Category: blaze media

Big Tech companies helped censor Americans during COVID. Now many of the same interests pillaging rural America for surveillance data centers want to suppress debate over their next great project. This time, they are not merely trying to censor speech. They are helping create the pretext to criminalize it.

Federal and state law enforcement should have their hands full with real threats: jihadist networks, political assassinations, attacks against ICE, and the growing culture of left-wing violence that led to Charlie Kirk’s murder. Yet last week, Wired obtained documents showing a coordinated effort among the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis, and roughly 80 regional fusion centers to monitor supposed anti-tech and anti-data-center violence.

It is disgraceful to watch law enforcement silence Americans on behalf of Big Tech.

More than 1,000 pages of internal DHS, FBI, and fusion-center reports describe “anti-technology extremism” as an emerging domestic threat based largely on a handful of unverified threats against politicians. No one should excuse genuine threats or violence. But the idea that data-center opponents have created a domestic threat requiring this level of federal coordination is absurd. It is gaslighting dressed up as intelligence work.

This is the same logic behind the Trump administration’s decision to station marshals with surveyors for data-center transmission lines in Carroll County, Maryland. The point was not to respond to credible threats. The point was to frame opposition — especially in one of Maryland’s most conservative counties — as dangerous before the debate even began.

Which brings us to Dixon, Illinois.

Last week, resident Harley Delander organized a Facebook protest outside the home of former state Rep. Tom Demmer (R), who is now promoting a 387-acre data-center site through the Lee County Industrial Development Association. People can debate the prudence of protesting at an official’s residence, though such protests have become common in local disputes. But police produced no credible evidence that Delander or his friends planned violence.

Delander was arrested outside his home 12 hours later and charged with two felonies: intimidation and stalking. Police said his communications “knowingly and willfully” caused fear for Demmer and his family’s safety. Delander recorded the arrest.

This reflects a growing trend: criminalizing sharp public debate based on how a public official claims to feel rather than what a citizen actually did.

A Massachusetts resident was sentenced to prison and spent a full year behind bars before trial for writing angry emails to a local Michigan politician. The emails were ugly — the sort of language elected officials receive every day — but they contained no personal threats or even veiled threats. He was extradited to Oakland County, Michigan, in December 2023 and charged under Michigan’s law against intimidating public officials, which hinges on whether the “victim” felt “terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.”

RELATED: After fierce debate, Trump opts for federal controls in AI development

Arvitalya/Getty Images

We have reached the point where heated political debate — a tradition as old as Adams and Jefferson — can become grounds for abridging the First Amendment. What a way to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence!

The crackdown is not limited to nasty emails or home protests. Across the country, law-abiding rural residents, many of them seniors, are getting roughed up or arrested for speaking too long or objecting too loudly at data-center hearings.

On February 17, Oklahoma farmer Darren Blanchard exceeded his three-minute speaking limit by a few seconds at a Claremore City Council town hall on “Project Mustang,” a proposed AI data center backed by Beale Infrastructure. Once his time expired, he stopped speaking and walked to the rostrum to give the city manager a written copy of his remarks. For that, police handcuffed and removed him, transported him to Rogers County Jail, and booked him on criminal trespassing charges.

In April, Imperial County, California, resident Ismael Arvizu was arrested and charged with trespassing, disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, and threatening a public official. Did he attack an official? No. After speaking during his allotted time at an Imperial County Board of Supervisors meeting, Arvizu applauded when another resident threatened to start a recall petition against the supervisors. The Los Angeles Times reported that an officer led him out and arrested him, and prosecutors charged him with threatening a public official.

In Midland, Texas, video shows a resident calmly calling for a point of order under meeting rules at a data-center meeting. He was immediately grabbed and removed from the room. He does not appear to have been arrested or charged, but the point remains: Police increasingly seem prepared to remove data-center opponents before their speech, outbursts, or objections would traditionally qualify as disrupting a meeting.

RELATED: Self-driving trucks are about controlling the roads — not making them safer

Dylan Hollingsworth/Bloomberg/Getty Images

This is happening in deep-red counties across America. It is disgraceful to watch law enforcement silence Americans on behalf of Big Tech.

Recently, the Intercept obtained a law-enforcement bulletin from a fusion center housed within the Philadelphia Police Department showing that federal authorities were monitoring anti-data-center social media posts for “domestic violent extremists.” The bulletin warned that “domestic violent extremists” were “likely interested in targeting artificial intelligence data centers,” posing physical and cyber threats to infrastructure in the Philadelphia region. Then it conceded that authorities lacked “specific information on plans to target AI data centers in the Philadelphia area.”

That is the whole game. Invent a vague threat, inflate it into a domestic extremism category, and use it to justify surveillance, intimidation, and arrests. Then pretend ordinary citizens are dangerous because they object to surrendering their land, power, and communities to Big Tech.

The irony is hard to miss. Governments at every level are deploying censorship, surveillance, and criminal enforcement to service an agenda built on surveillance, data extraction, and control.

Talk about paying for the rope to hang ourselves!

​Data centers, Ai, Big tech, Covid, Dhs, Fbi, Trump administration, Law enforcement, Ismael arvizu, Opinion & analysis, Artificial intelligence, Surveillance, First amendment, Protest, Domestic terrorism 

The cultural obsession with — and corresponding private-public support for — all things non-heterosexual is waning, having apparently reached its zenith sometime earlier this decade.

New Gallup polling shows that support for homosexual “marriage,” non-straight relations, and so-called transgenderism is collapsing.

‘Those pro-LGBTQ+ attitudes peaked about five years ago.’

Whereas in 2023, 71% of American adults said that homosexual “marriages” should be valid — up from 27% in 1996 — that number has since dropped to 65%.

After reaching an all-time high in 2022 of 71%, the percentage of U.S. adults who regard homosexual relations as “morally acceptable” fell to 62% this year, the lowest it has been in a decade. This decline shows no signs of stopping.

Gallup started asking Americans in 2021 whether “changing one’s gender is morally acceptable.” That year, 46% of respondents said “yes,” but this year, only 38% of Americans said the same.

Just 5% of Republicans and 42% of independents said that “changing one’s gender” is morally acceptable.

RELATED: Just 1 MLB team opts out of Pride Night as league shifts toward LGBT ‘package’

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

The polling outfit credited Republicans with the declining support for the LGBT agenda, noting that some of the most drastic changes in attitude regarding non-straight issues have taken place on the right.

In 2022, for instance, 55% of Republicans said that they support legal homosexual “marriage,” but over the past four years, that number has plummeted 18 percentage points.

Independents are similarly pumping the brakes on the rainbow train, with their support for same-sex “marriage” having fallen six percentage points.

While Democrats predominantly remain on board with the LGBT agenda, there are some signs of fatigue. This year, 81% said that homosexual relations are morally acceptable — down five points from 2025 — and 60% signaled support for transgenderism, down seven points since 2021.

“For about two decades, Americans grew more accepting of LGBTQ+ people and more supportive of their civil rights,” said Gallup. “However, those pro-LGBTQ+ attitudes peaked about five years ago and have since edged downward, mostly among Republicans.”

Coinciding with the change in attitude about non-straight issues, there has been a precipitous decline in the proportion of students identifying as “transgender” and “non-heterosexual,” as detailed in a study last year from the University of Buckingham’s Centre for Heterodox Social Science.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Lgbt, Gay, Homosexual, Trans, Transgender, Gallup, Poll, Opinion, Normalcy, Social contagion, Politics 

On June 2, Zach Lahn won the Iowa Republican gubernatorial primary. Campaigning as an “Iowa First” outsider focused on water quality, reducing corporate influence, and core conservative issues, the political newcomer and farmer/businessman pulled off a shocking upset, earning about 38% of the vote in a crowded five-candidate race and narrowly beating Trump-endorsed Rep. Randy Feenstra.

On this episode of the “Steve Deace Show,” Deace extracts “8 lessons” the political right can learn from Lahn’s stunning victory.

Lesson #1: Christian conservatives are changing from being profile-driven to issue-driven.

Deace explains that historically, Iowans have voted for people that look the part.

“We’re flyover country, and a lot of times the rest of the country just kind of wants to look down and sneer at us. So understanding us — being from us, one of us — is a big thing,” he says, noting how Iowa’s longtime senior Senator Chuck Grassley has been running successful campaign ads showing him “driving a tractor” for his entire political career.

But Lahn’s victory proved that voting based on profile is “no longer the model.”

“We can now see it’s a paradigm shift — that issues now matter more than the profile does,” says Deace, highlighting how Lahn “spoke to the issues” and defeated opponent Adam Steen who “represented the profile.”

Lesson #2: MAHA and Christian conservatives are the coalition of the future.

Lahn’s success was largely a result of his ability to appeal to Make America Healthy Again supporters. Endorsed by RFK Jr.’s MAHA Action PAC, his campaign zeroed in on Iowa’s cancer crisis, water toxicity, and use of chemicals and pesticides in farming.

Deace predicts that the union of MAHA advocates and conservative Christians will be the right’s strongest weapon in future elections.

“You see this especially with our mamas and our nanas,” he says, noting how the government’s handling of COVID-19 created a deep skepticism that will surely continue to influence voting.

Lesson #3: Issues still trump everything.

Just days before the primary, Deace — who had earlier endorsed Adam Steen — released a last-minute video endorsement for Lahn, which he says was the “last spackle of frosting on the cake” that pushed him to his razor-thin victory.

But that’s not a pat on his own back. Lahn, Deace argues, was only in the position where he could be nudged to victory because he ran on “hard-right issues.”

“If I put that video out about Zach Lahn, but he hasn’t been running all the issue ads they did the last few weeks, does it work? No,” he declares.

“They baked the entire cake. I helped them with the frosting.”

Lahn’s victory, he argues, is proof that “the number-one thing our people want to vote on is issues.”

Lesson #4: This wasn’t a ‘loss’ for President Trump, but one of his most impressive shows of force yet.

Many political observers and media outlets are interpreting Lahn’s win as a notable loss or setback for Trump, who endorsed Feenstra.

But Deace pushes back on that narrative. “Folks, this was actually one of the most impressive shows of force that Trump’s ever had with an endorsement,” he counters.

Deace marvels that Trump was able to “[take] a candidate that his own base did not like, who saw his negatives go up by 20 points in the last three months” and “in less than four days with no major media in our state” made him jump “at least 10 points.”

“He got people to vote for a guy they didn’t like because they like him more,” he says, calling it an “incredibly impressive feat.”

Even more impressive is that Trump was able to accomplish this despite rural Iowans suffering the most from the rise in diesel prices thanks to the U.S.’ ongoing conflict with Iran. The fact that Feenstra only narrowly lost to Lahn is proof of how deep Iowa’s Trump loyalty runs.

Lesson #5: The generational divide is real, and it’s here.

“What we saw is Feenstra won the oldest of voters, and Zach Lahn won every other group,” says Deace.

“If you’re 65 or older, you narrowly voted for Randy Feenstra, and if you were under 65, you narrowly voted for Zach Lahn,” he continues, noting that this same dynamic played out in the Thomas Massie-Ed Gallrein race.

Deace interprets this as proof of the “generational divide” within the Republican voter base.

Lesson #6: Reports of the demise of TPUSA continue to be greatly exaggerated.

Since the atrocious assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk in September 2025, several outlets have reported that the nonprofit, which is heavily credited with helping Trump get re-elected in 2024, is losing influence.

But Deace says Lahn’s victory debunks this claim.

Immediately after Trump endorsed Feenstra, TPUSA formally endorsed Lahn, which Deace speculates was not a counter-endorsement but rather coincidental timing.

Even though this was the first time TPUSA has ever gone against Trump, the organization stuck with the endorsement and went “all in,” with door-knockers and full effort the weekend leading up to the primary, proving TPUSA is still a strong, committed organization.

Deace calls it “a helmet sticker for TPUSA.”

Lesson #7: If you don’t come in with your money or already have high name ID, you probably can’t beat the establishment in a statewide election.

Deace argues that in today’s environment, it’s almost impossible for a first-time candidate like Adam Steen to win a statewide race unless he comes with wealth (like Lahn) or already has high name recognition — because campaigns are very expensive.

The other factor at play is Trump’s “king” power. His endorsement holds so much weight that major donors and organizations are scared to back anyone else, fearing that Trump might endorse an opponent and make the investment worthless.

That’s why Feenstra, who was “as dead as Star Wars” on the Thursday before the primary, almost won, says Deace. Trump’s last-second endorsement was powerful enough to boost him from hopeless to the narrow runner-up.

Lesson #8: Nominate candidates who energize and unify the base.

Deace argues that Lahn is a much stronger general election candidate than Randy Feenstra because Iowa Republicans have a huge built-in advantage: “over 200,000 more registered voters than Democrats.”

Feenstra, he says, “disappointed” and “dissed” the conservative base as a congressman, which would negatively affect voter turnout. At the same time, Democrats would do what they always do and call him “the worst, most Nazi, most homophobic, transphobic, racist that’s ever racisted and transphobited.”

With Lahn, however, the base is actually excited and unified, meaning more Republicans will actually show up to vote in November.

“With Zach, we have a chance to control what we can control — mobilize, unite our base, inspire our base with messaging they want to vote for, not branding they want to vote against,” says Deace.

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Steve deace, Donald trump, Steve deace show, Randy feenstra, Zach lahn, Iowa 

A disturbing discovery was made by police at a Minnesota home after a 14-year-old girl was reported missing from her school on May 26.

The parents of the girl called the Maplewood Police Department to report her missing, and the girl’s father told police the girl might have been at her friend’s home in Oakdale.

‘Her whole top half is out, and I’m like, “Whoa, what’s going on here? Why are you naked in front of a child?”‘

Police said they investigated the home and spoke to a woman named Angeline Olson. She told them the girl was not at the home but that she would take the girl home if she showed up there.

Police then said they returned to the home after a disturbing report from a neighbor at about 1:30 a.m.

“I came outside to smoke, and I’m minding my own business, and all of a sudden this little girl comes running past out her house, right in front of me, half naked,” said Teaira Vennes, the woman who called police.

“Next thing you know, Angel’s out the bushes, and Angel comes out naked. Like, her whole top half is out, and I’m like, ‘Whoa, what’s going on here? Why are you naked in front of a child?'” she added.

Police said the Olsons were argumentative and defied orders, so they were detained.

When police searched the home, they found the girl in a cardboard box that was under a pile of clothes in the Olson couple’s bedroom.

Police then obtained warrants to search the couple’s digital devices and found sexually explicit videos with the Olsons and the victim.

The couple was arrested, and 47-year-old Angeline Olson was charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Andrew Olson, 49, was charged with three counts of possessing child sexual abuse material.

Their neighbors, who were outraged and terrified by the incident, told KARE-TV that Child Protective Services had taken away their teenage children prior to the incident.

“It’s not just another story; it’s another f**king victim. It’s another little girl,” Vennes said. “After going through this, I couldn’t never imagine that happening to my daughter.”

RELATED: Indiana teen targeted victims across several states for child sex abuse through social media, cops say

“My client is presumed innocent and looks forward to clearing his name where it counts: in court,” said John Chitwood, the lawyer for Andrew Olson.

Andrew Olson faces up to 18 years in prison if convicted, while Angeline Olson faces up to 30 years if convicted.

“They need to be locked up. I hope that they are locked up for a very, very long time,” Vennes added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Sexually explicit videos, Missing teen, Child sex abuse, Crime 

This week, as critics lined up to call Steven Spielberg’s June 12 film “Disclosure Day” the best thing he has made in 20 years, Glenn Beck made a point on his program that matters more than the movie.

The real story, Beck argued, is not whether Spielberg is running a quiet psychological operation for the Pentagon. The real story is that we have entered what Beck calls “the death of free will” — an age in which the device in your pocket studies what frightens you, flatters you, and keeps you watching, then feeds each of us a private version of reality until no two Americans can agree on what is true.

A faction that insists on deciding how much reality you can handle and an algorithm that quietly decides which reality you will see are two versions of the same problem.

He is right. I would push the point one step further.

That is precisely why the fight over UFO disclosure matters more than it appears.

I am an attorney by training and a California public school science teacher of 19 years. I have published 20 books, all on governmental and corporate corruption, and none of them touched anything I would have called fringe. Two and a half years ago, I co-wrote “Catastrophic Disclosure: The Deep State, Aliens, and the Truth” with documentary filmmaker Michael Mazzola.

I came to the subject as a skeptic. What convinced me something serious was being hidden was not a sighting or a leaked photograph. It was a congressional hearing.

On July 26, 2023, three credentialed witnesses — Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch and Navy pilots Ryan Graves and David Fravor — testified before the House Oversight Committee. Anyone who has covered Capitol Hill knows witnesses are vetted exhaustively before they testify under oath.

Grusch described an active military program of UFO crash recovery, reverse engineering, and the retrieval of “biologic” remains. He said he was denied access when he asked for it. Either the witnesses were lying, or the government was. As a lawyer, my instinct was to look for what we call best evidence: the earliest accounts, made before anyone had reason to shade the truth.

That brings me to the documents.

RELATED: Pentagon publishes first tranche of ‘hidden’ UFO files

AFP/Getty Images

On May 8, the Pentagon began releasing what it calls “never-before-seen” files on unidentified anomalous phenomena under a new program called PURSUE. The first tranche, roughly 162 documents, includes Apollo-era astronaut sightings, decades-old military records, and pilot encounter reports over the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. More tranches are promised on a rolling basis. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called it “the first in what will be an ongoing joint declassification and release effort.”

One document, dated December 19, 1947, is a letter from H.M. McCoy, the Air Force chief of intelligence, transmitting reports on what were then called “flying discs.” McCoy wrote that continued reports from qualified observers still made the matter one of concern.

A second document — a September 23, 1947, assessment by Lt. Gen. Nathan Twining of the Air Materiel Command — is blunter. Twining concluded that “the phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.” He described disc-shaped objects roughly the size of manned aircraft, with metallic surfaces, maneuvering in ways that suggested intelligent control at estimated speeds above 300 knots.

That was the Air Force’s own view in 1947. In 2026, our best and brightest still cannot give the public a credible answer. We have walked on the moon. We have edited human DNA. Yet, we still cannot explain what military pilots record on infrared cameras over the Persian Gulf.

Credit where it is due. The May 8 release would not have happened without the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), and the persistence of Reps. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) and Eric Burlison (R-Mo.). President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth deserve credit for the directive that made it possible. This is real progress and the kind of transparency that should not be a partisan question.

But it is a first step, not a final one.

When I started the book, my co-author described a quiet war inside the national security state between two factions. One wanted “controlled” disclosure, a careful release at a pace the public could absorb. The other wanted “full” disclosure, the entire record at once. The first faction feared the second would trigger what it privately called catastrophic disclosure — a revelation severe enough to disrupt the basic institutions of public life.

RELATED: The real mystery isn’t UFOs — it’s what the government won’t explain

Moor Studio/Getty Images

What that faction fears the public will learn, I do not know. I will not pretend I do.

Here is where Beck’s warning and my book meet. A faction that insists on deciding how much reality you can handle and an algorithm that quietly decides which reality you will see are two versions of the same problem. Both take away the same thing: the right to look at the evidence and judge it for yourself.

Beck worries that the machine will hand each of us a custom world and convince us we discovered it on our own. The defense against that is not a better algorithm. It is a shared, documented, public record — primary sources and sworn testimony any citizen can read and weigh.

That is exactly what disclosure produces. It is also exactly what the “controlled” faction wants to ration.

In an age when truth is splintered into a million private feeds, a common set of facts is not a small thing. It may be the only thing.

On June 12, Spielberg releases “Disclosure Day.” He has spent his career telling stories about contact, from “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” to “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.” He is a serious filmmaker with serious sources. The question is whether the disclosure he puts on screen looks like what the government released May 8 — or like something larger it is still holding back.

I hope it is the larger one.

Beck asks what is real. In a free country, the answer starts with the documents.

The American public can handle them. We have earned them.

​Ufos, Steven spielberg, Disclosure day, Aliens, Pentagon, Glenn beck, Extraterrestrial life, Opinion & analysis 

Federal prosecutors said that four suspects turned themselves in after an investigation into a $30 million Medicaid fraud scheme.

Two Ohio state employees and two co-conspirators were indicted in the scheme that fraudulently billed the federal government for children’s behavioral health services, according to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.

‘These initial suspensions mark a critical step forward in ensuring accountability and deterring abuse within the Medicaid system.’

Two of the defendants falsely claimed to provide the medical services through behavioral health organizations that they owned and operated, according to Blanche.

The four suspects were hit with 32 counts in the indictment.

The fake services provided included behavioral therapy and psychotherapy for young people who attended summer camps, church groups, and recreational programs. They allegedly diagnosed the kids with a behavioral adjustment disorder, but no tests were performed, and the children received no actual care.

Among the 14 luxury vehicles seized in the investigation were a Maserati, six Mercedes Benz, a Jaguar, a Bentley, and a McLaren.

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel added that $600,000 was seized through seven bank accounts.

The investigation was a part of the administration’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, led by Vice President JD Vance.

“It is disgusting that fraudsters were allowed to deprive essential developmental services from American children in need,” a spokesperson for Vance said to CBS News.

“Countless lives could have been made better by the millions of tax dollars stolen, but instead they were used to purchase luxury cars,” the spokesperson added. “This is another example of the type of fraud the vice president’s task force is putting a stop to.”

RELATED: Newsom lashes out at report of MASSIVE fraud in California

Also on Thursday, Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine’s administration announced the suspension of Medicaid payments to 49 businesses providing home health care that were flagged for waste, fraud, or abuse.

“These initial suspensions mark a critical step forward in ensuring accountability and deterring abuse within the Medicaid system,” said the Ohio Department of Medicaid Director Scott Partika. “We will continue using advanced analytics and enforceable action to protect Ohioans and preserve program integrity.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Federal bureau of investigation, Justice department, Trump administration, Politics, Medicaid fraud 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent battled it out with Democratic Rep. Linda Sanchez of California during a hearing of the House Ways and Means Committee Thursday.

Sanchez accused Bessent of being complicit with what she called corruption of the Trump administration when they entered a shouting match at the end of her comments.

‘The congresswoman is slanderous. She has nothing but the unsubstantiated opinions, and I will not stand for that!’

She asked him about whether he had reviewed the decision to give the president’s family complete immunity from being audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

“Why are you allowing President Trump and his family to have complete immunity from being audited?” Sanchez asked.

“Since you’re a lawyer, you will understand that the U.S. Treasury and the IRS are represented by the Justice Department and the acting attorney general,” Bessent responded.

Sanchez interrupted and accused Bessent of refusing to answer questions about the immunity order.

“I’m curious to know who counts as Trump’s ‘family’ for the purposes of this immunity. Is it his children, his in-laws, his grandchildren, his second or third cousin, his great-great-grandchildren? Do you know the answer to that question, Mr. Secretary?” she asked.

“Again, I imagine you have the Justice Department phone number. I suggest you call them,” Bessent responded.

“I’m not the one that runs the Department of the Treasury or that oversees what is happening with this immunity that has been granted,” Sanchez fired back.

“I’m not the one either,” Bessent said. “We follow the instructions of our lawyers, and we obey the law.”

“I hope that you’re proud of your performance today,” Sanchez said.

“Well, I hope you get some social media clips!” Bessent said to Sanchez.

“I think it’s pretty safe to say that this is probably the most corrupt Treasury Department in our nation’s history!” Sanchez said.

“I am going to have to take exception to that. That is a slanderous statement!” Bessent hollered.

“While you dance around questions to protect Trump, Americans are suffering in Trump’s spiraling economy. Inflation is now raising faster than average hourly wages, gas prices are at an all-time high with the war in Iran,” Sanchez said.

“Nah!” Bessent interjected.

“The price of groceries has risen 3.2% over the past years, and prices on most goods have gone up because of Trump’s tariffs,” she continued. “So I don’t see how you can call that anything other than a failure of the most corrupt Treasury Department in history.”

Bessent was given the chance to respond after Sanchez’s time was over.

“The congresswoman is slanderous. She has nothing but the unsubstantiated opinions, and I will not stand for that!” Bessent hollered.

RELATED: Scott Bessent slaps down Newsom at Davos: ‘He’s here with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros’

“There is nothing corrupt. We move at the highest levels, and just because she cannot get the answer she wants, if she would like to give me facts — she seems … short on facts, long on hot air. And I will not stand for that,” he added.

“It’s a disgrace to make a remark like that,” Bessent concluded.

The IRS audit immunity order was announced by the Justice Department as a part of the $20 billion lawsuit from the president over the leak of his IRS documents.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Scott bessent, Rep linda sanchez, Irs audit immunity, Treasury department, Politics 

The momentum behind Spencer Pratt’s campaign is only growing, as his chances of beating his Democrat opponents are up significantly.

While according to the polls he had a 7% chance in February, he was up to a 26% chance at the end of May.

“There’s so much hype around Spencer Pratt, and that’s because he’s done a good job with this campaign. Like, he’s, I would say, outperformed expectations in a major way. The fact that anyone thinks he has any chance of winning this election is impressive,” BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere says.

“This is a place, if you don’t know, where Donald Trump lost this election by over 40 points in 2024, in an election that Donald Trump won, right? So to come in as a Republican and try to win in this area is near-impossible,” he continues.

“Almost everything has to go your way,” he adds, “And with Pratt, a lot of it has.”

One element that’s working in Pratt’s favor is his “completely incompetent opponent,” Karen Bass — who is polling only slightly above the reality star.

Pratt’s AI ads are also working well for his campaign, with one of his latest showing a conversation between a husband, wife, and their son, whom they found to be searching “Spencer Pratt” online.

“In this house, we don’t believe in Spencer Pratt. He’s MAGA,” the father told the son, who asked, “What about Spencer Pratt is MAGA?”

“You know those streets downtown, the ones that are full of piss and homeless people? He wants to clean them up,” the father responded.

“And those neighborhoods that burned down — the Palisades, Malibu — he wants to rebuild them,” the mother chimed in, wiping a tear away.

“You know how people inject heroin in front of children at the park? He wants to stop that,” the father added.

“There’s still that weird uncanny valley thing going on with the AI, but he’s just really good at the messaging here. Like, you shouldn’t be embarrassed to vote for a guy who wants to clean up your streets,” Stu comments.

Dave points out that Karen Bass has said that if there is “a homeless encampment near you, you’re not safe.”

“So is that MAGA?” Dave asks.

“The whole city is a homeless encampment.”

Pratt has also been expertly using social media, where he recently posted a video of a Los Angeles ballot box surrounded by homeless people.

“That’s how voting is supposed to happen,” Stu says, “you’re supposed to drop it over a homeless body as you put your ballot in the ballot box.”

Want more from Stu and Dave?

To enjoy more of Stu and Dave’s lethal blend of wit, humor, and insightful commentary subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Stu burguiere, Spencer pratt, Karen bass, Dave landau, Los angeles, Ai, Maga, Homeless, Stu and dave do america 

Audience members were thrilled and confused by former President Joe Biden interrupting his wife at a publicity event for her memoir.

Jill Biden was being interviewed by Whoopi Goldberg about “View from the East Wing” on Tuesday when the former president shuffled out of his seat in the front to address her.

‘My book … my book, which comes out in September, read it.’

Joe Biden was protected by security guards but did not have a microphone, which led many to believe the moment was unplanned.

“I have a question,” he said.

“Joe has a question. Like you couldn’t ask it later?” Jill Biden replied to laughter from the audience.

“Who do you love most in the whole world?” he asked.

“Whoopi,” she joked.

While the audience laughed at her joke, her husband didn’t, and the uncomfortable exchange continued.

“I love you most, Joe. Was that it? Was that the answer he wanted?” she added.

“It’s overwhelming, isn’t it?” he replied.

“Overwhelming, well, that’s what keeps him on his toes. He’s never 100% sure. I always keep him guessing. Is that not true?” she responded.

Goldberg tried to steer away from the bizarre interaction, but the former president pressed on, prompting a staffer to hand him a microphone.

“My book … my book, which comes out in September, read it,” he said.

“Do I have to remind him that this is my event?” Jill Biden joked.

“The only thing that Jill does better than write, she’s a beautiful woman,” he said.

RELATED: Trump slams ‘Crooked Politician’ Biden over attempt to block release of interview

The former president has been out of the spotlight since he dropped out of his re-election campaign in July 2024 and handed off the Democratic baton to Kamala Harris. He’s also being treated for stage four prostate cancer, which was revealed to the public in May 2025.

The former first lady has faced criticism for recently admitting that she was shocked by her husband’s condition during the June 2024 presidential debate against Trump that eventually led then-President Biden to quit his re-election campaign.

“I was frightened because I had never, ever seen Joe like that before or since. Never,” she said.

“I don’t know what happened. As I watched it, I thought, ‘Oh my God, he’s having a stroke.’ And it scared me to death,” she added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Jill biden, Joe biden, Video, Biden health, Politics 

In 2024, Pat McAfee made a controversial statement about WNBA superstar Caitlin Clark — calling her a slur while complimenting her.

“There’s one white bitch for the Indiana team who is a superstar, and it is because she stayed in Iowa and put an entire state on her back and took a program from nothing to a multiple-year success story,” McAfee said on his show.

BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock has watched as the disrespect for Clark because of the color of her skin and superstar status has only grown — and he believes it’s time for big names like McAfee to step up and defend her.

“I’m disappointed with someone like Pat McAfee,” Whitlock says.

“And I’m saying this today trying to inspire him. He’s based right there in Indianapolis. He’s talked about Caitlin Clark previously. He has all the power and leverage at ESPN. He can say whatever the hell he wants and has previously on Caitlin Clark,” he explains.

“But you know what Pat? We need more than you being on ESPN calling Caitlin Clark a ‘white bitch’ as you did previously,” he continues.

“You didn’t say it in a negative way, but you said it. We need more than that. We need you to draw a line in the sand and say, ‘Hey man, whatever the Fever got going on here … the Stephanie White liberation army, this group of angry lesbian feminists that are running the Indiana Fever organization,’ you need to call them out,” he adds.

And Whitlock points out that Clark herself has “Stockholm syndrome” and “can’t speak for herself,” which is why someone like McAfee needs to step up and tell “Indianapolis and Indiana Fever fans, ‘Stay out of that arena until they clean out this left-wing alphabet mafia garbage.’”

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Fearless, Jason whitlock, Caitlin clark, Pat mcafee, Wnba, Indiana fever, Fearless with jason whitlock 

A Catholic priest who was officially employed as an exorcist has been removed from his role.

The Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., said the firing came in direct response to comments made in late May surrounding UFOs and aliens.

‘They can do things that we can’t do.’

Cardinal Robert McElroy, the Archbishop of Washington, D.C., said in a press release on Wednesday that Monsignor Stephen Rossetti, a priest of the Diocese of Syracuse, N.Y., would no longer be affiliated with the archdiocese where he was used as an exorcist.

Rossetti recently made comments in a YouTube video saying that his personal belief was that aliens were most likely demonic entities.

“There’s no question in my mind … that probably many, if not most of these UFO sightings, are in fact demons,” Rossetti said in a video that has been removed from YouTube.

It has since been noted that Rossetti is a former Air Force intelligence officer who spent six years in service. Rossetti confirmed this in a 2024 interview, describing himself as a signals intelligence officer, while other biographies have also listed him as working in an intelligence capacity.

RELATED: Exorcisms are exploding across America — but nobody wants to admit why

Grzegorz Galazka/Archivio Grzegorz Galazka/Mondadori Portfolio/Getty Images

Rossetti is also listed as a former serviceman in an official Air Force document, where he is described as a “distinguished graduate of the Air Force Academy class of 1973.”

“They can do things that we can’t do, thus the speed and all sorts of things that human beings can’t,” Rossetti said in his recent video. “They will try to manipulate us.”

Cardinal McElroy said Rossetti’s statements that linked “UFOs to demonic presence” and his social media activity “gravely undermine the Church’s very precise teaching on the devil, demons, and exorcism.”

Rossetti responded to the press release by saying he was “saddened” by the decision and asked for forgiveness if he had not been faithful to the “teachings of the Church’s Magisterium.”

“I believe it is of the utmost importance to be obedient to the Church, and I will continue to endeavor to subject all that I do and the Center to be thus obedient,” he added.

RELATED: EXORCIST: Is America demonically possessed?

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The comments come at a time of increased UFO disclosure, which has included a trove of government documents revealing reports of unknown objects like “glowing orbs.”

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) in particular has been at the forefront of remarkable claims about aliens and UFOs/UAPs in recent months.

Burchett has claimed that alien aircraft, life forms, and even human-alien breeding programs are confirmed to exist.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Ufo, Aliens, Demons, Tech, Exorcism, Catholic church, News, Faith 

Former National Security Adviser John Bolton will reportedly plead guilty to one of the 18 federal charges against him, according to sources who spoke to CNN.

Bolton was indicted by a federal grand jury in Maryland in Oct. 2025 on eight counts of unlawful transmission of national defense information and 10 counts of unlawful retention of national defense information.

‘I think he’s, you know, a bad person. I think he’s a bad — yeah, he’s a bad guy. It’s too bad. But that’s the way it goes, right? That’s the way it goes.’

The 77-year-old is expected to plead to one count of illegal retention of sensitive documents and also agree to pay a fine of $2.25 million.

Federal prosecutors alleged that he illegally retained classified documents and information for the purpose of writing his 2020 memoir, “The Room Where It Happened.”

Bolton had allegedly sent thousands of pages of classified national security material via a private email server to his family members before he was fired by Trump in Sept. 2019.

“While Bolton was a national security adviser, he was literally stealing classified information, utilizing his family as a cutout,” said a top U.S. official to the New York Post after Bolton’s offices were raided in Aug. 2025.

President Donald Trump has lambasted Bolton often since tossing him out of his first administration.

“Washed up Creepster John Bolton is a lowlife who should be in jail, money seized, for disseminating, for profit, highly Classified information,” said the president in June 2020.

Bolton is expected to admit to improperly keeping classified information in his diaries, but he is expected to continue to deny he illegally carried classified documents out of government offices.

The sources indicated that Bolton is likely to plea guilty at his arraignment on June 26.

Neither Bolton nor the Justice Dept. commented on the report, according to ABC News.

RELATED: DOJ fires back at John Bolton over accusations in his book

“You’re telling me for the first time, but I think he’s, you know, a bad person,” the president said in October about Bolton’s indictment. “I think he’s a bad — yeah, he’s a bad guy. It’s too bad. But that’s the way it goes, right? That’s the way it goes.”

He was facing 10 years in prison for each of the 18 counts in the indictment.

Bolton worked in the Trump administration as national security adviser between 2018 and 2019. He had been a longtime proponent of regime change in Iran, but he has criticized how the president has handled the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Classified documents, John bolton, National security adviser, Trump administration, Politics, Donald trump 

On June 1, Vickrum Digwa — the British-born Sikh man from Southampton who stabbed and killed 18-year-old British university student Henry Nowak over false claims of racism in December 2025 — was sentenced to life in prison.

The day following Digwa’s sentencing, released bodycam footage from the incident sparked a furious national uproar.

The footage captured police handcuffing and treating the dying Nowak as the aggressor based on Digwa’s false racism claim, while he repeatedly pleaded, “I’ve been stabbed,” and “I can’t breathe” — fueling widespread anger over perceived two-tier policing and racial bias in how officers responded. A particularly chilling image from the footage showing Nowak’s pale, bloodless hand in handcuffs has gone viral.

BlazeTV host Steve Deace wonders if this horrific case will finally “light the powder keg in the U.K.”

While Deace believes the outrage over the Nowak case has revitalized Reform U.K. leader Nigel Farage, making him sound like his stronger, more outspoken “Brexit-era” self again, he fears that the U.K. still lacks a strong enough political party or movement to actually ignite change — especially given the enormity of the task ahead.

“History shows Islamists don’t ever just peacefully hand over cultures,” he says, speculating that to successfully uproot Islam from British culture will take far more than the current “embers of resistance.”

Co-host Todd Erzen is even less hopeful. “I don’t think this is going to wake anybody up. Nobody wants to be awake. That’s the thing. They want to be comfortably numb there,” he says.

Aaron McIntire agrees, noting that more Brits would likely riot over Arsenal’s Champions League loss to PSG than over Nowak’s treatment and the broader erosion of British culture by mass immigration.

“The Christian worldview does not allow for nihilism, does not allow for black pilling, but I’m just trying to analyze this realistically,” he admits. “What would you point to to say that there is an appetite?”

The only leverage the U.K. has left, says Deace, is “the zero option” — the ultimate escalation of no-limits force.

But even this method isn’t foolproof.

“Sometimes against jihadists, you don’t even have that because now they’re just like, ‘You know what’s on the other end of zero option? Forty vestal virgins and a law in eternity,’” he says.

Even still, he believes zero option remains the only hope of change.

To hear more of the panel’s discussion, watch the episode above.

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve’s take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Steve deace show, Steve deace, Henry nowak, Uk, Britain, Two-tiered justice system 

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) ratified a radical piece of Democratic legislation last week that will force colleges across the state to moonlight as dispensaries for abortion drugs like mifepristone, thereby encouraging college-age women to abort the next generation.

‘College students shouldn’t have to go through hoops.’

House Bill 1335 — a bill sponsored by state Rep. Lorena Garcia, a Democrat who ensured last year that all Coloradan taxpayers contribute to abortion — requires that:

Thirty-two Colorado colleges with student health facilities “provide abortion medication to all students enrolled at the institution”;On-campus pharmacies “maintain a stock of and provide access to abortion medication to students” enrolled at the school; andColleges without on-site pharmacies submit prescriptions for abortion medications to off-campus pharmacies or alternatively dispense abortion drugs through their student health centers.

The law goes into effect on Aug. 1, 2027.

Among the organizations that condemned the legislation and urged Polis to consider a veto was the Colorado Catholic Conference, which deemed HB 1335 “a violation of the sanctity of life of preborn children.”

RELATED: James Talarico’s WOKE CHURCH raises money to fund abortions and transgender summer camp for children

WOJTEK RADWANSKI/AFP/Getty Images

“Requiring colleges and universities to stockpile abortion pills will destroy more human life and cause serious physical, emotional and mental harm to many young women,” the CCC stated. “Additionally, HB26-1335 violates the religious freedom of insurers who do not cover abortion.”

Lydia Davis, a spokeswoman for Students for Life of America, warned about the dangers of abortion drugs.

Davis told the College Fix that “these deadly drugs have killed millions of babies, harmed women, and polluted our water systems with chemically tainted fetal remains flushed into our sewer systems. This bill would turn college campuses into abortion distribution centers and continue transforming our sewers into cemeteries.”

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, there were at least 36 patient deaths associated with mifepristone between September 2000 and December 2024.

Adverse events have also been reported in 2,740 cases of women who took mifepristone to kill their unborn children. Between November 2012 and December 2024, 288 women who used mifepristone were hospitalized; 190 experienced blood loss requiring transfusions; and 114 suffered infections, the USDA reported.

Rebecca Weaver, director of advocacy for the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists Action, said in her written testimony to Colorado lawmakers that the legislation “imposes sweeping requirements without establishing basic medical safeguards, creating significant risks to women’s health and undermining standards of care.”

Lloyd Benes, a Coloradan who testified earlier this year in opposition to the legislation, echoed some of AAPLOG Action’s concerns in an op-ed in the Loveland Reporter-Herald last month, stating that the legislation does not require campus clinics to provide informed consent; has no in-person dispensing requirement, raising concerns about potential coercion; has no ultrasound requirement, perhaps leaving ectopic pregnancies undetected; has no guidance on the disposal of human remains; and lacks conscience protections.

After Polis signed the bill into law, state Rep. Garcia stated, “This new law makes sure college students can easily access their constitutionally-protected right to reproductive healthcare. For college students, their entire lives center around campus, and this law makes medication abortion accessible through a student health clinic or pharmacy.”

State Rep. Kenny Nguyen (D) said, “College students shouldn’t have to go through hoops to receive their constitutionally-protected right to an abortion. Our law streamlines access to medication abortion accessible so college students can receive life-saving care.”

Regis University, a private Catholic school in Denver, is exempt from the law, Axios reported.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Abortion, Colorado, College, Democrats, University, Abortion pill, Pharmaceuticals, Death, Mifepristone, Politics 

Oil industry executives have reportedly warned the Trump administration that energy prices are likely to spike even more as reserves hurtle closer to a danger point.

Gas prices have already risen sharply as a result of the blockade by both the U.S. and Iran on the trade route through which much of the world’s oil travels, the Strait of Hormuz.

‘I hope they are paying attention to inventories right now. You’re hitting tank bottom.’

According to a Politico report, four executives confirmed that officials of the U.S. energy industry informed the administration that backup oil reserves are being depleted quickly.

“We’re at dangerously low levels already,” said an industry executive who requested anonymity. “We have shared those concerns at the highest levels of government about what’s coming in mid-to-late June. … I hope they are paying attention to inventories right now. You’re hitting tank bottom.”

However, a White House official flatly denied the Politico report.

“Politico’s anonymous sources are wrong,” the official said.

The report was supported by recent public statements from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and other oil companies about depleted oil backup resources.

Gas prices have risen on average by an astounding 42.9%, according to statistics from the Automobile Association of America. A gallon of gas cost just under $3 before the war started, reached as high as $4.50, and has settled recently at $4.26.

Exxon’s senior vice president, Neil Chapman, said at an investor conference that crude oil prices could hit $150 or $160 a barrel once reserves run out.

“You can debate whether that’s going to hit those really low levels in two weeks or three weeks. Once you get to that point, then you’ll see prices shoot up,” he said.

Another oil executive commented to Politico about Chapman’s statement.

“The administration has already been told that,” the executive said. “Don’t think that an open strait is going to mean your July 4 gasoline bill isn’t going to be higher than what it is today. It’s going to be.”

Others expressed surprise that the oil price shock hadn’t hit already.

RELATED: Gavin Newsom tries to blame gas companies for high gas prices — and gets NUKED by community note

The Trump administration points to policy changes it has made to alleviate oil prices, including a waiver to the Jones Act.

“President Trump and his energy team anticipated short-term market disruptions, communicated them openly to the American people, and implemented an aggressive plan to mitigate any impacts,” reads a statement from Taylor Rogers, a White House spokesperson. “President Trump will never allow Iran to possess a nuclear weapon, and he will continue to advance America’s core national security interests.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Blockade, Energy prices, Gas prices, Strait of hormuz, Politics 

President Donald Trump has criticized California for its vote-counting delay in the gubernatorial and Los Angeles mayoral races, accusing the state’s Democratic leaders of “BIG cheating.”

While California polls closed at 8 p.m. local time on Tuesday, that state’s counting appears to remain at a standstill as of Thursday morning.

‘Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS.’

Only 56% of the votes have been counted in the race for governor and 62% in the mayoral election, according to the Associated Press. This is a 2% decrease for both races compared to Wednesday morning.

In the race to replace Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, former Fox News host and small-business owner Steve Hilton (R) currently holds a slight lead over former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra (D), and climate advocate and businessman Tom Steyer (D) remains in third position.

Hilton has so far received 1,421,466 votes, Becerra received roughly 1,318,536, and Steyer received 1,019,332.

Despite the AP and other election data aggregators stating that the race is currently too early to call, Trump declared Hilton the winner on Wednesday afternoon.

“Congratulations to Steve Hilton on coming in first, last night, in the California Vote for Governor,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “If Californians are smart, which I know they are, they will put Steve into the Governor’s Mansion, and watch their State get better at a rate that has probably never been seen before. I know Steve — He is a hard driving WINNER, and he will turn California around, quickly — and the Federal Government will be there, with him, to help!”

The top two winners will face off again in November.

RELATED: California vote-counting continues: Who’s advancing in the governor and LA mayor races?

Frederic J. BROWN/AFP/Getty Images

Meanwhile, in the race for L.A. mayor, only incumbent Karen Bass has currently secured enough votes, 183,701, to move on to November’s runoff election, according to the AP.

Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt sits in second place with 157,116 votes, and L.A. City Councilwoman Nithya Raman is in third with 119,809.

On Wednesday afternoon, the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk claimed that many voters had returned their mail-in ballots on Election Day.

RELATED: ‘Doomsday scenario’: California governor race turns into high-stakes scramble as vote split may keep Republican out

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

Trump accused the “Dumocrats” in California of “trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES.”

“Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS,” he wrote on social media.

Trump announced that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles is investigating the vote-counting delay.

“There’s BIG cheating by the Dumocrats in California. Votes are all tied up. May not be in for weeks. Under investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles. Why the vote counting DELAY???” Trump wrote.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office declined Blaze News’ request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, California, Los angeles, Donald trump, Steve hilton, Spencer pratt, Karen bass, Xavier becerra, Tom steyer, Nithya raman, Politics 

Welcome, America, to the Thunderdome of AI oversight.

President Trump has dropped his executive order, putting the onus on the federal government’s most secretive agencies to determine whether the products of private corporations are safe for public consumption. The National Security Agency is at the heart of the plan, with the intelligence community setting classified benchmarks, vetting, and gatekeeping new AI models within a 30-day window. Private-sector institutions and stakeholders, including AI companies themselves, must sit and wait, blind, for decisions to be handed down.

It can’t be said that this decision is strongly supported by conservatives, the “based community,” or even MAGA people more narrowly. The personal, private bid by former White House AI and crypto chief David Sacks to stop the Trump train on AI resulted only in a delay and a narrowing of the oversight window. On X, Sacks had to resort to emphasizing the things the order doesn’t do that he and the accelerationist wing of the right oppose.

Is there anything we can tell these machines to do that doesn’t tend to demote us as human beings?

That means even Trump’s inner circle will keep on duking it out among themselves.

Congress is wrestling with OpenAI’s approach, which relies on (deep breath) the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation. In short, the idea is that oversight and testing should be carried out under the aegis of established and respected bodies that bridge government and industry through public-private partnerships. This approach allows AI companies themselves, plus other stakeholders and experts outside the intelligence community, to have a participatory role in testing and oversight of new models.

Yet Congress is sharply divided, and the upcoming midterm elections could alter the balance of power. Competing bills are already in the mix on Capitol Hill, with the leading piece of draft legislation, the bipartisan American Leadership in AI Act, hinging on outcomes in the rat’s nest of congressional politics — ranging from Louisiana Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s unwillingness to reauthorize the House AI Task Force to rank-and-file Democrats’ unfavorable disposition toward the draft bill.

Can both houses of Congress come to an agreement on AI model development as well as testing? One that Trump won’t veto? Probably not, but with anti-AI sentiment running hotter and hotter across the populist (and opportunist) wings of both parties, principled members and ambitious members alike are all but guaranteed to shoot their shot before November.

That means Americans won’t be looking to their elected representatives for clarity on AI.

RELATED: Why dystopian AI doomers need to get religion

The doomer delusion ArtMarie via iStock/Getty Images

And Pope Leo XIV, of course, has his landmark encyclical out there, insisting — along with many other Christians — that no law or regulation or basket of rules is enough to enable anyone, even the United States government, to get the kind of grip on AI that will ensure our sacred human being is no worse for wear.

But there’s no indication that America’s Christians, much less the world’s, are poised to throw down their doctrinal and ecclesiological differences and line up shoulder to shoulder with the pope’s presentation of things — or with the pope as a singular planetary spiritual authority on all matters AI and tech.

That means neither our leading political power players nor our leading spiritual authority figures will give Americans the kind of overall guidance they increasingly seem to crave.

Perhaps, however, we should all recognize that’s actually for the best, because the essence of the problem concerning AI is its risk, not of wiping out the human race, but of emptying the human race of all power and authority except for a tiny cyborg elite, one hell-bent on remaking all God’s creation, every single one of us included, in their monomaniacal image.

Paradoxically, responding to this risk by maximizing tech hate and consolidating all tech hatred into as tiny and powerful an elite as possible dramatically increases the risk of both wiping out the human race and deepening the would-be cyborg elite’s conviction that if they don’t achieve a radical and irreversible break with all to ever come before them, then they’ll meet a fate worse than death.

Back on our feet and back in charge

Given the dangers of over-centralized AI oversight on one hand and a regulatory war of all against all on the other, now is a good time to ask whether Bitcoin can offer ordinary people a more balanced, distributed, and practical path forward.

For all the noise and blather in the fractured crypto world, the case for Bitcoin in the AI age is simple: If we are not going to dismantle these machines — and if people will keep building more powerful ones — can we direct them toward anything that preserves rather than diminishes our human dignity?

The answer is obviously yes, but the combination of massive fear over techno-dystopia and massive resistance to “organized religion” leads many to paint themselves into a paralyzing psychological corner where no answer seems plausible or effective.

That’s a shame. Bitcoin is sitting right there, an advanced, mature technology that allows people with a minimum of new information or expertise to start creating and growing markets and institutions that benefit and protect themselves and their friends, families, and parishes, without having to rely on superintelligent machines or government financial systems.

Given that superintelligent machines and government financial systems have a clear logical and practical tendency to converge, becoming one system very well suited to enforcing a single, uniform, and servile existence worldwide, it would seem fairly urgent for people to consider the benefits of taking a few steps outside their zone of comfort or self-disempowerment and start to use Bitcoin at least a little with those they care about most.

That’s why I continue to offer my book on our tech reckoning, “Human Forever,” only in Bitcoin. Piling up the digital currency and waiting for Nirvana just isn’t going to cut it, whether we face a societal collapse scenario, an age of mandatory pleasure and plenty, or a mutant future that somehow combines both into one waking phantasmagoria. Using Bitcoin needs to happen well beyond the realm of books, obviously. But being a writer, well — I’m putting my money where my mouth is.

Is it enough to solve all our problems, with our machines and with one another? Obviously, again, no. But it just might fix our attention on how we can preserve human ways of life that open the way not just to solutions, but to salvation.

​Artificial intelligence, David sacks, Donald trump, Executive order, Intelligence community, National security agency, Opinion & analysis, Pope leo, Tech, Human forever, Oversight, Bitcoin, Religion, Christianity 

As controversy continues to swirl around the Freedom 250 Great American State Fair, one performer is making it clear he has no intention of dropping out: rapper Vanilla Ice.

The man behind the hit song “Ice Ice Baby” isn’t backing down from his decision to perform at the fair — which is a festival organized by Freedom 250, a nonprofit working with the White House Task Force 250.

When the lineup for the festival was announced, several large performers dropped out, including Martina McBride, Bret Michaels, Young MC, the Commodores, and Morris Day.

“We’re going to have a nice concert with a whole bunch of acts that haven’t been big in 35 to 40 years,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray jokes on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

“Vanilla Ice,” he says, adding, “And he was one that didn’t pull out.”

“I’m reinforced. I’m here. I am committed. Once you commit, you don’t quit, man. And that’s how I am,” Vanilla Ice said in an interview.

“And the way the people are dragging this into politics, it’s not fair,” he said. “It is not fair to us as entertainers for sure. And I think that this shouldn’t be looked at as political or anything.”

“I don’t think that doing a partisan rally is the way to go on this,” Gray comments, though he notes that he does “love what this president is trying to do to celebrate this country.”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Americas 250th birthday, Bret michaels, Commodores, Freedom 250, Ice ice baby, Martina mcbride, Morris day, Pat gray, Pat gray unleashed, Vanilla ice, Young mc 

A threat to livestock has re-emerged in South Texas and has prompted a significant response from state officials and food safety authorities in the Trump administration.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture flagged a potential South Texas case of New World screwworm, a flesh-eating parasite that is considered a real threat to livestock.

‘These eggs hatch into dangerous parasitic larvae, or maggots, which burrow or “screw” into flesh with sharp mouth hooks.’

The USDA confirmed that a sample has been taken to the USDA’s National Veterinary Services Laboratories in Ames, lowa, for “confirmatory testing.”

The agency confirmed that it is monitoring the situation on the ground in coordination with local partners.

RELATED: Exclusive: CBP stops 300+ hatching eggs at the border — possibly preventing bird flu outbreak

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The New World screwworm fly is a “devastating pest” whose larvae feed on the living tissue of warm-blooded animals, according to a USDA fact sheet available on a website page dedicated to screwworm information. A screwworm is roughly the size of a common house fly.

New World screwworm “flies lay eggs in open wounds or orifices of live tissue. These eggs hatch into dangerous parasitic larvae, or maggots, which burrow or ‘screw’ into flesh with sharp mouth hooks. NWS primarily infest livestock, but can also affect any warm-blooded animal, including wildlife, pets, humans, and birds,” according to a Texas Animal Health Commission document.

The screwworm fly thrives in warm, humid environments, making the national spread of screwworm unlikely.

On Wednesday night, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced that the tests at the laboratory in Iowa confirmed the detection of New World screwworm. She added that it was found in a “3 week old bovine in Zavala County, Texas.”

In another post, Rollins assured the public that “our food supply is 100% safe. This potential New World Screwworm detection is being fully contained and is not a harm to the American food supply or consumer safety.”

She added that a return of the parasite was expected last year, according to available predictions: “All models showed NWS coming to the U.S. last summer/early fall — so a big thank you to our partners across the industry and local, state and the entire Trump administration for unprecedented action that gave us almost an extra year to prepare for this moment.”

The extra time bought by those monitoring the situation may prove crucial in an already precarious moment for the beef industry.

According to an analysis of the USDA’s annual report on U.S. cattle inventory released on January 30, 2026, the cattle herd stands at 86.2 million head, its lowest point in 75 years. Beef prices have already been on the rise month over month for the past year with little relief in sight, and any drop in supply could drive them even higher.

Rollins encouraged all farmers to follow movement restrictions and treatment guidance provided by the Texas Animal Health Commission.

The Texas Animal Health Commission published a press release on Wednesday, stating that the agency has been preparing for a resurgence of NWS cases for “over two years” since “northward progression from Central America was observed in 2023.”

The U.S. government has historically had success eradicating the parasite and continuously pushing cases farther southward. The USDA, in fact, “declared the United States free of indigenous screwworms as early as 1966,” despite a severe outbreak with 90,000 cases in Texas alone by 1972.

The best method of stopping the spread of NWS is the mass release of sterile flies into the region in which cases are found. Flies are sterilized by being irradiated with gamma rays before being released into the area.

In April, the USDA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers broke ground on an $8.5 million sterile fly production facility at Moore Air Base in Edinburg, Texas. The initial facility is expected to be operational late 2027 with the production of 100 million sterile flies per week. The project will be scaled further to increase the production to 300 million flies per week in an effort to bolster the United States’ domestic strategy against the screwworm.

Rollins reportedly called the response an “all of Trump administration effort,” according to CNN.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Brooke rollins, Usda, Texas, Politics 

Vickrum Digwa, the Sikh who fatally stabbed and maligned white 18-year-old Henry Nowak in the U.K. in December, was convicted of the teen’s murder last week and sentenced on Monday to a minimum of 21 years in prison.

The British public now wants accountability for the police officers who responded to the scene of Nowak’s murder — those who reflexively accepted the Sikh’s false claim that the dying teen was a racist aggressor, arrested and handcuffed Nowak based on those false accusations, and then dismissed his final pleas.

‘They just hate white people.’

Following the release of bodycam footage showing Nowak’s undignified death in the custody of members of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary — one of whom has resigned — hundreds of Britons took to the streets of southern England in protest. Politicians, meanwhile, sounded off about the discriminatory policies and practices that lay the groundwork for the teen’s mistreatment.

Amnesty International decided to chime in on Tuesday with a tone-deaf statement that critics seized upon as further evidence of the organization’s ideological capture and moral bankruptcy.

Rather than condemn the police’s treatment of Nowak, Amnesty International — a London-headquartered NGO that is purportedly committed to challenging “injustice wherever it exists,” confronting “uncomfortable truths,” and pushing for “transformative change, even when it’s unpopular or politically inconvenient” — condemned the reactions from right-leaning politicians.

“At a time when hate crimes are rising, and violence and fear are becoming a daily reality for people of colour and migrants, calls for ‘cold, hard rage’ are completely reckless,” stated Amnesty International.

RELATED: Two-tier Britain finally has its George Floyd moment

Britons take to the streets to protest Henry Nowak’s treatment at the hands of Southampton police. Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images.

The “cold, hard rage” quote derives from a statement from Reform U.K. Party leader Nigel Farage: “The fear of being called racist was greater than dealing with Henry Nowak’s murder. We should respond to this with pure cold rage. Britain’s historic way of life is being thrown away.”

While acknowledging that Nowak’s murder “is an awful tragedy,” Amnesty International said that “irresponsible narratives of two-tier policing seek to sow division and fly in the face of decades of evidence of institutional failure within policing and disparities faced by racialised communities. This includes many cases of deaths in police custody for which meaningful steps towards accountability are long overdue.”

Amnesty International filed this reality–averse statement under “racial justice.”

Charlie Weimers, a Swedish member of the European Parliament, said in response to the NGO’s statement, “Amnesty has been morally bankrupt for a long time. A pure left-wing organization.”

“Amnesty International lost its moral compass many years ago,” wrote former Canadian Defense Minister and Alberta Premier Jason Kenney. “Sad that an organization that used to be hugely effective in advocating for prisoners of conscience was coopted to become a boringly predictable voice for the left’s omnicause.”

Amnesty International has in recent years expanded its advocacy to include championing abortion, pushing climate alarmism, and advancing the cause of LGBT cultural imperialism.

Turning Point USA contributor Jack Posobiec emphasized, “It’s not complicated. They just hate white people.”

Amnesty International was hardly alone in its effort this week to gaslight the public about two-tier policing in the United Kingdom.

Nigel Farage demanded in parliament on Wednesday that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “end this divisive practice of two-tier policing and make sure that all British citizens are treated the same.”

The leftist prime minister, who briefly expressed horror this week over Nowak’s mistreatment by police, responded by saying, “I don’t believe there’s two-tier policing in this country.” He proceeded to accuse Farage of attempting to exploit the tragedy.

While Starmer is evidently keen to pretend the U.K. doesn’t practice two-tier policing, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has announced it is reviewing its anti-racism guidance that, as currently worded, explicitly calls for treating people differently on the basis of race:

Our commitment to racial equity means producing equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups by responding to individuals and communities according to their specific needs, circumstances, and experiences, with understanding that these will be racialised and with the aim of reducing harm. It does not mean treating everyone “the same” or being “colour blind” (racial equality).

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Henry nowak, United kingdom, Britain, Policing, Racism, Discrimination, Murder, Sikh, Immigration, Dei, Leftism, Police, Amnesty international, National police chiefs’ council, Keir starmer, Nigel farage, Politics