Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton
appeared on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” Monday, encouraging fellow travelers to continue with the anti-Trump rhetoric that set the stage for two assassination attempts and recommending the prosecution of American citizens over so-called undesirable speech.
After Maddow concern-mongered without interruption for over a minute, Clinton suggested that the mainstream media’s failure to “cover Trump the way that they should” has “threatened the physical safety of so many people.”
Clinton was not referring to President Donald Trump, who was targeted for assassination the previous day, but rather the illegal aliens he has criticized.
‘I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative.’
Clinton intimated that dissenting views are the problem — that the press should adopt a single narrative moving forward.
“I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is,” said Clinton, a
proponent of the Russian collusion hoax and an advocate for punishing standout journalists who faithfully fulfilled their duty.
It’s unclear how much more conformity it would take to satisfy Clinton. After all, the mainstream media has consistently attacked Trump and portrayed him in a negative light over the past eight years.
Blaze News
previously reported that Pew Research showed 20% of stories in the press about Obama in his first 60 days in office were negative and 42% were positive. In Biden’s first 60 days, 19% of the stories were negative; 27% were positive. In Trump’s first 60 days, 62% of the stories about his presidency were negative and only 5% were positive.
A Harvard University
study found that 80% of the press coverage of Trump during his first 100 days was negative.
The Media Research Center revealed last month that on CBS, NBC, and ABC, Kamala Harris was painted in a favorable light in 84% of the networks’ coverage, whereas Trump was depicted negatively in 89% of their coverage,
reported the New York Sun.
The coverage has not only been consistently negative but hyperbolic. The mainstream media has dutifully worked in concert with Democrats to
characterize Trump as a would-be dictator or a reincarnation of Hitler.
Having apparently not learned anything from the actions of Thomas Matthew Crooks and Ryan Routh — or perhaps just enough — Clinton stressed that Americans should be “outraged by what [Trump] represents,” adding that he is a “very dangerous man.”
After recycling Democrats’
well-worn Project 2025 falsehood and joining Maddow in once again resurrecting fears about Russian election interference, Clinton suggested that Americans engaged in what she believes constitutes foreign-sponsored “propaganda” should be “civilly or even in some cases criminally charged.”
‘Something makes me feel like she might be talking about some friends of mine.’
According to Clinton, clamping down on the constitutionally protected speech of Americans accused of advancing Russian talking points would “be a better deterrence because the Russians are unlikely, except in a very few cases, to ever stand trial in the United States.”
Responding to Clinton’s comments, Blaze Media co-founder and nationally syndicated radio host Glenn Beck
said Tuesday, “Something makes me feel like she might be talking about some friends of mine. I don’t know. But that seems like dangerous talk and a slippery slope.”
Clinton alluded to the suggestion by some Republicans in Congress that their colleagues had parroted Russian propaganda on the House floor. She appears to be referring to Ohio Republican Rep. Mike Turner’s assertion to CNN earlier this year that “there are members of Congress today who still incorrectly say that this conflict between Russia and Ukraine is over NATO, which of course it is not.”
Turner, who was reportedly advancing an accusation made earlier by Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas), added, “To the extent that this propaganda takes hold, it makes it more difficult for us to really see this as an authoritarian versus democracy battle, which is what it is.”
Americans who would dare exercise their constitutional rights to suggest that NATO expansionism was a motivating factor behind Russia’s invasion would apparently be ripe for prosecution if Clinton got her way.
Clinton has been pushing for a clampdown on speech she finds undesirable for a while.
In 2021, Clinton
told the Guardian, “The technology platforms are so much more powerful than any organ of the so-called mainstream press, and I do think that there has to be not just an American reckoning but a global reckoning with the disinformation, with the monopolistic power and control, with the lack of accountability that the platforms currently enjoy.”
“In particular Facebook, which has the
worst track record for enabling mistruths, misinformation, extremism, conspiracy, for goodness’ sake, even genocide in Myanmar against the Rohingya,” continued Clinton. “So governments are going to have to decide right now that the platforms have to be held to some kind of standard, and it’s tricky.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Hillary clinton, Clinton, Misinformation, Censorship, Totalitarianism, Pink police state, Leftism, Democrat, Democratic, Free speech, First amendment, 1st amendment, Speech, Online, Censor, Disinformation, Politics