blaze media

America First can’t survive an Iran quagmire

The Iran war risks becoming the classic Washington trap: Trade concrete domestic wins for an open-ended foreign project, then discover the home front slipped away while everyone watched the fireworks.

Over the weekend, the United States joined Israel in the opening salvo of what looked like an increasingly inevitable fight with Iran. Plenty of ink has already spilled over whether Donald Trump should pursue regime change abroad. The larger stakes sit at home. Trump began his second term with an all-out assault on the left and the permanent bureaucracy. Agencies were closed, and budgets were slashed. The border was secured, and deportations began. The early blitz of executive orders stunned progressives, but activist judges soon started tying the administration down. That reality demanded legislative victories

A successful Iran campaign could reshape the region. A failed or prolonged one could reshape American politics by handing Democrats a narrative of chaos and betrayal.

Congress has not delivered. Rather than spend months trying to whip spineless Republicans into motion, the White House shifted toward what it could do without them. Foreign policy offers that outlet. The result includes some impressive operations, including the capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. Iran, however, threatens to consume time, attention, and political capital that the domestic fight cannot spare.

Curtis Yarvin argues that the most valuable political win makes the next win easier. Power has momentum. Winning in the right order matters more than checking items off an ideological list. Trump’s best early moves fit that logic. They did not merely satisfy the base. They changed the battlefield.

The point is not isolation. America has enemies, and presidents sometimes must use force. The point is sequencing. Domestic consolidation makes foreign action cheaper and safer. A secure border, a disciplined bureaucracy, and election rules that prevent the left from gaming turnout strengthen deterrence.

They also insulate a president from war-party sabotage: leaks, lawsuits, and hearings meant to break public support. The same activists who file injunctions against deportations will file injunctions again against anything that smells like emergency authority. The same media class that demanded escalation yesterday will demand trials and timelines tomorrow. A president who has not locked down the home front fights with one hand tied, then gets blamed when the knot tightens.

Cutting the staff and budget of outfits like USAID and the Department of Education did more than signal hostility to the progressive project. It reduced the flow of money to Democratic patronage networks and throttled the institutions that launder liberal ideology into “expertise.” Closing the border and restarting deportations did more than satisfy a campaign promise. It slowed the importation of new dependents and future Democratic Party supporters. Even the executive order on birthright citizenship, whatever the courts decide, aims at the same long-term terrain: electoral math.

RELATED: The West’s forbidden truth: Ethnic cleansing is now official policy

Blaze Media Illustration

Those moves carried moral clarity and tactical advantage. Each win reduced the opposition’s resources and increased the odds of winning the next fight.

That strategy always faced a limit. Flooding the zone with executive action could only last until the legal system and the administrative state regrouped. Trump is not a dictator, no matter what progressive media claims. He needs laws. Without legislation, judges can block him, bureaucrats can slow-walk him, and the next president can reverse him with a pen.

Once the domestic agenda hit those constraints, the administration pivoted abroad to keep momentum. The question becomes whether momentum abroad strengthens the home front or drains it.

War burns political capital. Trump already took hits from the Epstein files mess and sloppy messaging around deportations. Governing by polls is foolish, but political victories still require public attention and pressure. A president can spend capital only if he has it. People love a winner. They also sour on leaders who appear distracted, trapped, or inconsistent.

Iran poses a special risk because it collides with Trump’s signature advantage: his break with Republican foreign adventurism. He rose by mocking George W. Bush’s regime-change fantasies as disaster. That stance enraged conservative orthodoxies, then remade them. Many pundits who cheered the Iraq War now treat regime change as a punchline largely because Trump made it respectable to say so.

Now Trump bets that the problem was not regime change itself, only its execution. Maybe he wins that bet. He deserves credit for successful strikes and bold operations. Yet the odds do not favor quick, clean wars, and Iran has a long history of swallowing neat plans.

Meanwhile, the domestic agenda needs hard wins that only Congress can supply. The SAVE Act offers the perfect example of a victory that makes the next victory easier. Voter ID is moral and common sense. It enjoys broad support. It constrains the fraud Democrats exploit. It makes every future election easier for Republicans to win. Yet GOP legislators cannot push it across the finish line. The Senate wastes time on performative votes and pageant nonsense. Caligula’s horse starts to look like a personnel upgrade.

RELATED: The commonsense case for nationalizing US elections

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

This imbalance matters because foreign policy creates durable facts, while executive-only domestic wins remain reversible. A successful Iran campaign could reshape the region. A failed or prolonged one could reshape American politics by handing Democrats a narrative of chaos and betrayal. Either way, the clock keeps ticking at home.

If Democrats win the midterms, impeachment and investigations begin immediately. If progressives win the next presidential election, the border reopens, amnesty returns, and the Department of Education fills up again with ideological enforcers. Iran is a brutal regime, but its nuclear program took a major blow last summer. Breathing room existed. The administration should have used it to lock in domestic gains.

Now Trump is committed. That makes speed decisive. A timely victory abroad could preserve the president’s image as a winner while he pressures Congress to codify the domestic agenda. A drawn-out war will do the opposite: sap attention, fracture the coalition, and leave the home front legally vulnerable.

America First cannot survive as a permanent posture if domestic reforms remain temporary. The administration must stop letting foreign battles substitute for unfinished work at home. Win fast abroad if you must. Then come back, and finish the job in Washington.

​America first, Iran, Operation epic fury, Curtis yarvin, Domestic policy, Republicans, Boots on the ground, Opinion & analysis, Donald trump, Forever wars, Israel, Nicolas maduro, Immigration, Birthright citizenship, Elections, 2026 midterms, Save act, Congress, Democrats 

blaze media

Want a machine gun? These states might soon make buying one easier

Republican lawmakers in West Virginia and Kentucky are working on making it easier for Americans to acquire fully automatic firearms — a move that might catch on in other red states.

Machine guns — defined by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives as a firearm that can fire “automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger” — are heavily regulated in the United States.

While such weapons can be privately owned, Americans are greatly limited in what they can buy and must jump through numerous hoops to seal the deal.

‘This is our constitutional right.’

Per the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act, civilians are barred from possessing a machine gun manufactured after May 19, 1986. Limited supply means a higher price — Silencer Central says that prospective buyers should expect to spend a minimum of $6,000 to $10,000.

Interested American buyers at least 21 years of age, neither a felon nor a fugitive, and living in a state without a machine gun ban must pass an AFT background check, pay a one-time $200 transfer tax, and get approval from the government in order to take possession. Once those hurdles are cleared, they can take the machine gun home but fire it only on closed target ranges.

In West Virginia, Republican state Sens. Chris Rose and Zack Maynard recently introduced legislation that would establish within the West Virginia State Police an office of public defense that would oversee the procurement and sale of machine guns to “qualified members of the public,” namely any citizen presently eligible to purchase and possess firearms under West Virginia and federal law.

The Cowboy State Daily reported that the new office would be authorized to transfer newer machine guns to state residents.

Blaze News has reached out to state Sen. Rose for clarification about whether out-of-state American citizens would be able to acquire a machine gun from the proposed authority.

RELATED: Virginians oppose Richmond’s war on the Second Amendment: Poll

Photographer: Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The preamble of the bill states both that “the Framers understood the Second Amendment to guarantee armament parity between the American citizen and government infantryman” and that “it is in the public interest of the State of West Virginia and its people that American citizens be armed and better able to assist in the defense of the State, and to resist tyranny, using bearable firearms commonly used in modern warfare.”

The legislation would ensure that machine guns made available to citizens in the state through the proposed office would “be the same as, or of like kind to, those machineguns currently in use by law enforcement or the United States Armed Forces, and shall include but not be limited to AR-15/M16-platform, M249-type, and MP5-type Machineguns.”

Kentucky state Rep. TJ Roberts (R) has introduced a nearly identical bill that would create a sub-office within the Kentucky State Police to acquire and transfer guns to qualified Kentuckians.

Roberts stated on X, “Law-abiding Kentuckians should be able to own any type of firearm they choose (including machine guns), as this is our constitutional right.”

The Kentucky version specifies that a “qualified person” is “a person who is eligible to purchase and possess firearms under Kentucky and federal law.” In Kentucky, out-of-state residents who are U.S. citizens have the right to purchase firearms.

Mark Jones, the national director of Gun Owners of America — the organization that authored the bill — told Cowboy State Daily that similar legislation is “doable in Wyoming” and that a Wyoming version of the bill might be introduced next year.

“Prior to the session, I had discussions about it with Wyoming legislators, but we didn’t have enough time to draft a bill,” Jones said. “We decided to focus on the four major (gun-related) bills that are now poised to pass in 2026 and reconsider the 1071 concept next year.”

While recognizing this legal approach as workable, George Mocsary, a law professor at the University of Wyoming and director of the school’s Firearms Research Center, told the Cowboy State Daily that Congress might intervene and overturn the proposed law if passed.

He noted, however, “If it works, I could totally see it catching on, particularly here in Wyoming, and with our northern neighbors in Montana.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Second amendment, 2a, Guns, Machinegun, Machine gun, Machine guns, Firearms, Weapons, Constitution, West virginia, Kentucky, Wyoming, Politics 

blaze media

Here’s why your iCloud is full — and how to fix it

This has probably happened to you at least once: You’re excited to upgrade your iPhone to a shiny new model. You get it all set up with your data and apps. Everything’s ready to go. Then you see it — that glaring red alert in your Settings app that says you’re out of storage. “How is that possible?” you wonder, and rightfully so. Your new phone shouldn’t already be out of storage! Should you buy more? It depends on what that alert actually means and what you can do about it. Let me explain.

iPhone storage explained

Your iPhone comes with two types of storage: local and cloud.

Local storage is the physical storage on your device that saves your apps, settings, data, and more. This is the option you choose when you purchase your phone, and once you walk out of the store, it can’t be changed. You’re stuck with it until the next time you upgrade your device. Most new iPhones come with 256GB or more, but if your device is a little older, it could have even less.

Apple wants you to buy more iCloud storage, even if you don’t necessarily need it.

Cloud storage, or more specifically iCloud storage, is the storage plan attached directly to your Apple account that backups and syncs your apps, settings, and data. All accounts come with 5GB of free storage, and unlike local storage, iCloud can be expanded, to anywhere from 50GB to 12TB, for a recurring monthly fee.

The only way your new iPhone can be out of storage is if you downgraded the storage capacity to an option less than your previous device (for instance, if your old iPhone was a 512GB model and your new one only has 256GB) and your apps no longer fit. Alternatively, iCloud will show an alert when it’s full. Eight times out of 10, the iCloud storage is the problem.

How to check storage levels on iPhone

To be certain, there’s an easy way to check the local storage in your iPhone, as well as the storage in your iCloud account.

RELATED: Out of phone storage? Try this free alternative to updating or upgrading

Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images

For local storage, open the Settings app. Tap “General,” then open “iPhone Storage.” It may take a few seconds to a minute for this screen to fully populate, so give it a moment. Once the chart shows up, you’ll see a complete breakdown of your iPhone’s local storage, including downloaded applications, music, photos, messages, and other system data. This is a great way to see which apps take up the most space on your device, and the recommendations section may also tell you which apps you can offload based on your usage habits. If you’re almost out of local storage, you can delete apps from this screen by tapping on an app and hitting the “Delete App” button.

Screenshots by Zach Laidlaw

To check iCloud storage, head back to the beginning of the Settings app. Tap your name at the top of the screen, then “iCloud.” This page shows you a comprehensive breakdown of all the data synced to your iCloud account. To take an even closer look, tap on “Storage” at the top. From here, you can see capacity totals for your device backups, iCloud Drive files, photos, messages, and iCloud-connected apps. If you’re almost out of iCloud storage, you can either upgrade to a higher-tier storage plan, or you can delete old files from your iCloud account to make more room.

Before you do anything, though, there’s one last thing everyone with a new iPhone should do first.

Screenshots by Zach Laidlaw

The real reason your iCloud storage is full

For those with a brand-new iPhone and a storage capacity alert, your iCloud storage is most likely full because a backup of your old iPhone is still saved on your account, taking up vital space that your new iPhone needs for its own backup.

From the main iCloud settings page, tap on “iCloud Backup” to see a complete list of your backed-up Apple devices. This should include your new iPhone, your old iPhone, and possibly an iPad (if you own one). Next, you need to delete the backup of your old phone to make room for your new device.

WARNING: After you delete the backup of your old phone, you will not have a current backup of any iPhone at all until you back up the new model. That means that if something happens to your new phone before you back it up, you will lose some data attached to the phone (like your home screen layout, app settings, and other local files). Other files you have synced to iCloud – like Notes, Messages, Photos, etc. — are not at risk of being lost or deleted. Still, this is why you should immediately run a backup of your new phone to make sure all your data is still safe and secure.

To delete the backup of your old iPhone, tap on your old device, and select “Turn Off and Delete from iCloud” to seal the deal. Lastly, from the same iCloud backup page, select “Back Up Now.” This will create a new backup file for your new device.

Screenshots by Zach Laidlaw

You probably don’t need more storage

As you can see, local iPhone storage and cloud-based iCloud storage are connected to each other, and although you need both of them to keep your device synced and running properly, they’re not the same. The worst part is that Apple doesn’t make a clear enough distinction between the two when one runs out.

The truth is that Apple wants you to buy more iCloud storage, even if you don’t necessarily need it. This is why the company still provides only 5GB of free storage while competitors offer much more. Luckily, there are more ways you can free up storage on iPhone, both from the device and the cloud.

In some cases, iCloud storage upgrades are unavoidable, especially if you own multiple Apple devices backed up to the cloud. But if your old phone was backed up to iCloud without any storage warnings, your new phone will also likely fit after you make room.

Whatever you do, check your physical storage and iCloud storage capacities before you purchase more. There’s a high chance you don’t need an upgrade.

​Tech 

blaze media

My message to President Trump: Don’t mess with Texas politics

Texas just had a primary election, and the message from voters could not have been clearer: A large share of Republicans are done with incumbent Senator John Cornyn.

After years of frustration with the longtime senator, voters forced a runoff between Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Cornyn may have finished with the largest vote total, but the numbers behind that result tell a more revealing story.

Cornyn will now have to defend his record directly to Republican voters who have grown skeptical of his leadership.

Cornyn received roughly 907,000 votes out of more than 2 million total votes cast in the Republican primary. That means over a million Texans showed up to vote for someone other than the incumbent senator. The difference between Cornyn and Paxton was only about 26,000 votes — a razor-thin margin in a state as big as Texas.

Then there is Wesley Hunt, who drew nearly 293,000 votes. Combine the Paxton and Hunt totals, and more than 1.1 million voters cast ballots against John Cornyn.

After all the money Cornyn poured into the race, that should have been the headline.

Cornyn and his allies reportedly spent close to $100 million between campaign spending and super PAC support. Nearly $100 million to hold on to a Senate seat — and the result was a runoff. Paxton spent a fraction of that amount, about $4 million, and still came within striking distance. Put another way, Cornyn spent $129 per vote against Paxton’s $3.79 per vote.

That is not the performance of a senator who commands overwhelming support in his own party. It looks like a political establishment trying to prop up a candidate who has worn out his welcome with grassroots voters.

Yet despite the message voters sent, Washington may be preparing to rescue Cornyn anyway.

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he would soon make an endorsement in the runoff and would ask the candidate he does not choose to drop out of the race immediately.

You would struggle to find many people who have been as outspoken in support of President Trump as I have. I have defended him when the media attacked him and stood by him through years of political backlash. But I still take offense at anyone in the federal government trying to manipulate a Texas election.

Texas has a runoff system for a reason. When no candidate receives a majority, the top two candidates go back to the voters. It forces candidates to earn a true majority rather than slide through a divided field.

Cutting that process short to protect an incumbent senator who just failed to win an outright majority defeats the entire purpose.

It also ignores a political reality that has fueled so much frustration: Cornyn has spent years drifting away from the conservative voters he is supposed to represent.

Cornyn has cultivated a reputation as a Washington dealmaker, working across the aisle and negotiating major legislation with Democrats. That may earn praise from Senate leadership and the political class in Washington, but it has increasingly alienated conservatives back home.

Cornyn’s relationship with Trump has also been anything but consistent. During the lead-up to the 2024 election, Cornyn questioned Trump’s ability to win a general election and suggested Republicans might need a different nominee. He said Trump’s “time has passed him by” and argued the party needed someone who could appeal beyond Trump’s base.

RELATED: America should eliminate the H-1B and replace it with THIS

eldadcarin via iStock/Getty Images

Statements like that do not disappear just because campaign season arrives.

Ken Paxton’s record with Trump tells a different story. When the political establishment turned on the former president after the 2020 election, Paxton stood with him. He challenged election procedures in court and took enormous political heat for doing so. Paxton absorbed the backlash anyway.

That loyalty is one reason grassroots conservatives rallied behind him in the primary.

And it brings the conversation back to the runoff itself.

Primary night showed that a majority of Republican voters were willing to vote for someone other than John Cornyn. Even after nearly $100 million in support, the incumbent could not clear the threshold needed to avoid a second round.

That fact should make Washington pause before rushing in to protect him.

The runoff exists so voters can finish the conversation they started on primary night. Cornyn will now have to defend his record directly to Republican voters who have grown skeptical of his leadership. Paxton will argue, and rightly so, that Texas deserves a senator who fights the establishment rather than manages it.

Those arguments belong in Texas, in front of Texas voters.

Cornyn has had decades in Washington to prove himself. The primary results suggest a growing number of Texans think that time has passed him by.

​John cornyn, Ken paxton, Texas, Texas primary, Senate race, Donald trump, Trump endorsement, Rino, Campaign spending, Opinion & analysis 

blaze media

‘This is a traumatic event’: Remains of two young girls found in suitcases in Cleveland field

A man walking his dog near a field in Cleveland found a suitcase with human remains, which led to the discovery of another suitcase, Ohio police said.

The investigation into the gruesome discovery led to the arrest Wednesday of a 28-year-old woman, who was charged with aggravated murder and child endangering, according to police.

‘Investigations of this nature require patience, precision, and discretion. Unlike what is often portrayed on television, every detail cannot be shared publicly.’

The man called 911 immediately after his dog hit on the scent from the suitcase near a residential neighborhood, according to police.

An investigation determined that the remains of the two girls had been in the field for some time. The suitcases were both in a shallow grave in a location near a school.

The Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner’s Office initially determined that the girls were half-siblings and then later identified them as 10-year-old Amor Wilson and 8-year-old Mila Chatman.

“This is a traumatic event for our officers, for the community,” Cleveland Police Chief Dorothy Todd said.

On Wednesday evening, a SWAT team and police performed a search warrant on a home only about 100 yards away from the location where the remains were found.

Police announced that they had identified and detained a person of interest. The suspect was arrested after questioning. Police also found a third child in the home and placed the child into the custody of the Department of Children and Family Services.

The woman was identified as Aliyah Henderson and was booked into the Cuyahoga County Jail.

RELATED: Illegal alien coach who allegedly murdered 13-year-old now charged with horrendous sex crimes against 2 other underage boys

“These were two young lives with their entire futures ahead of them. Our detectives worked tirelessly and with great care to identify those responsible,” Todd said.

“Investigations of this nature require patience, precision, and discretion. Unlike what is often portrayed on television, every detail cannot be shared publicly,” she added. “Certain information must remain confidential to protect the integrity of the investigation and ensure justice for these victims. That careful and methodical work allowed our detectives to develop the evidence needed to make quick identification of a person of interest, ultimately resulting in an arrest.”

Community members have contributed to a memorial for the two girls with balloons, teddy bears, and flowers to honor their memory.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Girls bodies found in suitcases, Cleveland child murders, Aliyah henderson murders, Child murders ohio, Crime 

blaze media

Trump and Rubio are playing ‘the art of the squeal’ in Cuba

Commentators keep treating President Trump’s moves against Venezuela and Iran as random, emotional, or “impulsive.” They aren’t. They read like strategic actions aimed at the real peer adversary — China — which now finds itself short roughly 20% of a key commodity that powers everything from industrial output to military operations: oil.

Orange Man Bad managed to hit another long-term communist adversary at the same time: Cuba.

Trump isn’t sending Marines to Havana. He’s squeezing the regime into an economic takeover.

After the Maduro snatch-and-bag operation — and after Washington threatened heavy tariffs on Mexico if it kept shipping petroleum products to Cuba — Havana’s fuel supply has reportedly fallen to roughly 35% of its monthly needs.

In 2025, Cuba imported about 13.7 million barrels of oil — roughly 112,000 barrels per day of crude and refined petroleum products — supplied primarily by Venezuela (about 61% of imports) and Mexico (about 25%), with Russia and Algeria covering most of the rest.

Trump’s executive order in late January authorized heavy tariffs on any country supplying oil to Cuba. Mexico suspended shipments to avoid U.S. retaliation. At the same time, a de facto maritime quarantine has targeted “ghost tankers” attempting to evade sanctions. Even Russian deliveries have run into trouble. Reports say the tanker Sea Horse, carrying roughly 200,000 barrels of Russian gas and oil, diverted in late February to avoid seizure or sanctions risk.

Cuba now faces a severe fuel crunch.

International observers — including U.N.-linked agencies — have described the situation as catastrophic. The island’s power grid has slid toward collapse, and the global fuel spike tied to U.S. action in Iran has only tightened the vise.

The petroleum deficit has reportedly cut national electricity generation capacity by about 65%. That leaves roughly one-third of needed power available at any given time. In Santiago de Cuba and Guantánamo, residents report blackouts lasting more than 20 hours a day. In Havana, scheduled cuts reportedly jumped from four hours to as many as 18 hours a day. Hospitals have reportedly performed surgeries by cellphone light. Water systems that rely on electric pumps have failed across large areas. Garbage collection in Havana has stalled because the trucks are out of gas.

The communist government has responded with wartime austerity measures. Major airports have suspended refueling for international flights. Airlines such as Air Canada and Air France have canceled or rerouted flights, gutting tourism — one of the regime’s few remaining sources of cash. State companies have shifted to reduced schedules to conserve power.

RELATED: Iran, China, and Trump’s ‘art of the squeal’

Photo by the White House via X Account/Anadolu via Getty Images

Washington has offered one narrow escape valve. On February 25, the U.S. issued a limited license allowing American companies to sell oil to Cuba’s emerging private sector. Analysts have described it as “a drop in the bucket.” It isn’t enough to run the heavy thermoelectric plants the national grid needs.

Last week, Trump publicly floated the idea of a “friendly takeover” of Cuba. The phrase stays diplomatically vague, but the surrounding actions and rhetoric suggest a specific approach. Trump described Cuba as a failing nation because it has “no money. They have no anything right now.”

He isn’t going to send a Marine expeditionary force to Havana. He’s pressuring the regime to cut a deal that looks like gently coerced economic integration: end the communist monopoly over banking and energy, allow U.S. firms to buy and operate failing infrastructure (telecom, ports, the power grid), and expand the private sector until the Communist Party can’t enforce centralized control.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has echoed that direction. He has argued that Cuba needs a “different economic model” and said the U.S. would welcome reforms that open space for economic and political freedom. Reports also suggest back-channel contact, though the administration has not confirmed details.

Cuba’s current leader, Communist Party chief Miguel Díaz-Canel, now sits in the position of a man about to get a colonoscopy. He should pray Orange Man Bad feels generous with the sedation — or he’ll learn the hard way what “the art of the squeal” means.

​Cuba, Marco rubio, Venezuela, Iran, Havana, Tariffs, Communist party, Friendly takover, Opinion & analysis, Donald trump, Economy, Poverty, China, Russia, Oil, Energy, Collapse 

blaze media

Tampon Tim Walz MELTS DOWN about Minnesota fraud

Governor Tim Walz (D-Minn.) was in front of the Oversight Committee this week when he was confronted by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) about fraud in his state — and his reaction did not make him look good.

“Governor Walz and Attorney General Ellison, you have presided over one of the worst government fraud scandals in American history. This was money intended to feed hungry children, help kids with autism, provide food and shelter and health care to the needy, and more,” Mace began.

“You both allowed billions in these American taxpayer dollars to be pillaged and plundered by Somali pirates. You knew this was happening. You chose to do nothing about it. And in some cases, you even enabled it,” she continued.

“My questions this morning, my first go to Governor Walz. And I hope you learned some lessons from your last hearing with me on the Oversight Committee. Have you learned anything since then?” Mace asked.

“I did,” Walz responded angrily. “That if I didn’t speak up, two of my people would be dead, Congresswoman, and I warned you.”

“Governor Walz, what is a woman? Have you learned that lesson? Do you know what a woman is?” she asked, ignoring his previous response.

“I’m not here to be your prop for your obsession,” Walz said.

“If you can’t define what a woman is, you certainly can’t define what fraud is,” she responded, before asking Walz how much money was spent on autism in Minnesota in 2017.

“I don’t have those numbers in front of me,” he answered.

As Mace continued to question him on the fraud, Walz repeatedly answered that he wasn’t there to be Mace’s “prop.”

“Congresswoman Nancy Mace held him to account,” BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler comments.

“Of course, you remember his nickname, Tampon Tim. The reason that we call him Tampon Tim is not to be vulgar. It’s not because we’re petty and we’re hurling an ad hominem at him,” Wheeler says.

“It’s because Governor Tim Walz put tampons in boys’ bathrooms in Minnesota. Because he won’t answer the question, ‘What is a woman?’ Because he’s so captured by leftist ideology,” she adds.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Camera phone, Free, Sharing, Upload, Video, Video phone, Youtube.com, The liz wheeler show, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze original, Blaze originals, Tim walz, Tampon tim, Nancy mace, Minnesota fraud, Somalians, Somalian fraud, Somalian immigrants 

blaze media

‘You have to cancel the cancel culture’: Marlon Wayans says new ‘Scary Movie’ satire will ‘bring back laughter’

Actor Marlon Wayans says the latest iteration in the “Scary Movie” satirical franchise will “cancel the cancel culture.”

The Wayans brothers are returning to helm the franchise after they were kicked off the sequels to the first two blockbuster movies by the disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein.

‘What we’re trying to do is bring back laughter. … You have to cancel the cancel culture.’

After the trailer to ‘Scary Movie 6’ dropped, Wayans described the film in an interview with Entertainment Weekly.

“What we’re trying to do is bring back laughter,” he said. “This is about bringing back comedy the way it used to be. And I think the only way to do it is you have to cancel the cancel culture.”

The movie satires are known for making mocking references to famous horror flicks, but Wayans said the newest version is trying to make a mark on the debate over censorship in art.

“We’re gonna do what we always do. We’re gonna make fun of everybody because we’re equal opportunity offenders,” he explained. “We have a recipe, we have a formula that you can’t mimic or copy. You could try, but it’s very specific. It’s how we grew up, and it’s how we see the world. It’s the household we were raised in with the sense of humor that we all were governed with, that we inherited from our mother.”

The film includes the return of many of the characters from earlier movies.

“We like to be fearless,” he added. “Yet still do things with kid gloves to let people laugh at themselves.”

RELATED: Actor and comedian Marlon Wayans rejects cancel culture: ‘It’s sad that society is in this place where we can’t laugh anymore’

Photo by Robin L Marshall/Getty Images for BET

Wayans has previously decried the effect of cancel culture on comedy.

“It’s sad that society is in this place where we can’t laugh anymore. I ain’t listening to this damn generation. I ain’t listening to these folks: these scared-ass people, these scared executives,” he said during a 2022 interview.

“Y’all do what you want to do? Great. I’m still gonna tell my jokes the way I tell them,” he added. “And if you want to make some money, jump on board. And if not, then I’ll find a way to do it myself. I know my audience.”

‘Scary Movie 6’ will be released in theaters on June 5.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Marlon wayans scary movie, Wayans brothers cancel culture, Scary movie cancel culture, Comedies against cancel culture, Politics 

blaze media

Elizabeth Warren’s housing fix could make home buying even tougher

As part of his affordability agenda, President Trump has been looking for ways to bring down housing costs.

He’s had some success. Mortgage rates are lower than at any point since his first term. The National Association of Realtors’ Housing Affordability Index has started ticking up again. And as Trump noted during his State of the Union address, the cost of buying a house has dropped about $5,000 since he took office.

Affordability is the target. A serious policy needs to increase the number of homes Americans can actually buy, not just score points against investors.

More work remains. Trump brought a guest to the State of the Union to make the point. Rachel Wiggins, a Houston mom of two, told a story many families recognize: She bid on 20 homes and “lost all of those bids to gigantic investment firms that bypassed inspection, paid all cash, and turned all those houses into rentals, stealing her American dream,” Trump said.

That experience explains the executive order Trump signed to curb large institutional investors from dominating the single-family market — driving up prices for buyers and renters alike while shrinking supply for both.

Trump’s order sets a clear policy: Large institutional investors should not buy single-family homes that families could otherwise purchase. It does that by restricting federal approval, insurance, guarantees, securitization, and other forms of facilitation for institutional purchases of single-family homes that could go to owner-occupants. It also limits the disposal of federal assets in ways that transfer single-family homes to large institutional investors.

The order goes farther. It directs the administration to promote sales to individual owner-occupants — people who actually live in the homes and care for the neighborhoods — through first-look policies, disclosure requirements, and anti-circumvention provisions. It also directs the legislative affairs office to produce legislation to codify the order.

The order includes narrow exceptions for build-to-rent projects planned, permitted, financed, and constructed as rental communities, as well as other tailored cases. It also directs the Treasury Department to tighten rules affecting housing acquisition and instructs the attorney general and the Federal Trade Commission chairman to review major acquisitions, especially serial purchases, and to prioritize antitrust enforcement as warranted.

Trump also directed Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner to require owners and managing agents of single-family rentals participating in federal housing assistance programs to disclose indirect owners, managers, and affiliates and to report changes in ownership.

In other words, Trump offered a concrete proposal: prioritize owner-occupants, expand supply, and curb the worst market distortions without choking off lawful investment that supports construction and growth.

RELATED: What ‘democratic socialism’ really means to young voters

Photo by Jeremy Weine/Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) offered something else.

Warren unveiled legislation last week before the Senate Banking Committee, where she serves as ranking member. Her approach targets the tax incentives that support housing investment. It would impose higher taxes on any person or entity that owns more than 50 single-family homes. It would also bar access to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-backed mortgages and restrict purchases of foreclosed homes.

That is less a housing plan than a punishment plan. It aims to drive investors out, even though big investors have never owned more than about 4% of U.S. housing stock. The core problem is supply: The country does not have enough homes for a growing population. The answer is not to chase away capital that can help build housing. The answer is to align incentives so that families — owner-occupants — get first priority.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Warren’s co-sponsor, said he’s willing to work with anyone trying to bring down home prices. Trump should take him up on that offer and make the point directly: The goal is not to punish firms that operated lawfully. The goal is to create rules that prioritize families, encourage construction, and expand affordable supply.

Affordability is the target. A serious policy needs to increase the number of homes Americans can actually buy, not just score points against investors.

​Elizabeth warren, Donald trump, Housing fix, Housing costs, American dream, Executive order, Build to rent, Senate banking committee, Opinion & analysis, Blackrock, Blackstone, Wall street, Scott turner 

blaze media

California math teacher under investigation for ‘fat-shaming’ and ‘sexist’ questions on quiz

A California high school is investigating a math teacher after he gave his students Algebra I quizzes that many described as sexist and fat-shaming.

Veteran educator Tom Chan was placed on leave, according to a message from Lowell High School Principal Jan Bautista on Monday to parents.

‘They’re finally teaching real world math in schools.’

The San Francisco Chronicle documented some of the politically incorrect questions.

“The amount of money you spend on a date varies inversely to how much they weigh. A typical girl that weighs 120lbs will cost you $55,” one problem reads.

Students were asked to “derive the variation equation” and then figure out how much to spend on a date “with Ashely who is 220lbs.”

“The fat kid from last time wouldn’t be quiet about the candy I was eating in front of him, so I punted him into the air,” another question reads.

“How tall are you, and how much do you weight?” students were asked.

A spokesperson for the San Francisco Unified School District released a brief statement to the Chronicle.

“We take these concerns seriously and are actively investigating,” Laura Dudnick said.

“It’s pretty shocking,” one parent said about the quizzes. “The fact that nobody has brought this up to the school and he’s been there a really long time.”

Some online took the opportunity to take their own comedic jabs.

“They’re finally teaching real world math in schools,” one comment reads.

“This precisely the sort of practical question that will get kids to take math seriously,” an NRO writer said.

RELATED: Pro-Ice student suspended over posters at California high school where hundreds of anti-ICE students walked out

“Y’all wanted culturally relevant education,” another user responded.

“Ask a 220 pound girl on a date and she’ll pay for everything,” online raconteur David Burge replied. “This why I got an 800 on the math section of my Dude Aptitude Test.”

“I’m more upset that 9th graders are doing simple ass math that Chinese kids do in the 4th grade,” another said.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​California math teacher on leave, Sexist math questions, Fat shaming math questions, Teacher tom chan, Politics 

blaze media

Major win for parents: Supreme Court bans schools from transitioning students in secret

The Supreme Court has granted a request from a group of California parents to reinstate a ruling that bans schools from hiding “children’s gender presentation” from them — and forces them to follow the parents’ instructions regarding the names and pronouns the children use.

BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey counts this as a win.

“Parents should absolutely know if their child is going by different pronouns or declaring that they are a boy at school. Right now in California, a student can go to school, say that ‘I want to transition to the opposite sex,’ and the student doesn’t have to notify parents,” she explains.

“They can socially transition that child. They can also get that child to a particular professional that will help them get the psychiatric care and the different medical treatments that they are seeking in order to look like the opposite sex,” she says.

Stuckey recalls a case out of California concerning Abigail Martinez, who lost custody of her teenage daughter Yaeli because she refused to support her transition.

Yaeli was placed in a group home, and a judge ruled that she could begin cross-sex hormones — but Yaeli took her own life.

“That’s what happens when you remove kids from the homes of parents who simply want what is best for their kids,” Stuckey says.

“You’ve got people framing this as, like, ‘Oh, it’s protection from abuse when the school won’t inform the parents of what’s really going on.’ The opposite is true. No one cares about your child the way that you do. No one knows your child the way that you do. The school does not care if your child lives or dies,” she continues.

However, while Stuckey is pleased with the ruling, she points out that it was only ruled unconstitutional because of the parental rights aspect, and there’s a long way to go before all of it is “completely illegal and stigmatized and criminalized.”

“You should actually go to prison if you are calling a child by the wrong, non-biological pronoun and encouraging them to change sexes,” Stuckey says.

“The Supreme Court is not where they need to be in understanding what is actually driving this gender deception among kids. It’s not genuine gender dysphoria,” she continues.

“It is pornography. It is propaganda. It is sexual perversion and even sexual abuse that’s going on. It has very little to do with gender dysphoria. So we’re not yet to the root of all of this in driving this out legally and ideologically, but this absolutely is a win for parents,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Video phone, Free, Upload, Camera phone, Video, Sharing, Youtube.com, Relatable with allie beth stuckey, Relatable, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Supreme court, Gender transition, Gender dysphoria, Transgender, Trans rights, Trans activism, Trans activist 

blaze media

‘Sorry, something went wrong’: Tens of thousands of disruptions reported at Amazon website

A website that tracks online outages reports that tens of thousands of users have been unable to reach the Amazon website or have had trouble doing so on Thursday.

The Downdetector website reported a peak of more than 20,000 outages at about 3:45 p.m. ET, with many users reporting problems with checkout and payment errors.

‘WHOA. is anyone else’s Amazon all crazy right now??’

An Amazon spokesperson told Blaze News: “We’re sorry that some customers may be experiencing issues while shopping. We appreciate customers’ patience as we work to resolve the issue.”

Amazon also claimed that AWS is functioning as normal.

Many reported their outage experiences on social media.

“WHOA. is anyone else’s Amazon all crazy right now?? I’m shopping for something (or trying to) and there are no prices! No Prime listings! Everything has a ‘see options’ button instead and IT MAKES YOU ADD IT TO YOUR CART TO SEE THE FREAKING PRICES,” said one user. “NO. NO. WE ARE NOT DOING THIS.”

“Came on here just to verify Amazon is down, twitter never fails,” said another.

“Is Amazon down? Can’t login,” another user asked.

“Anyone else having problems with ordering something on Amazon? The app doesn’t seem to be working and neither does the online site,” said another.

“Folks, is Amazon glitching out? Everything I click on shows as unavailable,” said a user from Portugal.

Others posted screenshots of an error message they claimed to have received.

“Sorry, something went wrong on our end. Please go back and try again or go to Amazon’s homepage,” the reported message read.

RELATED: Amazon store with ‘Just Walk Out’ automation was actually supported by workers in India

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Amazon outages, Iran strikes amazon, Amazon down, Users on amazon, Politics 

blaze media

‘Historic accomplishments’: Kristi Noem puts positive spin on DHS ouster

President Donald Trump declared Thursday that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem would soon no longer lead the agency.

Trump announced that Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) will take over for Noem on March 31, adding that she would be tapped as the special envoy for the Shield of the Americas, a new security initiative in the Western Hemisphere.

‘In this new role, I will be able to build on the partnerships and national security expertise, I forged over the last 13 months as Secretary of Homeland Security.’

Trump’s decision followed reports that he had been displeased with Noem’s performance for months, rumors the White House rejected in December. Speculation emerged that Noem’s removal was a result of her testimony before House and Senate committees earlier this week, during which she claimed the president approved a $220 million DHS ad campaign, a claim the White House denied.

Noem reacted to Trump’s announcement by expressing her gratitude to the president, adding that she looks forward to collaborating with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in the new role.

“Thank you @POTUS Trump for appointing me as the Special Envoy for the Shield of the Americas. @SecRubio and @SecWar are incredible leaders and I look forward to working with them closely to dismantle cartels that have poured drugs into our nation and killed our children and grandchildren,” Noem wrote.

“The Western Hemisphere is absolutely critical for U.S. security. In this new role, I will be able to build on the partnerships and national security expertise, I forged over the last 13 months as Secretary of Homeland Security,” she continued. “We have made historic accomplishments at the Department of Homeland Security to make America safe again: we delivered the MOST secure border in American history, 3 million illegal aliens have left the U.S., we have located 145,000 children, FEMA delivered disaster relief at a 100% faster rate, we ushered in the golden age of travel, saved the American taxpayer $13 billion and revitalized the U.S. Coast Guard.”

RELATED: Noem is OUT — and Trump has named her replacement

Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Some politicians expressed gratitude for Noem’s time at the DHS, while others celebrated her departure.

“I appreciate Secretary Noem’s service to our country. She will do a great job dealing with the drug cartels in her new role as Special Envoy for The Shield of Americas, and I know she will continue to contribute in the future. However, I think it was time for a change,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) stated.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) wrote, “President Trump was elected to secure our border, crack down on sanctuary cities and keep our country safe. I appreciate @Sec_Noem’s dedication to that mission. Thanks to the president’s leadership and her help, incredible progress has been made, and I know she will do a fantastic job as Special Envoy for the Shield of the Americas.”

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) released a video reacting to the DHS leadership shake-up, saying, “Hey, Kristi Noem, don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

RELATED: Government-paid traffickers? Noem testifies Biden administration funded abuse of migrant kids

Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Kristi noem, Donald trump, Trump, Trump administration, Trump admin, Department of homeland security, Dhs, Markwayne mullin, Lindsey graham, Rick scott, Jb pritzker, Tomi lahren, Politics 

blaze media

Glenn Beck exposes commie Mamdani’s ‘free’ day-care scam: $36K per kid — 55% more than private — and the socialist trap coming

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani ran on the pledge to provide free universal child care, and now that promise is coming to fruition starting this fall with the K-2 program.

Except … it’s more expensive than private day care, costing approximately $36,500 per child.

“That’s $13,000 more per child than the private market! Let me repeat that. [The] program designed to make child care less expensive and cheaper is 55% more expensive than the system that already exists,” scoffs Glenn Beck.

On this episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Glenn debunks the socialist promise of “free,” predicting that Mamdani’s day-care debacle will dissolve in three stages.

“You can almost explain every socialist program in three steps,” he says.

“Step one, you got to declare something a right. Housing is a right. Health care is a right. Child care is a right … because once you declare it a right, you never talk about the cost again. You talk about morality.”

Anyone who dares question the numbers — like why jump from $23,000 for private child care to $36,000 per child — “instantly becomes a villain,” he says.

“The second step is they promise you that it’ll only cost the rich … the millionaires — the people who aren’t paying their fair share of taxes,” Glenn continues.

“Here’s the problem. Millionaires, unlike most people, are very mobile, OK? They don’t like something? They move.”

He brings up the mass exodus of wealthy people in France after the president implemented the wealth tax in 1982 to fund a bunch of “free” programs for lower socioeconomic classes.

“When [the rich] leave, what happens? The tax base collapses,” says Glenn.

He explains that socialists sell “tax the rich” initiatives by promising voters it will only hit the “top 10%,” but once that top 10% flees, the socioeconomic class right below them slides into the crosshairs and starts shouldering those same punishing taxes.

This pattern of exodus and replacement continues, eventually bringing about the final step: “The system becomes unsustainable.”

“Here’s why it breaks,” says Glenn. “Because the government, Marxism, socialists, they don’t respond to signals — the market signals. … They respond to political incentives, so who cares if it’s $36,000 over [$23,000]?”

“When [socialism] doesn’t work, they know all they have to do is just find a way to convince you that somebody else is screwing you, and you’ll continue to vote for them. That’s a lot easier than fixing things,” he continues. “So the costs rise, bureaucracy grows, fraud appears, and suddenly the system costs far more than the private system it replaced.”

This is almost certainly the Big Apple’s dark destiny, he argues, because “it started with [step one].”

To hear more of Glenn’s analysis, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​The glenn beck program, Glenn beck, Zohran mamdani, Socialism, Free programs, Marxism, Nyc, New york city, Free daycare, Blazetv, Blaze media 

blaze media

State Department launches urgent push to evacuate Americans from Middle East

While the situation in the Middle East has remained volatile since the commencement of Operations Epic Fury and Roaring Lion on Saturday, the United States has been working overtime to support Americans attempting to evacuate Israel and the surrounding regions.

As military operations against Iran enter their sixth day, the State Department and related agencies have provided updated guidance for U.S. citizens seeking to depart the region.

‘Since February 28, the Department has facilitated the safe return of over 20,000 American citizens from the Middle East, approximately 8,500 arrivals yesterday.’

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee previously offered “fairly limited” options for Americans attempting to evacuate the region, including a bus service to Taba, Egypt, where travelers could attempt to catch an outgoing flight or continue to the airport in Cairo, Egypt. The bus service is still operational, according to a Thursday update from U.S. Embassy Jerusalem.

RELATED: Only one Democrat joins GOP as Senate rejects effort to halt Trump’s Iran strikes

Photo by Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

The service was initially offered by the Israeli Ministry of Tourism. Per the Thursday update, U.S. Embassy Jerusalem “has started offering” the same bus service to Taba.

The update also announced that Ben Gurion Airport reopened Thursday for “limited inbound flights” to Tel Aviv.

“We have no information yet on when outbound flights may become available,” the embassy’s security alert said.

There have been, however, some outbound flights for Americans facilitated by the Department of State.

According to a State Department media note released on Wednesday, “a Department of State charter flight of American citizens departed the Middle East in route to the United States as part of our ongoing efforts to assist Americans’ return home. Additional flights will be surged across the region.”

The note added that American citizens in UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Israel are encouraged to fill out and submit a crisis intake form or contact the department’s 24/7 task force.

A State Department spokesperson told Blaze News Thursday, “Since February 28, the Department has facilitated the safe return of over 20,000 American citizens from the Middle East, approximately 8,500 arrivals yesterday. Thousands more have successfully transitioned to safe havens in Europe and Asia or remain in active transit.”

The spokesperson added that the State Department’s 24/7 task force has “assisted nearly 10,000 Americans abroad, including offering security guidance and travel assistance.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Politics, Iran, Operation epic fury, Operation roaring lion, Israel, United states, State department, Tel aviv, Ben gurion international airport, Egypt, Cairo egypt, Us embassy jerusalem, Mike huckabee 

blaze media

Teens testify they saw mayor having sex with 16-year-old boy during boozy pool party at her home. Now verdict is in.

Misty Roberts — accused of having sex with a drunken 16-year-old boy during a boozy pool party at her home while she was mayor of a small town in Louisiana — has been found guilty of felony child sex crimes.

KPLC-TV on Tuesday evening reported that Roberts was found guilty of carnal knowledge of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a juvenile — both felonies.

‘Go fight your friend. He’s the one who did it.’

The station noted that the jury “deliberated for less than an hour” before reaching a verdict. Her sentencing is scheduled for 9 a.m. April 17. Roberts will have to register as a sex offender.

Blaze News previously reported on the initial arrest and resignation of the 43-year-old Roberts.

Roberts was arrested on Aug. 1, 2024, and charged with third-degree rape and contributing to the delinquency of juveniles, according to the Louisiana State Police.

Roberts — who was the first female mayor of DeRidder and was serving her second term — resigned on July 27, 2024.

In her resignation letter to the city council, Roberts explained her decision to step down by saying: “I must adjust my focus and priorities.”

The Beauregard Parish Sheriff’s Office requested the Louisiana State Police Special Victims Unit to investigate a complaint regarding allegations of sexual relations between a minor and Roberts.

Roberts hosted a boozy pool party at her home in July 2024 during her second term as mayor, prosecutors said.

RELATED: Marriage meltdown: Mom-of-two teacher busted for alleged child molestation of student; reportedly loses custody of kids

During the seven-day trial, jurors were shown text messages between Roberts and her teenage son, with the pair discussing what type of alcohol the teens wanted for the party hosted at her home.

KPLC reported on the victim’s testimony about the night of the pool party, noting that Roberts told him he “looked good, started winking at him, and dancing on him.”

In his closing arguments, Assistant District Attorney Charles Robinson highlighted a “lewd and lascivious photo” which KPLC described as Roberts “wearing a bikini as the teen smiles up at her.”

The victim said Roberts kissed him near the pool, then led them into a room of her home.

The victim — who was 16 years old at the time — testified that Roberts removed her top, he pulled his pants down, and then they had sex.

During explosive testimony Tuesday, the victim — who was a friend of Roberts’ son — told the jury he was extremely intoxicated when he and Roberts had sex, KPLC reported.

“I was kind of dizzy,” the victim told the courtroom. “I had to put my hands on the couch. My eyes were just, like, closed.”

The teen added, “While it was happening, I couldn’t feel my body.”

“After we had sex, I kinda was realizing what was happening,” the victim stated.

The boy recalled Roberts noticing what appeared to be a cell phone seen in a window of the room.

Roberts’ son told the pair that someone at the party had recorded their sexual encounter on video, according to the victim.

The victim testified that a “big argument” between Roberts and her son took place, during which she said, “Go fight your friend. He’s the one who did it.”

According to KPLC, the victim told jurors that Roberts “was trying to get him to fight me. She was trying to get the blame off of herself.”

The boy said he was “kind of shell-shocked” and added, “I just went to my truck and sat there.”

The teen said Roberts’ nephew later came up to him outside and said, “What you did was kind of messed up, but it’s her fault.”

According to KPLC, a 14-year-old at the party testified that he witnessed the victim and Roberts having sex. The teen told the court that Roberts “was acting real crazy” when she came back downstairs after the sexual encounter.

Another witness who was 17 at the time of the alleged incident admitted on the stand that he lied when he first told investigators in 2024 that he was asleep and didn’t see anything, KPLC reported, adding that he testified Monday that he actually did see Roberts and the victim having sex.

“It just seemed the easiest thing to do was to keep up with the lie,” he told the jury, according to the station.

‘I played dumb and denied it.’

Roberts’ nephew told the court he believed he saw the two engaging in sexual activity based on their movements but admitted he hadn’t seen any “private parts.”

Roberts’ daughter testified that she saw her mother and the teen “on top of each other” on the night of the party, KPLC reported.

The victim said those who knew about the incident had a plan “to not tell anyone because it was embarrassing” to Roberts’ nephew, Roberts’ son, and himself.

KPLC reported that Duncan Clanton, Roberts’ ex-husband and father to their two children, testified that his ex-wife told him she had sex with a juvenile, which their son confirmed to him.

Clanton added to jurors that Roberts requested that he call the victim’s family to gauge their reaction, which he said he did.

Clanton said DeRidder City Councilman Joseph Daniel Reynolds contacted him about the incident, and afterward he texted Roberts: “I played dumb and denied it.”

In another text, Roberts wrote to her ex-husband, “I can’t keep hurting others, friends, and family. Lord knows I’ve done enough.”

Clanton assured Roberts via text message that she was a great mom, according to prosecutors.

However, during cross-examination, Clanton was asked if his ex-wife was a great mom, and he responded, “No.”

Roberts’ lifelong best friend and former sister-in-law, Jill Weaver, texted her son — Roberts’ nephew, who attended the party — “Lie till you die” about what happened, according to KPLC.

Weaver was asked if she instructed her son to not contact authorities about the incident: “Did you consult with him on how to keep the police out of this?” Weaver responded, “Probably.”

The mother of the victim texted Roberts about the possibility that her son impregnated her, but Roberts assured the mom that she was on birth control, according to messages shown in court by prosecutors.

A DoorDash driver also informed the court that he delivered Plan B emergency contraception to Roberts’ home in 2024 and left it at her front door and that a customer named “Misty C” made the order.

KPLC reported, “He said he knew it was Roberts’ house because he had brought his kids trick-or-treating there before.”

The news outlet added that the DoorDash driver had “heard rumors of Roberts’ alleged crimes in the following days and believed that he had delivered the contraceptive for that incident.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Child sex crimes, Crime, Louisiana, Mayor arrested, Misty roberts, Misty roberts trial, Sex scandal 

blaze media

‘Stop spreading this garbage’: DHS fires back at Minnesota prosecutor’s ‘unlawful’ investigation into Bovino

The Department of Homeland Security has fired back at a Minnesota prosecutor who announced an investigation into federal agents’ actions in Minnesota.

The office of Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said Monday it was investigating Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino and other federal agents and opening an online portal for the public to send in tips about their “potentially unlawful behavior.”

‘Politicians are laying blame at the feet of law enforcement instead of looking in the mirror.’

A DHS spokesperson responded to the investigation in a statement via email to Blaze News.

“This does nothing to make Minnesota safer. Enforcing federal immigration laws is a clear federal responsibility under Article I, Article II, and the Supremacy Clause,” the DHS spokesperson said.

“What these States are trying to do is unlawful, and they know it. Federal officials acting in the course of their duties are immune from liability under state law,” the spokesperson continued. “Politicians are laying blame at the feet of law enforcement instead of looking in the mirror at how they have fueled the hatred and violent attacks we are seeing against federal law enforcement officers.”

The spokesperson went on to cite increased violence against federal officers, including a 1,300% increase in assaults, a 3,200% increase in vehicular attacks, and an 8,000% increase in death threats.

“We are calling on Democrats, like Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, to stop spreading this garbage,” the spokesperson concluded.

Moriarty’s investigation likely includes video captured of Bovino tossing a canister of irritant at protesters and a photograph of an agent spraying irritant directly into the face of a protester pinned to the ground.

RELATED: Sex toys, other objects allegedly thrown at cops at Minneapolis ICE facility, prompting dozens of arrests — but not by DHS

“Our [Transparency and Accountability Project] team is actively investigating 17 incidents that have been brought to our attention by the community, including Gregory Kent Bovino’s actions,” reads the statement from Moriarty.

Bovino had been praised by many for his aggressive tactics, but he left Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis after the deaths of anti-ICE protesters Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Border czar Tom Homan was placed in charge of the operation, and he removed all federal agents after reaching an agreement with state and local leaders.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Dhs spokesperson against hennepin, Hennepin county attorney mary moriarty, Ag investigation into bovino, Gregory bovino, Politics 

blaze media

House passes the buck on Mace’s push for sexual misconduct disclosure amid Tony Gonzales scandal

On the same day that Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) admitted to having an affair with a former staffer who tragically committed suicide by self-immolation, the U.S. House of Representatives sidelined a bill that would potentially have brought transparency to matters of sexual misconduct among members of Congress.

On Wednesday, the House voted “yea” on a motion to refer a subpoena sponsored by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) to the House Ethics Committee.

‘I think it is DISGUSTING how Congress protects its own corruption. No wonder the American people hate us.’

The bill, which passed 357-65 in favor of referring the resolution to the Ethics Committee, directs the committee to “preserve and publicly release records of the Committee’s review of violations or alleged violations of clause 9 (as it pertains to acts of sexual harassment) and clause 18 of rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives.”

Though she sponsored the bill, Mace appears to be upset by the vote to refer the subpoena to the House Ethics Committee because its leadership has made clear that it does not intend to move forward with the disclosure.

Ethics Chair Michael Guest (R-Miss.) and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.) said in a joint statement: “Victims may be re-traumatized by public disclosures of interim work product, excerpts of interview transcripts, and certain exhibits. And witnesses, who often only speak to the Committee confidentially or on condition of future anonymity, could fear retaliation if their cooperation is made public.”

Mace took to X shortly after the resolution was sent to committee to condemn the outcome of the vote.

“Our resolution to expose predators in Congress was killed. Your government is more concerned with protecting predators than protecting women. The establishment watches out for itself,” Mace wrote. “Remember this when they ask for your trust. This is what corruption looks like.”

RELATED: ‘I made a mistake’: Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who set herself on fire

Photographer: Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) signaled her support for the subpoena and said she was disgusted by the move to send the subpoena to the Ethics Committee, which she said is where “stuff” goes to “die.”

“I think it is DISGUSTING how Congress protects its own corruption. No wonder the American people hate us,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said on X.

Mace made another post with all of the names of her colleagues who voted in favor of sending the subpoena to the committee. She then admonished them: “Shame on every single one of you who voted to protect predators in Congress over the women they prey on.”

Though her first resolution was unsuccessful, Politico reported that Mace did have some success in forcing another vote, this time to subpoena the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights for records about sexual harassment awards and settlements under the Congressional Accountability Act.

Mace was able to successfully force that vote after reaching an agreement with Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) to limit the range of the subpoena to only members of Congress, as well as another small caveat, according to Politico.

Mace celebrated the win on X and made a promise to the American people: “After the full House voted to keep covering up Ethics Committee records of Members of Congress who engaged in sexual harassment records [sic], the Oversight Committee passed our motion to subpoena the taxpayer-funded settlement SLUSH FUND used to silence victims. Every Member of Congress who used your money to silence victims they harassed will be exposed, and we look forward to reviewing the records from the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights. We will make sure YOU, the people, know their names.”

Calls for disclosure of the so-called slush fund have been going on for years. In late 2024, then-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) called for the release of the payouts and the names associated with them. The “slush fund” was estimated to be over $17 million at the time.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Politics, Tony gonzales, Us house, Congress, House ethics committee, Nancy mace, Rep nancy mace, Anna paulina luna, Marjorie taylor greene, Thomas massie, Slush fund 

blaze media

Speaker Johnson tells Tony Gonzales to drop re-election bid after affair admission

House Republican leadership has officially called for disgraced Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales to drop his re-election bid.

The scandal-ridden congressman faced calls to resign after reports indicated he had an affair with a staffer, Regina Santos-Aviles, who later committed suicide by setting herself on fire. Gonzales dodged the allegations for weeks but admitted to the affair in a Wednesday interview, prompting an official call to step down from Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) as well as House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), and Chairwoman Lisa McClain (R-Mich.).

‘Let’s get to work.’

“The Ethics Committee has announced an investigation into Congressman Tony Gonzales’s conduct, and we urge them to act expeditiously,” Republican leadership said in a joint statement. “Congressman Gonzales has said he will fully cooperate with the investigation.”

“We have encouraged him to address these very serious allegations directly with his constituents and his colleagues. In the meantime, Leadership has asked Congressman Gonzales to withdraw from his race for re-election.”

RELATED: ‘I made a mistake’: Tony Gonzales admits to affair with staffer who set herself on fire

Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP via Getty Images

Gonzales’ primary opponent, Brandon Herrera, nearly unseated him in 2024, and the two candidates are currently heading to a runoff in May. Herrera holds a narrow lead over Gonzales in the 2026 primary and has embraced leadership’s calls for his opponent to step down.

“I would like to thank Speaker Johnson and House leadership for holding Congressman Tony Gonzales accountable for actions that have tarnished the office,” Herrera said in a post on X. “I’m looking forward to representing the district the way the people of West Texas have always deserved. Let’s get to work.”

RELATED: ‘Really disgusting’: Damning alleged texts prompt Republicans to call for scandal-ridden Tony Gonzales’ resignation

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Gonzales has not yet confirmed whether he will step down from the race. His office did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Tony gonzales, Brandon herrera, Mike johnson, Steve scalise, Tom emmer, Lisa mcclain, House republicans, Donald trump, Regina santos-aviles, 2026 primary, Texas primary, Republican primary, Politics 

blaze media

Jasmine Crockett crashes out in Senate bid — but is Talarico the Democrats’ ‘silent but deadly’ weapon?

Jasmine Crockett’s run for Senate has come to an end, with Democrat James Talarico handily beating the congresswoman and advancing to the general election — and BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock is not surprised.

“She didn’t campaign against her number-one opponent. She campaigned against Donald Trump,” Whitlock says, pointing out that her campaign ad featured a shot of Crockett staring straight ahead while a voice-over of Donald Trump insulting her played.

“Who told her that was going to work? Letting Trump talk accurately about you on camera for 30 seconds — that somehow was going to win you [the] election?” Whitlock asks.

However, Chad O. Jackson doesn’t believe it’s the time to be running any victory laps.

“Her opponent, James Talarico, is far worse than Jasmine Crockett is, in terms of his effectiveness in pushing the agenda that they’re pushing. It’s interesting because Jasmine Crockett has become this kind of household name in a negative way for a lot of Republicans and conservatives, for the very reason that she’s very boisterous and she’s very out there and what many people would call ‘ghetto,’” Jackson tells Whitlock.

“James Talarico is much more silent, but he’s much more deadly. Talarico represents a lot of what’s wrong, but he also is a heretic and he’s a fraud. He is a proponent of the social gospel, the, you know, liberation theology,” he explains.

“He has this so-called faith-forward agenda, where he adheres to a kind of progressive theology, and he’s been effective in terms of pushing leftist secularist policies here in the state of Texas,” he continues.

“Somebody like a Jasmine Crockett or an AOC — they’re easy to point at and say, ‘Oh, these people shouldn’t be in Congress; they shouldn’t be in politics,’ and I fully agree with that. But … it’s really easy to defeat their policies. These more silent and yet deadly people are more effective — and therefore more dangerous,” he adds.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Camera phone, Free, Sharing, Upload, Video, Video phone, Youtube.com, Jason whitlock harmony, Jason whitlock, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Chad o jackson, James talarico, Jasmine crockett, Senate, Texas senate race