Category: blaze media

The eBay board of directors did not seem pleased with GameStop’s CEO on Tuesday, firmly rejecting an offer from last week that was followed by continued online antics.

GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen offered $55.5 billion for the online auction site last Sunday, saying that with his expertise, eBay could become a rival to Amazon.

‘We have concluded that your proposal is neither credible nor attractive.’

This was followed by a series of comical posts on X by Cohen, who wrote messages like, “I’m selling stuff on eBay to pay for eBay.”

The CEO was selling memorabilia from video games and even GameStop signs before he was eventually suspended from the online marketplace.

On Tuesday, eBay announced that its board of directors was rejecting GameStop’s “unsolicited, non-binding acquisition proposal.”

“Dear Mr. Cohen,” eBay wrote in a press release. “The board, with the support of its independent advisers, has thoroughly reviewed your proposal and has determined to reject it.”

“We have concluded that your proposal is neither credible nor attractive,” eBay added.

Cohen’s proposal to buy 100% of eBay was valued at $125 per share in a 50/50 deal comprised of cash and GameStop’s own stock.

RELATED: GameStop’s next act? Becoming a ‘legit competitor’ to Amazon. How the company plans to do it is crazy.

The formal offer from Cohen promised to reduce costs at eBay by at least $2 billion within 12 months. He intended on cutting the marketing budget in half while slicing $300 million off of product development and reducing administrative costs by $500 million, among other moves.

In its formal rejection though, eBay went on the defensive, saying it remains a “strong, resilient business that has delivered meaningful results over the past several years.”

“eBay’s board is confident that the company, under its current management team, is well-positioned to continue to drive sustainable growth, execute with discipline, and deliver long-term value for our shareholders,” the company added.

Paul S. Pressler, eBay’s chairman of the board of directors, specified the reasons for their rejection, such as the “uncertainty” of Cohen’s financial proposal, the impact it may have on “long-term growth and profitability,” and how GameStop governs its own C-suite.

RELATED: Debit card company promises to pay your bill … sometimes: ‘Buy now, pay maybe’

While the degree of animosity shown by eBay seems unusual, it comes after Cohen made several antagonistic posts, like asking eBay to please respond to his customer service inquiries.

“On phone with customer support @eBay. please respond @eBay,” Cohen wrote on X.

Cohen then called stock sales by eBay “insiders” into question, and he mocked the company’s lack of customer service on social media.

“You’d think with 2.4 billion in marketing spend, they could login to X,” he wrote.

At the time of this writing, Cohen had not made any additional public statements regarding eBay’s rejection.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Ebay, Ecommerce, Gamestop, Gaming, Marketplace, Online business, Proposal, Return, Tech 

The winner of Nebraska’s Democratic Party U.S. Senate primary race on Tuesday came away with a landslide victory, despite her plans to drop out of the race before the November general election in a scheme to clear a path for a yet another candidate to take on Republican incumbent Sen. Pete Ricketts in the deep-red state.

Cindy Burbank defeated Democrat opponent William Forbes, receiving 89% of the vote, after accusing Forbes of being a plant for Ricketts.

‘I have no expectations of being able to win in November.’

“Pete Ricketts, who is running for reelection, is putting in a candidate loyal to him in the DEMOCRATIC primary — to split the vote against him, so he wins easily. He’s running an anti-abortion activist named Bill Forbes, who has posted in support of Pete Ricketts!” Burbank’s campaign website states.

Independent Dan Osborn is also challenging Ricketts in November and appears to be Burbank’s preferred candidate.

Burbank claimed that Ricketts “knows he’s losing to Dan Osborn and this is his plan to cheat his way to victory.” She argued that Osborn “deserves a fair shot against Ricketts” in the upcoming general election.

The Nebraska Democratic Party, which originally planned not to field a nominee, similarly claimed that Forbes was a Ricketts “spoiler and fake Democratic candidate.” The party stated that its strategy was to secure Burbank’s victory and then have her withdraw from the race to allow Osborn to compete against Ricketts “one-on-one.”

After Burbank won Tuesday’s primary, she reconfirmed to the New York Times that she plans to drop out.

“I don’t want to split the ballot,” Burbank wrote. “I have no expectations of being able to win in November.”

RELATED: The insane dirty tricks Democrats are using to win this bright-red Nebraska Senate seat

Pete Ricketts. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Forbes, who denied being a spoiler candidate, argued that he has been “a Democrat my entire life.” He referred to Burbank as a “self-admitted placeholder and a disloyal hack being used as a tool to sabotage the Democratic primary and clear the path for another insider.”

RELATED: Republicans receive another grim midterm forecast

Dan Osborn. Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty Images

Ricketts won Tuesday’s Republican primary, securing roughly 82% of the vote.

A Democrat-aligned Tavern Research poll indicated that Osborn has the highest chance of beating Ricketts in a one-on-one election. Among those surveyed, 47% stated they would vote for Osborn, while 42% selected Ricketts. However, in a race against Burbank, Ricketts led, receiving 48% of the vote compared to Burbank’s 39%.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Nebraska, Cindy burbank, Bill forbes, William forbes, Pete ricketts, Dan osborn, Nebraska democratic party, Politics 

In a recent podcast appearance, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) made some shocking comments regarding billionaires and the founders of our country — and BlazeTV host Pat Gray is not surprised.

“Speaking of stupid Democrats, holy cow,” Gray says, playing a clip of AOC.

“There’s a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned, right? You can’t earn a billion dollars. You just can’t earn that,” the congresswoman said on “It’s Open with Ilana Glazer.”

“You can get market power, you can break rules. You can do all sorts of things. You can abuse labor laws. You can pay people less than what they’re worth,” she continued.

“Since you didn’t earn that, you have to create a myth of earning it,” she added.

AOC went on to claim that “there are very few real archetypes” of “what America is all about.”

“I think about the civil rights and voting rights movement and how black Americans really created democracy in this country,” she said.

“White Americans have to be eliminated from every aspect of this society,” Gray comments, shocked.

“Anything good that happened in America didn’t come from white people. They’re all evil and bad, and they have oppressed and murdered their way to prominence,” he adds.

“You’re familiar with the father of our country, right?” executive producer Keith Malinak chimes in, showing a photo of George Washington that’s been updated by activists to have darker skin.

“George Washington, Black Lives Matter,” he adds, laughing.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Bill gates, Billionaires, Black americans, Black lives matter, Blaze media, Blaze news, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Blaze podcast network, Blaze podcasts, Blazetv, Blazetv host, Civil rights movement, Congresswoman alexandria ocasio cortez, Father of country, Founders of country, George washington, Labor laws, Pat gray unleashed, Podcast appearance, Society, Stupid democrats, The blaze, White americans, White people 

Dressing up like a dog is apparently too degrading for some OnlyFans creators.

On the show “Euphoria,” Sydney Sweeney’s character has taken on the ridiculous task of doing pornography in order to pay for $50,000 worth of flowers for her wedding. The insane storyline has Sweeney posing as a dog and dressing as a baby — portrayals that have some involved with the subscription-based website up in arms.

‘You have to really grow and nurture a fan base.’

Leathers report

Several women who make money from the overwhelmingly pornographic fan site reacted to Sweeney’s scenes in a set of comments to Hollywood-centric outlet Variety. The women accused Sweeney’s character of being an over-the-top and rather unbecoming representation of a porn actress.

Scenes that showed Sweeney dressed as a baby or an animal have already disturbed regular audiences on their own, but the content was seen as “ridiculous and cartoonish” by these apparent industry professionals.

“There’s so much that they have her doing that is not even allowed on OnlyFans, and that alone is infuriating,” Sydney Leathers, an OnlyFans veteran, told Variety. “The age-play stuff, where she’s dressed as a baby in a diaper, for example. Credit card processors have very strict rules that you have to abide by, and the rules are getting stricter all the time.”

Former “Boy Meets World” star turned porn actress Maitland Ward said Sweeney was only perpetuating “stereotypes that sex workers have no moral compass and that they will do anything for money.”

RELATED: ‘DISGUSTING’: Megyn Kelly rips into ‘Euphoria’ clip with Sydney Sweeney

Monica Schipper/Getty Images

Lewd awakening

Calling it “beyond troubling,” Ward argued that any idea that sex work is connected to abuse is false.

“There’s always this untrue stigma that somehow sex work is synonymous with sex trafficking and abuse. And they just said, let’s make a joke of it. That is so funny. I’m not laughing.”

Ward reportedly makes at least $100,000 per month from OnlyFans and also reportedly does traditional pornography.

Same goes for Alix Lynx, another nude actress and OnlyFans creator, according to Variety. She stated that there were actually some good ideas hidden in the “Euphoria” script.

“When [Sweeney] goes to the influencer’s house to get video, coming from a marketing background myself, I thought, ‘OK, that’s f**kin’ smart. That’s a great formula.'”

However, Lynx said that it’s only a myth that being attractive and performing lewd acts are a ticket to the top.

RELATED: Sydney Sweeney spurns Cosmo girl’s desperate ‘MAGA Barbie’ bait

– YouTube

Naked ambition

“It’s portrayed that if you just dress up and do crazy s**t, you’ll instantly make money,” she explained. Another idea that “you just have to be hot and have big boobs and you’ll instantly cash out,” is also allegedly a myth, she claimed.

“It doesn’t work like that. You have to really grow and nurture a fan base.”

All the women Variety spoke with reportedly argued that it is too difficult to start an OnlyFans page and garner a grassroots following; women must first have a large online fan base. The task of building a subscriber base to pornographic content was described as a near-impossible feat.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Align, Entertainment, Moral compass, Sex workers, Stereotypes, Porn actress, Onlyfans, Television, Sex work, Pornography, Feminism, Lifestyle 

If you think this is just another oil headline, think again. This one hits your wallet directly, every time you start your car.

The United Arab Emirates, one of the most powerful players inside OPEC, is walking away from the cartel. That’s a huge change to the system that has controlled oil prices and, by extension, what Americans pay at the pump for more than half a century.

The UAE’s departure exposes long-standing tensions inside the group. Some countries have followed production limits; others have ignored them.

And for drivers already dealing with high gas prices, this matters more than anything coming out of Washington right now.

Market mover

For decades, OPEC has operated as a coordinated force, adjusting production to influence global oil prices. Less supply meant higher prices. More supply meant relief, but only when it suited the producers. It was never a true free market; it was controlled output designed to protect revenue.

Now one of the few countries that actually had the power to move markets is stepping away.

The UAE isn’t just another member. It is one of the rare producers with real spare capacity, the ability to quickly increase output and stabilize supply during disruptions. Alongside Saudi Arabia, it helped anchor OPEC’s influence. Take that away, and the cartel doesn’t just weaken; it loses control of the narrative.

So why should the average driver care?

Because this could be one of the first real signs that global oil pricing is shifting away from centralized control and back toward competition. And when competition increases, prices tend to come down.

Dire Strait?

But don’t expect that relief overnight.

Here’s the reality drivers are dealing with right now. Gas prices in the U.S. are already elevated, sitting above $4 per gallon in many areas. That’s not just about oil supply; it’s about geopolitics. Tensions tied to Iran and disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most critical oil shipping routes in the world, are driving volatility and keeping prices high.

That’s the immediate pressure on your fuel bill, not the UAE’s decision — at least not yet.

The UAE exit is a medium-term shift. It means the country is no longer bound by OPEC production quotas. It can pump more oil if it chooses, and it has made it clear it wants to expand output significantly. More oil supply should push prices lower, but only if that supply actually reaches the market.

Mehmet Yaren Bozgun/Anadolu/Getty Image

And that’s the catch drivers need to understand.

Volatile for a while

Oil prices don’t drop just because more production is possible. They drop when that oil is flowing freely, refined, and distributed. If geopolitical tensions continue to disrupt shipping lanes or production, the added supply won’t fully offset the pressure.

That’s why, in the short term, volatility is still the story.

So let’s answer the question every driver is asking: Will this lower gas prices? And when?

In the next one to two weeks, probably not. Prices will continue to react to global tensions more than anything else. But within two to six weeks, that’s when things could start to change. That’s typically how long it takes for shifts in crude oil prices to filter down to what you pay at the pump. If the UAE ramps up production and tensions ease even slightly, drivers could start seeing prices move down by late May into June.

We’re not talking about a sudden return to cheap gas, but a drop of 20 to 50 cents per gallon is realistic if conditions line up. For families commuting daily, running businesses, or planning summer travel, that kind of relief will help. And yes, this ties directly into the broader automotive landscape.

High fuel prices don’t just affect what you pay at the pump. They influence what people buy. When gas spikes, consumers start rethinking vehicle choices, holding off on larger SUVs, reconsidering trucks, or delaying purchases altogether. Automakers feel that shift immediately, especially as they try to balance EV investments with ongoing demand for gas-powered vehicles.

When prices ease, even slightly, it stabilizes that decision-making. It gives consumers more flexibility and helps normalize the market. That’s why this OPEC fracture isn’t just an energy story; it’s an automotive story.

RELATED: GM slams brakes on electric trucks as reality crashes the EV party

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Priming the pump

Looking farther out, the bigger implication is what happens to OPEC itself.

The UAE’s departure exposes long-standing tensions inside the group. Some countries have followed production limits; others have ignored them. That imbalance has been building for years, and now it’s starting to break apart. When a cartel loses discipline, it loses its ability to control prices.

That’s good for drivers, but it comes with a trade-off.

Less coordination means more volatility. Prices could swing more sharply in response to global events. That’s not ideal for consumers or automakers trying to plan ahead, but it does reduce the ability of a centralized group to keep prices artificially elevated.

There’s also a strategic shift happening behind the scenes. The UAE wants flexibility, not restrictions. The country is investing in expanding production capacity and positioning itself to produce more oil, not less, in the years ahead. That aligns more with a competitive market than a controlled one.

For the United States, that could quietly become a win. More global supply, less cartel control, and increased competition all point toward lower energy costs over time. But again, timing is everything, and right now, geopolitical instability is still the dominant force.

So here’s the bottom line for drivers. The UAE just weakened one of the most powerful forces controlling global oil prices. That opens the door to lower gas prices and more competition. But in the short term, the same geopolitical risks that pushed prices higher are still in play.

If tensions ease and supply increases, you could see relief at the pump within weeks. If not, expect more of the same volatility that’s been hitting your wallet every time you fill up. Either way, this isn’t just another oil story. It’s a shift that will play out on American roads, in dealership showrooms, and, most importantly, at the pump.

​Energy costs, Free market, Gas prices, Lifestyle, Oil production, Saudi arabia, United arab emirates, Align cars 

Tennessee state Republicans passed a new congressional map last week that, applying the logic of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Callais ruling, carves up a Democrat-held district that was the product of a racial gerrymander. They managed to do so despite obstruction and gross incivility from their Democrat colleagues.

Tennessee state Rep. Justin Jones, for instance, walked around the chamber blowing a bullhorn in the faces of lawmakers and subjecting them to potential noise-induced hearing loss. Jones — a Democrat who was caught on film throwing a traffic cone at a driver during a 2020 Black Lives Matter blockade — also set fire to a printout of the Confederate flag and repeatedly accused Republicans of racism.

‘Maybe next year we’ll explain the basics like “don’t start fires in the Capitol.”‘

Democrat state Sen. Charlane Oliver — the radical who threatened riots in 2024 over the passage of a bill she didn’t like — danced atop her desk in the chamber, yelling and holding up a banner that said, “No Jim Crow 2 Stop the Steal.”

Some of the Democrats yelled and chanted while Republicans calmly conducted the work at hand, while another got testy with police, barraging a Tennessee Highway Patrol trooper with insults while interfering with an arrest.

Evidently, actions still have consequences in the Volunteer State.

Republican Tennessee House Speaker Cameron Sexton notified Democratic House Minority Leader Karen Camper on Tuesday that members of the Democratic Caucus should expect to receive individual letters removing them from all standing committees and subcommittees in the statehouse, “except where membership is required pursuant to Rule 65 of the House Rules.”

RELATED: South Carolina GOP poised to erase district of geriatric Democrat who got Biden elected

Madison Thorn/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Sexton cited as cause Democrats’ actions “aimed at disrupting the democratic and legislative processes and creating disorder on the House Floor, including, but not limited to:

Interlocking arms in the well of the House; Blocking aisles on the House Floor; Instigating and encouraging disruptions of the legislative process in coordination with paid protestors and attendees in the gallery, including the distribution of earplugs to a member of your caucus;The use of prohibited props and noisemakers on the House Floor; Demonstrating a lack of respect toward fellow members seeking recognition to speak on legislation; andFlagrant disregard for the Permanent Rules of Order of the House.”

Rather than reflect on whether they went too far again or shouldn’t bemoan the loss of a racial gerrymander, state Democrats condemned the committee-removal consequence, painted themselves as victims, and descended farther into lunacy.

Minority Leader Camper said in a long-winded, reality-averse statement that the passage of the new map “felt like being stabbed in the back, then having the knife pushed in deeper and turned to finish the job.”

The minority leader then engaged in several paragraphs of what could only be described as partisan-hack numerology.

Camper, convinced there was a “symbolic scheme behind the handling of debate during this extraordinary session,” said:

there were supposed to be 47 minutes of debate on each side, which was somehow “a clear nod to the 47th President”;the duration of the “debate allotments” when it came to the “debate structure surrounding changes to election law,” when added up, would have “totaled 54 minutes — a nod to 1954, the year of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education Decision“; andthe addition of 47 plus the time allotments also associated with the debate equals 74 — clearly a nod to 1974, the “year Harold Ford Sr. became the first Black member of Congress elected from Tennessee in the modern era.”

In conclusion to her embarrassing numbers game, Camper suggested that her protest last week was ultimately aimed at ensuring that these numbers wouldn’t add up — that there would instead be only 44 minutes of debate on the redistricting legislation in honor of the 44th president, Barack Obama.

“We are hurt. We are disappointed. But we are not intimidated,” wrote Camper. “And no committee assignment will stop us from fighting for democracy, voting rights, constitutional freedoms, and the people of Tennessee.”

State Rep. Justin Pearson — the Democrat who interfered with an arrest on Thursday and called a THP trooper “stupid motherf**ker” and “boy” — whined on X, “Speaker of the TN House Cameron Sexton just removed me and every Democrat — and therefore every Black elected official in the state legislature from any committee we served on. This move strips nearly 2 million Tennesseans from [sic] the representation they deserve in TN state leg.”

The Tennessee House GOP said of the Democrats’ responses, “Of course now they’re playing victim. Maybe next year we’ll explain the basics like ‘don’t start fires in the Capitol.'”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Charlane oliver, Confederate flag, Congressional map, Democratic caucus, Democrats, House minority leader, House rules, Justin jones, Racial gerrymander, Tennessee, Us supreme court, Numerology, Radicalism, Leftism, Nashville, Karen camper, Embarrassing, Lol, Redistricting, Gerrymander, Callais, Politics 

Online scams are nothing new, yet they still account for a rising degree of theft year over year. According to new numbers released by the Federal Trade Commission, social media users in particular were tricked out of a staggering $2.1 billion — eight times higher than in 2020 — and these losses could get even worse as criminals tap into AI to execute more sophisticated cyberattacks. Here are the biggest social media scams to look for and what you can do if it happens to you.

Biggest social media scams of 2025

The FTC’s report identified three main traps that tricked social media users out of billions of dollars:

Investment scams accounted for half of the total losses last year. These scams usually involve get-rich-quick schemes where “influencers” sell courses that show victims how to make money by investing in the stock market. In some cases, scammers create chat groups filled with other supposed investors who all proclaim the benefits of the program, when in reality, they’re part of the scam too. Ultimately, victims end up paying for these courses, or even provide funds to be invested on their behalf, with no real payoff on the other side.

Don’t click on social media ads. Ever.

Shopping scams came in second place, accounting for 40% of the reported losses on social media. These scams typically feature an ad to a product that’s too good to be true — either the price is lower than usually advertised, or the link clicks away to an unknown third-party site instead of a trusted retailer. From here, scammers convince users to provide their payment information, stealing the money while leaving shoppers with a cheaper product than they thought they were getting, or in many cases, no product at all.

Romance scams, also known as catfishing, involve users who create fake online accounts so that they can target other users and foster a false relationship. Once the victim falls head over heels to the point that they would do anything for their supposed lover, the catfisher will request money for some kind of unexpected crisis, typically involving a broken-down car, a shattered phone, or a family member suddenly passing away. The victim sends the cash, the catfisher pockets the money, and they’re never heard from again — or worse, they try to get more money later.

How to protect yourself from social media scams

Luckily, there are several ways to avoid these scams as you surf your favorite social media sites.

First, limit who can see your posts and friends on social media. Most platforms let you set your profile as “private” or limit public access by making adjustments to the settings page. Some social media apps also bar strangers from sending you private messages. Once your account is locked down, both scammers and AI agents will have a harder time finding you to execute targeted scams.

RELATED: New call center tech beats ‘bias’ by masking Indian accents

L-R: Wodicka/ullstein bild/Getty Images; Taylor Weidman/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Second, be careful who you trust online. It’s OK to form friendships with people you meet on social platforms, but refrain from sharing personal information or buying products, services, or courses from anyone you don’t know in person. Many online scammers make their careers out of falsely befriending or romancing unsuspecting users just to squeeze them for cash. As a general rule of thumb, don’t trust anyone on social media unless you can verify they are the person they claim to be and that they are worthy of that trust.

Third, don’t click on social media ads. Ever. Especially avoid ads that showcase expensive products sold for a staggeringly large discount. Instead, go to the manufacturer’s webpage or find the same product in a trusted online store. If the manufacturer is actually hosting a deal, you should see the same discounted price on an official page, and if the price doesn’t match, chances are even greater that the unknown store with the great deal is trying to deceive you. To be safe, always buy from a trusted online retailer or the manufacturer itself.

Fourth, never provide personal information to anyone online, even if it seems harmless — that includes your mother’s maiden name, first pet, hometown, first car, etc. All of these are typically answers to the security questions that protect many of your online accounts that a criminal would love to hack.

Finally, if you do run into a scam online, stop what you’re doing and report it to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov. This way, you can help them track down fraudsters and protect other users from losing hundreds or thousands of dollars to social media thieves.

​Scams, Social media, Ai, Personal information, Tech 

Across the country, cities and counties are implementing temporary moratoriums on new data center construction. My city of Cheyenne, Wyoming, is no exception. Petitions are now circulating asking the city to adopt a one-year moratorium as constituents question the long-term impacts of rapid expansion.

While these concerns have been present for some time, the proposed annexation of 1,260 acres of ranch land west of the city has intensified skepticism about whether large-scale data center development actually benefits our community.

What happens when existing data centers need more power than their private substations can supply?

Cheyenne currently has 12 fully operating data centers. When these facilities arrived, Black Hills Energy implemented a tariff requiring large data users — those with electricity loads above 13 megawatts — to build their own substations and pay for their own power. This system was designed to shield residents and small businesses from rate increases. In the short term, it made sense.

The long-term question, however, is what happens when existing data centers need more power than their private substations can supply? If they must tap into the main power grid, the system in place that protects ratepayers could be strained. Before we approve a dramatic expansion of this industry, we need to study potential impacts to the power grids.

Water usage is another important question. According to the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities and Cheyenne LEADS, all local data centers currently use around 1.2% of Cheyenne’s total water supply.

This low figure is possible because most new facilities use closed-loop cooling systems. However, projections suggest Cheyenne could someday host 40 to 70 data centers. Even with efficient systems, scaling up at that magnitude requires answers about flushing cycles, chemical additives, long-term cumulative water draw, and environmental impacts.

These questions are reasonable and very important for a community in a semi-arid region.

Security considerations must also be part of the discussion. Loudoun County, Virginia, hosts more than 200 data centers, but its proximity to Washington, D.C., and major federal facilities provides a level of deterrence that Cheyenne does not share.

Wyoming is one of the most rural states, so a dense cluster of data centers could present an attractive target for hostile actors. Our region’s missile sites were intentionally hidden and widely dispersed. Data centers built closely together inside a city make a very large target.

RELATED: The terrifying scale of the data center land-grab

Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg/Getty Images

We must also consider the impact on agriculture — one of the cornerstones of Cheyenne and Laramie County’s economy. A data center requires the usage of at least 225 acres or more of land, according to the World Resources Institute.

Rising land values driven by industrial demand could potentially price out ranchers and farmers, accelerating the loss of agricultural land. In 2025, according to the Wyoming Farm Bureau, agriculture contributed $163 million to Laramie County’s economy, the second highest in Wyoming.

Undermining that sector would have long-term consequences far beyond the next development cycle.

This discussion is not about rejecting data centers altogether. They play a role in national security and economic diversification. Most of the data centers currently operating or under construction in Cheyenne’s business parks have been net positives.

The real question is how many facilities Cheyenne can responsibly support without compromising our infrastructure, safety, agricultural industry, or quality of life.

For these reasons, I have sponsored a 12-month moratorium on new data center construction. This pause gives our city the time to analyze future power needs, water demand, land use, and security implications before committing to a future we cannot reverse.

​Data centers, Data center water use, Wyoming, Cheyenne, Water usage, Power grid, Ai, Agriculture, Opinion & analysis 

When BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales stumbled upon a flyer for a Muslim water park event in Grand Prairie, Texas, she was disturbed to find that it was “Muslims only” and immediately reported on it.

The city promptly shut it down.

After Gonzales interviewed the organizer of the event, who was shocked to find that Gonzales was critical of her Muslim-only event at a publicly funded park, the organizer’s husband sent Gov. Greg Abbott (R) and Gonzales a message.

“Now he is trying to fight all of this with some videos of his own,” Gonzales says, “very interesting videos, very poorly done.”

“The governor of Texas is attacking my family, and I’m sick of it. Two days ago, Greg Abbott forced the city of Grand Prairie to cancel our Eid event at Epic Waters. For the past two years, my wife and I rented out the entire park so Muslim families could celebrate Eid in a modest environment,” the man said.

“Then Islamaphobes got ahold of a private flyer and twisted it into something it was never meant to be. We never banned other religions and even changed the wording to ‘modest dress only’ to make that crystal clear,” he continued.

“But Greg Abbott, he don’t care about facts. He fueled the flames of hatred, empowered these hate-filled politicians, and turned my family into a political target. Now we’re receiving death threats and harassments because of it,” he said. “But hear me clearly. I’m not going to back down.”

He also warned that he would be taking “hate-filled politicians down.”

“It was the city who decided … they weren’t going to actually agree with your religious discrimination that you quite literally did,” Gonzales says.

However, he didn’t just go after Abbott. He also went after Gonzales herself.

“My life is in danger. And I think I just figured out why,” he said.

“I found the woman who claims to be the person who wrote the story — the super Islamophobe herself,” he said, sharing a photo of Gonzales.

“My wife’s information gets spread online on purpose by her to her hateful followers. People start targeting my family. Death threats start coming in. So I DM her directly. The DM she showed in her video, but it’s not the whole DM. Sara, you left out a really important part,” he continued.

He went on to ask viewers to “comment DM” on his video if they want to see the “full DM.”

“Somebody asked me, ‘How you going to take down Governor Abbott?’ It starts with these bigoted, hateful, racist, Islamophobe podcasters who the government is employing to sow seeds of division between Americans and spew hate. We take them down first,” he continued.

“It starts with her,” he added.

“If the government’s paying me for this,” Gonzales laughs, “the check got lost in the mail.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Blaze media, Blaze news, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Blaze podcast network, Blaze podcasts, Blazetv, Blazetv host, City shutdown, Eid event, Epic waters, Event organizer, Grand prairie texas, Greg abbott, Islamophobe, Modest dress only, Muslim water park, Muslims only, Religious discrimination, Sara gonzales, Sara gonzales unfiltered, The blaze 

A North Carolina gay couple was arrested after police got a tip about possible child sex abuse material possession, according to the Harnett County Sheriff’s Office.

Investigators said numerous tips from the Internet Crimes Against Children database in March led them to believe the two men were in possession of child sexual abuse material.

The arrest warrants indicate there are at least two victims from September.

Police performed a search warrant at the Linda Baucom Lane home of the couple identified as 39-year-old Joshua Lee Gilliam and 39-year-old Ronald Wayne Lynch Jr. and seized numerous digital devices.

Both Gilliam and Lynch were charged with first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor based on what was found on those devices.

Lynch faces an additional charge of second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor, while Gilliam faces additional charges of first-degree statutory sexual offense and indecent liberties with a minor.

The arrest warrants indicate there are at least two victims from September.

The couple first appeared at the Harnett County District Court on Thursday. Gilliam was given no bond, while Lynch was given a $360,000 secured bond.

The sheriff’s office said the investigation was ongoing and the two may face additional charges.

Online sleuths immediately found social media accounts that appeared to belong to Gilliam. An Instagram profile said the gay couple had custody of five children, all young boys, although a report from the North Carolina Beat said they have four sons together.

It is not known whether their boys are also victims.

One post on the account from March 7, 2021, reads, “Anyone wanna trade pictures with us message us.”

RELATED: Teen faces horrific rape and murder charges after 2-year-old foster child dies with suspicious injuries

WTVD-TV reported that Gilliam worked as a a phlebotomist at Cape Fear Primary Care in Erwin.

“The Harnett County Sheriff’s Office continues to work closely with the NCSBI and partner agencies to investigate crimes involving the exploitation of children and to ensure the safety and protection of victims and citizens of Harnett County.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Gay couple child porn, North carolina gay couple, Gay couple with young boys, Gilliam lynch online presence, Politics 

We can use game theory to answer the question of university decline, but we will have to look outside game theory for the answer if we want to turn things around.

Universities once claimed to form character, cultivate wisdom, and preserve civilization. Now many of them offer courses on “witchcraft and social change through gossip,” “decolonizing mathematics,” and the moral importance of “disrupting systems of power with drag shows.”

Ideologues understand something conservatives often forget: Institutions belong to those willing to fight for them.

Parents spend six figures so their children can be taught that truth is oppression and that literacy itself may be colonial violence.

How did this happen?

Part of the answer is laziness. These are lazy ideologies that appeal to people’s base instincts. But laziness alone is too shallow an explanation. The deeper answer is game theory.

Game theory, broadly speaking, studies how rational individuals behave when incentives reward certain actions and punish others. It explains why perfectly intelligent people often cooperate in systems they privately know are absurd.

Once you understand it, modern university decline becomes almost embarrassingly predictable.

The first thing game theory explains is why nonsense replaces good ideas.

Economists long ago noticed something called Gresham’s law: Bad money drives out good money. If counterfeit and genuine coins circulate together at the same legal value, people hoard the good coins and spend the bad ones. Over time, the bad currency dominates public life.

The same principle applies to ideas.

A university that rewards ideological conformity more than truth-seeking will slowly replace good scholars with ideological activists. At first, the institution still coasts on inherited prestige. The physics department still has Nobel Prize winners. The literature department still quotes Shakespeare. The philosophy department still invokes Augustine between land acknowledgments.

However, as advancement continues to depend less on intellectual excellence and more on ideological signaling, ambitious people adapt accordingly.

If a professor discovers that publishing another tedious article on “systems of oppression in medieval gardening practices” produces grants, praise, administrative favor, and social protection, then more such articles will appear.

RELATED: DEI went into hiding — but remains as dangerous as ever

Carl Lokko/Getty Images

Soon, entire academic ecosystems emerge around rewarding jargon and punishing dissent. Aristophanes understood this over 2,000 years ago.

In “The Frogs,” he lamented not merely political decline but cultural degeneration itself. Bad money replaces good money, yes — but bad poetry also replaces good poetry, bad music replaces good music, and inferior men replace superior ones.

Civilizations slump downward because institutions stop rewarding excellence and begin rewarding flattery, manipulation, and fashionable absurdity.

Game theory also explains why woke ideologues are especially attracted to teaching.

Teaching offers something extraordinarily valuable to ideological activists: asymmetric authority over the young.

A professor stands before 18-year-olds who often know almost nothing about history, philosophy, economics, or theology. The professor controls grades, social approval, and often the moral atmosphere of the classroom itself.

For someone driven by ideological fervor, such an atmosphere is the perfect missionary environment. This fact is why universities increasingly attract people who view education less as the pursuit of truth and more as political activism.

Much of contemporary academic ideology has a peculiar economic structure. It frequently operates by cultivating envy and moral resentment. Students are taught to interpret society primarily through oppressor-oppressed frameworks. Achievement becomes privilege, and personal failure becomes systemic victimhood.

Ideologies that pander to hate and envy replace those that call for discipline and character formation.

It is always easier to blame “systems” than confront one’s own moral failings like hate, envy, and gossip. It is easier to denounce civilization than to build and defend one.

The most important aspect of this issue that game theory explains is why conservative professors so often remain silent while their institutions go downhill.

RELATED: Democrats don’t have a fix for their extremism problem

Noushad Thekkayil/NurPhoto/Getty Images

Imagine a professor who privately believes the university is descending into ideological madness. He sees mandatory DEI trainings becoming political indoctrination. He sees departments openly rewarding activism over scholarship. He sees students being manipulated by emotional propaganda dressed up as education.

Should he speak? Game theory says probably not.

Why? Because the incentives are brutal.

If he speaks while others remain silent, he risks social isolation, administrative retaliation, poor evaluations, stalled promotions, public smears, and endless bureaucratic harassment. Meanwhile, if he remains quiet, he keeps his salary, his colleagues, his research time, and his peace.

From the standpoint of narrow self-interest, silence is rational. This silence, however, is what allows institutional collapse to accelerate.

Every individual dissenter waits for someone else to take the risk first. Meanwhile, the activists never hesitate. Ideologues understand something conservatives often forget: Institutions belong to those willing to fight for them.

The result resembles a kind of academic prisoner’s dilemma. If many professors resisted together, the ideological takeover could be slowed or reversed. But if each calculates personal risk individually, almost all remain silent. Thus the activists dominate despite often representing only a loud minority.

Game theory can describe this dynamic perfectly, but we must look elsewhere in order to solve it.

Eventually, civilization depends upon something game theory cannot fully quantify: courage.

There are moments when virtue matters more than personal advantage. Moments when a man says, “Even if no one stands with me, I will still stand.”

We increasingly reduce all human behavior to self-interest, incentives, careerism, or evolutionary advantage. But civilizations are not preserved merely by incentive structures. They are preserved by people willing to sacrifice for what is true, good, and beautiful.

A society survives only if enough people believe some things are worth defending, even at personal cost.

And if universities are ever to recover from their descent into fashionable nonsense, it will not happen because game theory suddenly changes. It will happen because enough people decide goodness, truth, and beauty matter more than safety.

​Game theory, Political activism, Conservative professors, Universities, Dei, Woke college students, University decline, Courage, Liberal colleges, Opinion & analysis 

A lesbian Florida couple allege in a lawsuit that Key West authorities are violating their constitutional right to paint rainbow colors on their picket fence.

Nicole Sohn and her wife, Linda Bagely-Sohn, have filed a lawsuit after the city’s Historic Architectural Review Commission fined them $250 a day for their LGBTQ fence.

‘If the city is only enforcing the law against some people because of the message they’re expressing, that’s viewpoint discrimination.’

The couple said they decided to paint the pickets as a way of protesting state officials ordering that rainbow crosswalks be painted over to avoid politicization of public spaces. They live in the historic Old Town section of the city.

“It was so upsetting for so many of us, and I woke up one morning and was like, ‘I’m going to paint some pickets on our front gate,'” Sohn said.

“We posted on Facebook as a joke, like, ‘Anyone else want the rainbow fairy to come visit?'” she added. “And we were inundated, and my wife and I ran around that weekend painting a bunch of fences and gates, and it just took off.”

That’s when the commission notified them that the fences were in violation of local regulations, after they received several complaints. The couple said they tried to go through the approval process and obtain a permit for the fences but were denied.

They were told in March to paint the illicit fences an approved color or face the daily fine.

ACLU of Florida attorney Nick Warren accuses the city of violating the lesbians’ constitutional rights.

RELATED: Lesbian couple says vandalism of their ‘Little Queer Library’ feels like ‘censorship’ and hatred

“If you walk around Old Town Key West, you’ll see lots of colorful displays and different colored paints on fences and houses,” Warren says. “Many of them violate the same rules that the city is citing — but if the city is only enforcing the law against some people because of the message they’re expressing, that’s viewpoint discrimination.”

Their attorney said the city has three weeks to respond to the lawsuit, and city officials did not comment about the litigation.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Florida lesbians fence, Lgbtq fence pickets, Free speech rights, Lgbtq agenda, Politics 

A mother discovered that her seventh-grade child had been given a bookmark in support of the LGBTQ agenda, and her email to her county supervisor has led to a bitter debate.

The mother claimed that a woman gave a presentation during English classes and passed out the politically charged bookmarks, according to the email sent to Fresno County Supervisor Garry Bredefeld.

‘These items stray into inappropriate and unwelcome advocacy.’

She said her 13-year-old daughter was given a bookmark and called it “abhorrent” that the Fresno County Public Library had used “tax dollars to target children, suggesting reading materials with sexual/homosexual and transgender content.”

A screenshot of the email was published by KMPH-TV.

The mother went on to point out that library employees had access to children’s private information, and she posited that LGBTQ activists might misuse that information.

“In theory someone could use that data as a grooming list of vulnerable children — confused, unsupervised, ‘not supported at home,'” she added.

Bredefeld brought the issue before the other supervisors, and they voted 3-2 to restrict public libraries from recognizing Pride Month or erecting any display to support the LGBTQ agenda.

“The library now, rather than serve all members of the community in an unbiased fashion, has chosen to become advocates and promote a political agenda that many don’t support,” Bredefeld said.

Predictably, activists are outraged that public spaces won’t be used to push their LGBTQ agenda.

“When an LGBTQ youth walks into a Fresno County library and sees a Pride display, it’s not about politics. It’s a lifeline,” said Diana Feliz Oliva, the founder and CEO of Casita Feliz. “It tells them you are seen.”

Clovis mayor pro tem Diane Pearce disagreed and supported the decision.

“These items stray into inappropriate and unwelcome advocacy,” she said.

RELATED: Lesbian couple says vandalism of their ‘Little Queer Library’ feels like ‘censorship’ and hatred

The KMPH report said the libraries would still be allowed to display whatever books they wanted.

And despite Bredefeld airing concerns about the questionable content of some books, the county supervisors had no plans to take those books off the shelves.

Bredefeld brought out a sign reading, “No indoctrination of our children,” before the voting took place.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Lgbtq agenda, Lgbtq bookmark, Pride month display library, Public libraries, Politics 

The Trump administration is investigating the U.S.-funded Ukrainian biolabs that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was previously smeared as “treasonous” and “traitorous” for bringing to the public’s attention.

Then

Gabbard issued a video statement while a private citizen in 2022 where she claimed that “there are 25-30 U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the U.S. government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens.”

In order to mitigate the risk of breaches at the facilities, Gabbard said that “these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed.”

‘The era of lies and betrayal is over.’

Gabbard was viciously attacked over the video even though days earlier, then-Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland — a woman whose meddling in Ukrainian affairs helped pave the way for the ruinous overthrow of its previous government — admitted that such labs existed.

Nuland testified to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee both that “Ukraine has biological research facilities” and the U.S. government was worried that “Russian forces may be seeking to gain control” of “research materials” in the labs. Then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) then steered Nuland into prophesying that should there be a biological or chemical incident in Ukraine, the Russians would necessarily be to blame.

Following Nuland’s admissions, then-Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testified to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee that Ukraine “operates a little over a dozen” biolabs for bio-defense; that the U.S. had “provided assistance” to the labs, at least “in the context of biosafety”; and there was room for misuse of “some of the material that’s there that is not intended for weapon purposes but nevertheless could be used in dangerous ways.”

RELATED: Chinese fraudster convicted for ripping off Americans with bogus COVID tests

Arun SANKAR/AFP/Getty Images

The Pentagon also noted in a fact sheet that month that the U.S., through the Biological Threat Reduction Program, had by that point dumped roughly $200 million in Ukraine since 2005 “supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.”

The fact sheet noted further that BTRP sought to help the Ukrainians “consolidate and secure pathogens and to continue to ensure Ukraine can detect and report disease outbreaks before they pose security or stability threats.”

Despite the Biden administration bolstering in advance the claims that Gabbard would make in her March 13, 2022, video, failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney accused Gabbard of “parroting false Russian propaganda” and spreading “treasonous lies” that “may well cost lives.”

Then-Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), a Ukraine hawk who later stumped for Kamala Harris’ doomed presidential campaign, shared Gabbard’s video, writing, “Actual Russian propaganda. Traitorous.”

Gabbard noted that such remarks were “slanderous” and stuck to her guns.

Now

Now in a position to do the work she took abuse recommending the government do in 2022, Gabbard is investigating over 120 biolabs outside the U.S. that have been funded by American taxpayers.

The spy chief told the New York Post on Monday that her team will “identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what ‘research’ is being conducted to end dangerous gain-of-function research that threatens the health and well-being of the American people and the world.”

“The COVID-19 pandemic revealed the catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens in biolabs can have,” Gabbard said. “Yet despite these obvious dangers, politicians, so-called health professionals, like Dr. Fauci, and entities within the Biden administration’s national security team lied to the American people about the existence of these US-funded and supported biolabs and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth.”

ODNI officials confirmed that more than 40 of the biolabs under investigation are — as Gabbard indicated four years ago — in Ukraine and could “be at risk of compromise” due to the ongoing war.

Trump ODNI officials said that the Biden administration’s mixed messaging about the Ukrainian biolabs were part of an “Information Resilience” strategy to “shape the public narrative” to simultaneously “mitigate and counter foreign malign influence” and downplay American ties to the war-zone research. In other words, they were pushing falsehoods domestically to neutralize foreign half-truths.

The State Department, for instance, noted in a carefully worded March 9, 2022, statement that “the United States does not own or operate any chemical or biological laboratories in Ukraine.” The State Department proceeded to reject the claim, not that the U.S. and Ukraine were collaborating on biological and chemical research, but that they were “conducting chemical and biological weapons activities.”

“The prior administration bankrolled dangerous gain-of-function research and foreign biolabs with American tax dollars, then deliberately hid it from the American people,” Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said in a statement.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, DNI Tulsi Gabbard and the entire Cabinet are righting these historic wrongs and delivering justice for our warfighters and the ones they protect,” Hegseth continued. “The era of lies and betrayal is over.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Adam kinzinger, Avril haines, Biden administration, Director of national intelligence, Kamala harris, Marco rubio, Mitt romney, Pentagon, Trump administration, Tulsi gabbard, State department, Ukraine, Kyiv, Russia, Bioweapons, Biolabs, Laboratory, Science, Gain of function, Politics 

Basketball sensation Caitlin Clark has done more for women’s basketball — at both the collegiate and professional level — than any other player in history. And she’s just at the beginning of her career.

But BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock believes Clark’s impact and influence is waning rapidly, not due to any fault of her own but because the WNBA has already broken her.

“This whole secular, feminist, matriarchal, slave to the LGBTQ agenda may have completely destroyed Caitlin Clark,” he says.

On this episode of “Fearless,” Whitlock adopts the persona of “Sherlock Homie” and investigates the real reason Clark’s reign is likely coming to an end.

Last week, the WNBA tipped off with a three-game run for the league’s 30th season. Clark’s Indiana Fever was one of the teams to debut the season, but to the surprise of many, Clark (who plays point guard) went back to the Fever’s locker room twice during the game for back adjustments.

In her postgame interview, she, as well as her coach Stephanie White, insisted the injury was nothing serious.

But Whitlock thinks there’s more to the story.

The Fever recently drafting point guard Raven Johnson when Clark is just in her third professional season is a “red flag” and “a clue,” he argues.

“Caitlin Clark got manhandled and beaten up in year one, and I don’t think she’s ever recovered, and I think they know it,” he says, pointing out that the WNBA and sports news outlets have started featuring other players in marketing over Clark.

“They know Caitlin Clark is not long term for this league. … They’re trying to hustle us until Caitlin Clark can’t play anymore, and they’re hoping that, hey, by the time you figure that out, that she’s not going to be Super Caitlin and that she may have a limited career because of what we put her through in her rookie year,” Whitlock continues, playing footage of Clark getting repeatedly fouled during her first professional season.

Clark, he argues, has been put through “a hazing process” by the WNBA, which he calls a “lesbian college fraternity.”

“DiJonai Carrington and Marina Mabrey and the other LGBTQ thugs damaged this woman with their brutal style of play,” he says.

“They damaged their rookie hazing her way too aggressively, and now they’re apologizing now that she’s damaged and destroyed potentially.”

“We’ve been had, and that’s why Sherlock Homie is on the case.”

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Blaze media, Blazetv, Caitlin clark, Dijonai carrington, Fearless, Fearless with jason whitlock, Indiana fever, Jason whitlock, Lgbtq agenda, Wnba, Women’s sports, Womens basketball 

Another exposé from Sara Gonzales has now led to a criminal investigation, this time related to a day care business that has sponsored a suspicious number of H-1B visas.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton directly cited the Gonzales report in a press release announcing the lawsuit against Golden Qi Holdings LLC and Yuan Yao, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China.

Then he drove off in his metallic rose gold BMW.

The report found evidence that Golden and other businesses are being falsely promoted as legitimate enterprises in order to apply for H-1B visas and sell them to Chinese nationals.

Gonzales visited the business known as the Allen Infant Care Center and found no evidence of children and instead found overgrown weeds. When she spoke to an individual familiar with the property, she claimed to Gonzales that Yao “sells visas” and that the business had not operated as a day care for an extended period of time.

The woman, whose identity was protected, claimed to Gonzales that Yao was selling visas for large amounts of money and then receiving labor from the applicants for “next to nothing” in exchange.

“None of these people come from poor homes. These are people who can pay him 20 grand for their visa,” the woman said in the report.

“That arrangement is made in China.”

Gonzales even confronted Yao, who appeared to claim through broken English that he was in the process of reopening the day care and that he had done nothing wrong. He also told Gonzales that he would call the police if she didn’t leave the business.

And then he drove off in his metallic rose gold BMW.

She went on to document how the company had apparently taken out two PPP loans in the amounts of $51,000 and $54,000, and both were forgiven. Gonzales also questioned how they had an autism behavioral center that did not seem at all operational.

“The thing that is so curious about this [case] when you go digging in the data and the [Labor Condition Applications] is that you wouldn’t think that a day care center would need, you know, ‘market research analysts’ or ‘supply chain analysts,'” Gonzales said.

“And yet, this company actually told the United States government that they needed foreign workers to fill those jobs,” she claimed.

RELATED: Sara Gonzales exposes ‘MUSLIMS ONLY’ event at city-owned site — and Gov. Greg Abbott is taking action

Paxton added in a statement that his office was working to prevent any foreign national from illegally entering into the U.S.

“Let this be a warning to anyone considering trying to scam the H-1B visa program,” he wrote. “I will continue fighting to ensure that the H-1B program serves the interests of Americans, not Chinese nationals, and that those who abuse the program are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.”

“My office will continue to work to stop any foreign national from entering this country unlawfully,” he added.

Gonzales thanked Paxton for taking action on her report.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Sara gonzales unfiltered, Golden qi holdings, Yuan yao, Politics, Texas day care chinese scam 

Liberal entertainer Chelsea Handler went head-to-head with one of the biggest comedians in the United States over the weekend, and the results were brutal.

Handler was once known for her talk shows, including “Chelsea Lately” (2007–2014), but in recent years, she has become a dominant progressive voice for feminism and being alone.

‘Her whole act is just talking about how it’s stupid to have kids.’

Handler has garnered headlines in the last two decades for comments like, “I’m not interested in long-term commitments” in 2025, saying “being childless and alone are everything they’re cracked up to be” in 2016, and “I definitely don’t want to have kids” in 2013.

On Sunday, however, Handler was forced to perform ahead of rival Tony Hinchcliffe on Netflix’s “The Roast of Kevin Hart” — giving the more conservative Hinchcliffe the last word.

Ladies first

Keeping with her progressive motif, Handler directed jokes at Hinchcliffe like, “Tony is what happens when women don’t have safe access to abortion care,” and “Tony you have the face of a school shooter and the personality of somebody who gets shot first.”

The 51-year-old also went after Shane Gillis, who was hosting the roast, saying, “Tony and Shane both live in Texas where abortion is illegal, but on the upside, if you see one of them doing comedy there’s a pretty good chance your uterus will start dry heaving on its own.”

She then joked that both are white supremacists who, if they weren’t at the event, would typically “just burn a cross on someone’s lawn.”

Six comedians later, it was Hinchcliffe’s turn, and he did not hold back his disdain for Handler in a series of brutal roasts.

RELATED: Video: Far-left comic Chelsea Handler hammers home how blissfully happy she is without children

–

Burn notice

“We knew Chelsea Handler would be available today because it’s Mother’s Day,” Hinchcliffe began.

Hinchcliffe then mocked Handler’s looks, saying she “looks like the f**king Joker” and is “aging like a vegetable in Lizzo’s fridge.”

It then seemed like Hinchcliffe may have gone off the cuff when he said Handler “f**king sucks and always has, by the way. Her whole act is just talking about how it’s stupid to have kids.”

He went on, “We get it, your ovaries are busted, that’s like if Kevin [Hart]’s whole act was about how ‘roller coasters aren’t that cool anyway.'”

Rounding out his full assault, the 41-year-old Hinchcliffe said, “Chelsea actually had her eggs frozen, not on purpose, they’re just inside of a cold, frigid bitch.”

RELATED: Progressive comedian blames anti-woke comedy for ‘slightly fascistic’ culture that will bring back slavery

– YouTube

Race to the bottom

Handler wasn’t the only liberal Hinchcliffe triggered, but the family of the late drug-addict turned progressive icon George Floyd took issue with one of the comedian’s closing remarks.

Hinchcliffe joked to Kevin Hart that the “black community is so proud of you — right now George Floyd is looking up at us all laughing so hard that he can’t breathe.”

TMZ was told by a spokesman for the George and Gianna Floyd Foundation that Hart allowing Hinchcliffe’s joke is “sad for the culture.”

Floyd’s family and friends reportedly think Hinchcliffe is a “racist comedian,” while the foundation claimed it is only trying to better its community.

The foundation also bizarrely stated, “Let’s try to be a little bit more positive — and not sit up there doing colon inspections by white comedians.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Align, Chelsea handler, Comedians, Comedy, Feminism, George floyd, Kevin hart, Roast, School shooter, White supremacists, Entertainment 

Nebraska voters heading to the polls on Tuesday are facing a convoluted Senate primary in which both parties are trading accusations of spoiler candidates intended to manipulate the November general election.

Incumbent U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) is up for re-election and defending his seat in the Tuesday primary against several Republican challengers.

‘We must vote for Cindy to knock fake Forbes out of the Primary Election to allow Osborn to take on Ricketts.’

Meanwhile, the Democrat primary election has sparked controversy, with candidate Cindy Burbank accusing her competitor, William Forbes, of being a Ricketts plant.

“Pete Ricketts, who is running for reelection, is putting in a candidate loyal to him in the DEMOCRATIC primary — to split the vote against him, so he wins easily. He’s running an anti-abortion activist named Bill Forbes, who has posted in support of Pete Ricketts!” Burbank’s campaign website states.

Burbank claimed that Ricketts planted Forbes because he is concerned that he will lose his re-election bid in the November general election to independent candidate Dan Osborn.

“He knows he’s losing to Dan Osborn and this is his plan to cheat his way to victory. We can’t let that happen,” Burbank’s website reads.

Burbank accused Forbes, a pastor who previously voted for President Donald Trump, of being “a ‘fake’ Democrat,” stating that Osborn “is a good man, a working man, a strike leader, and someone we can trust.”

“He deserves a fair shot against Ricketts.”

RELATED: Republicans receive another grim midterm forecast

Pete Ricketts. Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Osborn previously ran a strong 2024 race against Sen. Deb Fischer (R), losing by less than seven percentage points. Although he did not win, he garnered 66,000 more votes than former Vice President Kamala Harris (D) received in Nebraska in the presidential election against Trump.

The Nebraska Democratic Party echoed the accusation that Ricketts “planted his spoiler and fake Democratic candidate.” The party expressed concern that a Forbes win over Burbank would split votes between Forbes and Osborn in the general election, giving Ricketts a greater chance of victory.

The NDP, which originally planned not to field a nominee, stated that the strategy was to ensure that Burbank won the primary. Burbank would then presumably withdraw before the general election to allow Osborn to compete against Ricketts.

“We must vote for Cindy to knock fake Forbes out of the Primary Election to allow Osborn to take on Ricketts one-on-one in the General Election. This is the path to send Ricketts and his millions packing. This is the way to break the one-party rule in Nebraska,” the NDP wrote.

NDP chair Jane Kleeb wrote in a post on X in July 2025 that the party planned to support Osborn, believing he was the best chance to beat Ricketts in the deep-red state.

The New York Times reported that Burbank “confirmed that she planned to exit the race after the primary, assuming that Mr. Osborn submits enough signatures to qualify for the November ballot.”

“I will stay in until it is obvious that I cannot win in November, and I will drop out,” Burbank told the Times.

Osborn accused Ricketts of reverting to “classic dirty tricks” to win re-election.

“Unfortunately for Ricketts, Bill Forbes’ Trojan-horse campaign is doomed,” an Osborn campaign manager told KETV.

Forbes denied being a plant, telling the outlet that he is a “real Democrat in the mold of JFK and Ben Nelson — tough, practical, and focused on working families instead of coastal lunacy.”

“What flies in radical California dies in Nebraska. Voters here want a strong Democrat who reaches across the aisle and actually unites people — not another phony independent puppet like Dan Osborn,” Forbes said.

Ricketts’ campaign has denied having any role in the Democrat primary.

The Nebraska Republican Party responded to the Democrat plot by filing a complaint to have Burbank removed from the ballot, arguing that she was not a “good-faith” candidate because she had no intention of serving in office. Burbank challenged that removal attempt, and the Nebraska Supreme Court ultimately ruled to reinstate Burbank, stating that the deadline to consider such complaints had passed.

RELATED: Republican Indiana state senator has no regrets about redistricting vote

Dan Osborn. Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty Images

Legal Marijuana NOW Party candidate Mike Marvin was also accused of being a spoiler in the race after Burbank paid his $1,740 filing fee on the last day for candidates to file, according to the Nebraska Examiner.

She confirmed to the outlet that she paid his filing fee after witnessing “the secretary’s people refusing to take Mike’s check because it was for 10 dollars too much.”

“It pissed me off, and I paid for it. … I’ve never met Mike,” Burbank told the Nebraska Examiner. “If Ricketts can throw his money around, then so can I!”

When asked why Burbank paid his filing fee, Marvin told the outlet that he had “no idea what is happening.”

“I keep waiting for the check I wrote to clear,” Marvin stated. “I don’t even know Cindy Burbank.”

Marvin denied being a plant, writing in a Facebook post, “No one has hired me to do this; that is slanderous.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Pete ricketts, Nebraska, Cindy burbank, William forbes, Bill forbes, Dan osborn, Donald trump, Trump, Nebraska democratic party, Democratic party, Jane kleeb, Nebraska republican party, Mike marvin, Politics 

After losing his home in the Palisades Fire, former reality star Spencer Pratt launched a viral mayoral campaign ad blasting Los Angeles leadership — and while Liz Wheeler isn’t the biggest fan of celebrities getting political, she believes there is something different about him.

“I confess: I am not typically a fan of celebrities who, just because they’re bored after the peak of their career, dip their toe in politics. I’m not typically a fan of that,” Wheeler says.

“However, Spencer Pratt might be a little bit different,” she admits, before playing Pratt’s viral campaign ad, which he reportedly shot in a few hours on a very limited budget and which has millions of views on X alone.

“This is where Mayor Bass lives,” Pratt begins, standing in front of a mansion. “You notice something?”

“They don’t have to live in the mess they’ve created — where you live,” he says, before showing a homeless encampment.

Pratt goes on to reveal where he now lives after the Palisades Fire: in a trailer.

“This is where I live. They let my home burn down. I know what the consequences of failed leadership are. That’s why I’m running for mayor — for my sons and the rest of us Angelenos that want to stop these corrupt politicians from destroying our city,” he continues. “We are going to get the golden age of Los Angeles back.”

“The best part of this will be how immediately obvious that it becomes to everyone in the country — not just to residents of Los Angeles, not even just to California residents, but to everyone in the country, people on the right and the left, how immediately obvious it becomes that disgusting, dangerous, degrading cities like Los Angeles are not inevitable,” Wheeler comments.

“They are, in fact, a deliberate political choice that the Democrats make intentionally to hurt you and to control you. This is also why Democrats are not going to fight fair. They cannot let Spencer Pratt win, because they cannot have the American people, by and large, understand that disgusting, dangerous, degrading cities are a deliberate political choice that Democrats have made intentionally to harm and to control you,” she continues.

“And this is why we, the American people — even those of us who don’t live in Los Angeles — must help Spencer Pratt win in any way that we can offer our assistance,” she adds.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Blaze media, Blaze news, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Blaze podcast network, Blaze podcasts, Blazetv, California, Celebrities, Corrupt politicians, Democrats, Failed leadership, Golden age, Homeless encampment, Leadership, Liz wheeler, Los angeles, Mayor bass, Political, Residents, Spencer pratt, The blaze, The liz wheeler show, Viral campaign 

A repeat offender who’s accused of seriously wounding two in a brazen daytime shooting Monday in Cambridge, Massachusetts, seemed headed for a long stretch in prison after he pleaded guilty in 2021 to firing at police officers in Boston.

You see, prosecutors wanted Tyler E. Brown to serve at least 10 years in prison for shooting at cops the year before, the Boston Globe reported.

‘I am a firm believer that when Mr. Tyler Brown gets out, he will hurt, or worse, kill someone.’

However, the paper said Judge Janet L. Sanders imposed a sentence of five to six years in state prison, with credit for about 18 months he’d spent in custody while the case was pending.

After just a few years behind bars, Brown was released back into the community, WFXT-TV reported.

Brown on Monday allegedly shot two people with a rifle on a Cambridge street not far from Harvard and MIT, the Globe said. The victims remained hospitalized Tuesday with life-threatening injuries, officials told the paper.

RELATED: 19-year-old thug reportedly violated bond at least a half dozen times before being accused of murder — while out on probation

Brown was shot by a state trooper and an armed civilian, the Globe said, and remained at an area hospital.

Officials on Monday said Brown is expected to face two counts of armed assault with intent to murder and firearms offenses, the paper reported.

Forget how angry officials likely are over Monday’s shooting given that Brown might otherwise have been behind bars. Law enforcement was outraged back in 2021 over Brown’s lighter sentence — records show he was already on probation for a stabbing and witness intimidation at the time, WFXT noted.

One officer even predicted Brown would return to violence once he was released.

“I am a firm believer that when Mr. Tyler Brown gets out, he will hurt, or worse, kill someone,” one officer involved in the 2020 shooting wrote in an impact statement, according to WCVB-TV. “Probation apparently means nothing to Mr. Tyler Brown, nor does the value of life.”

Gregory Long, the department’s superintendent in chief at the time, said in a statement after Brown’s August 2021 sentence that “the Boston Police Department is extremely disappointed in this sentence,” the Globe reported.

Long, according to the paper, added that “this sentence does not reflect the magnitude and seriousness of the offense committed by this individual. Acts of violence such as this in our city streets require and demand adequate accountability.”

Even George Soros-backed Rachael Rollins — the Suffolk district attorney at the time — wasn’t happy with the judge’s sentence.

“My office recommended a significant sentence for Mr. Brown given the nature of his offenses and the trauma and harm he inflicted,” Rollins said, according to the Globe. “I am disappointed in the sentence that was imposed.”

As Blaze News previously reported, Rollins in 2023 announced plans to resign as Massachusetts U.S. attorney after she was accused of leaking “sensitive DOJ” information to the press in an effort to influence an election in favor of a fellow Democratic colleague.

More from the Globe:

Brown, now 46, had only been out of jail a few months on May 16, 2020, when he opened fire at several officers who had responded to a report of a man with a gun who was threatening people on Northampton Street in the South End. He was arrested after he fled to Massachusetts Avenue, where he shot at officers who returned fire, the Globe reported.

He pleaded guilty the following year to eight charges, including armed assault with intent to murder, attempted assault and battery by means of discharging a firearm for firing at a Boston police officer, and three counts of assault with a dangerous weapon for pointing a firearm at additional responding Boston police officers, officials said.

Prosecutors said they had sought a sentence of 10 to 12 years, followed by five years of probation. At the time of the shooting, Brown was on probation for a 2014 conviction for assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, a knife, and witness intimidation, records show.

In relation to Monday afternoon’s shooting, Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan told WFXT in a separate story that an active shooter situation was under way when officers arrived at the scene in Cambridge, noting that the suspect “was already traveling down the middle of Memorial Drive, cars were stopped in traffic, … and he was actively firing in an erratic fashion at various vehicles along the road.”

RELATED: Thug reportedly with 131 prior arrests just got charged with setting homeless man on fire while victim slept

Two victims in separate vehicles were struck by gunfire, including a municipal bus driver who reportedly drove himself to the hospital after he was shot in the head, WFXT said.

Authorities added that a state police trooper — as well as a civilian described as a former Marine licensed to carry a firearm — moved toward the suspect while shots were being fired, WFXT said.

Officials said the suspect was struck multiple times in the lower extremities and treated at the scene, WFXT added.

Ryan noted that motorists abandoned their vehicles and ran in multiple directions as the shooting unfolded, WFXT reported, adding that some people reportedly took cover underneath their cars.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Cambridge, Judge janet l sanders, Lenient sentence, Massachusetts, Police, Rachael rollins, Repeat offender, Sentencing outrage, Shooting, Tyler e brown, Violent history, Crime, Politics