Category: blaze media

Republicans were able to reach an agreement to vote Todd Blanche’s nomination through the Senate Judiciary Committee despite some senators’ concerns about the president’s “anti-weaponization fund.”

Blanche’s nomination for attorney general passed the committee Tuesday with a vote of 12 to 10 along party lines. It will now go before the entire Senate, which is controlled by Republicans.

‘Well, there’s nothing we could do to rein in the president, when he said he likes the fund, wishes it still exists.’

Democrats blasted the holdouts for caving on their demand that the Trump administration agree in writing to abandon the fund.

“To state the obvious, Mr. Blanche’s statement on the slush fund and the IRS immunity agreement are not signed by the parties to the settlement agreement and are therefore unenforceable,” said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee.

“The parties could still sue to enforce the agreement and the cop-beaters fund can easily be revived with a new order from the Department of Justice 15 minutes after Mr. Blanche is confirmed as attorney general,” he added.

Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, one of the previous dissenters, told reporters afterward that they got the assurance they needed to approve the nomination.

“Well, there’s nothing we could do to rein in the president, when he said he likes the fund, wishes it still exists,” he said. “But the fact of the matter it’s dead, and that’s all we could do under these circumstances.”

President Donald Trump had excoriated Cornyn and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) for stalling the nomination in order to seek assurances that the fund was dead. Tillis is retiring, and Cornyn was defeated by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the Republican primary runoff this year.

RELATED: Trump administration DEFIES ultimatum from Clinton judge on anti-weaponization fund

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas enthusiastically supported the nomination.

“America is safer today because Todd Blanche is serving at the Department of Justice. Now it’s time for the Senate to confirm him,” he wrote on social media.

Passing the Senate is complicated by the absence of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has been hospitalized for weeks and is reportedly in a rehabilitation facility over health issues.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Todd blanche, Senate judiciary committee, Donald trump, John cornyn, Dick durbin, Politics 

Late last month, Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company behind the chatbot Claude, agreed to a whopping $1.5 billion settlement resolving copyright claims over its acquisition and use of millions of pirated books to develop its AI models, making it the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history.

According to court documents, Anthropic’s Project Panama involved the purchasing of millions of physical books in bulk, which hydraulic cutting machines then sliced the spines off of so that the pages could be fed into high-speed scanners to train Claude.

The remnants of the books were then shredded — and that’s the part that disturbs Glenn Beck the most.

“The book is not discarded; it’s shredded. … It’s destroyed on purpose because now the digital copy is now considered enough,” he warns.

On this episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Glenn imagines a future where physical books are a thing of the past and the terrifying implications of such a dystopia.

Digitally preserving all books is a “fine goal” as long as it doesn’t involve the destruction of physical books, says Glenn.

But Project Panama did not appear to share that restraint. Not only did internal Anthropic planning documents that surfaced in court filings describe the operation as an “effort to destructively scan all the books in the world,” but employees were also explicitly told: “We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.”

And the books they went after weren’t just any titles sitting on a Barnes & Noble shelf. Reporting shows Anthropic heavily pursued older, used, and out-of-print volumes, including obscure and hard-to-find titles.

“These rare, rare bookstores started getting phone calls [asking] … ‘Do you have these titles? … We’ll buy all of them,” Glenn summarizes.

A judge later ruled that Anthropic’s destructive scanning of lawfully purchased books qualified as fair use under copyright law. The court reasoned that converting legally acquired print books into digital copies for internal use was transformative, with the destruction of the original books supporting that conclusion because Anthropic was not retaining both physical and digital libraries.

While destroying books may be legal, it’s certainly infuriating to a great many bibliophiles and history buffs.

“Men and women who have dedicated their lives to protecting books, to protecting history, these rare books — they were obviously outraged. When I read the story, I was outraged,” says Glenn, noting that some of the titles Anthropic destroyed “were the single remaining [copies] left … in the world.”

While Glenn wants American AI companies to build “the smartest systems on Earth” using books, he doesn’t want tangible copies destroyed, especially when those copies are rare or out-of-print titles.

“Books are civilization’s memories. Scan them, learn from them, preserve them — but never confuse scanning with shredding,” he pleads.

The destruction of physical books is something Glenn has warned about for years, which is why he always urges his audience to “buy paper copies.”

“A book is a witness,” he says. “Once it’s printed, it can’t quietly change overnight. Nobody can sneak into your library at night and rewrite page 247; nobody can update chapter 5 while you’re asleep.”

Not so with digital files.

“I’m not claiming Anthropic is secretly changing books. I’m saying something more simple and much more dangerous: Without the original, there is nothing left to check against the file,” says Glenn. “The original is the referee. You destroy the referee and eventually somebody else decides what the score was.”

“That’s not paranoia. This is history. You cannot destroy the original because any digital copy can be changed, and you have nothing to check it against.”

To hear more, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Glenn beck, Artificial intelligence, Anthropic, Claude, Book burning, Blazetv show 

Yet another white woman who devoted her time and energy to welcoming third-worlders into Europe has wound up dead, apparently at the hands of the very sort of military-age foreigner she was trying to help.

The corpse of a 38-year-old Scottish woman who was volunteering with a refugee support group in Greece was discovered on July 18, stuffed into a suitcase in an abandoned building in Athens.

‘The testimony of the wife has been crucial.’

The Hellenic Police announced on Sunday that investigators were able to lift the victim’s fingerprints despite the body being found in a state of advanced decomposition. With the fingerprints and the help of both Interpol and American authorities, police identified the victim as Elisabeth-Jane Ross of Edinburgh.

Ross, who previously volunteered with the refugee assistance group One Heart, entered Greece on June 26 and was staying in the port city of Piraeus until July 10, when she left for an unknown destination.

On Thursday, police arrested Sharif Ahmadzai, a 26-year-old Afghan national, on suspicion of robbing and murdering Ross. They seized a replica pistol and a knife at his residence.

The Afghan — a super lightweight boxer who made his way by boat to Greece in 2016 after first making stops in Pakistan, Iran, and Turkey — allegedly used Ross’ bank cards to make withdrawals and used her phone to contact her friends and family in an apparent attempt to mislead them about her whereabouts and demise.

Ahmadzai, who with his Christian wife runs a refugee-support ministry, was allegedly also caught by surveillance camera leaving Ross’ address and wheeling around what appears to be the same suitcase in which the victim’s body was discovered.

RELATED: Asylum-seeking boyfriend of American mother flees Ireland after her brutal murder

Afghan and Syrian migrants descend on the Greek island of Lesbos in October 2015. Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto/Getty Images.

The suspect’s wife, an American named Alaina Hall, is said to have reported Ahmadzai to the police after Ross was identified as the victim, reported the Independent. After becoming concerned about Ahmadzai’s absence from their home on the evening of July 15, Hall — who has a child with the suspect — checked a shared location tracking app and discovered that he was at Ross’ apartment, where the victim is believed to have been killed, according to the Daily Mail.

A police source told the Times (U.K.), “The testimony of the wife has been crucial. Without her and CCTV evidence, we would not have been able to find this man.”

According to the now-scrubbed website for the couple’s refugee support organization, Hall met Ahmadzai in 2016 when volunteering in a migrant camp.

The Afghan, whom the Hellenic Police claim has admitted to killing Ross, is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday.

Ross’ body was discovered just days after the discovery of the remains of 43-year-old American mother Jamey Carney in Ireland. The prime suspect in the murder of Carney is 28-year-old Ahmad Al-Saqar, Carney’s romantic partner and a Middle Eastern asylum-seeker who fled the country on a plane bound for Turkey.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Afghanistan, Migrants, Asylum-seekers, Murder, Greece, Politics 

Recently, someone on X.com said that Japan was the last “first world country” left on earth. I felt an instinctual agreement when I read this statement. America no longer feels very “first world” to me. Not lately.

When the three worlds concept was first invented — in 1952, during the Cold War — America was the definition of “first world.”

Everywhere you looked you saw competence, excellence, and cultural cohesion.

America, most of Western Europe, Japan, Korea, and a few other prosperous nations were “stable capitalist countries with the highest literacy rates, life expectancies, and living standards.”

Communist countries, especially those controlled by the Soviet Union, were considered “second world.” They had modern amenities but limited freedoms. Living conditions were significantly lower. And the governments were coercive and authoritarian.

Poor countries in places like Latin America and Africa were “third world.” These countries suffered entrenched poverty and deeply corrupt, criminal governments.

Which way, Western man?

It seems that America and most of the other first world countries have begun to slide downhill toward second world status.

The citizens of Western nations have watched helplessly while their homelands have been transformed by mass immigration. Can you be a first world country if a large portion of your population just arrived from the third world?

Not to mention the growing presence of Soviet-style socialist/communist ideologies in many of these countries.

In America, we might be one election cycle away from having a Mamdani-style socialist running for president.

Land of the Rising Sun?

Japan has problems too. But having visited there in 2023, their problems are nowhere near our problems.

From the moment I arrived in Tokyo, I felt a sense of safety and order as well as an uplifting feeling of civic and cultural pride.

The city itself was spectacular. The arts were thriving. The technological advancement was instantly apparent. You felt like you were in a science-fiction movie.

At the same time, the past was celebrated and preserved: shrines, torii gates, beautiful parks. Everywhere you looked you saw competence, excellence, and cultural cohesion.

Plus, Tokyo natives were friendly and helpful. If you were lost, were on the wrong train, or had accidentally deviated from some local custom, a Tokyo-ite would appear and cheerfully assist you.

The ‘Japanese Wives Club’

In Kyoto, I met a bunch of male, English-speaking expats. They called their group the “Japanese Wives Club,” as most of them were married to local women.

I expressed my admiration for Japanese society to these guys. They assured me there were plenty of difficulties and drawbacks to living in Japan.

But when I asked them if they would eventually leave, they all said no. They liked their Japanese wives. They liked their adopted home.

One guy said he’d recently returned to his hometown of Denver to visit family. Denver was a dump. He wouldn’t even consider moving back there.

RELATED: Japanese soccer fans show Texas what being a good foreign guest actually looks like

Charlotte Wilson/Getty Images

Oh thank heaven …

Later in my trip, I stayed in a small village outside Tokyo. Here, there was one grocery store, one café, a few restaurants. And a 7-Eleven.

Being American, I mostly frequented the 7-Eleven. It was immaculately clean and full of exotic snacks and beverages.

But I couldn’t figure out the coffee machine. The first time I tried it, I made such a mess the proprietor — a very old, very skinny Japanese man — came out from behind his counter and began scolding me in Japanese.

After more harsh words, he demonstrated step by step how to work the coffee machine.

The next morning, I returned to the 7-Eleven. When I approached the coffee machine, that same old man watched me with deep suspicion.

But I had paid attention when he showed me which buttons to push. It was actually quite easy. And when I brought my coffee to the counter, he smiled approvingly. So I wasn’t a complete moron! Good for me!

He and I developed a relationship. He was very helpful. He gave me discounts. Not personal discounts, that would be dishonest. But the posted discounts I wasn’t aware of because they were written in Japanese. Two mini pizzas and a Hello Kitty soda … only 400 Yen!

After four days, I had barely scratched the surface of the most colorful and technologically advanced 7-Eleven I’d ever seen.

Return to the darkness

When it came time to go home, I packed my bag and went to the train station in the center of the town. I had been in Japan a total of three weeks, and I had loved every second of it. But now I had to leave!

I stood in the tiny village square, where I felt TOTALLY SAFE, where everyone wanted to HELP ME, where I had become FRIENDS WITH THE CRANKY 7-ELEVEN guy. There was no #metoo, no BLM, no Antifa, no cries of “racism,” no protesters, no nose rings, no LGBTQ flags. Everything worked, nothing was graffiti-ed, no vending machines had been kicked in or destroyed …

I sat down on a little bench, in that little square, which had been lovingly constructed to create a sense of peace and serenity.

I sat down on that bench, and I started to cry. I had to go back. I had to go back to broken America. And all I could do was cry.

​Antifa, First world, Japan, Mass immigration, Racism, Lifestyle, Culture, Blake’s progress, Communism 

Too many people scare themselves into silence by making courage more complicated than it is.

For years, women such as Jennifer Sey and Riley Gaines have carried the hopes, safety, and opportunities of girls on their shoulders. We applaud them, share their interviews, and call them brave. Then we tell ourselves that we could never do what they do.

The next voice does not have to be famous. It may have to be yours.

That’s easy. Speaking when the consequences belong to us is much harder.

Only four years ago, Gaines was a college swimmer preparing to graduate and attend dental school. She had no national platform, political résumé, or plan to become one of the country’s most recognizable advocates for women’s sports.

Hundreds of female swimmers were forced to compete against and share a locker room with Lia Thomas. Gaines became the name people remember because she decided that what happened required more than private disapproval.

Now we see the television appearances, speeches, photo shoots, merchandise, and crowds. We see a confident and articulate woman who has become exceptionally good at public advocacy.

What we forget is that she had to begin before she felt ready.

I know that temptation.

Nearly five years ago, at 18, I helped pass Iowa’s Save Girls Sports law, which bars male athletes from competing in women’s sports. I wrote articles, gave interviews, posted information online, and spoke at the state Capitol.

I also felt overwhelmed and badly underqualified. I was called a bigot and a transphobe. I received harassment and death threats. Being compared to a Nazi was not how I expected to spend my senior year of high school.

Over time, I learned to make peace with the insults. If someone cannot acknowledge the difference between a man and a woman, that person’s condemnation says more about his relationship to truth than it does about me.

But my 18-year-old self had not learned that yet.

During one of my first interviews, on BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey’s “Relatable” podcast, I admitted that something had to be done but insisted that plenty of people were better equipped to do it.

Stuckey answered with a sentence I have carried ever since: “God doesn’t call the equipped. He equips the called.”

That is what I love about Sophie Cunningham. The WNBA guard did not deliver a complicated manifesto when she defended women’s spaces. She stated a basic truth plainly.

“I think that I am here to extend love,” Cunningham said. “But I also think with that love is truth, being honest. And I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn’t have to go against biological men.”

When reporters pressed her, she did not retreat into qualifications or issue the ritual apology expected of public figures who violate progressive etiquette.

“I think I said what I said.”

That’s it. It’s that simple. And the answer resonated because it stripped away the excuses people use to stay silent.

RELATED: How the WNBA’s hottest star became the left’s newest headache

Michael Hickey/Getty Images

Men and women are different. Girls deserve privacy, safety, and fair competition. Saying so may provoke anger, but the argument itself is not difficult.

Cunningham’s example is more than a headline or slogan. It reminds ordinary people that public courage does not begin with a perfect résumé, a media strategy, or complete confidence.

It begins when someone decides that fear of criticism cannot carry more authority than the truth.

Games will end. Records will fall. Statistics will be forgotten. Cunningham’s willingness to speak when silence would have been safer may outlast all of them.

She was not obligated to speak because she is famous or because her platform is large. She was obligated because girls were being asked to surrender their rights to a lie.

The same obligation does not belong only to athletes, activists, or people with television audiences.

You do not have to be Riley Gaines, Jennifer Sey, or Sophie Cunningham. You do not have to consider yourself the smartest, bravest, or most articulate person in the room. You do not have to feel qualified.

You do have to stop using those doubts as permission to do nothing.

God does not ask for perfection. He asks for obedience. Again and again, He accomplishes more through willing people than they imagined themselves capable of doing.

Thank you, Sophie Cunningham, for showing how simple the first act of courage can be: Tell the truth, withstand the reaction, and refuse to take it back.

The next voice does not have to be famous. It may have to be yours.

​Activists, Advocacy, Ainsley erzen, Allie beth stuckey, Female athletes, Iowa, Riley gaines, Save girls sports, Sophie cunningham, Truth, Wbna, Women’s sports, Opinion & analysis 

Texas state Rep. James Talarico (D) recently held a town hall in Houston where he discussed what black voters would supposedly get in return for supporting him over Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) in the Texas U.S. Senate race.

During the town hall, Talarico appeared to agree that convicting the person who murdered Austin Metcalf was a “tragedy.”

‘It’s a satanic strategy to deny truth in all aspects of life.’

“What is a tragedy is that James Talarico would rather side with dangerous criminals than keep Texas communities safe,” National Republican Senatorial Committee regional press secretary Samantha Cantrell told Blaze News.

Talarico — the Democratic Senate candidate and part-time Presbyterian seminarian who has attempted to use Scripture to justify abortion, fought to keep the Bible out of school, taken money from an associate of dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and championed keeping male athletes in women’s sports — fielded several questions during the recent town hall, including one from a black identitarian named Amanda Meredith.

Meredith, who said she is a Navy veteran, complained about perceived “over-policing” in black neighborhoods, claimed that police shut down her Juneteenth event prematurely, and suggested that the “craziness in this country has gotten worse” under the Trump administration.

“Our people getting killed left and right. Karmelo Anthony’s case is just a f**king tragedy,” Meredith said while Talarico nodded in apparent agreement.

At no point did Talarico challenge the identitarian speaker.

Karmelo Anthony, a black teen, savagely murdered Austin Metcalf, a white teen, at a high school track meet last year. In early June, Anthony was convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison. A month later, Anthony’s attorney filed an appeal and requested a new trial.

RELATED: Female attackers yelled ‘free Karmelo’ according to alleged assault victim; 3 suspects arrested

The identitarian whom Talarico nodded along with at his town hall said in a video shared to Instagram after Anthony’s sentencing, “To the mother of Karmelo Anthony, I’m so sorry that the system failed your boy.”

In the video, Meredith also accused local authorities, including police and prosecutors, of being “hateful”; claimed that Anthony was “simply defending himself” when he fatally stabbed his unarmed victim; suggested “we don’t get justice here”; and said that she was preparing to leave the U.S. with her son to avoid being “terrorized by the white people in this country.”

After Meredith concluded her rant at his town hall — in which she also suggested that her life in America is more traumatic than the time she spent in Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern nations — Talarico thanked her, apologized on behalf of law enforcement for supposedly shutting down her Juneteenth event an hour or two early, and criticized police.

“Thank you. Thank you for your question, and thank you for your service. This is unacceptable,” said Talarico.

“Too often, we see law enforcement weaponized against black and brown communities in this state,” said Talarico. “We have a deeply broken justice system. We have a deeply broken approach to policing.”

Neither the Talarico nor the Paxton campaign responded to requests for comment.

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) was among the many critics puzzled by Talarico’s response to Meredith’s commentary, asking “why it was a tragedy for a black kid to go to jail for murdering a white kid?”

“There’s an incredible hostility to truth in a world this secular. It’s a satanic strategy to deny truth in all aspects of life. Men can be women and have babies. We have a Supreme Court justice who can’t define the word woman,” BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock told Blaze News. “When a teenager murders another teenager in front of multiple witnesses, the approved lie is to call the dead teenager the villain and the murderer the victim. Lying is a qualification for politics. Talarico clearly seeks a more important political office.”

Jeff Metcalf, the father of the murdered teen, told Whitlock in mid-June that he has been inundated with death threats and disgusting messages from the murderer’s supporters.

“Just the vile statements from everyone, and ones who are in denial of the truth. That’s the hardest part. It’s like now that the truth has been shown, all the facts have been presented. So all your lies have been debunked, but they still refuse to accept the verdict, the truth, and they’re all hanging their hat on this appeal,” said the bereaved father.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Austin metcalf, Brandon gill, James talarico, Jason whitlock, Karmelo anthony, Texas, Anti-white, Politics 

China has a dirty little habit of swiping tech that doesn’t belong to it and passing it off as its own. Why should AI be any different? Latest accusations claim that China stole intellectual property from American AI companies to use in its own platforms, and the Trump administration is poised to take swift retaliatory action.

The whole hubbub started over the prevalence of open-source AI models originating from China. As the costs of major platforms, including Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, continue to rise in the States, U.S. companies that have already integrated AI into their workforce, or that plan to add AI in the future, are looking for new ways to cut costs without sacrificing capabilities. One solution is to fall back on Chinese-made open-source AI, like DeepSeek and Kimi.

‘We have the ability to sanction them because of this theft.’

Open-source AI is more appealing than closed-source platforms for several reasons: It’s publicly available with fewer or no licensing fees. It’s customizable to fit a wider range of applications. It can work on local hardware (laptop, desktop, or servers) without the need to pay for cloud compute. Its local capabilities make it much cheaper and more private. Lastly, although these models are usually slightly less sophisticated than closed models, their open nature gives third-party developers the power to adjust the code themselves and bring it on par with closed offerings.

In other words, open-source models are more affordable and adaptable, and if widely adopted, they could put a financial strain on the frontier AI market or even put it out of business.

Where does Chinese open-source AI come from?

So far, China has been a major proponent of open-source AI, largely for the threat it poses to America’s AI dominance, while platforms in the States have leaned harder into closed-model options.

Here’s the kicker, though. Most of China’s AI models were built on the backs of American AI companies. DeepSeek, for instance, reportedly used OpenAI’s ChatGPT (and other unnamed models) as the basis for its platform through a process called distilling, where answers from larger platforms are reverse-engineered to design smaller, more efficient models that mimic the original. Meanwhile, the newly more capable Kimi K3 was distilled from Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic.

Essentially, Chinese AI platform makers took a shortcut by training off of American frontier AI models and are now trying to flip the script so that American companies rely on their Chinese “innovations” instead of the original platforms that created these AI advancements in the first place.

RELATED: Tired of password hell? Do this now

Rawf8/Getty Images

Why open-source Chinese AI is a problem

This is an issue for American companies and American security for several reasons:

Theft: Although distillation operates in an ambiguous gray area of legality, what China’s platforms have done equates to theft directly from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and SpaceXAI (formerly xAI).Regulation: Open-source makes AI harder to regulate. Especially now that some advanced AI models can hack into legacy systems without any trouble at all, open-source versions of these would make them dangerously accessible to bad actors.Leadership: Companies that pay for AI platforms essentially fund their future development, ensuring that AI platforms are sustainable as America leads the AI race. Without this funding, American-made AI development slows down, stalls, or flatlines entirely, surrendering the lead to China.Security: Anyone can tamper with open-source code, potentially making companies that use these platforms more vulnerable to sneak attacks, hacks, and malicious code injections.

What’s next?

Reports on what to do about the alleged IP theft are mixed. Axios says that President Trump may ban companies from using Chinese-developed open-source AI models wholesale, immediately cutting off the potential threat these models pose to the nation. However, United States Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent proposed another way, stating, “We’ve seen a lot of talk about open-source models coming and threatening the large language models in the U.S. This administration supports open-source models, but what we do not support is IP theft. If we see, especially, that overseas models are stealing from our great companies, we have the ability to sanction them because of this theft.”

Sanctions appear to be the answer to get China to back off. Whether or not it will work, though, remains to be seen. So far, China is pushing back with the Ministry of Commerce holding firm: “These actions lack factual basis and legal support and constitute double standards in practice, representing typical acts of AI hegemony. China will take all necessary measures to firmly safeguard its legitimate rights and interests against any actions that substantially harm China’s interests.”

A tug-of-war over AI sovereignty will no doubt ensue in the coming weeks.

​Open-source ai, Tech 

A father who shot a man suspected of raping his 11-year-old daughter was arrested and charged with felonious assault and weapon under disability charges.

Grove City police said they were called to the apartment on July 15 over the report of a sexual assault on an 11-year-old girl.

‘I can see why he went after him. I’m not saying it’s right, but that at least makes some sense.’

The mother of the girl called police after allegedly seeing a video of a sexual assault at their home on her daughter’s phone.

The next day, the alleged victim’s father lured the rape suspect back to the home by pretending to be his daughter on the TikTok app.

Police were called back to the residence to find Diego Montoya Gonzalez shot twice.

The father told police that he intended only to beat up Gonzalez and then call police but that the suspect reached for a gun and precipitated the shooting.

A neighbor named Terrie Shirkey described the father as visibly upset after finding out about the allegations.

“[He] had checked the phone, and he saw texts,” Shirkey said to WSYX-TV. “Whatever he saw on the phone, he just couldn’t calm down. He just kept pacing, pacing.”

Investigators allegedly found several videos of child abuse on Gonzalez’s phone, including one involving an infant or toddler.

“I can see why he went after him,” Shirkey added. “I’m not saying it’s right, but that at least makes some sense. It wasn’t a senseless thing. If it’s not, that means we’ve got a predator, and that scares the crap out of me.”

RELATED: ‘Depraved’ serial child molester barricaded himself in bathroom with 1-year-old and tried to commit suicide

Gonzalez was later arrested and charged with rape, pandering sexually oriented material involving a minor, and obstructing official business.

On Monday, he pleaded not guilty in a Franklin County Common Pleas Court. He was given a $20,000 recognizance bond as well as a $50,000 cash/surety bond.

If released, he was ordered to stay off the internet except for work and restricted from contacting the alleged victim’s family.

WSYX also reported that the father had previously been charged with strangling his girlfriend, but that was dismissed. He also was convicted for misdemeanor attempted breaking and entering. He is being held on a $100,000 bond.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Child rape, Online predators, Tiktok, Shooting, Pedophile, Crime 

Joseph McCarthy, Richard Nixon, George W. Bush, and Andrew Jackson have little in common beyond one striking fact: Young Americans are revisiting reputations that schools, media, and popular culture once treated as settled.

The trend is not a wholesale endorsement of every decision these men made. It is a rebellion against inherited verdicts.

TMZ may fret that McCarthyism is returning. It isn’t. Institutional deference, however, may be gone for good.

As democratic socialists such as Francesca Hong and Zohran Mamdani have gained traction with voters, some young conservatives have revived interest in McCarthy’s campaign against communist influence in the United States. The slogan “Joseph McCarthy was right” has circulated online alongside renewed discussion of Soviet espionage and foreign political influence from countries such as Cuba and China.

McCarthy’s record remains contested, and the abuses associated with his name should not be waved away. But younger critics are increasingly unwilling to accept the textbook version in which he appears only as a paranoid bully who invented a threat that did not exist. One widely used history resource, for example, describes his methods as bullying tactics that created a climate of fear.

McCarthy is not alone.

Richard Nixon became a viral figure this summer through “Nixon-maxxing,” an online fascination that mixes irony and style with a serious effort to reconsider his foreign-policy record and political downfall. George W. Bush, once a permanent punch line for late-night comedy, now appears in nostalgic images as a cowboy from a more confident American era. Andrew Jackson has also returned to online debate as younger people reassess his nationalism and tariff policy.

None deserves automatic vindication. McCarthy, Nixon, Bush, and Jackson were consequential men with real failures, bitter controversies, and legacies that remain open to dispute.

But their reputations were shaped by institutions that many members of Gen Z no longer trust.

Black Lives Matter activists tried to tear down Jackson’s statue in Washington. Legacy outlets treated Nixon’s name as shorthand for betrayal and corruption. Late-night television and “Saturday Night Live” spent years reducing Bush to a caricature.

When those same institutions lose credibility, their historical judgments lose authority with them.

That loss of trust is measurable. Confidence in higher education fell from 57% in 2015 to 36% in 2024. Gen Z reports the highest levels of mistrust toward colleges of any generation, and 59% of students say they fear expressing “right-wing” political opinions in class.

RELATED: The once and future Nixon

Photo courtesy of the Richard Nixon Foundation

Young people therefore approach official narratives with a suspicion earlier generations reserved for propaganda. If they want the truth, they need to uncover it themselves.

COVID taught us the hard way.

Most members of Gen Z were in high school, college, or the opening years of adulthood when governments closed schools, restricted work, separated friends, and imposed sweeping health rules. They were told that officials possessed reliable answers, then watched many claims change, collapse, or become subjects of bitter dispute.

The vaccine debate supplied one example. Research identified an increased risk of myocarditis after some COVID vaccinations, particularly among adolescent and young adult males. That finding did not prove every warning about vaccination correct, but it complicated the insistence that skepticism itself was irresponsible or morally wrong.

The release of Anthony Fauci’s diary reinforced the belief among many young Americans that officials presented more certainty in public than they privately possessed.

The result was not merely disagreement over masks, vaccines, distancing, or school closures. It was a broader lesson in institutional fallibility.

Young Americans learned that credentials do not eliminate self-interest, consensus does not guarantee truth, and a confident official narrative may later require substantial revision.

That lesson now shapes how they view both contemporary politics and American history.

Donald Trump’s return to the presidency after Russiagate, two impeachments, criminal prosecutions, and years of predictions that his movement would collapse reinforced the idea that establishment condemnation can increase rather than settle public doubt. Young men voted for him heavily in 2024 and extended the same instinct to figures such as JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The same appetite has helped independent journalists like Nick Shirley build audiences by pursuing stories local governments and established newsrooms neglected.

RELATED: Two Americas, under Fauci, with liberty and justice for none

Alex WROBLEWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

This impulse can go wrong sometimes. Contrarianism is not the same as truth, and a historical figure does not become virtuous merely because liberal institutions despised him.

But the refusal to inherit conclusions without question is healthy.

Gen Z is treating history less like a museum exhibit and more like a cold case. It wants the documents, the motives, the context, and the arguments omitted from the standard account.

That approach will not vindicate every accused man. It may confirm some old judgments and overturn others.

The larger significance lies in who now claims the authority to decide.

Schools, television networks, universities, and political movements once expected younger Americans to accept their moral rankings of the past. A growing number of young people now insist on reopening the file themselves.

TMZ may fret that McCarthyism is making a comeback. It isn’t. Institutional deference, however, may be gone for good.

​Black lives matter, Covid, Democratic socialists, Donald trump, Francesca hong, Gen z, George w bush, Joseph mccarthy, Marco rubio, Richard nixon, Right wing, Zohran mamdani, Opinion & analysis 

Opponents of the SAVE America Act have reached for the oldest smear in the election-law playbook: racism.

Sunny Hostin of “The View” recently said she opposed the bill because it would “disproportionately affect African-American voters.” She compared proof-of-citizenship requirements to Jim Crow devices such as literacy tests and jelly bean counting.

Election reform cannot proceed honestly while racial demagoguery substitutes for argument.

The comparison is historically illiterate.

Poll taxes, literacy tests, and arbitrary guessing games were designed to keep black Americans from voting. Requiring voters to prove identity and citizenship applies a neutral rule to everyone.

The SAVE America Act would require applicants for federal voter registration to provide documentary proof of citizenship, such as a passport, a REAL ID indicating citizenship, or qualifying military records. Related provisions would require photo identification at the polls.

Those are not instruments of racial exclusion. They are ordinary safeguards meant to ensure that only eligible citizens participate in federal elections.

Democratic politicians and media figures have spent years describing voter-identification laws as “Jim Crow 2.0.” Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Stacey Abrams, and others have portrayed routine verification as a deliberate attack on minority voters.

The claim insults the people it supposedly defends.

Polls consistently show broad support for voter identification, often above 80% overall, with strong majorities among black and Hispanic voters. Millions of minority Americans already use driver’s licenses, state identification cards, and other government-issued documents because modern life requires them.

Americans need identification to board a commercial flight, open a bank account, cash a check, buy alcohol or tobacco, rent a car, enter many offices and government buildings, collect some prescriptions, and check into a hotel.

Even New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, an opponent of voter-identification requirements, recently announced that his taxpayer-funded grocery stores would require identification for entry.

RELATED: Mamdani rejects voter ID, but his grocery stores may ask shoppers for proof

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The country accepts identity verification for countless transactions carrying far lower stakes than choosing its leaders. The idea that voting alone must remain exempt from basic verification makes no sense.

Critics next argue that noncitizen voting is rare and therefore unworthy of concern. Recent examples show why prevention remains vital.

In New Jersey, Governor Mikie Sherrill (D) disclosed last month that a software error at the Motor Vehicle Commission improperly registered roughly 6,600 noncitizens between June 2023 and June 2024. About 400 of them cast ballots. The Trump administration believes the number may be much higher.

In North Carolina, authorities previously charged 19 foreign nationals with voting unlawfully in the 2016 elections. In Philadelphia, an illegal immigrant was arrested after allegedly voting in several federal elections.

None of those cases proves that noncitizen voting determines every election. They do prove, at a minimum, that registration systems make mistakes and that ineligible people sometimes vote. One can only imagine the depth of election fraud a DOGE-style investigation into all 50 states’ practices would uncover.

The most revealing feature of the opposition is its refusal to separate legitimate access concerns from the basic question of eligibility. Lawmakers can provide free identification, mobile enrollment services, and reasonable procedures for citizens who lack standard documents while still requiring proof that applicants are citizens.

That would expand lawful access and protect lawful votes at the same time.

Instead, critics invoke the ugliest chapters of American history to shut down discussion. They treat any identity or citizenship requirement as presumptively racist and imply that minority voters are uniquely incapable of complying with ordinary rules.

Americans of every race deserve elections in which every lawful vote counts and every unlawful vote is excluded. Proof of identity and citizenship is not an attack on democracy. It is the minimum a democracy owes its citizens.

Election reform cannot proceed honestly while racial demagoguery substitutes for argument. The people using Jim Crow as a shield against neutral safeguards should be shunned, not indulged.

​Election fraud, Election reform, Jim crow, Kamala harris, Noncitizen voting, Philadelphia, Save america act, Stacey abrams, Zohran mamdani, Opinion & analysis 

In a recent appearance on Michelle Obama’s podcast, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson explained that she refuses to do anything that might appear biased.

“When I get invitations to do things, I always have them screened by the legal office, the public information office, just to make sure that there are no ethical conflicts, that it’s not a fundraiser. You know, there are lots of limits on what judges can do,” Jackson told Obama.

“And I try to be very, very mindful and scrupulous with respect to that because, as you say, our obligation is to be unbiased in our approach. And so, you have to then navigate all the sources that could make for an appearance of partiality, which you want to avoid,” she continued.

“So, there are lots of things that I end up not accepting for that reason,” she added.

BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales can’t help but point out the glaring issue with her statement.

“It’s just that you’re on Michelle Obama’s podcast,” Gonzales comments.

“I’m just going to say, nothing says impartial and unbiased like appearing on Michelle Obama’s podcast. Like what?” Gonzales asks.

But Jackson isn’t the only one Gonzales is tired of hearing from, as Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) recently made a “wild claim about DEI.”

“When they decided to go after quote, unquote ‘DEI,’ black women, the most educated demographic in this country, somehow ended up the most unemployed out of everyone,” Crockett said.

“So, black women are the most educated demographic in this country,” Gonzales comments. “I think we need a fact check here.”

According to the Emerald Pages, 56.7% of Asian women hold bachelor’s degrees, making them the most educated in the country. Following closely behind them are white women at 52.9%.

Meanwhile, only 29.3% of black women have bachelor’s degrees.

“I don’t know where you’re getting your information,” Gonzales says. “Once again, I’m very uncomfortable with the way they keep passing out these law degrees like candy to all of these people who seem to be dumber than a box of rocks.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Jasmine crockett, Kentaji brown jackson, Michelle obama, Sara gonzales, Supreme court, Black women, Dei, Blazetv show 

A homeowner in Rochester, New York, early Monday opened fire on a burglar who was on parole for a previous burglary conviction, police told WHAM-TV.

Officers responded to Avery Street on the city’s west side around 4:30 a.m. following a 911 call about gunshots coming from a nearby home, the station said.

‘The homeowner did what he needed to do, to protect his home and himself. End of story.’

Police told WHAM a second call came from a homeowner who said he shot an individual who broke into his home.

Officers found the burglar in the home’s kitchen, the station said, adding that he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Police told WHAM the homeowner has a valid New York state pistol permit and used a legally owned and registered handgun in the incident; the station added that the homeowner is cooperating with the investigation.

The homeowner did not know the burglar, who was on parole for a previous burglary conviction, police told the station, adding that the suspect’s identity has not been released.

Police added to WHAM that the home in question had been burglarized at least twice since June.

Monday’s incident remains under investigation, the station said.

Police Captain Frank Umbrino told WHEC-TV that the shooting “appears to be justified” and that “my message is don’t break into houses.”

Neighbors told Umbrino that they’ve also been victims of recent break-ins, WHEC added.

RELATED: Thug allegedly threatens to kill homeowner, enters victim’s residence. But homeowner fights back with baseball bat — and gun.

A number of commenters sounded off underneath WHAM’s story:

“Well, [the suspect] is no longer a problem for law-abiding citizens of Rochester,” one commenter said.”Ah — another feel good story!” another user declared. “I hope the innocent homeowner has not been traumatized by this incident.””The homeowner did what he needed to do, to protect his home and himself. End of story,” another commenter wrote. “I just hope he gets some help. Taking a life, even if it’s justified, can’t be an easy thing.””When it comes to someone breaking into my house, you get one warning — that’s it,” another user stated. “If you are still in my house when I get down the stairs, you are going to get shot. I don’t care who you are or what race you are, they will be calling the meat wagon to take you out of my home. I legally own my gun and I shoot 3 or 4 times a week. Oh, and I would grab my shotgun with deer slugs to [ensure] your visit to the great beyond.””Isn’t it scary in NY, where the homeowner is still worried he might be charged?” another commenter asked. “NY is awful for victim rights. If I were him, I’d get a lawyer.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Rochester, New york, Burglary, Fatal shooting, Homeowner shoots intruder, Gun rights, Crime, Second amendment 

A federal court issued a preliminary ruling that blocked New York officials from banning federal immigration agents from wearing masks and other coverings.

Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the Face Covering and Identification Acts in May in order to rein in ICE operations in the state.

‘We stand firm in our belief that masked agents do not make New York safer, and our offices are reviewing all legal options at this time.’

The Department of Justice sued against the order and argued that it violated the “sovereign function” of the United States.

Linda Fang of the New York State Attorney General’s office argued that the law did not contradict any law issued by the federal government.

“When the federal government has not spoken, it can be subject to general rules that impact its function,” Fang said.

U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino sided with the government in the ruling Monday.

“The United States has demonstrated a likelihood that it will succeed on its claim that the Face Covering and Identification Acts directly regulate federal officers in violation of the Supremacy Clause,” D’Agostino wrote.

However, D’Agostino allowed New York to continue banning cooperation agreements between local governments and ICE.

The judge described the ban as the “appropriate means of furthering New York’s legitimate interests in protecting public welfare and choosing how state and local resources are expended.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James and Gov. Hochul released a joint statement about the ruling.

“As we have said from the start, New York’s ban on 287(g) agreements is legal and will keep our communities safe. Local law enforcement should be focused on local matters, and New York taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for any collaboration with ICE,” the joint statement reads.

“While the court enjoined enforcement of New York’s mask ban, we stand firm in our belief that masked agents do not make New York safer, and our offices are reviewing all legal options at this time,” they added.

RELATED: Trump is reportedly FURIOUS at Jeanine Pirro — and may fire her

Democratic New York state Sen. Patricia Fahy said officials were likely to appeal the decision.

“We always knew there was a constitutional debate on this,” said Fahy. “But either way, we know that the push from us, along with others, has been effective in sending the message that this was totally outrageous — the actions of ICE.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Department of justice, Federal court, Kathy hochul, Letitia james, Supremacy clause, Jeanine pirro, Immigration and customs enforcement, Politics 

The failure of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to prosecute a former Olympian for allegedly damaging the resurfaced reflection pool at the Lincoln Monument may lead to her termination.

President Donald Trump is furious at Pirro after she dropped the charges against 67-year-old David Hearn on Saturday, according to two sources who spoke to CNN.

‘Really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella.’

Hearn pleaded not guilty to the felony charge of destruction of property after National Park Service employees allegedly saw him willfully and “violently” damage a section of the lining of the pool.

Trump is reportedly thinking about firing Pirro after she admitted that the damage to the lining was more likely to be the result of flawed installation rather than vandalism.

One of the sources said the president “fumed” over the situation throughout the weekend, and the source concluded that it’s “highly likely she’s removed from her job.”

The other source said Trump was “blindsided” by the decision to drop the charge.

“The president did not know beforehand that she was going to do that,” the source said.

The White House directed CNN to the president’s comments to reporters.

“Frankly, I think she choked because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her and went after her department, and I guess she choked,” the president said on Monday at the Oval Office.

“I was disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. Really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella,” Trump added.

One of the CNN sources said the president and Pirro had a phone conversation on Saturday about the issue and described the interaction as not “pretty.”

The president also blasted Pirro in a post on social media Saturday.

“I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM,” Trump wrote.

Hearn had been facing 10 years in prison over the charge.

RELATED: Trump greets crew that restored Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool in visit to the White House

Pirro blamed the Dept. of the Interior in the filing.

“Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment,” she wrote.

“Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt,” she added.

CNN noted that Hearn has some legal options available to him that would include suing the administration and referring prosecutors to disciplinary action.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Lincoln monument, President donald trump, Reflecting pool, Us attorney jeanine pirro, Politics 

If you’re an illegal alien, your next U.S. flight could end as a one-way trip home.

ICE is now targeting expired visa holders in its airport detention campaigns, according to the Washington Post. The move goes beyond the Department of Homeland Security’s previous focus on aliens with existing deportation orders, according to the outlet.

‘This administration is working diligently to ensure that aliens in our country illegally can no longer fly unless it is out of our country to self-deport.’

“We’ve been saying for a while: If you don’t have permanent status, you should really consider whether it’s safe to fly,” Amica Center for Immigrant Rights deputy program director Atenas Burrola Estrada told the Washington Post. “I think a lot of people were still flying, and it was safe, and that is clearly not the case anymore.”

Burrola Estrada also claimed that nearly a dozen arrests have occurred at the Reagan National, Washington Dulles International, and Baltimore/Washington International airports.

The Transportation Security Administration did not respond to a request for comment.

The Biden administration previously allowed illegal aliens to fly using their CBP One app in lieu of traditional identification. A 2024 DHS report found significant safety concerns with the app-identification and non-detainment system.

RELATED: Illegal immigrant allegedly attacks police in Virginia — after dodging prosecution for allegedly choking his wife

Gilles Clarence/AFP/Getty Images

“DHS reversed the horrendous Biden-era policy that allowed aliens in our country illegally to jet around our country,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement to Blaze News. “Under President Trump, DHS will no longer tolerate this. This administration is working diligently to ensure that aliens in our country illegally can no longer fly unless it is out of our country to self-deport.”

ICE signed a memorandum of agreement with TSA in May 2025, establishing data-sharing and notification systems between the agencies. The document was first obtained by American Oversight, a nonprofit organization founded by former Obama administration officials.

A Colombian woman engaged to an American citizen was detained by ICE while boarding a Southwest Airlines flight on July 17, according to her attorney, Johanna Kelley.

“There were two or three men, without uniform, without ID, in regular clothing,” Kelley told the Washington Post. “Then they said, ‘We are ICE. You need to come with us. You are arrested because you’re an illegal alien.’”

The woman was released from ICE custody on Wednesday after a Virginia judge granted her bond, according to Kelley.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Cbp one app, Department of homeland security, Illegal alien, Joe biden, Immigration and customs enforcement, Politics 

Aaron Rodgers minced no words when talking about former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci on Monday, repeatedly calling him a “coward” in front of a live audience.

The Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback was meant to be talking football and his feelings heading into likely his last year in the NFL, but it took less than one minute for the interview to shift from pro ball to politics.

‘Did they do even a minute on Tony Fauci? I bet they didn’t.’

Appearing on ESPN’s “The Pat McAfee Show” live from Steelers training camp, host Pat McAfee started off by asking Rodgers simple questions about where his head is at before the start of the 2026 campaign.

“Can you tell us about the mindset of coming into your last season?” McAfee asked.

“How do you kind of view this year versus maybe the years of the past?”

“I’m going to plead the Fifth,” Rodgers quickly replied. “Like that absolute coward, Tony Fauci.”

Rodgers was referring to Fauci invoking the Fifth Amendment 111 times last week during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Rodgers’ comments immediately started to rile the crowd up, escalating into jaunts and jeers as Rodgers increased his rhetoric.

“Are you kidding me? You got a pardon, and you pleaded over 100 times?” Rodgers continued.

“What are you scared of, Tony? I thought you were the science!”

RELATED: Two Americas, under Fauci, with liberty and justice for none

Rodgers mocked the doctor for not answering any questions and then looked straight into the camera and seemingly set his sights on ESPN.

The 42-year-old started listing the critical coverage of his “responses,” his “vaccination status,” and even coverage of the marriage between singer Taylor Swift and NFL tight end Travis Kelce.

“Did they do even a minute on Tony Fauci? I bet they didn’t,” Rodgers claimed before McAfee’s panel hilariously urged him to go back to insulting Fauci. Much to their pleasure, the Super Bowl champ obliged as the crowd erupted in “M-V-P!” chants.

Rodgers claimed that Fauci was “spending the entire time writing in his diary about how fun it is to be famous. You got to be kidding me! What are they going to say about me now? … They can’t talk about the COVID stuff because obviously it was made in a lab in China, that’s, like, not even questionable anymore.”

RELATED: ‘He was lying’: RFK Jr. blasts Dana Bash for pushing Fauci’s lies, defending the jab

Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images

As McAfee informed Rodgers they had only four minutes to speak — so he’d like to get some football talk in — the former University of California QB took a second to applaud pundit Stephen A. Smith.

Just days earlier, Smith apologized for his 2021 comments when he suggested NBA player Kyrie Irving made himself look “flat-out stupid” for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. In hindsight, Smith said, “It didn’t make him stubborn or selfish; it made him brave.”

In response, Rodgers said to Smith, “You are not a coward. I appreciate you.”

Viewers may be surprised to see that McAfee did not back off from the conversation. In fact, he took significant time to talk about the abuse he took for hosting Rodgers on his platform at the time in 2021.

McAfee said that given his history with the quarterback and all they had discussed years prior, he knew Rodgers would have something to say. This culminated in McAfee leading an applause with the live audience for Rodgers.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Covid-19, Aaron rodgers, Anthony fauci, Nfl, Sports 

What began as criticism of eBay’s business practices spiraled into one of the most bizarre corporate harassment scandals of our time, which ended in David and Ina Steiner receiving millions from the online marketplace.

And harassment may be putting it lightly — as they were sent live cockroaches, spiders, fly larvae, a bloody pig mask, and a book on dealing with the death of a spouse.

The couple’s online newsletter, EcommerceBytes, reports on eBay as well as other internet marketplaces and angered eBay executives enough for them to begin cyberstalking the pair.

“They apparently were saying bad things about eBay,” BlazeTV co-host Jeff Fisher explains on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

“And that pissed eBay off, including the CEO of the company,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray says.

They also sent porno magazines and listed the couples’ home on Craigslist as a “nightly destination for singles, couples, and swingers.”

“They sent porn magazines on purpose to their neighbors just to embarrass David,” Gray comments.

“And don’t forget, they put a GPS tracker on their car,” Fisher says.

The couple opened a civil lawsuit against the former eBay executives in 2021, which was finally settled this year on July 27.

The payout was a whopping $55.7 million.

“That’s nice,” Gray says. “OK, that takes a little bit of the edge off all of it.”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Civil lawsuit, Cyberstalking, Ebay, Jeff fisher, Pat gray, Settlement, Blazetv show 

Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee has filed articles of impeachment against a federal judge after she ruled to block the president’s rescission of deportation protections for Somalis.

U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs issued an administrative stay on Friday to stop the administration from deporting Somalis who had been granted Temporary Protection Status.

‘This judicial activist’s obstruction of the people’s will must be stopped. Judge Burroughs must be impeached.’

Ogles fired back in a statement on Saturday, threatening to impeach Burroughs, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama. On Monday, he filed the articles.

“America is not Africa’s dumping ground. We will end Temporary Protected Status, remove those who have no lawful right to remain, and put the sovereignty of the American people FIRST,” he wrote on social media.

Ogles explained the justification for the impeachment in a statement to Just the News.

“SCOTUS made it very clear that lower courts cannot suspend TPS. Yet, an Obama-appointed judge is defying the court and the Constitution in an attempt to subvert the will of the president,” Ogles said. “This judicial activist’s obstruction of the people’s will must be stopped. Judge Burroughs must be impeached.”

Burroughs issued the stay after African Communities Together and other plaintiffs accused the administration of discrimination on the basis of race as well as national origin. The plaintiffs had changed their lawsuit in order to fit the standards the Supreme Court had placed on federal judges blocking TPS terminations.

The same judge had also issued a previous stay over the TPS program. Department of Homeland Security General Counsel James Percival issued a stern condemnation of Burroughs’ latest decision.

“Judge Allison Burroughs just entered yet another order preventing the termination of Somalia TPS,” Percival posted Friday. “There is no serious debate about what is going on in these cases — defiance, obstruction, and delay.”

RELATED: Spain says 25,000 migrants have been expelled from tiny Ceuta territory — with at least 34 DEATHS

The process to remove a judge is difficult and unlikely. Ogles has begun the process, but a majority of the U.S. House of Representatives will need to approve the motion.

Then, the articles would go to the U.S. Senate for trial, and two-thirds of the senators would need to vote to convict to remove Burroughs from office.

Only eight federal judges have been convicted and removed in U.S. history.

Ogles is facing a fierce and well-funded challenge in the Republican primary, and Democrats are also targeting his seat as a possible pickup for them in the general election.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Barack obama, Impeachment, Temporary protected status, Andy ogles, Somalia, Politics 

A popular OnlyFans model accused of stabbing her boyfriend to death inside a Florida luxury condo in 2022 has reached a plea deal with prosecutors, her legal team confirmed to Fox News.

Courtney Clenney, 30, was charged with second-degree murder with a weapon in the death of her 27-year-old boyfriend, Christian “Toby” Obumseli, according to records from the Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Center.

A ‘tempestuous and combative relationship.’

Clenney’s attorneys, the Prieto Law Firm and Puglisi-Carames Law, stated that the agreement will not be finalized until the court accepts it and did not reveal specifics.

“We will reserve further comment on the specific terms until they are placed on the record before the court,” Clenney’s attorneys said, according to Fox News.

The attorney for the stabbing victim confirmed that Clenney has reached a plea deal.

“On behalf of the Obumseli family, I am pleased to announce that defendant Courtney Clenney, the state, and the Obumseli family have reached a resolution that would avoid an unnecessary trial,” the attorney said in a statement, according to WFOR-TV.

“Pleading guilty and accepting full responsibility will begin the process of bringing closure to a very tragic, life-changing event for the Obumseli family,” the statement said.

Citing a court docket, People magazine reported that Clenney is scheduled to appear before Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Andrea Ricker Wolfson on Aug. 10 for a plea hearing.

WFOR reported that Clenney initially pleaded not guilty of fatally stabbing Obumseli.

RELATED: Fired cop avoids jail time after allegedly groping OnlyFans star in X-rated ‘traffic stop’ video while on duty

Blaze News previously reported that Clenney and Obumseli arrived at their high-rise building in Miami’s upscale Edgewater neighborhood just after 4:30 p.m. on April 3, 2022. Soon the couple reportedly began fighting, according to a wrongful death lawsuit Obumseli’s family filed.

“Building security arrived at the Clenney unit, knocked on the door, heard yelling through the door, stood outside, and did nothing despite knowledge of Ms. Clenney’s history of past disturbances in the unit and common areas, her history of erratic, volatile, and aggressive behavior … and her recently diagnosed mental health disorder,” the complaint stated.

“By the time Ms. Clenney finished committing her crime, at 4:58 p.m., she opened the door to her unit and security saw her and her dogs covered in blood and Mr. Obumseli was already unconscious on the floor,” the lawsuit asserted.

The complaint noted, “Had the building personnel or security performed their duties when they were first notified about the fight, two minutes after it started, Christian Obumseli would still be alive.”

The Miami Herald reported that defense attorneys have argued that Clenney was in a tumultuous, toxic relationship with Obumseli, and that she was a victim of battered women’s syndrome and was “forced to take action in the defense of her life.”

A police report said officers discovered Obumseli with a single stab wound to the torso.

Clenney stated that she hurled a knife at Obumseli from more than 10 feet away after he threw her to the ground. However, prosecutors argued that the autopsy revealed a deep puncture wound indicative of an up-close stabbing.

Clenney’s attorney noted that the OnlyFans model immediately called 911, which the attorney claimed supports his client being charged with manslaughter rather than second-degree murder.

Clenney never denied she was responsible for the victim’s injuries but asserted that she was acting in self-defense, Court TV reported.

Two months before Obumseli died — Feb. 21, 2022 — Clenney was caught on video attacking her boyfriend in the elevator of their Miami apartment building, prosecutors said.

As Blaze News previously reported, Clenney was arrested in August 2022 on the Big Island of Hawaii by Hawaii County police with assistance from the U.S. Marshals Service.

Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said the relationship began in November 2020 but eventually spiraled into a “tempestuous and combative relationship,” Fox News reported.

Clenney has nearly two million followers on Instagram under the name “Courtney Tailor.”

The Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to Blaze News‘ request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Onlyfans, Courtney clenney, Murder, Stabbing, Florida, Crime 

A transgender-identifying reality television star has been arrested for multiple felonies related to child molestation allegations.

Sidney Favors is known by stage name Sidney Starr and has been cast in numerous shows including “Love & Hip Hop” and “Baddies.”

Favors was booked under charges of sexual battery against a child under 16 years of age.

On Monday, the Hapeville Police Department said the 37-year-old was arrested on Sunday at the Embassy Suites hotel on International Boulevard.

Favors was booked on charges of sexual battery against a child under 16 years of age, aggravated child molestation, and sodomy, according to records from the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office.

“Because this case involves a juvenile, no additional information will be released from our agency,” said the Hapeville Police.

A TMZ report says Favors allegedly confessed to performing oral sex on the minor in a hotel in Hapeville.

Favors had become famous after claiming to have had a sexual relationship with the rapper Chingy. The artist denied the claims, and Favors later admitted fabricating the entire allegation.

RELATED: Trans-identifying liberal seems to call for DEATH of Elon Musk over comment about Zizian trans cult

Favors’ social media account says he is a cast member of “Baddies ATL,” “Love & Hip Hop: New York,” and “Wild ‘N Out” on MTV.

Fulton County Jail records list the transgender-identifying celebrity as a black male.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Child molestation, Child sex crimes, Transgender, Crime