversing six months of intelligence analysis, and reliance on the discredited Steele dossier all suggest that Gabbard likely has the better of this argument, though calling the former Obama administration’s actions a “treasonous conspiracy” may be a step too far.

Setting the stage

John Brennan served as Barack Obama’s CIA director from March 2013 until just before Trump took office in January 2017. Since leaving office, he has been an outspoken Trump critic. In October 2020, he was one of 51 intelligence analysts who signed the intentionally misleading letter that Hunter Biden’s laptop “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

Brennan and the other intelligence analysts used their training in deception to trick American voters just before the 2020 presidential election. As many signatories were aware at the time, the FBI had already vetted the legitimacy of the laptop and its contents. The oblique allegation was intended to convey that its content was fake, while preserving the analysts’ ability to deny that was their conclusion.

The letter also gave the FBI cover to deny knowledge of the laptop, allowing it and other federal agencies to influence and coerce the media into suppressing coverage. Numerous surveys suggest that wider knowledge of Hunter’s laptop could have changed the outcome of the 2020 election, sparing America the Biden-Harris administration.

Three years later, when the FBI introduced the laptop into evidence in the Hunter Biden prosecution, it publicly confirmed that its contents were authentic. Asked how that squared with the analysts’ letter, Brennan disingenuously asserted they had never suggested the content was false, but merely observed there were similarities to a Russian intelligence operation.

Mirrors within mirrors. Just days after again taking office, Trump revoked Brennan’s security clearance.

Brennan was just the beginning

Brennan wasn’t the only high-profile Obama appointee targeting Trump. Obama’s FBI director Comey and Director of National Intelligence Clapper were integral to the effort.

In mid-2016, Comey opened an FBI criminal investigation of the Trump campaign, at least partially motivated by the Steele dossier. No later than January 2017, the FBI knew that much of the information in the dossier was false. Shortly after, it learned the dossier was disinformation funded by the Clinton campaign using the law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS as cutouts to engage the putative author, erstwhile British spy Christopher Steele.

At the start of the first Trump administration, Comey apparently lied to Trump and then misled congressional committees by denying he was under investigation. On March 20, 2017, he finally revealed the FBI investigation to the House Intelligence Committee. The Justice Department’s inspector general and special counsel John Durham criticized Comey’s handling of these matters, and, as a result of Durham’s investigation, former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pled guilty to falsifying information in a surveillance warrant request targeting Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

They quickly learned the dossier was disinformation funded by the Clinton campaign to engage the putative author, erstwhile British spy Christopher Steele.

When Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017, Comey retaliated by disclosing confidential information, depicting Trump in an unfavorable light, to Columbia Law professor Daniel Richman for delivery to the press. Comey became a Trump critic only somewhat less vitriolic than Brennan. Trump then revoked Comey’s security clearance.

Though Democrats and the media have savaged the criminal investigation of Brennan and Comey as political retribution, it’s evident — while in their Obama-appointed positions atop the world’s premier law enforcement and espionage agencies — they broke their oaths, exceeded their authority, ignored the Constitution, and investigated, harassed, and sought to prosecute Trump and his campaign team for their opposition to the deep state. Both lied in testimony to congressional committees about the status, origins, process, and findings of the FBI investigation and related intelligence community activities.

Shattering norms

When, just six weeks before the end of his term, Obama ordered the intelligence community to prepare a predetermined assessment of Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 campaign, the CIA completed the effort in just one week, over the Christmas holiday. The IC assessment concluded with “high confidence” that Russia sought to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process and damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Analysts buckled to pressure and included the claim that Putin “aspired” to help then-candidate Trump win the election but applied the reduced “moderate confidence” standard to that inference.

The CIA’s Directorate of Analysis routinely conducts internal after-action reviews of its work on controversial and high-profile intelligence topics, but no review was conducted after the intelligence community assessment’s publication, because it was considered “too politically sensitive,” according to analysts involved in the process.

Current Trump-appointed CIA Director John Ratcliffe rectified that failure two months ago, ordering the Directorate of Analysis to undertake a tradecraft review of the ICA. The review shed considerable light on the politicization of the intelligence community at the behest of Obama, Clapper, and Brennen — and the likelihood that agency heads repeatedly perjured themselves in congressional testimony. It also provides a view into the tortured abuse of facts that undergirds the lawfare waged against Trump by the Biden-Harris administration and Democratic prosecutors.

RELATED: Bombshell documents referred to DOJ expose Obama’s direct role in Russia hoax

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The tradecraft review concluded that the intelligence community generally — and the CIA specifically — violated norms for the development, drafting, and issuance of similar assessments. Work that usually occurs over many months was compressed into one holiday week, during which the agency heads were unusually and intensely involved in drafting the IC assessment in a “chaotic,” “atypical,” and “markedly unconventional” process. Strict compartmentalization prevented team members from accessing the information required to evaluate the proposed findings.

The conclusion that Putin “aspired” to help Trump win was largely based on one classified CIA report that Brennan refused to share with most team members. From the outset, Brennan and Clapper excluded the National Intelligence Council. In his book “Undaunted,” Brennan acknowledges that the agency heads and Obama White House agreed on this process prior to initiating the assessment.

The tradecraft review noted:

The decision by agency heads to include the Steele dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment. … FBI leadership made it clear that their participation in the ICA hinged on the dossier’s inclusion and, over the next few days, repeatedly pushed to weave references to it throughout the main body of the ICA.

The IC assessment authors and multiple senior CIA managers — including the two senior leaders of the CIA mission center responsible for Russia — strongly opposed including the dossier, asserting that it did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards. The CIA’s deputy director for analysis warned in an email to Brennan that including it in any form risked “the credibility of the entire paper.”

The review shed considerable light on the politicization of the intelligence community at the behest of Obama, Clapper, and Brennan.

Brennan overruled their objections, insisting that narrative consistency was more important than accuracy. As the tradecraft review explained:

Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness. When confronted with specific flaws in the dossier by the two mission center leaders — one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background — he appeared more swayed by the dossier’s general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns.

Brennan issued written instructions to include the Steele dossier in the report. A summary was attached as an appendix, though it was expressly referenced in the main body of the intelligence community only once.

The tradecraft review determined that the intelligence community assessment not only relied on information from the problematic Steele dossier, but excluded “credibly sourced” differing reports.

Brennan’s perjury?

Contrary to the intelligence community’s assessment and Brennan’s written instructions to its authors, Brennan claimed in congressional testimony under oath on May 23, 2017, that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done.”

In January 2017, the Office of National Intelligence issued a statement from Clapper that “we did not rely upon [the dossier] in any way for our conclusions.” Several months later, Clapper assured Congress the dossier was “not a formal part of the intelligence community assessment.”

More recently, during a May 2023 House Judiciary Committee interview, Brennan asserted that “the CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment.” Though Brennan was apparently the intelligence community assessment’s architect and gave specific instructions to use the Steele dossier, he testified he was “not involved in analyzing the dossier at all.”

Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations reported that Clapper swore in the same May 2023 House Judiciary Committee interview that the Steele dossier was not used “in” the intelligence community assessment or “for” the intelligence community assessment, and the team “didn’t draw on it.”

The tradecraft review and the information released by Gabbard on Friday show a systematic breach of oath, duty, and honor by Barack Obama and the nation’s highest-ranking intelligence officials.

The statute of limitations has likely run out on the initial wrongdoing and most efforts to cover it up, though not the 2023 testimony. A congressional investigation should bring clarity to the American public, while the FBI focuses on prosecutable crimes.

The standards for perjury should be those applied to former White House strategy chief Steve Bannon and White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, both of whom were prosecuted and imprisoned for their testimony before congressional committees. To the extent other wrongdoing can be prosecuted, the standards should be those applied to senior government officials who betrayed their oaths in an effort to subvert the country.

Editor’s note: This article was published originally at the American Mind.

​Opinion & analysis, Russia, Russiagate, Russia collusion hoax, Donald trump, Barack obama, James clapper, John brennan, James comey, John kerry, National intelligence, Odni, Department of justice, Cia, Fbi, Steele dossier, Tulsi gabbard, Criminal referral, Congress, Perjury, Senate intelligence committee, Intelligence community, Intelligence community assessment, Fusion gps, House intelligence committee, Christopher steele, American mind, Carter page, Surveillance, John ratcliffe, Vladimir putin, Sources and methods 

The Trump administration faced significant backlash over the Justice Department’s July 6 conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein did not have a client list — a list that Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed in a Feb. 21 interview to have sitting on her desk.

While President Donald Trump has indicated he does not personally share the public’s continued fascination with the Epstein case, he told reporters on July 15 that he would instruct his administration to release any “credible information.”

‘The FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.’

The DOJ, acting on Trump’s instruction, is working to check off some items that appeared on Turning Point USA President Charlie Kirk’s list of “10 immediate credible action items” Bondi could take that might satisfy Americans’ hunger for answers, namely pressing Epstein’s former lover and co-conspirator for answers.

Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse minor girls as young as 14 with Epstein, going all the way back to the early 1990s.

According to evidence presented at her trial and allegations in court documents, Maxwell “assisted, facilitated, and participated in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse victims known to Maxwell and Epstein to be under the age of 18.”

In addition to grooming minors for abuse, Maxwell — whose father the Telegraph indicated was a newspaper baron who had “known links with MI6, the KGB, and the Israeli intelligence service Mossad” — apparently did her best to normalize the abuse, allegedly discussing sexual topics with the victims, undressing in front of them, hanging around when the victims were being stripped, and encouraging the victims to massage Epstein.

RELATED: Charlie Kirk outlines ’10 immediate credible action items’ Pam Bondi can take on Epstein case

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Besides Epstein, it is unlikely there is anybody more familiar with the monstrous operation than Maxwell.

A source close to Maxwell recently told the Daily Mail that the convicted groomer “would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story.”

“No one from the government has ever asked her to share what she knows,” said the unnamed source. “She remains the only person to be jailed in connection to Epstein, and she would welcome the chance to tell the American public the truth.”

‘No lead is off-limits.’

Charlie Kirk recommended that all of Maxwell’s grand jury testimony should be unsealed and that the administration should “green-light Maxwell to speak freely and learn what she knows.”

“President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in statement on Tuesday. “If Ghislane [sic] Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.”

Blanche indicated that he reached out to Maxwell’s counsel at Bondi’s direction “to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department.”

RELATED: Why the Epstein story cannot be buried

Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

“I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days,” continued Blanche. “Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now.”

“No one is above the law,” Blanche added in a separate message, “and no lead is off-limits.”

While the convicted sex offender might volunteer some satisfactory insights, it’s clear that the DOJ is not budging in the meantime on its conclusion regarding the existence of the Epstein list.

Blanche noted that the DOJ and FBI’s controversial conclusion “remains as accurate today as it was when it was written. Namely, that in the recent thorough review of the files maintained by the FBI in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Department of justice, Doj, Fbi, Pam bondi, Bondi, Jeffrey epstein, Elites, Pedophile, Sex trafficking, Sex offender, Ghislaine maxwell, Maxwell, Blanche, Politics 

Comedian Shane Gillis is not one to hold back, and he made no exceptions as the host of the ESPY awards last week. As he took the stage, he fired shots at just about everyone … that you’re not allowed to fire shots at.

“Four-time WNBA all-star Brittany Hicks is here. Give it up for Brittany, everybody,” Gillis said, pausing to let the crowd clap. “I’m joking around. That’s my friend’s wife. I know none of you knew WNBA players. That’s crazy. You clap for that.”

Gillis also joked that when Caitlin Clark retires from the WNBA, she’ll work at a Waffle House to “continue doing what she loves most, fighting black women.”

The comedian even took aim at the audience and event, saying, “There was supposed to be an Epstein joke here, but I guess it got deleted. Must have probably deleted itself, right? Probably never existed actually. Let’s move on.”

BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock was a fan of Gillis’ performance, calling it a “healing process.”

“The woke crowd has raised the white flag of surrender,” he says. “Any time you have someone like Shane Gillis hosting the ESPY awards, cracking the jokes that Shane Gillis cracked — wow, there’s been a culture shift.”

“I’m not sure if you recognize the significance of perhaps the most politically incorrect comedian being able to host the ESPYs and being allowed to crack these jokes. You’ve got to remember what the ESPYs are. Caitlyn Jenner, Bruce Jenner, got a courage award for changing his gender,” he continues.

“And I hope that you will be inspired by the progress, the obvious progress that Disney, a grooming institution, the headquarters for the alphabet mafia, they had to wave the white flag,” he adds.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Camera phone, Video phone, Upload, Free, Video, Sharing, Youtube.com, Fearless, Jason whitlock, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Shane gillis, Espy awards, Shane gillis comedian, Epstein, Shane gillis epstein joke, Shane gillis wnba joke 

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling greenlighting mass layoffs at the Department of Education sends a clear message: The courts no longer belong to the Democrats.

For decades, Democrats relied on judges to impose policies they couldn’t pass through Congress. But that strategy has collapsed. With a conservative majority now on the bench, the judicial workaround has given way to constitutional limits — and the left is losing.

Every time Democrats sue to block Trump’s orders, they hand him another opportunity — and this court is more than ready to lock in conservative victories for a generation.

In the final week of its 2024-2025 term, the high court:

Curbed federal courts’ ability to issue sweeping nationwide injunctions.Affirmed the right of parents to opt their children out of school lessons that violate their religious beliefs.Allowed South Carolina to deny Planned Parenthood Medicaid funding for non-abortion services.Approved mass layoffs across the government — at least temporarily.

In high-stakes emergency cases, Trump keeps winning — notching victories in nearly all 18 Supreme Court petitions. That includes greenlights to deport migrants to third countries and enforce the transgender military ban.

Short-term gains, long-term pains

Democrats thought they could run out the clock with courtroom delay tactics. Instead, they handed Trump a fast pass to the one branch he dominates.

Only one branch of government speaks with a single, constitutionally defined voice — the executive. And right now, that voice belongs to the president, no matter how loudly the deep state screams.

Unlike the executive, Congress isn’t built for speed. It’s a fractured, slow-moving body by design — hundreds of voices split by region, party, and ego. The judiciary can splinter, too, with power scattered across lower courts nationwide.

But the Supreme Court? That’s a different story.

With a 6-3 conservative majority, Trump holds a 2-to-1 advantage. Imagine if Republicans had that kind of dominance in Congress.

Trump wouldn’t be scraping by with a razor-thin 220-212 majority in the House. His agenda would cruise through. In the Senate, forget the 60-vote filibuster firewall — Trump’s bills would pass outright.

Reconciliation wouldn’t be a high-wire act. It would be routine. No more watching the Senate parliamentarian gut key provisions from his One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Granted, the Supreme Court can’t launch policy offensives like Congress or the White House. It waits for cases to land.

But thanks to Democrats, those cases keep coming. Every time they sue to block Trump’s executive orders, they hand him another opportunity — and this court is more than ready to lock in conservative victories for a generation.

Dems’ Achilles’ heel

For decades, Democrats treated the courts as a shortcut to power. When they couldn’t pass laws, they let judges do the work. Roe v. Wade was the crown jewel — a sweeping federal abortion mandate they never could have gotten through Congress. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg admitted the legal reasoning was flimsy.

They used the same playbook to expand the welfare state and rewrite social policy from the bench. Judicial activism became the norm, and both sides played the game. But Democrats played it harder — and now the rules are turning against them.

What once looked like a string of permanent victories has turned into a pipeline of defeats. Every lawsuit they file hands Trump’s Supreme Court another shot at affirming his agenda. Even when he technically loses, the rulings often leave behind a roadmap showing exactly how to win the next round.

RELATED: Supreme Court grants massive victory to Trump administration on cutting down Department of Education

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Democrats’ Supreme Court problem could get a lot worse. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the court’s oldest liberal at 71, has Type 1 diabetes and a history of health problems. If she steps down during Trump’s term, he could lock in a 7-2 conservative majority.

And if either Clarence Thomas, 77, or Samuel Alito, 75, decides to retire, Trump could replace them with younger conservatives — extending the court’s rightward tilt for decades.

Securing a conservative legacy

Trump has every incentive to issue bold executive orders. Each lawsuit the left files creates another opening for the Court to back him — and turn temporary wins into permanent precedent.

By chasing headlines and placating the base with short-term court fights, Democrats are handing Trump the long game. Their decades of judicial overreach have backfired. The courts they once controlled now serve as Trump’s most powerful weapon.

​Opinion & analysis, Donald trump, Supreme court, Clarence thomas, Samuel alito, Ruth bader ginsburg, Sonia sotomayor, Majority, Precedent, Congress, One big beautiful bill, Department of education, Layoffs, Doge, Judicial activism, Liberals, Democrats, Executive orders, Roe v. wade, Legislation, Judicial supremacy, Conservative, Victory, Nationwide injunctions, Unconstitutional 

Why does the story of Jeffrey Epstein matter so deeply to the American right? Why does it persist, years after his death, as a source of outrage, fascination, and dread? Why is the call to “move on” met with such visceral resistance?

The answer lies in what Epstein’s case reveals. It is not merely the record of one man’s depravity or even the scale of the crimes committed. It is a window into a concealed architecture of unaccountable power, intelligence protection, institutional rot, and elite impunity. For many on the right, it confirms long-standing fears about how power in the United States is really organized and who it is designed to serve.

These questions strike at the heart of an older conservative concern: Who governs? And who is permitted to ask?

These concerns are hardly new. They are the very ones that helped elect Donald Trump, and they have shaped conservative criticism of the American regime since the New Deal. The Epstein affair provides a rare glimpse into the soft underbelly of the administrative state. At some point, moral clarity demands that we stop parsing and start acting. This is a time to strike, to “fire for effect.”

From the expansion of the federal bureaucracy under Franklin D. Roosevelt to the postwar rise of the national security state, conservatives have warned about the merger of government power with private influence. The most dangerous feature of that merger is not the bureaucracy itself, but the consolidation of authority among entrenched intelligence services, elite financial networks, and foreign-aligned interests. These actors operate in close coordination, beyond democratic oversight, and with the consistent protection of institutional power.

Epstein is valuable because he exposes that structure in plain sight. He had no obvious source of legitimate wealth. His hedge fund, insofar as it existed, had only one known client. Yet, he moved in elite circles, befriended presidents and princes, and maintained access to corporate titans and scientific institutions.

Most disturbingly, Epstein appears to have operated a long-standing sexual blackmail network. The question is not merely how he got away with it, but who allowed him to do so.

Staggering implications

The answers are deeply unsettling. The FBI curtailed its investigations. The CIA has remained silent. The media showed little interest and declined to pursue the story in any depth. Meanwhile, the possible involvement of foreign intelligence services (especially those operating through figures like Leslie Wexner) has been treated as politically untouchable. This refusal to investigate is not born of ignorance or oversight. It is protective behavior. It signals that the wrong people are implicated.

Even if one adopts the minimalist position, that Epstein was not a formal intelligence asset, the implications remain staggering. Why would a known predator be permitted to operate so openly, with so many connections to power? Is the American state unable or unwilling to act when the guilty hold the right kinds of passports or relationships? Have we reached a point where elite networks are simply beyond reach, shielded by layers of shared interest and mutual compromise?

These questions strike at the heart of an older conservative concern: Who governs? And who is permitted to ask?

RELATED: The White House will need to do plenty more to get past Epstein

Photo by ALEX WROBLEWSKI/AFP via Getty Images

Epstein’s case offers a rare and ugly answer. What it uncovers is not a fever dream of conspiracy but an observable mode of governance that relies on secrecy, compromise, and shared immunity. It appears that intelligence actors have conducted operations not only abroad but also inside the United States, targeting the American elite itself. An immoral country condones sexual blackmail as a mechanism of influence and protection, integrated into a broader system of control … ironically an indication of a country spinning out of control.

A complicated inquiry

One can find instructive parallels in the operations of Israeli intelligence during the 1980s and 1990s. Under the direction of Mossad officials such as Efraim Halevy, Israel conducted systematic surveillance and developed personal leverage over Syrian elites. These methods included financial inducements, covert recordings, and exposure of private behavior. Such tactics are common in international espionage and are recognized tools of statecraft.

What makes Epstein so alarming is the apparent use of similar techniques within the United States, directed inward rather than outward. The uncomfortable possibility is that foreign intelligence services (including Israeli cutouts operating through figures like Wexner) were not merely bystanders, but active participants or beneficiaries of the Epstein operation. That possibility remains largely uninvestigated, not because it lacks merit, but because it threatens established political alignments.

Wexner’s history as a major donor to Republican candidates is one example of how these relationships complicate any honest inquiry. For a sitting senator or rising intelligence officer, confronting these questions comes at great cost.

This story is not important only because of the criminal sexual behavior it contains. That abuse, particularly of underage girls, is monstrous and demands full exposure and justice. But Epstein’s operation mattered at a higher level because those crimes were used to build networks of control. They were not incidental. They were instrumental. This is the cold logic of espionage deployed inside a supposedly self-governing republic.

RELATED: The conspiracy theorist is the last honest man

Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

For the political right, Epstein represents a grim vindication. The warnings about politicized intelligence services, compromised elites, and foreign impunity were long dismissed as paranoia or fringe thinking. Yet, the details of this case suggest those warnings were not only plausible, but understated.

Consider the unequal application of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Consider the way domestic allies are hounded while foreign-aligned actors operate with impunity. Consider the cultural message that those with the right credentials and connections will never face consequences. Epstein’s story reveals the inner wiring of a regime that no longer pretends to serve the citizen, only itself.

Denial becomes confirmation

Was Epstein a direct employee of a domestic or foreign intelligence apparatus? I highly doubt it. My best guess is he was a very well-connected money launderer with a psychopathic lack of empathy who was therefore the perfect tool for intelligence gathering and manipulation. He operated in the open, however, and was criminally harmful to some of the most vulnerable U.S. citizens. But we have seen how little citizenship means in the modern internationalist cosmopolitan soup.

Efforts to bury this story are morally callous and institutionally suicidal. Each attempt to suppress, ignore, or discredit the legitimate questions raised by the Epstein case erodes the remaining credibility of the agencies involved. The denial becomes confirmation. The silence becomes testimony. The cover-up increases the criminality, the offense to the American people.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) warned in his farewell address of a rising military-industrial complex. But the deeper danger he identified was the fusion of state power, private capital, and unaccountable influence. Epstein should be understood as a grotesque product of that fusion. Refusing to confront it will not preserve institutional authority. It will ensure its collapse.

In the end, the Epstein story is not simply salacious. It is foundational. It forces a reckoning with how the American regime truly operates and what moral and political compromises have become routine. That is why so many are eager to see it buried.

And that is precisely why it must not be.

​Opinion & analysis, Donald trump, Jeffrey epstein, Deep state, Administrative state, Blackmail, Intelligence community, Intelligence agencies, Elites, Control, Mossad, Cia, Fbi, Cover up, Leslie wexner, Republicans, Democrats, Trafficking, National security, Foreign influence, Regime 

Last week, a video capturing an alleged affair between Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot went mega viral. Byron and Cabot were visibly horrified when they found themselves on the jumbotron “kiss cam” at a Coldplay concert. As soon as they recognized they were on display for thousands to see, Byron, whose arms were clasped around Cabot in a romantic embrace, ducked out of the camera, as Cabot’s hands flew up to cover her face.

It’s a national scandal at this point. The video has amassed over 100 million views on social media, while thousands of articles at various news outlets have covered the story. Byron resigned from his lofty position, and his wife removed the name Byron from her Facebook account. Cabot has been placed on administrative leave pending a formal investigation.

Alex Stein, BlazeTV host of “Prime Time with Alex Stein,” addressed the outrage on his show last week, but to help him dive into the scandal, he accepted the invitation of a very interesting guest: Ashley Madison Chief Strategy Officer Paul Keable.

For those unfamiliar with Ashely Madison, it’s an online dating and social networking service marketed to people seeking extramarital affairs. The company’s tag line is “Life is short. Have an affair.”

According to Keable, Byron and Cabot’s relationship was unwise – but not because it’s a moral and ethical catastrophe. Rather, it’s unwise because “office affairs are not safe for work” due to the risk of job loss.

“That’s why our business exists – so that you can come and have a discrete affair and be, you know, undiscovered,” Keable told Alex.

Perhaps he thought Alex would agree with him, but to his surprise, he was met with a level of roasting only Alex can deliver.

“Do you have no shame? … Having a website that helps people cheat on their spouse – I mean, isn’t that morally repugnant?” Alex fired back.

Keable then tried (and failed) to justify Ashley Madison’s services. “Every single day if we don’t exist, things like this event [Byron and Cabot video] are going to happen more and more because our core competition is not another dating site; it’s the office space because that’s where we spend so much of our time, and so what we’re trying to do …” he blurted out before Alex cut him off.

“Wait, you’re saying if your website didn’t exist, people would cheat anyway? So even though your website facilitates cheating at a level that is much easier … somehow that is morally OK?” Alex quipped. “Where are your moral standards?”

Keable then tried again to justify Ashley Madison. “Our business doesn’t make people have affairs. I can’t convince happily married people to have affairs. What I can do is help people avoid the very situation that’s brought me to your show tonight,” he said. “We’ve built our business on the whole idea of discretion so that like-minded people can connect and have ironically a more honest conversation about the nature of what they’re interested in.”

“Anybody that says they have an affair, that has a negative connotation. So now you’re turning the word affair and you’re giving it a positive spin. For me, that seems, I mean, inconceivable to even think that you could do that and not even feel bad about it,” Alex countered.

Keable tried once again to legitimize the site, arguing that religion, specifically Christianity, is a roadblock to the inevitable reality that “infidelity happens,” but Alex shut him down.

“Well, I think it’s absolutely terrible. I think Ashley Madison really needs to shut down,” he retorted, before asking Keable about his sexual orientation.

Much to Alex’s surprise, Keable revealed that he is a straight, divorced man who left his marriage, which was, according to him, “a wonderful, beautiful” relationship, after 20 years because “that chapter of [his] life is over.”

“Well, listen, Paul, I think you’re a crazy son of a B, and I love you for coming on this show, but I think your website is repulsive, and I’m a repulsive person, so me saying that really, you know, it just shows you how repugnant your website truly is,” Alex said, concluding, “Thank you for coming on. Have a good day. Nobody join that website. Yeah, we don’t love you. All right, kick him off the show.”

To watch the hilarious footage of Alex’s epic takedown, check out the video above.

Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex’s culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Prime time with alex stein, Alex stein, Ashley madison, Andy byron, Kristin cabot, Coldplay, Blazetv, Blaze media 

An illegal alien from Honduras was caught on video carrying away a screaming woman whom police later identified as a sex trafficking victim.

The woman who was later identified as a 44-year-old immigrant from China told police that she had been brought willingly from New York to Houston before someone took her passport and she was held against her will. She said she had been promised a job in the massage industry with better pay.

‘I’m angry with myself that I didn’t pick up on it sooner or maybe done more, even though, like I said, I had that feeling that something wasn’t right. But who knows, it could have made a bigger difference.’

When she tried to escape, a man identified as 22-year-old Jose Armando Carcamo-Perdomo dragged her back, prosecutors said.

“She tried to leave, but this defendant carried her back inside the residence without her consent,” a Harris County judge said. “He tied her up and then sexually assaulted her.”

The woman was allegedly held for five days without food or water before she tried to escape.

A neighbor who did not want to be identified recorded the video of Carcamo-Perdomo dragging her back to a trailer home. The neighbor said he called the police and reported a child abduction because he wrongly believed the woman to be a child.

“As soon as I drove out of the fence at work, I called 911 to report a possible child abduction,” the neighbor said to KTRK-TV.

Investigators said they found the woman in a closet with her hands bound when they responded to the emergency call.

He has been arrested for kidnapping and was identified by ICE as a Honduran national who had illegally entered into the U.S. in 2020.

Investigators believe he may be a small part of a much larger human trafficking operation. They are looking to identify more possible suspects and victims.

RELATED: Young girls escape molester by kicking him in the groin at Fourth of July celebration, police say

The neighbor expressed frustration at not having done more to prevent the alleged crime.

“Especially being right next door, you know, I’m angry with myself that I didn’t pick up on it sooner or maybe done more, even though, like I said, I had that feeling that something wasn’t right. But who knows, it could have made a bigger difference with other people, maybe, other victims,” he said. “It’s very disheartening.”

An attorney for the suspect released a statement on his behalf.

“Our client, Mr. Jose Carcamo, is shocked by the serious allegations brought forth against him and firmly maintains his complete innocence,” the attorney said to KPRC-TV. “He fully expects that the evidence will ultimately clear his name.”

Carcamo is being held on $150,000 bond and is also being held on an ICE detainer.

The woman is said to be safe now, according to police.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Ice detainer crime, Jose carcamo-perdomo, Illegal alien sex trafficking, Man dragging away woman, Politics 

An unidentified 24-year-old man and his friend began arguing with a third male in the 14th Street Subway Station in Manhattan just after 7 p.m. Saturday, the NYPD told the New York Post.

According to amNY, a staring match preceded the dispute.

‘I will never ride the train again. It’s not safe.’

Police told the Post that the third male pulled out a knife and slashed the 24-year-old man in the lower torso and then ran away through the station’s mezzanine level.

With that, the 24-year-old man and his friend — a 20-year-old, amNY noted — chased down the third male who carried out the slashing and grabbed his knife, and one of the two other men stabbed the third male in the chest with that knife, sources told the paper.

RELATED: NYPD reports 2 stabbing subway incidents: 52-year-old man attacked for refusing to stop smoking and woman stabbed in the back

WABC-TV reported that it appears the 24-year-old man who was initially slashed carried out the stabbing against the third male.

The alleged initial assailant and the 24-year-old man were taken to Bellevue Hospital, where the initial slasher was pronounced dead, and the 24-year-old was in stable condition, the Post reported, citing police.

The paper added that two people are in custody but have not been charged. AmNY said the 24-year-old and the 20-year-old are being questioned.

The male who died has not yet been identified, WABC reported.

RELATED: Police arrest thugs suspected of slashing and pummeling uniformed NYPD officer on NYC subway

Commuters enter and exit the 14th Street-Union Square subway station in New York City. Photographer: Craig Warga/Bloomberg via Getty Images

As of Monday evening, 270 comments have been posted under WABC’s YouTube video report about the incident. Here are a handful of them:

“I thought that was a No Knife Zone?” one commenter quipped.”Things should get better once free grocery stores and a [downsize] in police services take effect with a new mayor,” another commenter added sarcastically.”With all these knife crimes I’d think there’d be more calls for more knife control,” another commenter reacted with tongue fully in cheek.”No charges,” another commenter declared. “Self-defense.””There’s truly something wicked going on …” another commenter observed.”It’s just too much violence going on in the subway,” another commenter shared. “I will never ride the train again. It’s not safe.””Should have not pulled the knife out,” another commenter stated before adding that “you get what you ask for.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Stabbing, Fatal stabbing, New york city, Manhattan, 14th street subway station, Turning the tables, Crime, Staring match 

The Trump administration chalked up another victory when the Fourth Circuit Appeals Court ruled that it could implement the end of temporary protective status for migrants from Afghanistan and Cameroon.

The order applies to about 11,700 migrants from Afghanistan and will allow the government to begin deporting them on midnight Monday evening.

‘The Trump administration’s attempt to end TPS for Afghanistan and other countries is a racist, unlawful action that cannot stand.’

The lawsuit was filed by immigrant activist group CASA, which had previously won a temporary ruling from the same appeals court for seven days. They had hoped the court would extend the stay but lost their motion.

“Although temporary, every moment counts when it comes to families figuring out their futures and being protected from ICE’s terror. We will fight for this pause on the termination to continue,” CASA legal director Ama Frimpong said at the time.

“The Trump administration’s attempt to end TPS for Afghanistan and other countries is a racist, unlawful action that cannot stand,” Frimpong continued.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the decision would bring the TPS program back to its original intent.

“Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country,” Noem said. “Additionally, the termination furthers the national interest as DHS records indicate that there are recipients who have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security. Reviewing TPS designations is a key part of restoring integrity in our immigration system.”

RELATED: Noem prepares to deport 500,000 immigrants from one long-troubled island

The administration has used the rescissions of TPS to bolster the president’s goal of mass deportations of migrants from the U.S.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Trump court victories, Tps status lawsuit, Tps afghanistan, Tps cameroon, Politics 

A newly released report from the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General revealed bombshell findings about the Obama-era FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released the 2018 report, which found that the FBI failed to complete a full investigation into Clinton’s “mishandling of highly classified information.”

‘Weeks later, on July 31, 2016, Comey’s FBI formally opened the bogus Crossfire Hurricane investigation into President Trump’s disproven collusion with Russia.’

President Donald Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi declassified the report’s “Clinton Annex” and provided it to Grassley after he requested the information.

Grassley stated, “This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s email usage and mishandling of highly classified information.”

“Under [former FBI Director James] Comey’s leadership, the FBI failed to perform fundamental investigative work and left key pieces of evidence on the cutting room floor,” Grassley continued. “The Comey FBI’s negligent approach and perhaps intentional lack of effort in the Clinton investigation is a stark contrast to its full-throated investigation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, which was based on the uncorroborated and now discredited Steele dossier. Comey’s decision-making process smacks of political infection.”

The OIG report found that under former President Barack Obama, the FBI failed to conduct targeted searches of eight thumb drives obtained by a source amid the ongoing Clinton investigation.

RELATED: Bombshell documents referred to DOJ expose Obama’s direct role in Russia hoax

Former FBI Director James Comey. Photo by Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

The report stated that “the vast majority of [the thumb drives’] data has never been reviewed by the FBI.” It further noted that the OIG previously concluded that a “review of the thumb drives was necessary to conduct a ‘thorough and complete investigation’ and to ‘assess the national security risks’ associated with former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private server.”

Grassley’s office stated that Comey planned to exonerate Clinton before conducting an interview with her, ultimately officially recommending the DOJ take no legal action against her on July 5, 2016.

“Weeks later, on July 31, 2016, Comey’s FBI formally opened the bogus Crossfire Hurricane investigation into President Trump’s disproven collusion with Russia,” a press release from Grassley’s office read. “On that day, [former FBI Special Agent Peter] Strzok texted Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer, saying: ‘And damn this feels momentous. Because this matters. The other one did, too, but that was to ensure we didn’t F something up. This matters because this MATTERS. So super glad to be on this voyage with you.’”

Grassley’s office further noted that the OIG’s report revealed that “the Obama administration took efforts to scuttle the investigation into Clinton and protect her candidacy.”

RELATED: Bill Clinton suggests Biden shouldn’t pardon his wife — then tries to wipe her record

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The senator accused the then-FBI of taking a “kid gloves approach” to the Clinton investigation. Grassley thanked Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel for sharing the new information with the American public, and he urged them to “continue to fully review this matter, including its national security impact.”

Bondi commended Grassley for his “unwavering, years-long commitment to exposing the truth and holding those who seek to conceal it accountable.”

“This Department of Justice is fully committed to transparency and will continue to support good-faith efforts in Congress to ensure accountability across the federal government,” Bondi stated.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Hillary clinton, Clinton, Barack obama, Obama, Obama administration, Fbi, Federal bureau of investigation, Kash patel, Department of justice, Doj, Pam bondi, Clinton annex, Chuck grassley, Department of justice office of inspector general, Doj oig, Oig, Office of inspector general, James comey, Crossfire hurricane, Peter strzok, Lisa page, Politics 

Pete Buttigieg’s presidential hopes are bringing renewed scrutiny to his performance while running the Department of Transportation under the Biden administration, and it is not going well.

The DOT approved tens of billions of dollars of grants for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs but stalled efforts to upgrade obsolescent air traffic control technology, according to a New York Post report.

‘He was definitely pushing an agenda.’

The report cited airline industry insiders and spending records from the federal government.

In one damning incident, Buttigieg reportedly told industry executives that upgrading air traffic control systems would only lead to more airplanes being put into the air, which would not be in his interest.

“He was definitely pushing an agenda,” said one industry official, who went on to accuse Buttigieg of having “little to no interest” in the needed air traffic control system upgrades.

“At first, [the Department of Transportation] and he were reluctant to say there was an air traffic controller shortage or that the shortage had anything to do with flight delays or flight cancellations,” the air industry official said.

Sources said that Buttigieg spent much of his time defending DEI policies from critics who said they put the public at risk through traffic controller shortages. He also blamed airlines for delays while refusing to upgrade the air traffic systems.

A spokesperson for Buttigieg denied the report in a statement to the Post.

RELATED: Pilots frustrated FAA prioritized ‘inclusive’ language, ‘environmental justice’ over tech issues that led to major system outage

Chris Meagher pointed to improved software changes under Buttigieg that improved efficiency and changes to flight routes that are projected to cut flight times. He also said that traffic control hiring increased during Buttigieg’s tenure.

“Suggesting that Secretary Buttigieg chose not to pursue air traffic control modernization is absurd,” Meagher said. “Secretary Buttigieg’s focus was always on safety — not just in aviation, but also on roads and bridges, where 40,000 Americans die on our country’s roads each year. Fixing issues with air traffic control was a priority.”

Officials that spoke to the Post accused Buttigieg of focusing on looking good on television rather than actually improving transportation for Americans.

Meagher also defended the DEI program funding during the Buttigieg tenure.

“You can walk and chew gum at the same time,” he said. “FAA operates completely separately than other modal administrations. So what happens at FHWA doesn’t have a meaningful effect on FAA or NHTSA because they operate independently. It’s separate staff, separate budgets, separate programs.”

Many of the claims in the Post report corroborated a previous documentary produced by Stu Burguiere at Blaze Media warning that incompetence in leadership at the Dept. of Transportation would lead to disaster.

The Trump administration has a chance to significantly improve transportation after the Republican “big, beautiful bill” provided for an increase of $12.5 billion for the improvement of FAA systems.

Blaze Originals’ “Countdown to the Next Aviation Disaster” can be viewed on BlazeTV. If you’re not already a subscriber, go to BlazeOriginals.com and start a seven-day free trial. Plus, use code DEI for $30 off your first year of BlazeTV+.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Buttigieg’s failures, Buttigieg faa debacle, Nypost vs buttigieg, Buttigieg dei, Politics 

If you’re going to be the CEO of a tech company, you might think twice before engaging in PDA at a Coldplay concert with a woman who’s not only not your wife but the chief of human resources.

And unless you’re living under a rock, you know that’s exactly what happened when CEO of Astronomer Andy Byron was caught on a Coldplay concert kiss cam cozying up with Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot.

Byron is married with children.

Days after the incident went viral across all social media platforms, Byron resigned from the company after being placed on leave.

“Andy Byron has tendered his resignation, and the Board of Directors has accepted,” Astronomer said in a statement. “The Board will begin a search for our next Chief Executive as Cofounder, and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy continues to serve as interim CEO.”

While the company clearly isn’t happy with the negative publicity Byron’s actions have caused, Glenn Beck’s head writer and chief researcher, Jason Buttrill, notes on “The Glenn Beck Program” that it “sounds like everyone knew about it.”

Buttrill read through comments and internal text threads from workers, explaining that these workers sounded “pretty much elated that he was finally getting outed for doing this.”

Glenn himself believes that Cabot, the other woman, has made it clear she’s not fit for her role either.

“That HR director should not have a job as HR ever again,” Glenn laughs. “That’s the person who’s like, ‘No sexual harassment.’ You are the one caught with a CEO, you know, in a love embrace.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Free, Sharing, Camera phone, Video, Video phone, Upload, Youtube.com, The glenn beck program, The blaze, Glenn beck, Jason buttrill, Andy byron, Ceo of astronomer, Kristin cabot, Coldplay affair, Viral affair, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Blaze news, Blazetv, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network 

The brother of late football player Pat Tillman was arrested in San Jose after he crashed his car through a post office and then lit the building on fire, according to California police.

San Jose police arrested 44-year-old Richard Tillman on suspicion of arson after a car was driven through the front of the post office in Almaden Valley on Crown Boulevard at about 3 a.m. The building went up in flames, and firefighters took 90 minutes to extinguish the fire.

‘I cannot think of a reason why that would make sense, but that’s one of the things we’re looking into.’

“We’re definitely investigating it as possibly an intentional act, so driving the vehicle into the building and then starting the fire can’t be ruled out as having been done on purpose,” U.S. Postal Inspector Matthew Norfleet said.

Video from the scene showed that there was vandalism on the post office that read, “Viva La Me.”

“Those markings were not on the building yesterday. What their connection is to the fire and crash is so far unexplained,” Norfleet continued. “I cannot think of a reason why that would make sense, but that’s one of the things we’re looking into.”

He went on to say that Tillman may have been broadcasting video of the incident.

A witness said that Tillman had a box of belongings at the incident, including a photograph of his brother.

“I remember reading about Pat Tillman, and I come from a family of a lot of military people, so his story — Pat Tillman’s story — did impact me,” resident Gladys Huerta said.

RELATED: Pat Tillman’s mom rips ESPYs for naming Prince Harry as recipient of son’s award

Some residents in the area said they have no idea where their mail is because of the incident.

“I guess I’m going to come see if the mailman comes to my house,” Tom Gerber said. “I’ll put it outside in the box and see if the mailman comes. I don’t know if we’ll get mail today or not.”

Richard Tillman is being held at the Santa Clara County Jail without bail and is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday.

Pat Tillman was praised by many when he gave up a million-dollar contract to play in the NFL in order to join the military after the 9/11 attacks. The story turned to tragedy when he was killed in Afghanistan in 2004 and the government later acknowledged that he was hit by friendly fire.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Pat tillman’s brother, Richard tillman, Post office arson, Viva la me, Crime 

During the pandemic, In-N-Out was among the very few companies that immediately stood up against the tyrannical measures to force the vaccine on unwilling citizens.

In a statement sent to ABC7 News in San Francisco at the time, the burger chain indicated that it would “refuse to become the vaccination police for any government.”

“We fiercely disagree with any government dictate that forces a private company to discriminate against customers who choose to patronize their business. This is clear governmental overreach and is intrusive, improper, and offensive,” the company’s statement said.

“There were so many pressures and just hoops we were having to jump through. You know, ‘You’ve got to do this, they have to wear a mask, you have to put this plastic thing up between us and our customers,’” Lynsi Snyder, president of In-N-Out Burger, tells BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey on “Relatable.”

“But that was definitely where we held the line. … We’re not policing our customers,” she continues.

After its refusal to bow down to the vaccine mandates, In-N-Out was “shut down for a brief moment,” but Snyder believes “it was worth it.”

Now, In-N-Out is building an office in Franklin, Tennessee, a place that did not see the same authoritarian response.

Snyder is moving herself and her family to Tennessee along with it.

“Number one priority is really keeping the company the same company that my grandparents started as,” she tells Stuckey. “I want the legacy to continue.”

“We don’t want to be in every state, and we don’t want to ever compromise our values and standards and the cornerstones that my grandparents laid down,” she continues, adding, “so it’s really just keeping those priorities at the forefront when we make decisions.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Free, Sharing, Camera phone, Video, Video phone, Upload, Youtube.com, Relatable with allie beth stuckey, Relatable, Allie beth stuckey, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, In n out burger, Vaccine mandates, Hold the line, Covid 19 tyrants, California covid, California 

As the Trump administration continues to grapple with the botched Epstein file release, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has stepped up to the plate.

On Monday, Gabbard released over 230,000 pages of documents related to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in accordance with President Donald Trump’s executive order. This “unprecedented” release includes information about the FBI’s investigation, the “discussion of potential leads,” internal memos, documents from James Earl Ray’s former cellmate, as well as “never-before-seen” CIA records pertaining to the case.

‘The declassification and release of these documents are a historic step towards the truth.’

“The American people have waited nearly sixty years to see the full scope of the federal government’s investigation into Dr. King’s assassination,” Gabbard said in a joint statement. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we are ensuring that no stone is left unturned in our mission to deliver complete transparency on this pivotal and tragic event in our nation’s history. I extend my deepest appreciation to the King family for their support.”

“The American people deserve answers decades after the horrific assassination of one of our nation’s great leaders,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in the statement. “The Department of Justice is proud to partner with Director Gabbard and the ODNI at President Trump’s direction for this latest disclosure.”

RELATED: FBI, DOJ Epstein memo sparks right-wing outrage: ‘Nobody is believing this’

Although some documents were previously made public, the ODNI will for the first time digitize and publish the records online “with minimal redactions for privacy reasons.” In accordance with Trump’s executive order, the only documents to have previously been digitized were those related to former President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

RELATED: Bongino and Bondi clash over botched handling of Epstein files

Photo by Stephen F. Somerstein/Getty Images

“I am grateful to President Trump and DNI Gabbard for delivering on their pledge of transparency in the release of these documents on the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.,” Dr. Alveda King said in the statement. “My uncle lived boldly in pursuit of truth and justice, and his enduring legacy of faith continues to inspire Americans to this day. While we continue to mourn his death, the declassification and release of these documents are a historic step towards the truth that the American people deserve.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Dni, Tulsi gabbard, Pam bondi, Donald trump, Epstein, Mlk, Mlk assassination, Jfk, Jfk assassination, Jfk files, Mlk files, Epstein files, Doj, Trump administration, Politics 

A lengthy MIT Media Lab panel on “Forbidden Research” featured a segment on studying pedophiles and whether or not “child-size sex robots” should be provided to them.

The discussion lasted about nine hours when it was webcast in 2016, with the after-lunch portion of the event dedicated to a discussion on the study of pedophilia.

The discussion was uncovered as the saga surrounding deceased child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is ongoing, with the public clamoring for more information about the shadowy elite financier’s life. The topic of the panel was revealed to be even more disturbing considering the lab’s financial ties to Epstein.

‘Courts don’t know what to do with these because no child has been harmed in making them.’

Around the five-hour mark of the event, Dr. Kate Darling took the stage to start the off-putting discussion.

“Once child-size sex robots hit the market, which they will, is the use of these robots going to be a healthy outlet for people to express these sexual urges and thus protect children and reduce child abuse? Or is the use of these robots going to encourage, normalize, propagate that behavior and endanger children in these people’s environments?” Darling asked.

The Swiss doctor works in robotics and is a research scientist at MIT. She also holds the position of lead for ethics and society at the Boston Dynamics AI Institute, per her website.

Darling went on to say that “we just don’t know the answer” to whether or not to let pedophiles use the “sex robots,” mostly due to the restrictions around what that research might look like.

RELATED: DOJ fires Maurene Comey from SDNY; she worked on Epstein, Diddy cases and is the daughter of James Comey

“I understand why people want reporting requirements,” Darling continued. “But I do wonder whether they’re doing more harm than good in these cases. Because as much as people want these sexual urges — the urges, not the act — to be a moral failing, they are a psychological issue, and if we really care about helping children, we might need to be a little bit more pre-emptive about this.”

While the panel seemed to recognize the discomfort their discussion would cause, it cannot be ignored that the MIT lab had received funding from Epstein during the same years it took place.

In 2019, Joi Ito, former director of the MIT Media Lab, admitted that the lab had “received money through some of the foundations” that Epstein controlled.

Ito resigned following a blockbuster New Yorker report detailing internal evidence that Ito and staff members accepted Epstein’s funds and worked to hide their source even though Epstein had been blacklisted by MIT. Epstein was also alleged to have been consulted about the use of funds and utilized as an intermediary between the lab and other wealthy donors.

Ito said he had taken $525,000 in funding from Epstein for the media lab, with MIT receiving $800,000 in total from Epstein over a period of 20 years.

“I vow to raise an amount equivalent to the donations the Media Lab received from Epstein and will direct those funds to nonprofits that focus on supporting survivors of trafficking,” Ito added at the time.

RELATED: Wikipedia co-founder: Epstein, elite rings, and occult portals — what they don’t want you to know

The Media Lab on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2023. Simon Simard/Bloomberg via Getty Images

MIT responded to a request for comment from the Daily Caller and said it did not wish to comment on “the individually held and freely expressed views of any particular community member. The views of any individual community member are their own.”

The school said it has also taken a “number of steps” to change its gift acceptance and donation processes and has been donating to “four nonprofits supporting survivors of sexual abuse.”

Dr. Darling did not respond to Blaze News’ request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Return, Robots, Epstein, Mit, Lab, Pedophiles, Tech 

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a treasure trove of evidence revealing how former President Barack Obama and his national security Cabinet members had, as many long suspected, apparently “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.”

Both before and after the 2016 election, the understanding among intelligence officials appears to have been that Russia had likely not interfered, particularly by using cyber means, to influence the outcome.

Gabbard revealed, however, that before this conclusion could be delivered to the American public, the Obama White House seemingly intervened to set an alternative narrative — a narrative largely based on the Steele dossier, a political opposition research report paid for in part by the Clinton campaign, which the intelligence community knew to be devoid of credibility.

‘They weren’t in Russia; they never made a phone call to Russia; they never received a phone call.’

This false narrative, which was initially fed piecemeal through leaks to the liberal media and then officially advanced through a reworked intelligence assessment published on Jan. 6, 2017, served “as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump’s victory, the years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high-level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened U.S.-Russia tensions, and more,” Gabbard said.

The success of what Gabbard characterized as a “treasonous conspiracy” was largely reliant on the participation of the liberal media, whose assistance took on various forms but in some cases was as simple as framing unnamed partisan sources from the previous administration not only as credible but noble.

For instance, in March 2017, the New York Times explained away Obama officials’ eagerness to push the Russian collusion narrative before President Donald Trump took office not as an attempt to “make an excuse for their own defeat in the election,” as then-White House spokesman Sean Spicer put it, but rather as a heroic effort to protect legitimate intelligence from obfuscation or destruction:

Mr. Trump has denied that his campaign had any contact with Russian officials, and at one point he openly suggested that American spy agencies had cooked up intelligence suggesting that the Russian government had tried to meddle in the presidential election. Mr. Trump has accused the Obama administration of hyping the Russia story line as a way to discredit his new administration. At the Obama White House, Mr. Trump’s statements stoked fears among some that intelligence could be covered up or destroyed — or its sources exposed — once power changed hands. What followed was a push to preserve the intelligence that underscored the deep anxiety with which the White House and American intelligence agencies had come to view the threat from Moscow.

This explanation was followed paragraphs later by the claim that Obama directed none of the efforts.

RELATED: ‘Prosecuting Obama’: Trump makes shocking statement as he commends Gabbard for bombshell evidence release

Photo by Saul Loeb – Pool/Getty Images

One month prior, Trump — whose transition team emphasized early on that the intelligence agencies alleging Russian interference were “the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction” — called the Russia narrative a “scam.”

“You can talk all you want about Russia, which was all a, you know, fake news, fabricated deal, to try and make up for the loss of the Democrats, and the press plays right into it,” Trump said during a Feb. 16, 2017, press conference. “In fact, I saw a couple of the people that were supposedly involved with all of this — that they know nothing about it; they weren’t in Russia; they never made a phone call to Russia; they never received a phone call.”

The Poynter Institute’s PolitiFact, among the publications that made good use of the reworked intelligence assessment, leaned on the apparently Obama-skewed document when insinuating that Trump’s remarks at the press conference were false.

The Washington Post, which was among the biggest media proponents of the hoax, readily and routinely leaned on the input and framing of fierce Trump critics, including those apparently involved in the manufacture of the Russian collusion hoax, such as ex-CIA Director John Brennan.

In its long-standing effort to portray Trump as guilty and defensive, the paper also tracked how many times the president and those in the White House denied Russian collusion.

‘The integrity of our democratic republic demands that every person involved be investigated and brought to justice to prevent this from ever happening again.’

Unhinged Trump critics such as Anne Applebaum, the writer who smeared as propagandists early proponents of the pandemic lab-leak theory and wasted ink last year imagining parallels between Trump and various 20th-century dictators, kept Washington Post readers’ hope alive that they were getting closer to “direct evidence” of collusion, while over at CNN commentators worked as if it there were proof that Russia interfered to get Trump elected.

RELATED: Ex-CIA Director John Brennan’s bad year could get a lot worse: ‘Maybe they have to pay a price for that’

Photographer: Will Oliver/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Former CNN editor at large Chris Cillizza suggested in a 2018 piece that Trump’s refusal to play along with the hoax was a likely sign that Moscow had compromising information on the president. This, for Cillizza, made more sense than the notion “in Trump’s mind [that] any talk of Russian interference in the election is an attempt to undermine the ‘brilliant campaign’ (his words) he ran in 2016 and somehow invalidate his victory.”

Days later, CNN’s Marshall Cohen identified “10 ways Trump has strayed from his own intelligence agencies on Russian meddling” — a piece that now serves to memorialize the media’s misplaced faith in the intelligence community and to vindicate Trump’s skepticism.

While the newly released documents from the DNI both salt the remains of the Russian collusion hoax and justify Trump’s use of the term “fake news” in reference to numerous publications, the documents could prove far more impactful for those who constructed the false narrative. After all, Gabbard referred the documents to the Department of Justice for potential prosecution.

“These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate,” Gabbard wrote.

The director of national intelligence added, “The integrity of our democratic republic demands that every person involved be investigated and brought to justice to prevent this from ever happening again.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Coup, Conspiracy, Barack obama, Obama, Hillary clinton, Donald trump, Tulsi gabbard, Dni, Odni, Fake news, Leftism, Democrat, Lies, Narrative, Russiagate, Russian collusion, Russia, Russia hoax, Politics 

Former first son Hunter Biden went on several expletive-laden rants about issues ranging from illegal immigration to the treatment of his father by the media.

Biden spoke to “Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan,” a left-wing YouTube channel that has long covered Donald Trump rallies and interviewed strange characters.

The former president’s son gave a whopping three-hour interview highlighted by comments he made about President Biden’s cognitive capabilities, coupled with a vehement condemnation of the deportation of illegal immigrants.

‘By the numbers, what influence does Jake Tapper have over anything? He has the smallest audience on cable news.’

Clips of Biden were seen by millions in mere hours, including the 55-year-old disagreeing with Democrats who have pointed out that American citizens are upset with illegal immigration.

“All these Democrats say, ‘You have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration,'” Biden told the host before quickly escalating his rhetoric.

“F**k you! How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you have food on your f**king table? Who do you think washes your dishes? Who do you think does your f**king garden?” Biden ranted.

After listing a series of job categories frequently filled by illegal labor, Biden claimed that illegal immigrants have admirable determination.

RELATED: How the Biden regime went from ‘scamdemic’ to sympathy tour

“Who do you think is here by the f**king, sheer f**king just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give theirselves and their family a better chance?” Biden said of the illegal aliens.

Biden also stated that he did not believe illegal immigrants are criminals, but his comments later on about his father’s obvious cognitive decline on the 2024 campaign trail made for more fiery television.

Biden lashed out at celebrities and commentators who pointed out his father’s decline, and he frequently used curse words to describe the ethics of President Biden’s detractors.

First, Biden unleashed on actor George Clooney, who penned a New York Times op-ed suggesting that Joe Biden resign as nominee for the Democratic Party.

“F**k him. F**k him. F**k him and everybody around him. I don’t have to be f**king nice,” Biden unloaded.

— (@)

The Delaware native also discredited political analysts like James Carville and David Axelrod for what he described as their lack of accomplishments. Biden then decided it was CNN host Jake Tapper’s turn. Tapper released a book in May, an exposé citing insider reports about President Biden’s brain functions.

Biden criticized Tapper for doing “a two-week informercial” to promote the book, even though Tapper’s “ratings just went to s**t after he put the book out.”

“I mean, it was such a money grab, such a disservice to everybody that he serves with,” Biden continued, while also mocking the size of Tapper’s audience.

“By the numbers, what influence does Jake Tapper have over anything? He has the smallest audience on cable news.”

Biden was also asked about his father’s debate performance against President Trump, which, by most accounts, was the spiritual end to his campaign.

RELATED: Jill Biden’s ‘shadowy’ chief of staff clams up during autopen probe

US President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden hug on stage at the Democratic National Convention on August 19, 2024. Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Biden chalked up his father’s appearance to globe-trotting jet lag.

“I know exactly what happened in that debate. He flew around the world basically. … He’s 81 years old. He’s tired as s**t. [They] give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage, and he looks like he’s a deer in the headlights.”

Other topics in the discussion included Biden admitting to drinking “almost a handle of vodka a day” and the physical toll crack cocaine takes on the body. However, he insisted that alcoholism is far worse than crack addiction.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Jake tapper, Cnn, President biden, Trump, Debate, Illegal immigration, Hunter biden, George clooney, Politics