Darline Nordone’s rise in South Carolina threatens to turn one of MAGA’s founding promises into a punch line. The movement that vowed to “drain the swamp” is now watching establishment money, inherited political machinery, and a presidential endorsement converge behind the sister of one of the Senate’s most durable establishment figures.
It also risks making Republicans look ridiculous as they denounce the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Democrats will use this cartoonish spectacle to argue that the Republican Party has been captured by corporate interests and turned its back on ordinary Americans.
Nordone (recently rebranded as Darline Graham) remains something of a political blank slate. Beyond the relationship with her late brother Lindsey, her support for a pro-abortion political ally, her years in state bureaucracies, and her association with diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, voters have relatively little record from which to judge what she would actually do in the Senate.
Her refusal to state clearly what she is for and against only deepens the uncertainty.
What voters can reasonably expect, however, is continuity with the Graham political brand: Lindsey Graham’s fanatical interventionist foreign policy, establishment instincts at home, and comfort with bipartisan deals that many MAGA voters spent the past decade rejecting.
That is precisely what the MAGA movement was supposed to oppose. We do not need to consult America’s founders to remember why. We need only go back to 2015, when candidate Donald Trump declared war on the political establishment and won by promising to change it.
Obviously, the call to “drain the swamp” reigns supreme in setting the frame, but there is an embarrassment of riches in terms of quotes to choose from to make the point even more specifically. How about at the first Republican debate in 2015:
I will tell you that our system is broken. … I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them, two years later, three years later, I call them. They are there for me. … And that’s a broken system.
How about candidate Trump on Hillary Clinton:
These interests have rigged our political and economic system for their exclusive benefit. Big business, elite media, and major donors are lining up behind the campaign of my opponent because they know she will keep our rigged system in place. They are throwing money at her because they have total control over everything she does. She is their puppet, and they pull the strings.
And what about the special interest support of failed military interventions supported by his then-opponent Senator Lindsey Graham:
Judging by the incompetent way he ran his campaign, it is easy to see why his military strategies have failed so badly — we can’t even beat ISIS!
That is the political movement I signed up for, volunteered for, worked for, and still fight for.
RELATED: ‘Birthright senatorship’ betrays America First
Finn Gomez/Getty Images
How can that movement be squared with an extension of establishment politics rather than its replacement? It can’t. Everything Trump once condemned is now reappearing in almost cartoonish form.
So who is spending so heavily to support Darline Graham Nordone — and what do those interests expect in return?
A group called the Invest in Tomorrow Coalition is flooding money to support Darline Graham Nordone against her conservative opponent Ralph Norman. The group has announced $1 million in the race, as part of a $15 million larger pledge across the country, having already spent millions to defeat conservatives Chip Roy and Andy Ogles in their primary races.
The group is a super PAC, made possible by the 2010 Citizens United decision and its progeny, and funded by “clean energy” interests that favor government support for their industry. Conservatives have spent years attacking that kind of arrangement as corporate welfare — or, less politely, socialism. The point is not that every donor buys a politician outright. It is that political money is rarely charitable. Donors spend because policy matters to them.
Darline Graham Nordone has also received support from the establishment Senate campaign arm, the National Republican Senatorial Committee. While she can’t take over her late brother’s campaign account directly, it can be transferred to the NRSC, which is funding her already. Notably, her opponent, Ralph Norman, is an original co-sponsor of the Save America Act from six years ago. For an establishment Senate already twisted into knots over its obstruction of that critical legislation, it makes sense that they wouldn’t want another fierce advocate for it.
There are others in this one-sided spending race as well. The Security is our Strength PAC, formerly associated with Lindsey Graham, is of course supporting her to the tune of $900,000. This group makes it clear that it views her as the one who will be “carrying the legacy forward.”
I take it from their perspective that they want the same out of this Graham that they got out of the last one, which is a different political tune than others suggesting that Darline may be more focused domestically. There is also a group called Palmetto Action that is coming in north of $1 million to oppose Ralph Norman, on similar lines.
RELATED: The Biden autopen scandal has one big winner: Anthony Fauci
Alex WROBLEWSKI/AFP/Getty Images
Put simply, a great deal of money is flooding into South Carolina, and most of it is either supporting Darline Graham Nordone or opposing Ralph Norman. For a movement built around draining the swamp, the optics could hardly be worse.
South Carolinians should brace for a deluge of ads from every screen and speaker they own. Special-interest money can move votes; that is why people spend it. But the underlying question will remain: Why is Darline Graham Nordone a serious contender for this Senate seat? Her birthright senatorship via a famous last name, President Trump’s endorsement, and a flood of outside money are doing much of the work.
South Carolinians should see this for what it is: a rejection of one of MAGA’s core promises. This is not draining the swamp. It is restocking it.
Democrats will happily use this cartoonish spectacle to argue that the Republican Party has been captured by corporate interests and turned its back on ordinary Americans. They will also have an easy answer when Republicans denounce democratic socialism: Why should voters take that charge seriously if a Republican senator reaches office with the help of interests seeking to socialize the costs of private investment?
That will be a tough charge to rebut.
Darline nordone, Democratic socialism, Lindsey graham, Political establishment, President trump, Republican party, South carolina, Democratic socialists of america, Maga, Opinion & analysis
