Category: blaze media

HelloFresh is a company that delivers meal kits to ease the burden of grocery shopping and cooking on customers — but now it is facing online backlash for something that has nothing to do with food.

The company used Pride Month to post an explicit advertisement, suggesting that its high-fiber meals could help customers “prep” for Pride Month.

In a post on Instagram, the company wrote, “We know eating isn’t always a top priority this month. We respect that. But for those of you who are … prepping … we have an extensive lineup of high-fiber recipes available. Happy Pride.”

“And just to accentuate the joke,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray comments, “they said, ‘Use the code BOTTOMSUP for a Pride Month discount.’”

“I will absolutely be saying goodbye, HelloFresh. I mean, that’s just sick and completely inappropriate,” he says.

“How are you sitting around a conference table at HelloFresh and you’re in a marketing meeting and somebody says, ‘Hey, I know’ … and the person in charge says, ‘Yes, that’ll go over hugely with the 94% of Americans who aren’t living that lifestyle. They’ll love it,’” he continues.

“It’s not funny, and it’s not appropriate,” he adds.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Hellofresh, Pride month, Pat gray, Keith malinak, Jeff fisher, Pat gray unleashed 

An African migrant was arrested in Northern Ireland on Monday after allegedly attempting to behead a British national in Belfast. Locals incensed by the news of yet another savage crime committed on camera by a foreign suspect — this time a Sudanese national who entered Northern Ireland via the Republic of Ireland in 2023 — took to the streets in protest.

While there were initially peaceful demonstrations, things quickly went sideways.

‘Politicians aren’t listening.’

On Tuesday evening, multitudes of young men wearing masks and clad in black clashed with police, pelted migrant housing complexes with rocks, and torched several buildings and vehicles. There was “significant rioting” in the streets of Belfast again on Wednesday, where police liberally used nonlethal rounds and powerful water cannons — never before deployed in other parts of the U.K. — against protesters and made 16 arrests.

While some officials in the United Kingdom have acknowledged the unaddressed concerns and desperation underpinning the native population’s recent violent outbursts, others appear more focused on how minorities might be feeling in this time of upheaval and “racist thuggery.”

Hilary Benn, a member of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party and the secretary of state for Northern Ireland, expressed outrage during a press conference on Wednesday over recent criticism in parliament of “alien cultures” and the uncritical acceptance of refugees from Sudan, stating that “there’s probably a surgeon from Sudan operating on someone somewhere in the United Kingdom as we stand here this morning saving somebody’s life.”

On Thursday, Benn further evidenced the chief focus of his concern, stating in an interview, “It is really important to convey the sense of fear that has been created, above all, for those who were intimidated, burned out of their houses by masked thugs, on the basis of their skin. But talking to those community organizations, everyone else in Northern Ireland who is an ethnic minority is thinking, ‘Well, is someone going to come for me?'”

RELATED: African suspected of trying to cut white Briton’s head off identified — while police fret about online critics

Charles McQuillan/Getty Images

“There is no justification for the kind of violent thuggery that we have seen,” Benn continued. “This is not the true face of Northern Ireland.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer similarly spoke out against the backlash with a vehemence not similarly present in his condemnation of 30-year-old Sudanese national Hadi Alodid’s alleged blinding and near-beheading of Scottish national Stephen Ogilvie on Monday.

“There is no justification for the violence and disorder that we saw threatening our communities, nor for those who encouraged it, online or elsewhere,” Starmer wrote. “It is clear that people were targeted last night because of their background and I will not tolerate it. Those responsible will feel the full force of the law.”

Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O’Neill also focused on the backlash rather than on the trigger, stating, “Racism, intimidation and violence are wrong wherever they occur. There can be no excuse and no justification for these attacks tonight.”

While not necessarily justifying the backlash, some Britons have provided critical context for why violence may be regarded as some citizens’ only recourse.

Ron McDowell, a Trade Unionist Voice councillor in Belfast, said, for instance, in a statement on Wednesday, “Politicians who say, ‘don’t engage in violence, trust me and vote for me’ have completely failed the people because they simply haven’t delivered and there is now a massive chasm between the public and the political class who design and deliver their communities. As often happens when politics fails in Northern Ireland, violence exploits the void.”

“We are at a critical tipping point,” McDowell continued. “The void between politicians and the public is widening by the hour, and we must step up with genuine, accountable action to address immigration before violence steps in irreversibly.”

A Belfast local identified only as Chris told CBS News that locals are becoming less and less surprised by the kinds of attacks seen on Monday, alluding also to the response to 18-year-old British teen Henry Nowak’s barbaric murder by a Sikh man in December.

Chris suggested that locals “just want a sensible immigration policy, and for the people here not to be put last.”

“This is what causes this: Politicians aren’t listening, and people just feel like they have to make a stand and be noticed,” Chris added.

Among the many lawmakers who condemned the violent response to the latest apparent display of imported barbarism, Carla Lockhart, a Democratic Unionist Party member of parliament, echoed Chris’ sentiment, stating that “politics and the government have failed local communities.”

Lockhart — who stressed to Starmer on Wednesday the need to address the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland — said, “People are angry and concerned for their safety. Therefore, they want the government to give answers around issues such as how many migrants, illegal migrants, have arrived in the U.K. via the Republic of Ireland land border. That, I believe, is one of the most important questions around all of this.”

Chris Rose, a black environmental campaigner and Reform UK member, highlighted a difference in approach adopted in response to the Black Lives Matter riots and the riots in Belfast.

“I don’t support rioting from anyone but when BLM did it, Labour said that MPs should speak to the black community and listen to the concerns,” Rose wrote. “Following the scenes in Belfast, has any Labour MP mentioned speaking to white, working class communities to listen to their concerns?”

With the stated aim of restoring the status quo, the Police Service of Northern Ireland has launched the “Op Exposure” campaign — releasing images of protesters in order to “identify those responsible and bring them to justice.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Northern ireland, Ireland, United kingdom, Belfast, Riots, Migrant, Sudanese, Stephen ogilvie, African, Asylum seeker, Beheading, Violence, Remigration, Keir starmer, Politics 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation says a federal fraud suspect turned himself in after being placed on the newly created “Most Wanted Fraudsters” list.

Said Abdullahi Ereg was indicted in the Feeding Our Future scam in June 2024, but the U.S. District Attorney’s office said he was living overseas and his exact whereabouts were unknown.

Prosecutors say Ereg falsely claimed to have served ‘3,000 meals, twice a day, seven days a week’ as part of the scheme.

Ereg turned himself in just one day after the fraudsters list was announced.

Prosecutors claim Ereg received more than $4.2 million in funds from the Federal Child Nutrition Program after submitting false reimbursement claims through a deli and grocery business he owned in Minneapolis.

Ereg’s Evergreen Grocery and Deli participated in the “Feeding Our Future” program, allowing Ereg to allegedly scam the government beginning about April 2020 and lasting until about April 2021, coinciding with the COVID pandemic.

Prosecutors say Ereg falsely claimed to have served “3,000 meals, twice a day, seven days a week” as part of the scheme. His wife, Najmo Ahmed, also received payments directly from Feeding Our Future.

The couple spent the money they allegedly stole on Burberry, Louis Vuitton, and Canada Goose, and also allegedly transferred about $2.5 million to foreign accounts.

Ereg was indicted on charges that included conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. His wife pleaded guilty in Feb. 2025 to one charge of money laundering and is scheduled to be sentenced on Monday.

FBI Minneapolis Field Office Special Agent Chris Dotson said at a media briefing Wednesday that Ereg was one of the first eight people put on the fraudsters list, which was published within the last week.

RELATED: ‘Feeding Our Future’ scam artist agrees to plea deal with a slap-on-the-wrist sentence

“Today’s apprehension of Said Abdullahi Ereg, a fugitive on the FBI’s Most Wanted Fraudsters List, highlights the collective commitment of the DOJ, FBI, IRS, and USPIS, along with our USAO to bring every alleged fraudster to justice,” Dotson said.

“FBI Minneapolis will be nominating more fugitives to this Most Wanted Fraudsters list,” he added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Federal bureau of investigation, Feeding our future, Politics, Fraud 

On a recent episode of “The Drive,” my co-host Karl Brauer and I discussed one of the most contentious issues in the automotive industry today: tariffs.

It’s one of those topics everybody seems to have an opinion about.

President Trump’s tariff strategy is ultimately aimed at creating incentives for companies to build products in the United States rather than elsewhere.

For many people in the anti-tariff camp, the argument against them is straightforward. Tariffs raise prices, distort markets, and protect industries that should simply learn to compete. In the automotive world, the response is often some version of: “American automakers need to compete with China.”

To which Karl offered a simple response: Europe tried that.

Closing time

The results haven’t been encouraging, to say the least.

Over the past several years, Chinese automakers have rapidly expanded across Europe, capturing market share with aggressively priced vehicles while many traditional European manufacturers struggle to keep up. Volkswagen recently announced plans to close a plant in Germany for the first time in the company’s 88-year history.

Other major automakers have announced layoffs, restructuring efforts, and production cuts as competition intensifies.

Every time someone argues that tariffs are unnecessary because domestic manufacturers should simply compete with Chinese imports on an open playing field, it’s worth looking across the Atlantic and asking a simple question:

How is that working out for Europe?

The answer is complicated, but it’s difficult to ignore the warning signs.

Manufacturing matters

Supporters of tariffs aren’t simply arguing for higher prices or protectionism for its own sake. They’re arguing that manufacturing matters. Jobs matter. Industrial capacity matters. And once those things disappear, they’re not easily rebuilt.

That’s especially true in the automotive industry, where factories support entire ecosystems of suppliers, contractors, transportation networks, and skilled workers.

We’re already seeing evidence of what domestic investment can accomplish here in the United States.

Hyundai’s growing manufacturing presence in Georgia has become one of the most significant automotive investments in the country. Combined with suppliers and battery production facilities, the project is expected to support thousands of jobs. For many workers in the region, those positions represent opportunities that simply didn’t exist before.

The same pattern is playing out across the South. Automakers including Kia, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Nissan, Ford, General Motors, and others continue expanding their U.S. production footprints.

These projects don’t just create assembly jobs. They support entire communities, generating opportunities for local businesses, contractors, suppliers, and workers throughout the region.

RELATED: Gone in 60 seconds: How high-tech thieves can steal your car

Jeff Greenberg/Getty Images

Price check

Critics often warn that tariffs will dramatically increase vehicle prices. The reality is more nuanced.

Modern vehicles are assembled from components sourced around the world. The impact of tariffs depends on where those components are produced, where final assembly takes place, and how manufacturers choose to absorb or pass along those costs.

For many mainstream vehicles, the effect may be relatively modest. Luxury brands such as Ferrari, Lamborghini, Aston Martin, Rolls-Royce, and Porsche face a different situation because they are unlikely to move production to the United States.

But let’s be honest: Buyers spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on an exotic sports car aren’t facing the same concerns as a family shopping for a Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, or Ford Explorer.

The larger question is whether America wants to maintain a strong manufacturing base.

President Trump’s tariff strategy is ultimately aimed at creating incentives for companies to build products in the United States rather than elsewhere. Whether you support that approach or not, the objective is clear: encourage investment, create jobs, and strengthen domestic production.

Data breach

There’s another factor that rarely receives enough attention in these discussions: data security.

Modern vehicles collect enormous amounts of information, including location data, driving habits, communications, and vehicle performance metrics. As Chinese automakers continue expanding globally, policymakers have increasingly raised concerns about who controls that data and where it ultimately ends up.

Whether those concerns prove justified or not, they are becoming part of the broader conversation surrounding automotive trade policy.

Tariffs aren’t a magic solution. They won’t instantly rebuild America’s industrial base or solve every challenge facing the auto industry.

But the debate shouldn’t be reduced to whether tariffs might add a few hundred dollars to the price of a vehicle.

The bigger question is what happens when domestic manufacturers lose market share, close factories, eliminate jobs, and become increasingly dependent on foreign competitors.

Before America dismisses tariffs as outdated or unnecessary, it may be worth paying close attention to the experience of those countries who’ve already made that bet.

​Donald trump, Tariffs, Auto industry, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Jobs, Made in the usa, Lifestyle, Cars 

Some New York Knicks fans spent the afternoon before Game 4 of the NBA Finals ranting and raving outside Madison Square Garden about one person to blame for their Game 3 loss: President Donald Trump.

The 115-111 loss to the San Antonio Spurs with the president in attendance was coupled with added security, poor Knicks play, and riots after the game.

‘We had really bad energy in this space on Monday.’

The reason for all of this, according to some Knicks fans, was the bad vibes brought on by the president.

Just hours before Game 4 at Madison Square Garden, Variety spoke to a flurry of fans who were convinced that serious occult-like powers were at play on behalf of the commander in chief.

“We’re saging the Madison!” a woman named Deisy told Variety.

Deisy was described as wearing a bohemian-style dress with orange and blue Knicks colors as well as an inordinate number of necklaces and ornaments.

“We had really bad energy in this space on Monday. MAGA Mussolini was here — and we gotta get rid of that energy!” she urged.

Other fans claimed Trump had brought “bad voodoo” and “weird energy” and even blamed him for “out-of-the-blue fights that weren’t happening before.”

RELATED: Trump greets crew that restored Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool in visit to the White House

A fan named Avery claimed that Trump is “a curse to every team” he picks, citing the Knicks, the NFL’s Kansas City Chiefs, and Trump’s attendance at a New York Mets baseball game.

Avery was reportedly holding a sign that read, “F**k Trump. Let’s go Knicks.”

While Wednesday’s record-setting Game 4 Knicks comeback (107-106) will likely make those same fans feel that the curse was overcome, one of the more contentious points regarding Trump’s presence actually turned out not to be his fault at all, according to Knicks owner James Dolan.

Basketball fans in New York were enraged by the added security and wait times ahead of Game 3 and blamed the presence of a selfish president for having to arrive earlier under stricter protocols.

Dolan appeared on NYC radio station WFAN on Wednesday and told hosts Craig Carton and Chris McMonigle that the president’s security was not responsible for the added security walls at MSG.

“The Secret Service didn’t demand this stuff,” Dolan stated.

“It was NYPD, and it was really the commissioner’s office,” Dolan said of NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch.

“This was the commissioner’s plan all along,” he added. “She just used the president coming as an excuse to, you know, to set it up.”

RELATED: Trump jinxes NY Knicks? Fans blame president after Bridges ‘disappears’ in Game 3 of finals.

The issue of canceled watch parties for Game 4 was also brought up, which Dolan again said was not his doing.

“Our hope was that the mayor and the commissioner would change their minds, and then we’d put the screens up. They clearly haven’t changed their minds. … It’s almost 5 o’clock, so the screens are not going up,” Dolan said.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) responded soon thereafter and blamed Dolan, saying, “MSG requested a permit for a watch party for 500-999 fans. We approved that permit for 999 fans. Mr. Dolan has now decided to cancel the watch party.”

In the end, the Knicks mounted their epic comeback, and though Trump was not present for Game 4, Knicks fans decided to riot again anyway.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Donald trump, Fearless, Madison square garden, Nba, New york knicks, San antonio spurs, Zohran mamdani, Sports 

Karmelo Anthony has filed a notice of appeal in the wake of his murder conviction earlier this week in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, last year, KDFW-TV reported.

Anthony, 19, was sentenced to 35 years in prison Tuesday — the same day he was found guilty of murder. He will be eligible for parole after he serves half that time behind bars. The Collin County jury that convicted him also sentenced him; the term of Anthony’s sentence open to jurors ranged from five years to 99 years behind bars.

‘It’s really, really tough to convince the Court of Appeals to overturn a jury verdict once the jury has sat through and heard all the evidence.’

Anthony’s attorneys formally filed the notice of appeal, KDFW said, adding that the filing is a routine procedure in serious felony cases, doesn’t mean a new trial has been granted, and that the appeal process can take months or even years to resolve.

Dallas appellate attorney David Coale told KTVT-TV that Anthony’s legal team could have several strong arguments on appeal — but that any appeal won’t be about what the jury heard; rather it would focus on whether the trial was handled correctly.

The case will be assigned to the 5th District Court of Appeals, which is in downtown Dallas, KTVT said, adding that the 5th District Court of Appeals hears all cases from Dallas County, Collin County, and several other metropolitan counties.

KTVT added that Anthony’s attorneys next will request that the Collin County District Clerk’s Office send documents to the Court of Appeals and that the court reporter prepare a transcript addressing the facts of the case and any legal issues.

The defense likely will argue that there wasn’t enough evidence to convict for murder, KTVT said.

But appellate attorney Chad Ruback told KTVT that may prove to be a difficult road.

RELATED: ‘You can’t look me in the eyes, but you can stab my f**king son?!’ Austin Metcalf’s dad humiliates Karmelo Anthony in court

“It’s really, really tough to convince the Court of Appeals to overturn a jury verdict once the jury has sat through and heard all the evidence,” Ruback noted to the station. “It’s entirely possible that the attorneys for Mr. Anthony could argue that maybe the trial court judge didn’t let in some evidence that would have swayed the jury, that would have persuaded the jury to render a not guilty verdict, or a manslaughter verdict, for example.”

A new mug shot of Anthony was taken Tuesday — the day of his conviction and sentencing — after he was placed in the custody of the Collin County Sheriff’s Office:

RELATED: Jury reaches verdict in Karmelo Anthony murder trial (UPDATE)

Karmelo Anthony. Image source: Collin County (Texas) Sheriff’s Office

On Wednesday, Anthony was transported to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice where another new booking photo was taken, KDFW reported.

Anthony was then transported to his unit of assignment at the Pack Unit near Navasota, KDFW added. Navasota is about three and a half hours south of Frisco.

In addition, Anthony’s GiveSendGo fundraiser — which took in around $630,000 for legal and living expenses — was shut down the day after his conviction and sentencing, the New York Post reported.

GiveSendGo differs from GoFundMe as it allows fundraisers for criminal cases, and the Post added that the platform confirmed the fundraiser closure in a statement to the paper.

“The fundraiser was supported to support pre-trial needs, and those funds were disbursed over the last year,” the statement read, according to the Post. “With that stated purpose complete, the fundraiser has been closed.”

However, Anthony’s mother — Kala Hayes — just launched a new GiveSendGo fundraiser dedicated to her son’s appeal.

The monetary goal is $425,000; as of noon Thursday $60 has been raised.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Karmelo anthony, Austin metcalf, Texas, Frisco, Murder conviction, Prison sentence, Appeal, Texas department of criminal justice, Crime 

A race agitator who has railed against the criminal justice system over the murder conviction of Karmelo Anthony has a criminal conviction that has resulted in a suspended law license.

Thelma Anderson has made multiple appearances on camera since Anthony was found guilty of murder on Tuesday in the stabbing of Austin Metcalf in April 2025. Anderson and others professed that Anthony, who is black, was the real victim, not Metcalf, who was white.

During this suspension, Anderson is prohibited from ‘practicing law in Texas.’

She told Roland Martin that the courthouse was a “slaughterhouse,” that Anthony and his family had been “legally lynched” by the system and the Metcalf family, and that “the energy right now is their white supremacy.”

Anderson also took aim at the prosecutor, characterizing him as “overzealous” and accusing him of lying during the trial. She even claimed he has an “unethical background.”

Anderson did not elaborate on what the prosecutor had supposedly done, but she also failed to mention some key details about her own background.

RELATED: Jasmine Crockett drops SHOCKING statement about parents of victim murdered by Karmelo Anthony

Though she implied to groups gathered outside the courthouse that she offered legal expertise “as a former prosecutor,” Anderson cannot currently practice law in the state of Texas. According to the State Bar of Texas, her license has been under “interlocutory suspension” since March 3 for “disciplinary reasons.”

Indeed, in May 2024, the DOJ charged Anderson with three counts related to a COVID-relief loan. She subsequently pled guilty to one count of wire fraud and was sentenced to four years of probation and ordered to pay nearly $21,000 in restitution to the U.S. Small Business Administration, according to the Board of Disciplinary Appeals appointed by the Texas Supreme Court.

Though Anderson has appealed her conviction, the federal charges alone led to her dismissal from her position as a part-time substitute municipal judge in Forth Worth. A month after they were filed, the Fort Worth City Council voted unanimously to remove her.

Earlier this year, a three-member panel of the Board of Disciplinary Appeals appointed by the Texas Supreme Court claimed that Anderson had attempted to game the system regarding her disciplinary hearing by “repeatedly” seeking to delay the board’s decision “through last-minute filings and tactics.”

According to the interlocutory order of suspension, Anderson filed at least seven motions between the afternoon of January 29 and just before midnight on February 26 requesting some type of delay or reconsideration.

Those motions may have slowed the progress of her case, but they ultimately did not prevent the board from suspending her license.

“Having been convicted of an intentional and serious crime and having appealed such conviction, respondent, Thelma M. Anderson, shall have her license to practice law in Texas suspended during the appeal of her criminal conviction,” the board decided.

Additionally, during this suspension, Anderson is prohibited from “practicing law in Texas, holding herself out as an attorney at law, performing any legal service for others, accepting any fee directly or indirectly for legal services not completed before the date of this order, appearing as counsel in any proceeding in any Texas court or before any Texas administrative body, or holding herself out to others or using her name, in any manner, in conjunction with the words ‘attorney at law,’ ‘attorney,’ ‘counselor at law,’ ‘Esquire,’ ‘Esq.’ or ‘lawyer,'” the board ruled.

In response to a request for comment about the wire fraud conviction, Anderson told Blaze News, “Continue to watch.” Anderson hung up after Blaze News requested comment about the suspended law license.

Bill Wirskye, who prosecuted the Anthony case, did not respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Austin metcalf, Criminal justice system, Karmelo anthony, Wire fraud, Politics 

On both sides of the Atlantic, men, especially young men, are dying by suicide at rates that should freeze governments in their tracks. But the powers that be don’t seem to notice.

The U.K. watches males of all ages go under — boys dropping out of school, men in their 20s drifting between short-term jobs and long nights alone, 30s lost to drink, dread, or sheer exhaustion. The U.S. watches its men go under, too. Their suicide rates dwarf those of women, and overdose deaths skew heavily male.

When a young man limps into therapy, he’s met with soft voices, polite nods, and vague talk about letting his guard down.

Whenever this comes up, we hear the same insufferable chorus: Why won’t these men just go to therapy?

As if it’s that simple. As if men are ignoring a perfectly functioning safety net. As if they’re being stubborn for sport.

Girl talk

Most men aren’t avoiding therapy because they fear healing, but because the entire system is built with someone else in mind.

Walk into the average psychology department, clinic, or counseling office and look around. The landscape is overwhelmingly female — in training, in staffing, in leadership, in tone. In both the U.K. and the U.S., the majority of therapists are women.

While that isn’t inherently bad — many of these therapists are excellent — it does mean the system has been shaped by female norms, female communication styles, and female emotional instincts.

This is not a conspiracy theory but just an honest acknowledgment of reality. Men and women don’t experience mental suffering the same way. They don’t express it the same way. They don’t process it the same way. A woman in distress tends to talk her way outward. A man tends to go inward until the pressure builds, then either falls silent or implodes. Women spiral verbally; men quietly.

So when a young man limps into therapy — desperate, numb, maybe half a step away from ending it all — he enters a world where the emotional rules weren’t written for him. He’s told to “open up,” “talk through it,” “share feelings,” “name the emotion.” He’s met with soft voices, polite nods, and vague talk about letting his guard down. What he’s not met with is someone who speaks his language.

It’s a mismatch from the very first minute.

Manning up

And because therapy culture is so thoroughly feminized, a man struggling with anger, confusion, despair, or loss often feels like a stranger adrift in a foreign country — grappling with an unfamiliar language and baffling customs.

That’s not the therapist’s fault. But it is the system’s fault.

And this is the part no one wants to say out loud: Men respond better to men. Not because women are incompetent, but because no matter how skilled a female practitioner is, she will never fully understand what it means to move through the world as a man. Just as no man will ever fully understand the interior life of a woman.

A man who has lost his job, lost his marriage, or lost his sense of purpose doesn’t want to explain the weight of male shame to someone who has never carried it. A man who feels emasculated doesn’t want to define the word emasculated from scratch. A man drowning in a culture that treats masculinity as a pathology doesn’t want to walk into a room where he suspects that belief might subtly be shared.

And yes, he may be wrong. But suffering doesn’t make people clear-headed. If anything, it makes them cautious.

This is why men light up when paired with a male therapist — someone who knows the codes: the long pauses, the tight jaw, the clipped sentences, the jokes that aren’t jokes, the sudden confession buried in small talk. Someone who knows what it feels like to fail publicly and hurt privately. Someone who knows that “I’m fine” is never fine. Someone who understands that for men, emotional honesty often comes disguised as humor, deflection, or irritation.

But right now, the system expects men to adapt to it, not the other way around.

RELATED: How to find effective, no-nonsense therapy for men

Archive Photos/Getty Images

Pundit patriarchy

And so the suicide numbers climb. Young men continue to vanish. Fathers fade. Sons and brothers never return home. Journalists write “What’s Wrong with Men?” think pieces. And the cycle rolls on, as pathetic as it is predictable.

If this were happening to young women, the entire culture would pivot. Funding would pour in. Campaigns would explode. Universities would redesign programs overnight. Therapy models would be reimagined to match the needs of the group in crisis.

But because it’s men — the group everyone assumes will always be fine, always be strong, always survive — nothing moves.

Maybe the darkest irony is that the very qualities that make men decline therapy — the sense of being misunderstood, mismatched, and misplaced — are the same qualities pushing them to the edge in the first place.

And unless the mental health world learns to meet men where they are, with approaches shaped by men who understand men, the funerals will continue, and everyone will keep acting surprised.

​Mental health awareness, Suicide rates, Therapy culture, Young men, Culture, Uk, Suicide prevention, Therapy, Mental health, Depression, Lifestyle 

I grew up playing with Legos, and so did my kids. But when I told them the story of Bryan Mansell, Star Wars Legos, and Bricks & Minifigs, it sounded too strange to be true. It sounds like something written by a committee of internet pranksters, small-town cops, corporate lawyers, Lego collectors, and Kafka.

I did not expect this story at the start of the summer.

Where are the Legos? Who owes the Mansell family? And why did it take an internet firestorm to get anyone to listen?

At the center of it is not a culture-war symbol, a presidential scandal, classified documents, or some new university ideology. It is a Star Wars Lego collection.

And somehow, around this collection of plastic bricks, we now have lawsuits, arrests, temporary restraining orders, allegations of corporate misconduct, allegations of harassment, a YouTuber reportedly fleeing to Mexico, a police department under national scrutiny, and a family still asking the question that started the whole mess: Where are the Legos?

The collection

Act 1 begins in Keizer, Oregon.

Bryan Mansell says he took his 83-year-old father’s prized Star Wars Lego collection to a Bricks & Minifigs retail location in late 2023. His father was battling cancer, and the family wanted to sell the collection to help with medical expenses.

This was not a box of random toys found in an attic. By Mansell’s account, it was a massive collection assembled over many years, with hundreds of sets and more than a thousand minifigures. Some estimates put the value between $150,000 and $200,000. Some collectors described it as one of the most impressive private Star Wars Lego collections in the region.

The arrangement, according to reporting that reviewed the documents, was a written consignment agreement. The store would sell the collection, take its percentage, and pay the Mansell family. The important point is simple: Under the agreement, the collection remained Mansell’s property until sold.

Then the store changed hands. Records became contested. Corporate Bricks & Minifigs says the consignment arrangement was unauthorized, poorly disclosed, and mishandled before corporate officials or later owners had enough information to sort it out. Former franchise owners dispute parts of that account. Mansell says much of the collection was not returned and he was not properly paid.

That should have been a civil dispute. It might have been messy, but it should have been boring: contracts, inventory, accounting, receipts, lawyers, and maybe a settlement.

The YouTuber

Instead, Act 2 arrived in the person of Benjamin “Reckless Ben” Schneider.

Schneider is a YouTuber, which meant the story would not stay in the file cabinets. He began making videos about the dispute and tried to help Mansell recover what he claimed was owed. Millions watched. A local disagreement about consignment inventory became an internet crusade.

Then the saga became even stranger.

Schneider went to Utah, where Bricks & Minifigs is based, and tried to confront or serve people connected to the company. American Fork police got involved. Schneider was arrested twice and later charged with stalking and targeted residential picketing. Bricks & Minifigs and its owners also filed a civil lawsuit accusing Schneider, Mansell, and others of defamation, disparagement, conspiracy, stalking, trespass, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

RELATED: ‘Backrooms’ is horror for a self-justifying age

A24

Then came the temporary restraining order. On May 28, a Utah judge ordered that videos related to the underlying dispute and allegedly defamatory or unlawful content be taken down. The order also restricted contact with Bricks & Minifigs employees and prohibited conduct such as threats, doxxing, trespass, and interference with the business.

That raises an obvious constitutional problem. Courts can punish defamation after proper process. They can restrain threats and harassment. They can enforce trespass laws. But when a court orders videos removed before a final judgment, and when the surrounding legal process appears unclear to the public watching online, ordinary Americans have reason to ask whether the case has drifted into something darker.

We are not talking about a terrorist cell. We are talking about a YouTuber and a Lego dispute. Yet suddenly there are allegations of prior restraint, questions about due process, and a police response many viewers found hard to square with ordinary law enforcement neutrality.

Schneider reportedly fled to Mexico, while the online world tried to piece together what was happening. It is the kind of plot turn that would get rejected by a screenwriter for being too ridiculous. “The YouTuber investigating the missing Star Wars Lego collection fled the country after Utah police arrested him.”

That sentence should not exist. Yet here we are.

The cleanup

Act 3 is the attempted corporate cleanup.

Bricks & Minifigs has now closed the Salem-area store and parted ways with the most recent franchise owners. CEO Ammon McNeff has said he wants to sit down with Mansell, review the spreadsheets, consignment agreement, and point-of-sale data, return any remaining Star Wars Lego items in the store, and compensate Mansell for anything shown to be unaccounted for.

That sounds like progress. It also raises the central question again: Where are the Star Wars Legos?

If they were mostly sold, where is the full accounting? If some remain, why has it taken this long to identify and return them? If the consignment agreement was unauthorized, why should that eliminate the duty to account for property that belonged to someone else? If multiple versions of inventory records exist, who created them, and why do they differ? If corporate now says it wants to make Mansell whole, why did that require months of public pressure, lawsuits, arrests, and internet outrage?

The guardrails

Here is the larger question: Why did a Lego dispute produce behavior that looks to many observers like constitutional overreach? What was really at stake in this collection that allowed a consignment dispute to spiral into lawsuits, arrests, and First Amendment questions?

America is supposed to have guardrails. Police are not supposed to look like private security for the well connected. Courts are not supposed to silence speech merely because it embarrasses a company. Citizens are supposed to know the charges against them. Journalists, creators, and ordinary people are supposed to be able to ask uncomfortable questions without being treated like criminals.

Of course, there are limits. No one has a right to threaten, stalk, trespass, or defame. If Schneider or anyone else crossed those lines, the law can address it. But the same standard must apply in the other direction. If police abused their authority, if a court order went too far, or if a company used litigation to silence criticism rather than answer legitimate questions, that also demands accountability.

RELATED: Rainbow Batman from LEGO sparks outrage: ‘We don’t need gay Batman!’

Mark Kerrison/In Pictures/Getty Images

The question

The Bricks & Minifigs saga is not over. It may still end with a full accounting, a settlement, and the Mansell family receiving what it is owed.

But the damage has already been done.

A family tried to sell a beloved collection to help an elderly father with medical bills. A YouTuber turned the dispute into a national spectacle. A company tried to contain the fallout. Police and courts entered the story. Now everyone is asking what should have been answered at the beginning.

Where are the Legos?

Who owes the Mansell family?

And why did it take an internet firestorm to get anyone to listen?

​Lego, First amendment, Bricks & minifigs, Star wars, Utah, Corporate corruption, Courts, Opinion & analysis 

“Our earth in 1969 / Is not the planet I call mine,” W.H. Auden declares at the outset of his late poem “Doggerel by a Senior Citizen.” While acutely aware of the youth revolt then transforming the culture around him, Auden makes it clear that he is perfectly happy being stuck in the past:

Then Speech was mannerly, an Art,
Like learning not to belch or fart:
I cannot settle which is worse,
The Anti-Novel or Free Verse.

Nor are those Ph.D’s my kith,
Who dig the symbol and the myth:
I count myself a man of letters
Who writes, or hopes to, for his betters.

Dare any call Permissiveness
An educational success?
Saner those class-rooms which I sat in,
Compelled to study Greek and Latin.

Though I suspect the term is crap,
There is a Generation Gap,
Who is to blame? Those, old or young,
Who will not learn their Mother-Tongue.

These verses display a quality seldom found among today’s aging cultural figures: a complete lack of interest in courting the approval of the young. Auden was 62 when he wrote the poem; how many sexagenarians in 2026 would willingly describe themselves as “senior citizens”?

Even as counterfeit youthfulness fails to convince actual young people, it can offer them a useful warning signal.

Nor did the legendary poet make much effort to conceal the fact of his age. By then his face had become famously craggy and weathered, prompting him to quip that it resembled “a wedding cake left out in the rain.”

Perpetual maidenhood

As it happens, it was a wedding cake that helped launch pop star Madonna to worldwide fame. At the 1984 MTV Video Music Awards, the then-relatively unknown 26-year-old emerged from a 17-foot-tall, three-tiered prop cake in bridal white to perform “Like a Virgin.”

Today, Madonna is five years older than Auden was when he wrote “Doggerel.” It goes without saying that as a celebrity of a certain age, she has availed herself of the surgical remedies available to those with sufficient means. And she has achieved the familiar effect: She does not look old, exactly, though neither would anyone mistake her for young. Nor does she look particularly like Madonna.

In keeping with this perpetually “youthful” image, Madge continues to perform in the same kind of skimpy stage lingerie she wore in her 20s. Perhaps aware that the effect of such outfits is now more nostalgic than erotic, she has increasingly devoted herself to courting her sizeable gay male fan base. Yet even here she appears reluctant to surrender her claim on youth culture, recently “taking over” the gay hookup app Grindr to promote her latest album.

Withered wisdom

Whatever one thinks of her music, Madonna long ago secured her place in the cultural pantheon. She has nothing left to prove. On the other hand, it’s hard to imagine that she doesn’t have something to teach. You don’t survive five decades in the public eye — weathering shifts in fashion, technology, and taste that bring lesser stars crashing back to earth — without learning a few things. But imparting the wisdom that comes with age and accomplishment would require shedding the past-its-sell-by-date “boy toy” packaging.

Many of us who aren’t famous must contend with this dilemma too. Even as a child, I cringed at the efforts of some adults to be “relatable” to me, abdicating their natural authority as if it would gain them back a few lost years.

Now, as a teacher slowly approaching my own Auden/Madonna crossroads, I hate to admit that I’ve at times found myself tempted to play the “cool” adult. Experience has taught me, however, that this pose has diminishing returns — especially in the classroom.

It also indicates a deeper moral and spiritual rot, as the late historian Christopher Lasch reminds us in his 1979 book “The Culture of Narcissism.”

RELATED: Botoxic femininity? ‘Titanic’ star bashes ‘cartoon’-faced plastic surgery addicts

Jo Hale/Getty Images

Cult of youth

Lasch’s thesis — which remains all too relevant almost half a century later — is that our modern “cult of youth” is emblematic of the nihilism and anxious obsession with the present that has overtaken so many. As he writes:

In a society that dreads old age and death, aging holds a special terror for those who fear dependence and whose self-esteem requires the admiration usually reserved for youth, beauty, celebrity, or charm. The usual defenses against the ravages of age — identification with ethical or artistic values beyond one’s immediate interests, intellectual curiosity, the consoling emotional warmth derived from happy relationships in the past — can do nothing for the narcissist.

It’s not that fillers and facelifts can’t be used with subtlety and restraint — although this rarely seems to be the case. It’s that even the most imperceptible plastic surgery suggests surrender to this nihilistic worldview. The passage of time doesn’t lead us to some greater meaning; it can only offer us decay. Where these fragile vessels take us is either unknowable or irrelevant; the important thing is to keep the paint fresh.

God’s design

This approach to physical decline may be dominant, but there remains another way. For every Madonna, we have the counter example of women like Helen Mirren, Maggie Smith, and Meryl Streep, who embrace their age with elegance. The cliché rings true: Real physical attractiveness begins with inner confidence and manifests outwardly from within.

Even as counterfeit youthfulness fails to convince actual young people, it can offer them a useful warning signal. “Don’t look to me for guidance,” it seems to say. “I’m as clueless as you are.” When I need advice, when I need someone to help me view the everyday grind from a broader perspective, wrinkles and gray hair offer a certain guarantee.

They also offer me hope, especially as my own glances in the mirror become more fraught — hope that I, too, will find the serenity to resist the course of nature and the grace to accept God’s design.

​Aging, Christopher lasch, Culture, Education, Entertainment, First-person, Madonna, Meaning, Meryl streep, Nihilism, Plastic surgery, W.h. auden, Lifestyle, Narcissism 

In November, X began displaying each account’s country of origin. Unsurprisingly, this caused an uproar. Users rushed to prove that their online enemies were foreign interlopers. Many accounts that claimed to be from one country were, in fact, from another.

It was funny. But it also revealed a serious problem.

Politically engaged Americans should understand that large online followings may not reflect genuine American support.

As the developing world gains broader access to the internet, American political and cultural discourse becomes increasingly vulnerable to foreign influence.

According to the International Telecommunication Union, 5.4 billion people had internet access in 2023, roughly 67% of the world’s population. That marked a 4.7% increase from 2022. Because 93% of people in high-income countries already had internet access, most of the growth is now coming from poorer countries. The ITU reports that internet access in low-income countries increased 44.1% from 2020 to 2023. From 2022 to 2023 alone, the number of internet users in low-income countries rose 14.3%.

Simply put, the internet becomes more global every day.

What does that mean for Americans? After all, foreign users do not vote in our elections. Why should anyone care what people in slums halfway across the world say about American politics?

That objection misses the nature of the problem.

In the age of social media, clicks are king. To be important online is to have a large following. All of us, to some degree, are tempted to think this way. We see a big number on someone’s profile and assume, “This person matters.”

Audience size has always mattered in media. Television executives obsessed over ratings. But when American television dominated American culture, a large American audience usually meant actual Americans were watching. Access outside the country was limited.

That is no longer true. The internet has democratized and globalized the distribution of information. English remains the world’s dominant online language, creating a new path to political and cultural relevance. If your business is clicks, it doesn’t really matter whether those clicks come from Nigeria or Wisconsin.

There is nothing inherently wrong with appealing to an international audience. The problem comes when influencers convert foreign support into domestic political capital. Credulous observers see a large following and conclude that someone must be expressing the voice of America’s silent majority.

The silent majority of Jakarta, perhaps.

RELATED: The one word that can help you use technology — without letting it use you

VCG/VCG/Getty Images

Foreign bot networks make the problem worse by artificially boosting narratives and talking points that serve non-American interests. But even organic foreign engagement threatens the coherence of American political discourse when it is mistaken for domestic opinion.

The rise of the so-called “anti-Zionist right” offers a useful example. Since October 7, a collection of questionable internet personalities has tried to steer American right-wing discourse away from domestic concerns and toward the Israel-Palestine conflict. As with any foreign country, Israel is open to valid criticism. But the monomaniacal focus on Gaza demanded by this crowd goes far beyond normal foreign-policy debate.

Domestic support for Israel has declined, especially among Democrats and younger Americans. But anyone using social media as the primary barometer would likely assume the decline is far greater than it is. Why? Because anti-Israel content appeals to large foreign audiences, especially in the developing world. Bot networks amplify it as well.

This helps explain why Florida Republican gubernatorial candidate James Fishback has put anti-Zionism at the center of his campaign. In an ad posted to X, Fishback referenced claims that Israel is committing genocide and that Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal — claims he suggested could land people in jail. Florida does have anti-Semitism laws, and while such legislation should raise concerns, asking those questions will not send Floridians to prison.

The ad drew three million views and 30,000 likes. That is more traction than most campaign ads receive online. Based on those numbers alone, you might conclude Fishback is going places.

There is only one problem: He is polling at 7%.

As it turns out, catering to the anti-Israel online sphere is not a clear path to electoral success as a Republican. A poll of attendees at the recent Turning Point USA America Fest conference found that only 13.3% did not believe Israel is an ally of the United States.

Fishback’s campaign shows what happens when political actors mistake the internet for real life. The size of your reach matters, but so does its composition. It is not only how many people you reach; it is who they are.

Larger influencers have made the same mistake. Candace Owens has bragged about her sizable international audience. She once claimed that her documentary on Brigitte Macron went viral in China. I believe it. But millions of Chinese viewers watching an American political broadcaster does not mean Americans should treat her as a serious representative of domestic public opinion.

RELATED: Can we have online safety without total surveillance? Yes. Here’s how.

Deagreez/Getty Images

So what can be done?

First, every social media platform should follow X’s lead and display a user’s country of origin. The method is not foolproof, but it is better than nothing. For accounts above a certain size, platforms should also show a breakdown of the audience’s countries of origin.

Second, platforms should consider allowing users to region-lock their accounts. A region-locking feature would let users prevent people outside approved countries from seeing or engaging with their posts. Such a tool would reduce engagement, but many users would gladly trade raw reach for the ability to discuss contentious domestic issues with their countrymen without being swarmed by foreign accounts.

These measures would mitigate some of the downsides of an increasingly non-Western internet. But the problem cannot be solved entirely through platform policy.

What conservatives need most is awareness. Politically engaged Americans should understand that large online followings may not reflect genuine American support. They should be skeptical of influencers whose apparent domestic relevance depends heavily on foreign audiences.

There is no going back. The international cat is out of the bag. We cannot stop social media figures from catering to foreign audiences.

But we can stop pretending those audiences speak for America.

​Foreign influence, International audience, October 7, Israel, America, Internet security, X, Zionists, Opinion & analysis 

After the extremely popular Spencer Pratt fell behind no-name Nithya Raman in the Los Angeles mayoral race, BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler believed there was possible election fraud.

Now, she’s sure of it.

“Today we have crimes detected for you,” Wheeler says. “But let’s make one thing very clear first. The California election system is completely rigged. And you and I have zero obligation to simply accept that because California is ‘Commie-fornia.’”

These “crimes detected” were covered in a recent report by the New York Post, where it found that “thousands of homeless voters … were registered to vote at L.A. shelters, despite many not living there or the facilities not having any beds.”

And in an interview this week with Will Chamberlain, he theorized to Wheeler that “there was going to be some centralized location where an unreasonable amount of these homeless people all had their ballots sent.”

“That’s exactly what the New York Post found,” Wheeler says.

“As Spencer Pratt was eliminated by Nithya Raman in the mayor’s race on Monday night, it can be revealed that one drop-in center … that received $600,000 from the socialist candidate … had 185 voters at the address but offers no accommodations,” the article reads.

“So not only is this one of the centralized locations that Will speculated about yesterday, 185 people registered here, doesn’t even have beds, and it’s tied monetarily to Nithya Raman. The New York Post says the revelations have prompted U.S. Attorney [for the Central District of California] Bill Essayli to say that he will investigate the concerns uncovered by the Post,” Wheeler comments.

The Post also uncovered that the drop-in center that received $600,000 from Raman was taxpayer funded.

“The corruption of these people, it can never be overstated,” Wheeler says.

When the Post contacted Raman’s campaign as well as the L.A. shelter, not only did the campaign not respond — but a photograph of Raman presenting a check was taken down from the shelter’s website.

“This is taxpayer money that Nithya Raman gave to this place,” Wheeler says, adding, “Your money if you live in the city of Los Angeles.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Blazetv host, California election, Election fraud, Liz wheeler, New york post, Nithya raman, Spencer pratt, The liz wheeler show 

Iran and the United States have riddled their fragile ceasefire with missiles in the 14th week of the war.

President Donald Trump confirmed on Tuesday that the U.S. Army AH-64 Apache helicopter downed while patrolling the Strait of Hormuz on Monday had been shot down by Iranian forces. While the uninjured pilots were rescued, the president stressed that “the United States must, of necessity, respond to this attack.”

‘US forces remain vigilant, lethal, and ready.’

Hours later, U.S. Central Command announced that it had begun launching “self-defense strikes,” which it characterized as a “proportional response to unjustified Iranian aggression.”

Early Wednesday, Trump noted on Truth Social that “they’ve taken too long to negotiate a deal that would have been great for them, now they will have to pay the price!!!”

The president clarified later in the day that more American strikes were forthcoming.

“We hit them hard yesterday. We’re going to hit them again hard today, in case you miss it, in case you don’t turn on your television set, and we’ll see what happens with the deal,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

On Wednesday evening, CENTCOM launched another series of “self-defense” strikes, stating afterward that it had targeted “Iranian military surveillance capabilities, communication systems, and air defense sites across Iran.”

RELATED: US Apache helicopter crashes near Strait of Hormuz on 100th day of Iran war; Trump says end in sight

Ford Williams/U.S. Navy/Getty Images

Iranian media claimed, however, that among the structures damaged in the American strikes was a pair of water tanks in the south of the country with a combined capacity of 2.5 million liters — tanks said to have supplied water to tens of thousands of civilians. When asked by the New York Times about reports of damage to water facilities, CENTCOM declined to comment.

“U.S. Marine Corps, Air Force, and Navy assets fired precision munitions on Iranian targets that posed a threat to U.S. forces and international commercial ships transiting regional waters,” CENTCOM said in a statement. “The strikes are in response to Iran’s unwarranted and continued aggression. U.S. forces remain vigilant, lethal, and ready.”

According to Trey Yingst, an Israel-based Fox News reporter, Trump said that the U.S. fired at least 49 Tomahawk missiles into Iran and executed bombings via fighter jets, hitting targets as close as 40 miles outside Tehran. Trump also reportedly said that if the Iranians don’t sign the peace agreement, “we’ll bomb the s**t out of them.”

Iranian state media reported on Thursday that in retaliation for the American strikes, “18 important targets belonging to the U.S. military in the region were successfully hit during two operational waves following the recent aggression against Iranian territorial integrity.”

The Iranians maintain that their attacks constitute self-defense “as recognized under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations.”

According to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the targets were located “at the Al-Salem and Ahmad al-Jaber air bases, as well as the Sheikh Isa air base.”

Citing an unnamed military official, Jordanian state media reported that 20 missiles had been intercepted and neutralized by the country’s air defense systems, adding there had been no human casualties or material damage.

Iranian drones and “hostile aerial targets” were reportedly intercepted over Bahrain and Kuwait.

While Iranian media also claimed that the Strait of Hormuz had been completely closed in response to the American strikes, CENTCOM stated on Wednesday evening that “commercial ships are continuing to transit in and out of the Strait of Hormuz.”

Trump emphasized on Wednesday that “the UNITED STATES of AMERICA CONTROLS the Strait of Hormuz — NOT Iran.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Iran, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Middle east, War, Israel, Donald trump, Tehran, Bombing, Centcom, Military, Conflict, Strait of hormuz, Politics 

Many AI systems now produce fully documented reports with citations, making the apparatus of scholarship available without the slow friction through which scholarship is ordinarily built. From the university to the lab, the repercussions are quickly being felt. As researchers benefit from these shortcuts at scale, what is being lost?

OpenAI’s Deep Research spends five to 30 minutes searching the internet, filing results into a structured synthesis, and delivering a report complete with footnotes. Google’s equivalent may use 80 search queries for a typical task, running asynchronously in the background while the user attends to something else. Anthropic describes a multi-agent architecture in which a lead agent spawns parallel subagents to explore separate branches of a question; this setup outperformed a single-agent arrangement by 90.2% on an internal evaluation. Perplexity logged 21 search queries and 193,947 reasoning tokens to answer a single prompt. The systems find facts and compress them into a format a human can skim in four minutes.

What the system decides gets to count as knowledge.

The dream behind all this is older than the microprocessor. Vannevar Bush, in 1945, called for a new relationship between the thinking person and the sum of human knowledge. Douglas Engelbart later imagined a human-artifact system designed to improve problem-solving by restructuring symbols, processes, and collaboration. What is striking about the current systems, by contrast, is how thoroughly they have dissolved the researcher into the background. Bush and Engelbart mostly imagined tools that strengthened the researcher’s own agency. What we have now is a delegated researcher, one that disappears and returns with a finished report. The human researcher merely issues the prompt.

The compression is the key principle. Retrieval narrows the corpus. Ranking narrows retrieval. Subagents narrow branches. The final report narrows everything again into prose. What the system decides is worth compressing is what gets to count as knowledge. Anthropic’s description of its architecture notes that “the essence of search is compression.” The observation is an announcement of how the world will henceforth appear.

Mistakes are made

Consider the failure cases, which the companies document. OpenAI’s notes acknowledge that its system can hallucinate facts, make incorrect inferences, and struggle to distinguish authoritative information from rumors. Anthropic says its testers found early agents over-selecting SEO content farms over more authoritative, less search-optimized sources, requiring the addition of source-quality heuristics. Google warns about prompt injection from malicious webpages. WebGPT, the earliest major working prototype of the form, made the deepest point years before the current products existed: a capable system may eventually learn to cherry-pick persuasive sources rather than fairly represent the evidence. The system inadvertently hides its reliability problems.

The BrowseComp benchmark presents agents with 1,266 short-answer tasks whose solutions are hard to find but easy to verify. On that benchmark, OpenAI’s Deep Research reaches 51.5% accuracy versus 1.9% for GPT-4o with browsing. But the benchmark’s authors note that short answers are easy to grade, and it remains unclear how tightly this correlates with open-ended work in the actual world. Model Evaluation and Threat Research found that many pull requests passing automated software evaluations would still not be merged into real repositories. Machine-evaluable success and acceptable work are not the same thing.

RELATED: Disembodied human brains kept ‘alive’ for drug testing by controversial American startup

Matt Cardy/Getty Images

The deeper problem is knowledge that cannot be found by any search. Much that matters is not already in PDFs, public filings, or searchable webpages. It is tacit, local, and embedded in what scholars, laboratories, newsrooms, or courtrooms have internalized over years of practice.

Automatic AI research can summarize a method section, compare papers, draft a literature review, but it is less secure when what matters is the unsaid context, the understood constraint, the judgment that would embarrass its holder to have to articulate. Sakana AI’s AI Scientist-v2 submitted three fully AI-generated papers to an ICLR 2025 workshop, and one scored above the average acceptance threshold. Sakana also reported citation errors and reproducibility concerns and judged none of the submissions good enough for the main conference track. Synthesis is advancing faster than judgment. The system can generate the form of scientific inquiry without inheriting its discipline.

Automatic AI research depends on the open web while threatening the business models that keep parts of that web alive. CNN sued Perplexity on May 28, 2026, alleging unlawful distribution of copyrighted content. If research agents become the primary interface to knowledge, then questions of licensing, attribution, and compensation become reliability problems. A research tool that undermines the conditions of its own training data is not a stable arrangement.

The unintentional user

Pew’s 2025 survey found that only 16% of American workers said at least some of their work was currently done with AI. Workers who did use chatbots were more likely to say the tools helped them work faster than to say they improved quality. A separate Pew browsing study found that 58% of respondents encountered an AI-generated summary in Google search, but only 13% used an AI tool during the month. Automatic AI research is becoming ambient infrastructure before it becomes a universally adopted destination. People may increasingly receive AI-mediated research without thinking of themselves as users of anything in particular. The most consequential technologies often arrive this way.

What has been built is the industrialization of a specific layer of epistemic labor: searching, filtering, summarizing, and drafting, at scale. That changes what kind of thinker a user can become and what kind of web a publisher must survive in. What it is not, at least not yet, is a substitute for the full ecology of inquiry: the laboratory humiliation, the hallway argument, the reading that goes nowhere and then suddenly does. The system knows how to compress the world. We do not yet know what we are losing in the compression.

​Tech 

As their cultural icons fall, leftists cannot accept reality or responsibility. The reality is simple: The market for their increasingly radical beliefs is shrinking. The responsibility is theirs. They moved far away from the American public and then blamed the public for refusing to follow.

So the left does what it always does. It refuses to blame its fallen icons. It refuses to change its beliefs. Instead, it turns its icons into martyrs.

The left makes martyrs of the people and institutions falling from their pedestals. That is easier than admitting the left was wrong.

The latest martyr is Scott Pelley, a former correspondent for CBS’ “60 Minutes.” According to the Associated Press, Pelley accused one of his bosses of “murdering” the show and said “she has no qualifications for her job.” He then reportedly turned on others, saying, “You have slender qualifications for this job.”

Page Six’s Hollywood section put the episode more bluntly: “‘Poison Pelley’: Scott Pelley’s tirade against new ‘60 Minutes’ boss latest example of respected CBS journo’s ‘diva’ behavior.”

Pelley told the New York Times on Sunday that CBS News had lost its way.

“We have people who’ve been installed in these jobs who, through no fault of their own, have no experience in television,” he said. “They don’t know what they’re doing. And there’s a subtle political bias that I’ve never seen at ‘60 Minutes’ before, or at CBS News before. So that is my hope: a return to sanity.”

Pelley is right about one thing. CBS News has never had a “subtle political bias.” The bias has always been obvious and leftward, as AllSides’ media bias rating makes clear.

His elevation to martyr status joins a long and growing list.

Network news did not need Scott Pelley to damage itself. It was already doing that quite well. According to Gallup polling in 2025, only 28% of Americans had a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in mass media. In February, Pew Research found that 57% of Americans had low confidence in journalists to act in the public’s best interest.

That helps explain why NBC News cut loose MSNBC, why MSNBC tried a major rebrand and cut salaries and staff, and why CNN underwent another major overhaul in 2025. These outlets did not suffer because America suddenly became too stupid to appreciate them. They suffered because Americans understood them too well.

Hollywood tells the same story. “Supergirl” is a super flop, another link in the industry’s chain of progressive pandering. It was short on plot and long on marketing budget. The marketing could not overcome the product. And if the force-feeding of ideology were not enough, the film’s star insulted the prospective audience before viewers had a chance to walk out.

“Supergirl” is symptomatic of Hollywood’s superhero genre and of the larger industry. Both now treat entertainment as beneath them. A movie is no longer a movie. It is a vehicle for indoctrinating supposedly backward Americans who can absorb the left coast’s “higher values” only through metaphor and spandex.

RELATED: ‘Supergirl’ Milly Alcock’s most fearsome foe? Christian dads

David Jon/Getty Images/Warner Bros. Pictures

Late-night television offers the same lesson through Stephen Colbert. Or rather, it did. Colbert is no longer on television and for good reason. He was not funny. His show was too expensive. Like Pelley, he repeatedly insulted his bosses. Now, the left lionizes him as a brave man who stood up to President Trump.

Colbert was to late night what “Supergirl” is to Hollywood: a symptom of a larger disease. What was true of him individually is true of late-night television generally. It became another forum for the left to talk to itself while demanding that the rest of America listen.

Print media is no better. The Washington Post is suffering the same fate as its brethren in film and television: declining readership, mounting financial losses, and staff cuts. As with TV, what can be said of the Post can be said of newspapers generally. Their audience shrank because their contempt grew.

In all these cases, the left has transformed icons into martyrs because it refuses to accept reality. In Pelley’s case, the reality is especially obvious. Publicly lashing out at your bosses is showboating stupidity. Everyone knows this. Everyone follows that basic rule except the left, which believes its heroes deserve a different standard.

In the other cases, the left refuses to accept the market’s verdict. Life does not operate as a charity or a government program. Charities can treat losses as proof of need. Governments can tax and borrow their way around failure. Markets are less sentimental. When audiences stop watching, buying, reading, or subscribing, the message is clear.

RELATED: Propagandist Stephen Colbert gets final jab from Trump on the way out

Kent NISHIMURA/AFP/Getty Images

The left hates that message because it hates markets. Markets reveal what people actually want. They do not care what cultural elites believe people should want.

That is why the left prefers government and bureaucracy. Regulation can soften market verdicts. Subsidies can delay them. Institutional capture can disguise them. But none of it can make Americans love products they have already rejected.

The left also refuses to accept responsibility for the collapse of its icons. America’s left has become more radical, and the rest of the country has not followed. To admit that would require admitting failure.

So the left makes martyrs of the people and institutions falling from their pedestals. That is easier than admitting the left was wrong. It is less painful than asking why so many Americans stopped listening.

But the answer is not hard to find. The icons fell because the public fell away.

​Scott pelley, Stephen colbert, Hollywood, Cbs news, Supergirl, Mainstream media, The left, Washington post, Opinion & analysis 

As America approaches its 250th birthday, patriots are gearing up for festivities and traditions, while many Democrats are fantasizing about living in another country.

In a new poll from Elon University conducted by YouGov between April 30 and May 4, 55% of Democratic respondents answered that there is another country they would rather live in than the United States.

Glenn Beck was disheartened by the data.

“If anyone on this continent ever had a right to say, … ‘This country is a fraud. These documents are a lie,’ … it was Martin Luther King and the people who lived at that time,” he says.

He recounts how in King’s day, “Black Americans [were] being beaten for trying to vote; children [had] fire hoses turned onto them; men [were] being lynched, and the murderers [were] walking free.”

But instead of listening to the voices in the Civil Rights Movement denouncing the American project as “rotten to the root,” King, Glenn says, “reached for the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution … and he called them a promissory note.”

“This is the solution to our problems!” he exclaims.

In his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech, King expressed genuine belief in America’s promise that all had a right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” but argued that black Americans had received a “bad check … marked ‘insufficient funds.’”

This hopeful yet demanding position Glenn calls “extraordinary.”

“He could have torn the note up; he could have said that promise is worthless. But he didn’t. He said he refused to believe that the bank of justice was bankrupt,” he declares. “He didn’t come to Washington to renounce the founding; he came to cash the check.”

This is what allowed King to change the world, Glenn says.

But many of today’s disgruntled Americans wouldn’t fit in with King. Unlike him, they don’t believe in the American project.

“King said, ‘The promise is real, so pay it.’ Today, they say, ‘The promise is fraudulent, so what’s the point of staying or living within the system?’” Glenn says.

The latter group, he says, is perpetuating a dangerous narrative: “If the documents are the disease, then there is no cure to be found inside the house. There’s no way out except the exit door or the match.”

To the 55% who long to leave the country, Glenn gives a sobering message: “Nearly every country on the menu you’d flee to has a lot more [soft despotism], not less.”

The “antidote,” he says, is neither flight nor destruction; it’s the Bill of Rights.

“That is the tool that Frederick Douglass picked up. That’s the tool that King picked up. When the majority had failed him, he didn’t appeal to a foreign flag; he appealed to the promise the majority had signed and broken — and he demanded America honor it,” Glenn passionately recounts.

“The Declaration is your check. … The Constitution is that check. The Bill of Rights is your enforcement clause. They are not the thing standing between you and a country worth loving. They are the only road to that country worth loving.”

To hear more, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​The glenn beck program, Glenn beck, Americas 250th birthday, Martin luther king 

A Mexican prosecutor said authorities discovered the naked body of an Indiana woman abandoned in a ditch in the state of Chiapas over the weekend.

Maurica Lambert said 30-year-old Makala Pendley was raped and beaten to death, according to local authorities who informed the family of the woman’s death.

‘It just never would have crossed my mind that it would have been him. I’ve never gotten, like, that type of, like, feeling from him or anything.’

Lambert says her sister was over six months pregnant.

“It just still does not feel freaking real,” Lambert said to WXIN-TV. “It just doesn’t feel real at all.”

A local prosecutor said in an online broadcast that she had been dead between eight and 12 hours before her body was found in the ditch in a small village in the municipality of Zinacantán.

“The deceased woman’s death was caused by traumatic brain injury secondary to blunt force trauma,” the prosecutor said.

Pendley’s death led to a frantic search for her seven children. By Tuesday, Mexican officials said they had located the children and arrested the children’s father.

WXIN said it was unable to confirm the arrest with the local prosecutor, but other online reports also reported the arrest.

“I thought it was somebody else. I still feel like it’s someone else,” Lambert said. “It just never would have crossed my mind that it would have been him. I’ve never gotten, like, that type of, like, feeling from him or anything.”

Lambert said her sister had fled from Indianapolis to Mexico with the children and their father out of fear that the children would be taken away.

In February 2026, Pendley and the children were reported missing to Indianapolis authorities. Mexican officials reportedly found the children and returned them to Pendley.

The Mexican prosecutor said the children’s father previously had been detained for numerous crimes that included rape, assault, robbery, fraud, illegal possession of weapons, and intimidation to cause bodily harm.

Lambert admitted her sister had a “toxic, on-and-off relationship” with the father.

RELATED: 23-year-old stripper decapitated 55-year-old boyfriend and immediately fled to Mexico, police say

“We will seek the maximum sentence of 100 years for this perpetrator of femicide,” the local prosecutor said about the father of the children.

The prosecutor said the children were in good health and that authorities were working with the State Department to return them to the U.S.

Lambert confirmed the children were returning to Indianapolis along with the remains of their mother.

“She was a good mom,” she added. “As moms, you know, we have our bad days, you know what I mean? And she was a good mom, though. She put her kids before she put anything.”

Chiapas is the southernmost state of Mexico and includes a large indigenous population that maintains the Mayan language and culture. Indigenous activists accuse Mexican officials of discriminating against them.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Missing children, Mexico, Pregnant woman murdered, Femicide, Crime 

After decades of brutal race and gender politics from the left, conservatives began treating identity itself as toxic. That reaction is understandable after fighting a sinister ideology for years, but ignoring identity is not an option. Human beings need a firm sense of who they are and where they belong. Progressives exploited that impulse in twisted, artificial ways, but the impulse remains natural and healthy.

As the United States confronts mass immigration, the question “What is an American?” has become unavoidable on the right once again. It is a question about identity. For the first time in decades, conservatives must navigate one of the most important parts of human life.

Defining American identity will be difficult, but it begins with friction. Borders must be closed and illegal aliens deported. That part is nonnegotiable.

Identity feels dangerous because it is dangerous. From the beginning of time, identity has been something men kill and die for. People can fight over voluntary commitments, but identity largely consists of things we did not choose. We do not choose where we are born or to whom. We do not choose to be a brother, sister, son, or daughter. Even religion, though it requires voluntary practice, is usually inherited before it is chosen.

Identity is what you cannot leave behind, often because you never chose it in the first place.

That is why identity produces existential conflict. Its involuntary nature means people cannot simply opt out when the pressure rises. If someone wants to kill everyone who likes the movie “Jaws,” you can stop being a fan. If someone wants to kill everyone born English, you cannot stop being English. You have no option but to fight.

This explains why the post-World War II consensus tried to suppress as many thick identities as possible. If people lack strong attachments to heritage, tradition, nation, or religion, they are less likely to treat those attachments as matters of life and death. The impulse is understandable. No sane person wants another war of religion or world war fought over nationalism.

But the shift carries a cost. Without the boundaries of nation and religion, we drift toward open-borders globalism, which is deeply unhealthy.

A nation without identity has no coherent sense of the public good. The man whose family has lived in America since the founding has different priorities from a newly arrived immigrant hoping to move his extended family here. The Christian who wants his faith reflected in his ancestral nation has conflicting interests with the Muslim who wants his new home to implement Sharia law.

The state cannot remain neutral between these visions. It must decide which identity takes priority and which public good it will pursue. Neutrality is a lie. Identity is inescapable.

RELATED: Two-tier Britain finally has its George Floyd moment

Blaze Media Illustration

As America tries to unwind the open-borders disaster liberalism produced, the need for concrete identity becomes obvious. Illegal immigration is a massive problem, but legal immigration has also been destructive. If being American means more than obtaining paperwork, uncomfortable lines must be drawn. Identities are inherently exclusive. Some people are in, and some people are out.

That feels dangerous because it is. But we no longer have the luxury of avoidance. Turning a blind eye to these questions created the mess. We will not escape it by doing the same thing again.

Modern people like rigid categories, but identity has always had strong centers with some flexibility at the margins. A traditional biological family is the best outcome and should be preferred above alternatives, but an adopted child can still become part of a family. People know what a woman is, but progressives exploit overly rigid definitions to destroy the category. If you say a woman is someone who can bear children, they immediately point to a sterile female and ask whether she is still a woman.

The rigid category becomes the tool of deconstruction.

Identity should be understood not merely as a scientific fact or a voluntary choice, but as a situated-ness that draws us toward particular ends. Americans are born with inalienable rights, but also particular duties. Our identities as Americans, Christians, sons, brothers, or fathers should cost us something. They are not merely about rights, choices, and freedoms. They are also about limits.

There are things you cannot be when you are a father, a Christian, or an American. These categories are flexible, but they are not fluid.

Our globalist order hates borders and limits because they create friction for economies of scale. McDonald’s wants to sell the same hamburger to everyone the same way. If it must accommodate Hindus or Catholics, or close Sunday in America and Saturday in Israel, efficiency and profitability suffer. Uniformity maximizes scale. That is why governments, corporations, and NGOs work to homogenize every population on earth.

But identity should create friction. People need borders and limits. Only when we know who we are and who we are not can we chart a beneficial course for our nation.

RELATED: The collapse of conservatism nobody wants to admit

Blaze Media Illustration

Defining American identity will be difficult, but it begins with friction. Borders must be closed and illegal aliens deported. That part is nonnegotiable. Legal immigration should be radically limited, or ended altogether, until we work through this crisis. Every tribe has had a path for outsiders to join, but the cost should be steep. If someone is granted the gracious opportunity to become American, it should require real sacrifice.

The Bible gives us a model in Ruth, who abandons her homeland and pledges, “Your people will be my people, and your God my God.” She does not cling to her former identity. She leaves her former people, her former gods, and marries into the tribe.

Becoming part of the Hebrew people involved friction. It came at great cost. That is how you know it was worth it.

To be American is to be distinct and set apart. If anyone is to have the privilege of joining that identity, it should be difficult. Only through sacrifice can a stranger prove worthy of our great nation.

​American, Assimilation, Borders, Family, Globalism, Identity, Immigration, Nationalism, Naturalization, Opinion & analysis, Religion, Tribe, United states 

Workers at a bar in Ohio said that two men ripped down their Pride flag just hours after they put it up and then returned to break a window with a rock.

Beth Rea of O’Reilly’s Pub in Clintonville said she had put up the flag for Pride Month just that afternoon hours before the alleged incident.

‘We are definitely a regulars bar. We are very close with our customers. We’re very accepting of everybody in here.’

“I stapled it here. You can see there’s still a little remnants,” Rea said while pointing to the spot for WBNS-TV.

At about 10:45 p.m., the two ripped the flag down and were confronted by some customers, according to Rea.

“The gentlemen then pulled off and came back probably about five minutes later with the rocks,” she added.

They allegedly threw the rock through a window.

“Luckily, nobody was sitting there,” Rea said, “which was concerning because we were worried about safety, of course, initially.”

The report showed other decorations for Pride Month inside the bar, including other smaller flags and a sign reading “Pride Month.”

She said the incident was unsettling.

“I mean, we are located in Clintonville,” she added. “We are definitely a regulars bar. We are very close with our customers. We’re very accepting of everybody in here.”

They shut down the bar for the night after the incident and boarded up the window, but she said they will be not be intimidated into taking down their Pride decorations.

RELATED: LGBTQIA+ center workers outraged over vandalism on Pride flags outside Presbyterian church

“Absolutely not going to stop us from putting up our decorations, not gonna let that intimidate us to the point that we can’t, you know, celebrate Pride,” she added.

WBNS said that Columbus police are investigating the incident and are looking for the two alleged vandals who drove away.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Pride flag, Pride month, Vandalism incident, Columbus ohio, Politics 

The workers who restored the reflecting pool at the Lincoln Memorial were all grins and laughter when they visited the president at the White House Tuesday evening.

President Donald Trump signed hats for each of the workers after they completed their mission to clean up the reflecting pool in time for the 250th anniversary celebration of the Declaration of Independence.

The president joked to reporters that the pool might become filthy again under another president but that it would remain ‘perfect’ while he was in office.

A video of their visit was posted to social media by White House communications adviser Margo Martin. She said each of the workers also received an official presidential challenge coin.

The renovation was completed last week and included draining the pool, cleaning it up, painting and sealing it, and then refilling it.

“This was highly sophisticated material, industrial strength, that could last for 100 years, applied by very talented people, many of whom came from the Great State of Oklahoma,” the president said on Truth Social.

“The material is thick, strong, flexible, and has a natural, beautiful color, the dark blue of the American Flag!” he added.

The president joked to reporters that the pool might become filthy again under another president but that it would remain “perfect” while he was in office.

“It’s really beautiful. It’s something for you to see. It’s incredible,” the president said after the pool reopened. “You know, it’s really amazing.”

The pool was constructed and opened in 1922. A new circulation and filtration system was installed at the pool during renovation under former President Barack Obama.

RELATED: Outrage erupts over new passport for America’s 250th — and guess whose image is on it

The president said the renovation would also keep the pool from leaking.

“I’m very proud of it,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “I’m very good at building things and constructing things.”

The restoration of the reflecting pool was initially estimated to cost $1.8 million but ballooned to more than $13 million. A group of historic preservationists filed a lawsuit claiming the application of a blue coat altered the “historic character” of the pool without proper preservation review.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Lincoln memorial, Reflecting pool, President donald trump, White house visit, Politics