Category: blaze media

An 18-year-old male and a 19-year-old female have been charged with murder after a man was shoved off a moving train to his death in Chicago earlier this month; a 15-year-old girl initially was charged with the victim’s murder, but authorities were looking for more suspects.

Christian McBounds, 18, was charged with one count of first-degree murder, two additional murder counts, one count of aggravated battery of a transit employee, and one count of mob action, WMAQ-TV reported, citing Chicago police.

‘He shouldn’t have bothered us.’

A detention-hearing judge on Wednesday denied pretrial release for McBounds; he’s due back in court Oct. 7 on the charges, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Katlar Parchman, 19, also was charged with the victim’s murder, WMAQ said, citing police. Parchman was booked Saturday into Cook County Jail with no bond, according to jail records; her next court date is Oct. 7.

The 15-year-old girl was arrested Sept. 11 and charged with felony counts of first-degree murder, mob action, murder by other forcible felony, and aggravated battery to a transit employee, WBBM-TV reported, adding that a judge ordered the girl detained until her next hearing in October.

The victim, 29-year-old Kyle Bickham, was riding home from work Sept. 7 on the Red Line train when McBounds, Parchman, the 15-year-old girl, and another male boarded the train at the 95th Street stop, WFLD-TV reported.

Surveillance cameras inside the train car captured what happened next, WFLD said, adding that multiple witnesses described what they saw.

Prosecutors said Bickham sat across from Parchman and started talking to her while the 15-year-old girl was walking back and forth through the car, WFLD noted. Soon Bickham got up and approached another passenger, and that passenger told Bickham to back off, the station said.

Bickham briefly got off the train at one stop, then boarded again, WFLD said, adding that he and the 15-year-old girl began arguing and moving around the car while yelling at each other.

With that, Bickham spit on the girl — but the spit also hit Parchman, the station said, citing prosecutors.

Then it was on.

RELATED: 15-year-old girl accused of shoving man off moving Chicago train to his death after fight — but she’s not the only suspect

One of the men grabbed Bickham’s arm while the girl punched him in the face, WFLD said, citing prosecutors.

Prosecutors said the four people involved — McBounds, Parchman, the 15-year-old girl, and the other male — surrounded Bickham and began punching him as they moved toward the back of the train car, WFLD reported. Police initially said there were three attackers.

One of the men began choking Bickham while the others, including Parchman, continued punching him and pulling at his head, the station said.

More from WFLD:

According to prosecutors, there was a brief pause in the fight near the sliding train doors, during which Bickham reached down to pick up his headphones from the floor.

The two men then forced Bickham into the corner near the train car’s sliding doors, while Parchman and the teenager closed in around him. […]

One of the men fighting Bickham pulled the emergency lever on the sliding door while the train was still moving, forcing it open.

WMAQ, citing prosecutors, said the 15-year-old girl grabbed Bickham by his head and shoulders and — with the help of one of the males — threw him out of the moving train; Bickham was hit by a train traveling in the other direction.

Witnesses allegedly heard Parchman say, “He shouldn’t have bothered us,” WMAQ reported.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Chicago, Train, Physical attack, Murder charges, Fight, Crime 

In Tom Cruise’s most recent “Mission Impossible” movie, the bad guy was artificial intelligence, in the form of a menace simply called the Entity.

The filming predated a significant number of rogue AI events that point toward oncoming disaster. In his version though, humans are too clever and unpredictable for the machines to comprehend. Put shortly: Humanity will win.

‘I always believe in humanity.’

This made Cruise the perfect person to ask about AI’s intrusion on the entertainment industry, and his answers give a glimpse into how he sees the future of film.

On Monday night, Cruise was in London for an in-depth discussion on film, where he overwhelmingly supported the notion that people “want to see real things” in movies.

Cruise told the British Academy of Film and Television Arts he is keen on keeping movie theaters alive and will continue to have people coming together in person to see other real people.

“Here’s the thing: There is nothing like human,” Cruise began, per Variety. “I have nothing against streaming or anything like that,” but seeing a film in theaters is simply “a different art form.”

Cruise has remained confident in the box-office experience, which is why he pushed so hard to have his films storm through COVID-19 protocols and continue production.

The movie star was famously heard yelling at crew members on set for breaking COVID-19 restrictions, telling them the entire industry was hinging on the idea that they could make a movie without incident.

“We are not shutting this f**king movie down!” Cruise yelled.

The industry may now have Cruise to thank as he pointed toward record-setting box-office numbers for the summer of 2026.

RELATED: DEI is trying to take over AI. These universities are leading the charge.

Henry NICHOLLS/AFP/Getty Images

A reported $4.76 billion between May 1 and Labor Day had Cruise boasting that “people want that experience.”

“They’re going to movie theaters,” Cruise said, before he put his faith in man over machine.

“I always believe in humanity.”

Cruise fought for more actors’ and stunt performers’ rights in recent years when it comes to AI. The 64-year-old dove into SAG-AFTRA labor negotiations with movie studios in 2023 to hit on certain proposals that would protect “human-created work.”

He reportedly argued for compensation for actors, as well as their consent, before a studio can use AI to replicate their voice or likeness, or if they wish to create a “digital replica” of them.

RELATED: Hackers are trying to steal money from X users — don’t be one of them

1996. Murray Close/Getty Images

Creatives must “keep creating,” Cruise concluded. “You know, [AI] is coming and it’s going to happen. … But people want to see real things.”

Cruise is not one of the growing number of public personalities who are tossing their likeness around for profit, even as AI studios try to force their hand in the industry.

Interestingly though, Val Kilmer expressed gratitude in 2022 that he was able to have his voice recreated for Cruise’s “Top Gun: Maverick” despite being sick with throat cancer.

Since his passing, the estate of Kilmer announced earlier this year that the deceased actor would be resurrected on film using AI.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Artificial intelligence, Tom cruise, Tech, Movies, Hollywood, Ai 

Apple has made iPhones for nearly 20 years, and the latest iPhone 18 Pro Max puts that expertise on full display. This new phone is a mature device, crafted to spec with precision, while packing some truly powerful features that make the category feel new and exciting. It’s basically everything you know and love about iPhone, all kicked up to the max.

Visually, the iPhone 18 Pro Max looks very familiar beside its predecessor. As with most tick-tock cycles in Apple’s product history, last year’s phone introduced a new design language, and this year refines it with several meaningful upgrades.

It’s fast. Very fast.

The first big change is the paint job. Four colorways are available, up from the three offered last year. Black is back after a brief hiatus, joined again by a clean silver, a new bluish glacier, and a warm burgundy. That last one is sure to be a fan favorite this cycle.

iPhone 18 Pro Max Colors/Apple

Camera system upgrades

Also new this year, Apple introduced a mechanical variable aperture to the iPhone’s main camera. Built for photographers, the aperture has four preset options:

ƒ/1.8 is the default setting for equal parts low light and depth.ƒ/1.48 claims to pull in 50% more light in low-light conditions, a great option for dark rooms and night photos.ƒ/2.8 is a narrow setting that captures details far back in a scene that you otherwise might’ve missed.ƒ/4.0 for maximum depth puts the full scene into focus to create artistic shots.

For non-photographers who just want a good point-and-shoot camera, iPhone’s default setting will determine which aperture is best for every image, still giving you better photos than a typical smartphone camera.

iPhone 18 Pro Variable Aperture/Apple

Under the hood

The next set of changes happened underneath the glass, and although you can’t see them, you’ll certainly know they’re there.

The new A20 Pro chip is the first of its kind built on a 2-nanometer (2nm) architecture. It has more transistors for both higher performance and reduced power consumption, letting the new iPhone 18 Pro Max perform faster while achieving higher battery life at the same time.

In short, it’s fast. Very fast.

The GPU is reportedly 40% faster too, a huge leap forward for a single year. Apple specifically called out high-end gaming performance as a key target for the new GPU, while included neural accelerators are designed to improve on-device AI performance. Further leaning into AI, A20 comes with dual Neural Engines — another first for iPhone — built to run advanced models.

Although A20 is thinner and more efficient, high-end gaming and powerful AI create a lot of heat. To mitigate, Apple gave iPhone 18 Pro Max a new vapor chamber that’s three times larger and reportedly covers most of the interior of the device to keep components cool.

And for the cherry on top, Apple packed a truly massive 5,391 mAh battery into iPhone 18 Pro Max, capable of 30 to 45 hours of use between charges. The battery is so big that Apple has to temporarily lower the wattage through software to meet international shipping regulations when sending new iPhones to and around the United States.

RELATED: It’s tantalizing. It’s tempting. It’s $2,000. Here’s the verdict on the new foldable iPhone.

Apple/iPhone Duo

My impressions so far

I’ve had my iPhone 18 Pro Max for nearly a week, and so far, the experience has been mostly positive. As expected, the A20 chip is a serious piece of hardware. I play a lot of games on my phone — most of them graphically intensive — and the new chip is very smooth. Aside from the initial setup, I also haven’t had any heat issues that would cause me to throw my phone, lest I burn my palms.

Battery life is equally impressive. I use my phone a lot — playing games during my downtime, scrolling through social media to stay on top of current events, listening to BlazeTV while writing for Blaze News. With my iPhone 17 Pro Max, I would lose about 60% of my battery by the end of the day. So far, with iPhone 18 Pro Max, I usually only drop about 40%. I could easily see this phone lasting a couple of days on a single charge, even with medium-to-heavy usage.

I’m not a photographer, so the new variable aperture settings are Greek to me. That said, I have taken a few point-and-shoot photos, and they look great. The low-light performance is especially impressive. If there’s any complaint from me, it’s that Apple didn’t update the zoom length this year. While both Samsung and Google have flagship phones that zoom in 100x-120x the original focal length, Apple’s iPhone still maxes out at 40x. This means you can’t zoom into scenes from as far away as the competition, but 40x is better than most.

I haven’t had a chance to test local AI on iPhone 18 Pro Max either, so I can’t speak to its neural accelerator and dual engines. These will have to wait for another time.

Now for the negatives. Yes, nobody’s perfect.

Due to the massive battery and other components, iPhone 18 Pro Max is the heaviest iPhone to date. It weighs 8.78 ounces (249 grams), up from the next heaviest iPhones 13 and 14 Pro Max at 8.47 ounces (240 grams). Only the upcoming iPhone Duo foldable will be heavier at 8.96 ounces (254 grams), and it has a good excuse, thanks to its multiple displays.

For this reason, I wouldn’t call iPhone 18 Pro Max a two-handed device per se. You can still use it comfortably in one hand, but I’ve found myself holding on with both more often than not, just to make sure I don’t drop this brick of a device on my foot. I did that once with the iPhone 13 Pro Max, and ouch: It left a gnarly, days-long bruise.

RELATED: New spyware targets iPhones. Are you at risk?

rawat yapathanasap/Getty Images

There’s also a nasty bug going around that’s causing some early iPhone 18 Pro Max phones to freeze or crash entirely. I haven’t had any freezes, but I had one major kernel panic that resulted in a forced restart shortly after the initial setup. Apple has yet to determine if this problem is a software glitch or a hardware defect. Sometimes, kernel panics indicate a failed hardware component, but other times it can be the former, so I’m holding out hope.

The fact that it hasn’t happened again is a good sign that nothing is critically wrong. Still, it’s not good when brand-new phones fail en masse.

On the bright side, Apple will fix the problem one way or another, either through a software update or through warranty replacements. So I’m not concerned about the issue — yet.

Should you buy the iPhone 18 Pro Max?

Although the iPhone 18 Pro Max shares the same general design as last year’s iPhone 17 Pro Max, it’s new enough to make it a decent upgrade for anyone, regardless of when you had your last upgrade. For the sake of making it easy though:

Get the iPhone 18 Pro Max if you are a photographer who wants to take the best photos on an iPhone, you’re a gamer who prioritizes higher performance on the go, or you use your phone a lot and need the best battery money can buy.

If you don’t fit into any of these categories and there’s still a little life left in your current phone, go ahead and skip. The phone you’ll really want is either coming in October with the iPhone Duo, or perhaps an even bigger upgrade is coming in 2027.

Next year marks iPhone’s 20th anniversary, and according to the rumor mill, Apple has big plans for its next major iPhone release. Now we’ll just have to wait and see.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Apple, Iphone, Tech, 18 pro max 

Former tribal court judge Mary Peltola was voted out of Congress in 2024. Now, in an attempt to revive her political career, she is trying to unseat incumbent Sen. Daniel Sullivan (R) to represent Alaska in the U.S. Senate.

Although Peltola has long enjoyed an edge over Sullivan in the polls, her campaign now appears to be spiraling.

‘Mary Peltola’s closest aides describe a routine history of physical violence, explosive anger, and utter disdain for Alaskans.’

Weeks after senior campaign staffer Anton McParland abruptly left Peltola’s team, the New York Times shed an unflattering light on some of the skeletons in the Democrat candidate’s closet.

According to allegations from multiple former aides and text messages viewed by the Times, Peltola was allegedly a fan of using the words “faggot” and “retarded” in communications with her staff. In a text message earlier this year, she allegedly said of a commercial fisheries executive who posted a selfie with her, “F**k that retard.”

While the Democrat’s campaign denied that she used the word “faggot,” it acknowledged that Peltola used the word “retarded” and said that she regretted doing so.

Given that both terms have re-entered the popular vernacular — even on the left — Peltola’s alleged word choice is the least scandalous revelation in the report.

Former aides have characterized Peltola as something of an ill-tempered tyrant, accusing the Democrat candidate — who had the second-highest staff turnover rate in the U.S. House during her final year in office — of “angry and profane outbursts”; a tendency to jump up and down and stomp her feet when dissatisfied; allegedly shoving an aide; and supposedly cultivating a workplace so toxic that some staffers found themselves losing weight or in therapy.

RELATED: Iowa is flashing a giant red warning light for November

Jabin Botsford/Washington Post/Getty Images

Far more damning than the accounts of Peltola having her staffers feed her daughter’s pet chameleon is the 2024 text message viewed by the Times in which the Democrat apparently said of a woman on the board of a Planned Parenthood chapter, “I hope she dies of a botched abortion.”

Although Peltola is a pro-abortion Democrat, the 53-year-old was reportedly critical of Planned Parenthood in her final year in Congress in light of strategy differences regarding a defense bill that included pro-life policies.

The Peltola campaign has gone into damage control after the New York Times’ report, painting her as a victim and insinuating that her allegedly abusive behavior was the result of grief.

Alaskans for Mary campaign spokesperson Harry Child said in a statement, “Mary suddenly and tragically lost both her mother and her husband in the span of a few months in 2023. At the time of their passing, Mary was parenting kids through their own grief, serving full-time in the U.S. House of Representatives thousands of miles from home, and running a competitive re-election campaign — all while shouldering the enormous burden of grief.”

“Like any person who has gone through multiple personal tragedies in the span of a few months, Mary sometimes struggled to deal with her grief,” continued Child. “But she treats her staff with respect and care, and she maintains close positive relationships with her staff spanning her nearly 30 years in public service. Exaggerating and outright lying about moments from the hardest period of her life, and falsely presenting them as a pattern of behavior, is wrong.”

Peltola’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Alex Latcham, the executive director of the GOP-aligned Senate Leadership Fund, said in a statement obtained by Blaze News, “Mary Peltola’s closest aides describe a routine history of physical violence, explosive anger, and utter disdain for Alaskans, which makes her entirely unfit for the U.S. Senate.”

“Peltola’s deeply offensive and disturbing comments do not represent the Alaska way, and she must publicly apologize to her staff and the people of Alaska.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Mary peltola, Democrat, Alaska, Senate, Daniel sullivan, Abuse, Midterm election, Politics 

Imagine being accused of a crime because a camera spotted your car near the scene. The camera wasn’t wrong. Your car really was there. But you didn’t commit the crime.

The police, however, are so confident in their technology that they seem to be treating your guilt as an open-and-shut case.

Isaacs said she was home asleep when troopers arrived at 4:45 in the morning and told her she had killed three people.

Chrisanna Elser doesn’t have to imagine it.

Camera shy

Elser was accused of stealing a package after doorbell footage captured a woman taking it from a home. Police then searched Flock camera records for vehicles in the area around the time of the theft. They found Elser’s Rivian and concluded that she was the woman in the doorbell video.

They had the wrong woman. Elser really had driven through the area that day, but she was there for a noon appointment with her tailor, more than a quarter-mile from the house where the package was stolen. Her Rivian’s cameras showed her driving through without stopping.

She spent days assembling her own evidence — including location information and video from her vehicle — to show what she had actually been doing. The summons was eventually voided.

In Elser’s case, the Flock camera hadn’t failed. It had identified her vehicle in the area. The technology supplied one piece of the puzzle. The mistake was treating that piece, along with the doorbell video, as enough to identify the person who committed the crime.

That’s an important limitation of license plate readers. They can tell police that a particular vehicle was photographed in a particular place. They can’t tell them who was driving it, why it was there, or what the person inside was doing.

But what happens when the information going into the system is wrong?

False flagged

Automotive journalist Tim Esterdahl found out while driving a Range Rover Sport press vehicle in Nebraska. A Flock alert identified the vehicle as stolen, and police pulled him over. Esterdahl doesn’t fault the officer, who was responding exactly as he should have to an alert for a potentially stolen vehicle.

It apparently started with a Jaguar Land Rover manufacturer license plate that had gone missing during a film production in California. Only one specific New Jersey fleet plate had been reported missing. But somewhere between that report and the Flock system, Esterdahl wrote, the information appears to have been broadened to include multiple manufacturer plates sharing the same beginning and ending characters.

Esterdahl’s Range Rover had a different plate. It was flagged anyway.

Things got worse from there. Because the Range Rover was a manufacturer-owned press vehicle that had never been sold or titled through a state DMV, its VIN didn’t appear in the law-enforcement database the officer was using. Esterdahl had insurance paperwork, ownership documents and authorization to drive the SUV, but sorting everything out still took about 90 minutes.

Esterdahl wasn’t even the first automotive journalist stopped over the same Jaguar Land Rover fleet-plate issue.

Whether the data is accurate and someone draws the wrong conclusion from it, or bad information makes its way into the system in the first place, the result can be the same: An innocent person has to untangle the mistake.

TATTLETALE EXPRESS: School buses may soon become America’s largest mobile surveillance network

VIEW Press/Getty Images

Behind bars

And it doesn’t stop at inconvenience. Just ask Lindsey Isaacs.

In October 2025, a hit-and-run crash on I-4 in Florida killed three people. A Flock camera three miles away had recorded Isaacs’ black Dodge Durango just two minutes before the crash.

But other evidence pointed elsewhere. Witnesses had given conflicting descriptions of the Durango, including a maroon one with a partial plate that didn’t match Isaacs’ plate. Investigators later found maroon paint transfer on one of the vehicles struck in the crash. Isaacs’ Durango was black, only two months old, and showed none of the significant damage investigators said the vehicle involved in the crash should have sustained.

Isaacs said she was home asleep when troopers arrived at 4:45 in the morning and told her she had killed three people. Her Durango was impounded. Months later, she was arrested on eight felony charges and spent 13 days in jail.

Her attorney eventually showed prosecutors photographs of the undamaged SUV, and an inspection found it in essentially showroom condition. The charges were dropped in May. Authorities later arrested another woman driving a maroon Durango.

Think about the chain of events. A Flock camera accurately recorded Isaacs’ vehicle three miles from the scene two minutes before the crash. Investigators took that data point and built a case around it despite evidence pointing to a different vehicle. Months later, Isaacs was in jail.

A license-plate reader doesn’t know who committed a crime. It knows that a vehicle passed a camera. The danger comes when the certainty of the technology gets transferred to conclusions the technology itself can’t support.

Fooled by tools

I’m not arguing that police shouldn’t use license plate readers. They can be useful investigative tools. But there is an enormous difference between using a camera hit as a lead and treating it as proof that the registered owner committed a crime.

On August 26, Sen. Josh Hawley launched a Senate investigation into Flock Safety, seeking information about its data collection, retention, access, accuracy, and sharing practices. The investigation cited a network of more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states processing more than 20 billion vehicle scans every month.

That’s a lot of information about where Americans’ cars are going.

Most of the drivers of these cars aren’t involved in crimes. They’re going to work, taking kids to school, stopping at stores, and coming home. If government agencies are going to have access to a network this large, the public should know how the information is being used.

How long is it kept? Who can search it? Which agencies can see it? What safeguards are in place when a plate is misread, a database contains bad information, or investigators draw the wrong conclusion from an accurate camera hit?

And don’t make this solely about Flock. Replace Flock with another vendor tomorrow, and the questions remain the same.

Follow the money

If taxpayers are told these systems make communities safer, show them the contracts. Show them the pricing, retention policies, access rules, and accountability provisions. If a private company provides technology that becomes part of government enforcement, there needs to be a clear answer about who is responsible when its information contributes to a false accusation.

I’m not against police using technology. I’m against treating technology as infallible.

A camera is a tool, not a judge. A database is a tool, not a verdict. And a license plate identifies a vehicle, not necessarily the person behind the wheel.

Sometimes bad information makes its way into the system. Sometimes the camera gets everything right but investigators draw the wrong conclusion from what it shows.

When that happens, the person on the receiving end can spend 90 minutes on the side of the road, days trying to clear her name or, in the worst case, nearly two weeks in jail.

Show me the evidence. Show me the accountability. And if the system gets it wrong, show me who pays.

​License plate readers, Surveillance, Flock safety, Auto industry, Lifestyle, Law, Traffic stop, Ai, Automotive 

James Talarico, the Democrat nominee hoping to succeed Republican John Cornyn in the U.S. Senate, is a part-time Presbyterian seminarian who has emphasized, “My politics grows out of my faith.”

That faith was apparently greatly shaped by Jim Rigby, the pastor of St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church in Austin, Texas. Talarico previously cited Rigby as one of “the biggest influences on [him] as a Christian, as a human being.”

‘It’s mixed with myth.’

Hidden-camera footage exclusively obtained by Blaze News appears to show Talarico’s pastor rejecting one of the fundamental precepts of Christianity: the virgin birth.

In the video, Rigby is asked by a person off-camera, “Do you really believe, like, a virgin had a child?”

“I don’t,” the pastor responds, according to the video.

RELATED: Exclusive: Hidden-camera footage captures Talarico’s pastor saying evangelical Christians are ‘not smart’ and comparing Trump to Hitler

“The virgin birth stuff, you see it like in Hinduism … and it’s more like, it’s more like all human beings were born out of the transcendent,” Rigby claims in the video.

“There’s a cosmic process, there’s animals and stuff, so when the Christmas story is told, all of that’s in there.”

“I think the virgin birth came off of Plato,” Rigby continues, according to the video. “‘Only begotten one’ and kind of stuff like that — that’s in the writings of Plato. It’s about humanity and the cosmos.”

After the person off-camera poses the question of whether Jesus is reducible to an “allegory,” Rigby appears to state, “I think there probably was a Jesus, but I don’t think we can get back to that. I mean, I don’t think there’s — ‘cause the stuff is so legendary, and it’s mixed with myth and stuff.”

Rigby both claimed that “there’s no way you can know what happened with Jesus or any of the people from a long time ago” and appeared to suggest that Christ or Christianity was simply trying to convey that “you’re a child of the stars,” according to the video.

In a separate undercover video obtained and published by Blaze Media, Rigby was asked whether a newcomer to St. Andrew’s has to profess belief “that God became a baby and that a virgin had a baby.” Rigby responds, according to the video, “We all got in by lying.”

RELATED: Talarico’s pivot from ‘God is nonbinary’ is all just an act, admits minister at his church

Blaze News did not receive responses from the Talarico campaign or Rigby.

In addition to rejecting the virgin birth, Rigby has expressed disbelief in Christ’s Resurrection. He also has expressed contempt for belief in the supernatural and belittled evangelical Christians.

Rigby previously expressed hope that Talarico would one day succeed him as pastor, and Talarico has delivered various woke sermons at St. Andrew’s church.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Christianity, James talarico, Jesus, Us senate, Politics, Texas 

Calls at 9 p.m. from an unknown number annoy everyone, even government officials.

In fact, the massive fraud being perpetuated against Americans daily is enough to pay for their commute, groceries, or even the very cell phone bill they are being scammed through.

‘Twenty-five percent of the younger age group said they have been scammed more than once.’

In response to the billions being stolen every year, the Federal Communications Commission is issuing guidance.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has been a divisive figure over the past year, but in a move that is likely to garner bipartisan appeal, he has directed his federal agency to produce guidelines on how to fight spam calls and texts.

“As part of our ongoing efforts to crack down on illegal robocalls and text, the FCC has published step-by-step guides that enable consumers to turn on blocking and filtering tools,” Carr wrote on X.

What followed was a set of government guides for learning how to block numbers, filter spam, and control who can contact a person’s iPhone or Android. The guidance is also broken down into providers like AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon.

While these instructions may seem simple and targeted toward elderly folk, it’s actually younger adults who are more susceptible to fraud campaigns.

According to the Public Interest Network’s 2024 report on spam and scam, young adults ages 18 to 44 are three times as likely to be successfully targeted than those over 55 years old. Moreover, 25% of the younger age group said they have been scammed more than once.

The report stated that the reason older Americans are less likely to be victims of phone scams is because they simply aren’t picking up the phone or answering a text if they don’t recognize the sender.

“Fifty-seven percent have signed up for services like ‘Do No Call’ registry versus 30% in younger age groups (18-64 yrs),” the study explained. “Twenty-one percent of older adults have also downloaded a caller ID app or have caller ID on their landline compared to 14% in younger age groups.”

RELATED: Hackers are trying to steal money from X users — don’t be one of them

Notably, males are more likely to be victims of scam calls with 79% of men admitting to such over a 12-month period versus 68% of women. Women were also more likely to ignore spam calls/texts (65%) than men are (54%), despite women receiving about 5% more spam calls than men overall and per month.

These scams reportedly effect 21% of the adult population of the United States, with an annual average loss of $450 per person and $25 billion in losses nationwide.

Location matters too. A robocall study by outlet WhistleOut revealed that robocalling frequency changes depending on the state.

Since 2020, Louisiana has seen the biggest increase in robocalls by far at 792%, which is more than a skip and a jump ahead of Mississippi’s 117% increase.

Alaska, Indiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Kansas have all seen a 50%+ increase since 2020.

Utah has seen the biggest drop at -34%, while Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, New Jersey, Wyoming, Rhode Island, California, Colorado, and Connecticut saw decreases as well.

RELATED: Gmail is about to fill your inbox with political spam. Here’s how to skip it.

ROMAIN COSTASECA/Hans Lucas/AFP/Getty Images

The FCC publishes guidance that warns of over a dozen types of scams, including collect call scams, cell phone fraud, and something called “The One Ring” scam.

The FCC also provides resources to tell Americans the laws around spam and solicitation.

The calls do not appear to be stopping either. There were about 52 billion robocalls in the United States in 2025, with that number estimated to increase to 58 billion in 2028 if current trajectories hold up.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Spam, Robocall, Fcc, Brendan carr, Tech 

President Donald Trump has made the decision to ban CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access, and he predictably upset the left in the process.

BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere points out that Trump is understandably “sick” of their biased coverage, which has included a lot of Nazi references over the years.

“He had a long statement about how, well, they shouldn’t be able to make up fake news. I don’t want them here anymore,” he adds.

“Well, they do kick you out of the pool after you repeatedly pee in it,” co-host Dave Landau says.

“Of course you don’t want those people around,” Stu agrees. “The question is, of course, does the president have a different standard here that he should be hitting when it comes to the annoyance factor.”

“You’re the president of the United States,” he says, asking, “How much of this stuff do you have to put up with? How much of it is just part of the gig? And how much do you have to deal with?”

Ana Navarro is among those frustrated by Trump’s decision, explaining to the panel on “The View” that the president is behaving like a communist dictator.

“I fled communism. And this is what communist dictators exactly do in places like North Korea and Cuba and Nicaragua and Venezuela. They censor and shut down the free press because their little, thin skin cannot take any criticism,” Navarro said.

“She says a communist dictator would do this, right?” Dave asks. “A communist dictator would have them lined up and shot against a wall, which is legitimately what would happen. She’s getting paid six figures to sit on TV and call him a dictator.”

But Navarro isn’t the only one concerned about censorship, as JD Vance was pressed by a reporter how the move was not an attack on free speech.

“Well, they can still report on the Trump White House. They can still get the public reports. They can still, of course, talk to people in the administration and outside the administration. What the president has said is we’re not going to give you special access inside the White House,” Vance said.

Vance went on to point out that under Biden and Obama, Breitbart wasn’t given special access to the White House either.

“The Biden administration revoked press passes in 2023 because questions were disruptive,” Dave explains.

“I hate those disruptive questions,” Stu adds.

Want more from Stu and Dave?

To enjoy more of Stu and Dave’s lethal blend of wit, humor, and insightful commentary subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Censorship, Cnn, Communism, Dave landau, Donald trump, Fake news, Jd vance, Ms now, Politico, Stu burguiere, Blazetv show 

A federal judge has delivered a trio of liberal media outlets a win in their battle with the president over access to the White House grounds.

While the networks and their lawyer appear excited over the outcome, President Donald Trump has made clear this is but a battle in a war he means to win.

‘Plaintiffs have engaged in a number of reporting incidents that have threatened national security.’

How it started

Trump announced Friday that he was barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House “as a result of their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS,” stressing that “Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America.”

Following the president’s proclamation, White House television pool members — including Fox News — circled the wagons and agreed to end pooled coverage in protest.

Meanwhile, the three banned networks sued Trump, two of Trump’s staffers, and U.S. Secret Service Director Sean Curran, claiming that “this ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles.”

Alleging that the ban violated the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, the media networks asked for the restoration of their White House hard passes and access as well as for a declaration that the ban was unconstitutional.

RELATED: Trump picked the wrong way to fight fake news

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

The White House argued that:

the government has a “compelling interest in awarding hard passes to journalists satisfying minimum standards” and that the three networks did not meet those standards;the “Plaintiffs have engaged in a number of reporting incidents that have threatened national security”; and the networks are mistaken in their conclusion “that there is a special property or legal interest in access to the White House.”

How it’s going

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly did not buy what the White House was selling.

Early on Thursday, the Trump-appointed judge granted the liberal networks a 14-day restraining order and ordered the White House to reinstate White House hard pass press credentials to employees of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico.

Kelly said in his order that the plaintiffs had “shown a likelihood of success, at least on their Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim.”

The judge noted further that “none of Defendants’ arguments convince the Court that Plaintiffs are not likely to succeed on their due process claim.”

Kelly rejected the White House’s argument that the ban was motivated by national security concerns, writing, “Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was ‘banning’ Plaintiffs from the White House — instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of Plaintiffs’ reporting.”

“Defendants offer no declarations or other support — classified or unclassified — explaining how any of the reporting they identified in their letters to Plaintiffs damaged the national security.”

Trump, apparently anticipating this turn of events, noted on Monday, “As usual, we’ll go for appeal because Fake News people and publications that only write negatively, and who violate our National Security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown ‘sources,’ shouldn’t be allowed access to the most important Office anywhere in the World.”

Ted Boutrous, the lawyer representing the liberal outlets, said in a statement, “This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process, and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court’s swift action.”

The White House did not immediately respond to Blaze News’ request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Cnn, Politico, Fox news, Fake news, Ms now, White house, Donald trump, First amendment, Politics 

Over the last few decades, many industries discovered they could grow their customer base and profits by selling a cheaper, inferior version of their product while degrading the experience for everyone. Air travel and theme parks are obvious examples. Both learned that the advantages of scale could outweigh the obligation to deliver a high-quality experience.

That philosophy did not remain in the realm of economics. It spread slowly but surely into American public life. The United States government increasingly treats the country the same way: expand the customer base, maximize throughput, then sell people a tiered version of the American experience as the baseline crumbles.

An America designed for everyone eventually becomes an America belonging to no one in particular.

The old theme-park model was simple. You paid one admission price and had roughly the same access to rides and attractions as everyone else. The problem was capacity. If too many people entered, everyone spent the day standing in line.

The solution was brilliant. Sell more tickets, let the lines grow, then charge customers extra to escape the congestion the company created. Premium passes make the park tolerable for people willing to pay, but they do not fix crowded restaurants, bathrooms, sidewalks, or parking lots. The park serves more customers, earns more money, and becomes less pleasant.

The fast-pass system is especially revealing because the premium product is not really a new attraction. It is relief from the congestion created by admitting more customers. The company first degrades the common experience and then monetizes the escape hatch. That is the genius of the model. The wealthy do not merely buy more; they buy protection from the consequences of scale. Everyone else gets longer lines and is told that broader access represents progress.

Air travel followed a similar path. Flying was once expensive enough that many Americans rarely did it, but the experience was more comfortable and predictable. Low-cost carriers expanded the market by packing more seats into cabins and turning ordinary features into add-ons. Legacy airlines copied the model. More people could fly, but the customer experience became a maze of fees, cramped cabins, crowded airports, security lines, and delays.

This democratization was celebrated as progress, and in one obvious sense it was. Schoolteachers and retail workers could travel more cheaply and more often. But scale always has costs. When capacity expands faster than the infrastructure supporting it, abundance in one measure can produce scarcity in another.

RELATED: Free money wins elections — and that’s why America’s debt will keep growing

Blaze Media Illustration

The United States has applied the same logic to immigration. For decades, political and business leaders treated population growth as an economic good in itself. Illegal immigration and expansive legal immigration increased the supply of workers and consumers. Employers gained labor, investors gained demand, and headline economic measures such as GDP benefited from a larger economy. But a larger economy is not automatically a better country for the people already living in it.

Housing, roads, hospitals, schools, water systems, and power grids do not expand automatically with population. In places where growth outruns capacity, prices rise and service deteriorates.

Housing is the clearest example. The National Association of Realtors reported the median first-time buyer reached age 40 in 2025, though other estimates put the figure lower. Whatever the exact number, Americans are buying homes later, delaying marriage and children, and paying more for less space.

Labor markets create another conflict. Immigration can lower costs for employers and raise overall output while imposing concentrated costs on particular workers. Those effects are especially visible in lower-wage industries but also appear in sectors such as technology, where companies have long used and abused visa programs to expand the labor pool.

The costs are not purely economic. Large and rapid immigration can slow assimilation, especially when newcomers settle in concentrated communities large enough to reproduce the language, institutions, and customs of the countries they left. The result is not always conflict, but it can weaken the expectation that immigrants adapt to a common national culture.

The same sorting mechanism appears geographically. Families with enough money move away from crowded schools, failing services, and disorder, while people without that option absorb the consequences. Political leaders can then point to aggregate growth while the public realm fractures into radically different experiences depending on zip code and income.

The national statistics improve even as ordinary life becomes more expensive, more crowded, and less coherent. The public system remains available to everyone, but equality of access increasingly conceals inequality in the actual experience. That leaves Americans with a familiar arrangement: The baseline experience declines, while affluent people purchase private substitutes.

RELATED: This is what existential politics looks like

Blaze Media Illustration

Want a quiet neighborhood? Buy into a gated community. Want orderly schools? Pay private-school tuition. Want safety? Hire private security. Want enough space to raise a family? Move farther from the economic centers where you work. The things that once arrived as part of ordinary middle-class American life increasingly become premium upgrades.

The university completes the joke. It teaches students the moral case for ever-greater replacement migration while providing the credentials needed to earn enough money to avoid many of its consequences.

Other countries already show where this can lead. Brazil has wealthy neighborhoods, excellent private schools, luxury shopping, and first-world amenities alongside dangerous and dirty favelas. People with money can buy back pieces of civilization through walls, guards, private education, and exclusive enclaves.

That is not the American dream.

The American ideal was never perfect equality, but it did promise a broadly shared public world: safe streets, functional schools, attainable homes, reliable infrastructure, and a national culture recognizable to the people who inherited it. A nation cannot maximize scale forever without asking what, exactly, it is scaling. GDP is not a civilization. A labor market is not a people. A proper country cannot be reduced to an economic zone whose success is measured by how many workers and consumers it can process.

An America designed for everyone eventually becomes an America belonging to no one in particular. If we want the country to remain a nation rather than a marketplace, we will have to value continuity, capacity, assimilation, and the welfare of existing citizens more than endless growth.

​American dream, Illegal immigration, Legal immigration, Population growth, Private security, Labor market, United states, Equality, Opinion & analysis 

Over the past decade or so, diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives have transformed America beyond recognition, effectively replacing performance-based standards with identity-based quotas. Workplace hires, college admissions, and corporate promotions swapped personal achievement for group membership. Thankfully, commentators like Piers Morgan say those days are behind us. Woke, we’re told, is dead and buried.

It isn’t. DEI not only refuses to die but appears stronger than ever.

Administrators are writing their preferred political rules into machine intelligence.

A recent report by Defending Education, a grassroots organization dedicated to protecting American children from harmful ideologies, shows how universities are embedding DEI ideas directly into the AI systems that will shape how Americans learn and work.

Perhaps the most troubling part of this report is how ordinary the process can look. DEI can be built into the lessons used to teach children what AI is, the tests used to judge whether AI is “fair,” and the rules universities recommend for how AI should behave. The old social contract rewarded individual effort, clear competence, and the ability to tell fact from fiction. The new digital contract ranks software output based on ideological alignment.

Behind the academic curtain

MIT, for example, is developing AI lessons for K-12 students that teach kids to think about “algorithmic bias” and identify when an AI system produces unequal results. An algorithm that flags a high-risk loan applicant based on credit history fails this test if certain demographic ratios look uneven. UC Berkeley goes further, describing AI as something that can reinforce racial, gender, and other inequalities. Its researchers are developing tools to measure whether AI produces supposedly “equitable” results for different groups. Computer programmers used to debug code to fix technical errors. Today, researchers rewrite code to ensure equal outcomes across groups.

Columbia is developing tests for whether chatbots work properly for LGBTQ communities and has studied how prompts can produce better responses for “queer BIPOC youth.” A mathematical tool designed to process human language is being reprogrammed to act like a pink-haired guidance counselor with a radically leftist agenda. Other universities run programs that bring ideas about “equity” and AI directly to K-12 students and teachers and publish research that examines AI through Marxist ideas.

RELATED: Parents weren’t asked. Many still don’t know. Inside the new school surveillance nightmare.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images

A snowball effect is forming. Universities are helping write the rules for how AI will be taught and judged.

A century ago, political activists seized physical infrastructure like telegraph offices and train stations to control public life. Modern ideologues target software compilers and language models instead. Control the training data, and you control every answer the machine gives to the public.

Automating indoctrination

That creates a pipeline: First, a university develops a curriculum. Teachers receive it. Students learn from it. Then, AI companies adopt these standards to avoid lawsuits. Policymakers use university research when writing regulatory rules. Before long, ideas that began inside academia become part of the technology tens of millions of Americans use every day.

Engineers built computers to give accurate answers based on hard data. The current academic push forces these machines to censor objective reality whenever uncomfortable truths conflict with social theories. Ask a neutered AI model simple historical questions, and it will distort facts to avoid offending academic sensibilities. Ask it to evaluate job applications, and it will prioritize demographic targets over verifiable skills. Ask it about the perpetrators of crime in certain cities across America, and it will do everything but provide accurate information. White readers, particularly straight white men, routinely described as society’s most “privileged” group, should be especially concerned.

DEI on its own is dangerous enough, but merged with arguably the most powerful technology ever created, it is a recipe for disaster.

The end result is AI that lies to its users by design. When air traffic control systems, medical diagnostic tools, and financial software rely on algorithms trained to prioritize equity over accuracy, real-world performance drops and real lives are at risk.

Enforced mediocrity

The original social contract built American prosperity on a simple promise: Work hard, master a trade, deliver superior results, and you climb the ladder. The bureaucratic class spent decades dismantling that promise inside taxpayer-funded institutions. Now, those same administrators are writing their preferred political rules into machine intelligence. Human bias can be challenged, debated, and defeated in public debate. Software code hidden inside a proprietary algorithm operates without public oversight.

If left unchecked, this rather diabolical system will embed identity-based quotas into the permanent digital infrastructure of everyday life. Citizens will interact with technology that enforces destructive doctrines while presenting them as non-negotiable facts. The death of merit was bad enough when enforced by university deans and corporate HR departments. Machine-enforced mediocrity could make those bureaucrats look like absolute amateurs.

All is not lost, however. Now that the public can see what universities are doing, they can be challenged. The Trump administration has already ordered universities to abandon DEI. It now needs to recognize where DEI is taking root next and respond accordingly.

​Artificial intelligence, Tech 

The shooting death of a 15-year-old boy in Oklahoma was initially blamed on an intruder, but police arrested his 11-year-old sister after an investigation.

The teenager was found fatally shot in the head at his home in Edmond on Sept. 9.

They also said she was jealous of the attention he would get from the parents.

Initially his sister told police an intruder wearing a black hoodie broke in through a window and killed her brother before running out of the front door.

But police noticed that there were no signs of a break-in and instead saw evidence that the site was staged.

The parents of the children then told police that four security cameras had been turned off at the home before the shooting. When the daughter was asked about the cameras, she denied knowing anything about it.

Parents also said that their daughter was embarrassed by her brother, who was disabled. They also said she was jealous of the attention he would get from the parents.

The girl later admitted to shooting her brother with a small-caliber handgun, according to an affidavit.

Police seized an Apple iPhone, an Apple iPad, and a Samsung Digital Tablet from the home after obtaining a search warrant. They believe the devices may have evidence related to the motivation and the shooting.

A day after the shooting, the girl was booked into a juvenile detention facility on a second-degree murder charge, according to the Edmond Police Department.

RELATED: 16-year-old arrested for lethally shooting 15-year-old girl and her 9-year-old brother, cops say

Defense attorney Irven Box told KWTV-DT that the alleged comments from the parents were a strong motivation for the case against the girl.

“I think there’s a lot of evidence that she’s got some definite, very serious psychological problems,” he said.

However, she will likely not face charges as an adult, he added.

“She’s not going to serve any time in a state penitentiary; she’s going to be in some juvenile facility or some sort of treatment until she reaches majority,” Box said. “Until she reaches 18, so she’s got a long ways to go.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Oklahoma, Special needs child, Family shooting, Crime 

On Tuesday, Iowa House Republicans were shown polling that should scare the hell out of them.

The warning, as it was relayed to me, was stark: If you represent a district Trump carried by 15 points, you may still be within the margin of error. If you represent a Trump +10 district, you may already be under water.

We need to save our own country before we save anybody else. America first cannot become America eventually.

And this environment could end up being worse than the “thumping” of 2006.

I slept on whether to share this publicly because I do not want to black-pill people six weeks before a critical election. But there is still time to do something about it, and pretending the problem does not exist will not make it go away.

If the environment is this bad in Iowa — where Donald Trump has been the most popular political figure of the last decade — I shudder to think what it looks like elsewhere.

Iran has become a massive political albatross on par with the COVID lockdowns of 2020.

Whatever you want to call it — war, not-quite-war, prolonged military operation, strategic pressure campaign — voters are experiencing the consequences as another expensive Middle East entanglement with no clearly defined victory. Fuel prices are hurting. The public is frustrated bordering on furious. Republicans are beginning to distance themselves from the policy.

We are risking what remains of the Trump presidency on this.

If Democrats take control of Congress in January, much of the domestic agenda voters elected Trump to pursue will stop cold. Some of it will be reversed. Some of it will be tied up in investigations and appropriations fights. Add what the courts are already doing, and the remaining two years could become an exercise in siege warfare.

The damage would not stop in D.C.

RELATED: The mass-deportation promise is disappearing

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP/Getty Images

States like Iowa have spent the last 20 years moving dramatically to the right, with Trump accelerating that transformation. A national collapse would spill down the ballot and put those gains at risk.

That is why this half-war, quasi-war, whatever-we-are-calling-it has become such a catastrophic misuse of political capital.

Many of us never thought it was worth the cost. Increasingly, the voters seem to agree.

We need to save our own country before we save anybody else.

If a plane is in trouble, you put on your own oxygen mask first. Not because everybody else is unimportant, but because you are useless to them if you pass out.

America first cannot become America eventually.

I desperately want this presidency to succeed. I want it to fulfill the promise voters saw in 2024. But whatever this is right now, it isn’t working. And Republicans do not have to sit here and take the loss.

There is still time. There is still plenty of ammunition. Democrats have given Republicans more than enough material to run against. But the president needs to get on the stump now.

The messaging needs to get much sharper and much more aggressive.

RELATED: The Christian counterculture is already here

John Tlumacki/Boston Globe/Getty Images

Stop wasting money on stupid ads about how often some Democrat missed a committee vote. Tell voters what Democrats are actually voting for. Put the cultural, economic, and constitutional stakes in plain English.

And most important, explain the mission in Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. What does victory look like? What ends the operation? What are Americans being asked to pay, and for how long?

Because from the cheap seats, this increasingly looks like another Middle East quagmire in which ordinary Americans pay twice — once at the pump and again through their taxes.

If there is a compelling answer to that, the administration needs to give it. Soon.

Republicans are not out of ammunition. They are almost out of time.

And while we are at it, somebody please make sure Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas are getting the finest health care in America.

Editor’s note: A version of this article appeared originally on X.

​Fuel prices, Health care, Iowa, Midterms, Republicans, Democrats, Covid lockdowns, America first, Trump, Economy, Iran war, Polls, Opinion & analysis 

As the midterm elections approach, democratic socialism is attracting renewed attention as an alternative to America’s constitutional order. Recently elected officials in Seattle, Colorado, and New York City, along with dozens of others, identify as democratic socialists. Membership in the Democratic Socialists of America has surged, and a recent CNN poll found that a third of Democrats now identify with the movement’s political program.

The goals of the DSA and the promises made in campaign rallies should be understood by all Americans for exactly its aim: a complete overhaul of the U.S. Constitution and the governing laws that have ensured our freedoms for the last 250 years.

A ‘new society’ that eradicates the right to religious liberty is a familiar step down an extremely dark path.

This is not an esoteric challenge to our economic system. It’s a threat to our entire republic.

At the core of all socialist movements, historically and contemporarily, is the supremacy of the collective over the individual, where the state assumes the role of controlling guardian to determine what is “best for society,” squelching individual liberties, all in submission to this ideological monopoly.

As such, the one thing totalitarian governments will never allow is an appeal to a higher authority than the government. There can be no authority higher than the state. That is why socialist-controlled governments have always viewed religious liberty as a threat and target it as one of the first freedoms to dismantle.

That’s why Virginia Democrat Senator Tim Kaine’s remarks during a 2025 hearing deserve attention. The former Democratic Party vice presidential nominee said he found “extremely troubling” “the notion that rights don’t come from laws and don’t come from the government, but come from the Creator.”

The American founding says otherwise.

The Declaration of Independence states that “all men are created equal” and “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

That formulation is not ornamental. It establishes a limit on government.

If government grants your rights, government can redefine them or take them away. If rights exist before government, then government is bound to respect them.

That’s why religious liberty is the first right protected in the Bill of Rights. Without the right of conscience, all other liberty disappears.

Members of the DSA counter this assessment by pointing to its Religion and Socialism Working Group outreach to the faith communities. In their own words, “DSA’s Religion and Socialism group is open to DSA members of all faiths whose socialism is in some way inspired by their spiritual identity.” In other words, religion is welcomed and approved only if it agrees with the DSA’s socialist ideology, which in essence, then, is a state-endorsed church. All opposing religious viewpoints need not apply.

RELATED: ‘Reign of terror’: One-third of Democrats give thumbs-up to Trump assassination

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

In the old Soviet Union, state regulations defined how religious organizations could function, what they could say, and when they could meet. Eventually, church doors were closed, sectarian schools were closed, and religious leaders were incarcerated, all because socialist regimes cannot allow organizations or the populace to appeal to a higher authority than the government.

The commonly repeated pattern with all socialist movements begins with ideological propaganda denouncing all viewpoints that don’t fall in lockstep with its platform. In the case of the DSA, that means throwing out the old and fundamentally changing the very foundations of our government, including religious liberty.

But that’s just the start. In the DSA’s program for the current year, the objective is quite clear: “Our goal is to put workers in charge of the government through a new democratic constitution …” and “Replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.”

This “new society” would eliminate the three co-equal branches of government that provide essential checks and balances. Gone are the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights that protect the rights of all Americans.

Religious liberty is foundational to a country that values individual freedoms. It defines the relationship between citizens and government by limiting the government’s power and protects freedom of conscience. It is inseparably linked to broad civil liberties including free speech, parental rights, academic freedom, and freedom of assembly.

None of these rights can exist without the foundation of the right of conscience: religious liberty. A “new society” that eradicates this most important right is a familiar step down an extremely dark path. What we need instead is a recommitment to a society that understands and cherishes the liberties protected in our founding documents that have defined us as the “land of the free.”

​Bill of rights, Declaration of independence, Democratic socialism, Democratic socialists of america, Religious liberty, Soviet union, Midterm elections, Democrats, American founding, Dsa, Opinion & analysis 

A nude celebrity advertisement has become more offensive to some women than a mother accused of killing her own children, and BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales believes someone should be — and one day will be — “studying this.”

“I always feel like when I watch videos that feature white liberal women, like in a hundred years, they’re going to be studying this. They’re going to be looking at this phenomenon. They’re going to figure out how this hive mind of mental illness really came together,” Gonzales says.

“One of their biggest data points is how the Lindsay Clancy trial broke them,” she adds.

And in Adam Francisco’s series of man-on-the-street interviews with some of these women, he only proves Gonzales right.

In the series, Francisco holds up side-by-side photos of Sydney Sweeney posing nude and Lindsay Clancy, posing the question “Who hurts women more?”

One woman explained that Sydney Sweeney hurts women more because she “sets a bad precedence for women as a role model.”

“So, in your opinion, posing nude for an ad for a company that you’re an investor in … versus her, who’s accused of killing her own kids due to mental instability or hormones. You still would choose this is worse for women?” he asks.

“I think they both get a bad rap,” she answered.

“But who’s worse?”

“It depends what side of the fence you’re on,” she answered.

Another woman explained that her choice was Sweeney “because she’s putting a sexual image on women and for a sports ad when there’s women that have worked really hard in sports and they could honestly be more representative in a sports ad.”

She then said that Clancy doesn’t “hurt women, though, as much.”

“She hurts her own image and like mothers in general, like it affects like the mental state, but then she hurts like the reputation of women,” she added.

“I would argue, this hurts women way more, because it’s saying if a woman is too hormonal, she may kill her own kids,” he answered.

Gonzales is “honestly baffled” by the women’s answers.

“Like, please, Trump administration, can you guys study the white liberal woman brain?” she asks.

“There’s so much brain rot there,” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Blazetv show 

The president continued his rhetorical attacks on the mainstream media after issuing a controversial ban on several outlets from the White House.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to regain access, while other news outlets have boycotted the press pool as a form of protest.

‘She’s got a ”TRUMP” addiction, and so does CNN and MSDNC. They’re all sick, treasonous, and demented!’

President Donald Trump fired back in a post on the Truth Social platform.

“All of the SLEAZEBAGS, like Third Rate ‘Reporter,’ Kaitlan Collins, of Fake News CNN, a truly unhappy person, said they weren’t going to be covering me,” he wrote.

The president was referring to an episode in which Collins asked him when the Iran war would end during his visit to the United Nations General Assembly.

“Then why were they ranting and raving like Lunatics, in the Press Area, at the United Nations?” he added. “Why was she there? She’s got a ‘TRUMP’ addiction, and so does CNN and MSDNC. They’re all sick, treasonous, and demented! The ‘good news’ is that they have a great, for them, and totally disloyal Judge.”

Collins later said that she was credentialed by the United Nations and denied that CNN had said the network was never going to cover the president.

“We will continue to cover the president and his speech and as he meets with world leaders today, just not with a TV camera from one of the five major networks in the room,” she said.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly is presiding over the case and was appointed by Trump in his first term as president.

Collins also faced restrictions from the White House in 2018. Fox News defended her at time and called on the administration to back off.

RELATED: ‘By accident’: CNN panelist apologizes after accusing Trump of involvement in Epstein sex-trafficking ring

CNN host Jake Tapper defended Collins in a post Wednesday.

“Not going to dignify the president’s juvenile social media post about our brilliant @kaitlancollins except to say she and we are going to keep doing our jobs,” he wrote, “which is to ask and cover the questions voters care about — like those about the war in Iran and the economy.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​President donald trump, Kaitlan collins, Press ban, Jake tapper, Politics 

Sunny Hostin admitted during the latest episode of “The View” that she was the reason a cannibal killer was found not guilty of his crimes.

She was explaining the insanity defense being employed by attorneys for Lindsay Clancy after Clancy strangled and killed her three young children.

‘He did not mean to kill her, and once he killed her, he panicked. He chopped up her body, yes, boiled her body parts, tried to commit the perfect crime, and then … he fed her body parts to the unhoused.’

“The insanity defense has been around in Massachusetts for 182 years, so I think it’s well established, and I thought absolutely that she was not criminally responsible by reason of insanity,” said Hostin, an attorney.

“And the reason I felt that, I feel so strongly about this holdout juror is because I was a holdout juror in a case, in the Daniel Rakowitz case. I don’t know if people remember it, the ‘Butcher of Tompkins Square Park,'” she said.

The other hosts were shocked at the admission about the harrowing case from 1991.

“It was before I went to law school. When I brought it up at the Hot Topics meeting, I don’t think everyone believed me. And then my producer looked it up and I’m in the New York Times,” she continued.

“Apparently several jurors questioned afterward said one holdout juror was principally responsible for preventing them from returning a guilty verdict,” she read from the Times.

“That was me!” Hostin added.

“And it was because I saw clearly that he was psychotic. He was in psychosis. He did not mean to kill her, and once he killed her, he panicked. He chopped up her body parts, yes, boiled her body parts, tried to commit the perfect crime, and then … he fed her body parts to the unhoused.”

The other hosts expressed their shock at the man’s crimes.

“We ended up all 12, unanimously, voting that he was not criminally responsible,” Hostin added. “… But he’s still in a mental institution being treated.”

Video of Hostin’s comments was posted to social media, where they quickly went viral.

RELATED: ‘The View’ co-host has bizarre response to ‘lifelong progressive’ Whitney Cummings refusing to vote for pedophiles

Rakowitz is still reportedly being held at New York’s Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center. He is 64 years old.

While the 11 jurors in the Clancy trial were reportedly willing to find her not guilty by reason of insanity, the lone holdout on that jury forced a mistrial and a national debate about mental illness.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​The view, Mental illness, Lindsay clancy, Insanity defense, Politics 

As artificial intelligence rapidly transforms the economy, Americans are asking whether the technology is moving faster than the public can keep up — and BlazeTV host Steve Deace wants their questions answered.

So Vice President JD Vance is doing just that.

“A lot of our audiences around the country, Mr. Vice President, kind of feel like this is kind of being thrust on them, and they haven’t had time to breathe,” Deace tells Vance, noting that in contrast, even the internet “slowly rolled out phase by phase.”

“It didn’t in just 10 minutes just take everything over,” he continues. “And I think a lot of people feel like AI is. Like nobody wants China to dictate this technology to us. At the same time, you know, people do care about land use and making sure they’re heard, and are we building these things for jobs that will actually go to Americans?”

“Can you give us some clarity on this at all?” Deace asks.

“So first on the data center thing, my view is that the political backlash to the data center thing is fundamentally about local control, which obviously we love. As the president of the United States has said, these are important engines of the economy, but they have to be done in the right way,” Vance says.

“And I think the most important way to ensure that they’re done in the right way is for people to follow the Trump administration’s taxpayer protection pledge,” he explains, pointing out that in communities where data centers are building their own power sources, there’s less political backlash.

“When you, on the other hand, have a data center that’s tapping into the pre-existing grid where people see their power bills go through the roof, that’s a real problem,” Vance says. “I don’t want a data center built if it means that local residents are going to have to pay higher electricity costs.”

As for AI in general, Vance explains that the principle he applies is that “technology exists to serve the human person and the human person of course exists ultimately to have a relationship with their creator.”

“I don’t think that we can see technology as the end, and I think that we have to make these technology tools subservient to human operators,” he says.

“And so where I get a little worried is when I see the technology companies come out and say, ‘We’ve lost control. We can no longer control these tools.’ And that brings me to my final point, which is the solution to these problems is to hold the tech companies accountable,” he continues.

“Not to give them regulatory protection and allow regulatory capture,” he adds.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Americans, Artificial intelligence, Economy, Jd vance, Technology, Steve deace, Donald trump, Data centers, Blazetv show 

Another turn in the bizarre case that is dividing America came out of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday.

An Alaska woman serving as a surrogate fled to Texas in order to allow the baby she was carrying to be delivered after the biological parents asked her to abort the child over a rare and serious heart defect.

‘Those efforts have been rejected by every single court.’

Justice Elena Kagan rejected a request for an emergency appeal from McKenna West, the woman who is trying to wrest custody from the boy’s biological parents, Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar. Kagan presides over emergency appeals from California and nearby states.

West was asking the Supreme Court to block an order from a California court that found the couple to be the child’s legal parents.

Court filings say that the surrogacy contract allowed Ahmed and Gilkar to request an abortion if the child carried by West was diagnosed with a fetal abnormality, CBS News reported.

The couple requested that option after an anatomy scan after 20 weeks found the baby to have hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a life-threatening condition.

West refused and fled to Texas, where the baby was born in August. She has named him Gabriel, while the couple has named him Rumi.

The California court found the couple to be the child’s legal parents before he was born. A Texas court found that the couple is responsible for the child’s health decision, not the surrogate.

West wants to be declared the baby’s mother and argued that recognizing the couple as the boy’s legal parents may jeopardize his health and safety. In her filing, she claimed the couple may interfere with his ongoing treatment.

Attorneys for the couple said in a Supreme Court filing that they will provide lifesaving care to the child and are “committed to doing so for the rest of his life.”

“Respondents have been with their child around the clock in a hospital’s pediatric intensive care unit,” the attorneys wrote. “The child has been receiving critical medical care by his team of doctors at the consent and direction of Respondents.”

RELATED: Paxton intervenes to help save surrogate baby from abortion

Adam Wolf, an attorney for the couple, released a statement after Kagan refused West’s appeal.

“We are truly grateful that Rumi can continue receiving the treatment he needs to survive and that he will not be stripped away from what has been described by doctors as the excellent care of his parents,” he wrote, according to CBS News.

“Ms. West’s legal filings across three jurisdictions, state courts of appeals, and now the U.S. Supreme Court have sought to undermine Rumi’s parents’ right to provide him with the care he needs. Those efforts have been rejected by every single court.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Supreme court, Surrogacy, Politics, Elena kagan 

While many on the left have campaigned in the past on abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Democratic Rep. Delia Ramirez of Illinois says she’s putting forward legislation to do that and more.

Ramirez said Wednesday that the legislation would abolish ICE and send its funding to a left-wing community safety program.

The new department would focus on humanity rather than ‘surveillance’ and ‘terrorizing people,’ Ramirez said.

She introduced the Reimagining Safety Act at a news conference in Chicago, where she said funding for ICE and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security should be rerouted to programs that “working families rely on.”

Ramirez was joined by various politicians, immigration rights activists, and community organizers at the conference.

The bill would create a “new human- and community-centered federal department” that would promote “collective safety.” The new department would also focus on humanity rather than “surveillance” and “terrorizing people,” Ramirez said in an interview with WFLD-TV.

Calls against ICE and the DHS have increased from Democrats after the latest ICE-involved shooting in Austin, Texas, on Sunday.

During congressional hearings, Ramirez has previously compared ICE agents to the Ku Klux Klan and to slave patrols. She has also sponsored other bills intended to restrict ICE from its mission.

“ICE is shooting people who are going to work, taking their children to school, and even visiting as tourists,” she said in July. “The death toll of ICE victims keeps rising. The actions of ICE’s masked death squads reflect the shameless cruelty of [President Donald] Trump and [Trump aide Stephen] Miller’s policies, paid for by our tax dollars. It’s time to stop the ICE age.”

ICE and the DHS did not respond to requests for comment from Blaze News in time for publication.

RELATED: California Democrat calls for ICE to be abolished after Homan announces ‘record’ arrests

Ramirez had previously made headlines and caused outrage after declaring that she is a “proud Guatemalan” first and an American second.

She is also reportedly married to an illegal alien who received DACA amnesty from the Obama administration.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Immigration, Department of homeland security, Immigration and customs enforcement, Politics, Delia ramirez