The year millions of people were killed worldwide by a virus likely engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese scientists in Beijing began toying with a more deadly coronavirus variant called GX_P2V that killed humanized mice 100% of the time, largely with late-stage brain infections. While not formally linked, the study referenced parallel work executed by Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist Dr. Shi Zhengli.
In March, Chinese researchers at the Hebei Medical University revealed they had created a mutant version of the virus vesicular stomaitis, known to infect cattle, by giving it a protein from the Ebola virus. The hamster test subjects infected with the recombinant virus suffered weight loss, ulcerated eyes, inflammation, multi-organ failure, and then all died.
Apparently, the Pentagon has no idea to what extent it has bankrolled these kinds of potentially ruinous experiments in communist China.
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General released a partially redacted report Tuesday detailing the results of its efforts to track down the money the Pentagon has invested helping the communist Chinese enhance deadly pathogens.
The report made clear it was referring to gain-of-function experiments, referencing a definition published in the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, which states, “The term ‘gain-of-function’ means ‘to enhance a function by genetic manipulation’ or ‘to add a new function’ and applies to much research involving genetic recombination and genetic manipulation.”
The DOD Office of Inspector General sought specifically to track the amount of federal funds given either directly or indirectly by the Pentagon to:
the communist regime itself;
the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other organizations administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences;
Peter Daszak’s scandal-plagued and debarred EcoHealth Alliance, whose gain-of-function subcontractor was among the likely patients zero;
the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences; and
any other related lab in the Asian nation.
Of special concern was whether and where funds were spent on “research or experiments that could have reasonably resulted in the enhancement of any coronavirus, influenza, Nipah, Ebola, or other pathogen of pandemic potential or chimeric versions of such a virus or pathogen.”
The conclusions of the report were damning.
The Pentagon has admitted that it has no idea to what extent it has funded the creation of deadly viruses in an adversarial nation it has identified as its “top pacing challenge” — a country whose overall biorisk management score is less than stellar.
The report noted at the outset that Army officials had identified 12 relevant research programs and that for “seven awards, a prime awardee provided funds to a subawardee or contracting research organization in China or other foreign countries for research related to potential enhancement of pathogens of pandemic potential.”
The Inspector General’s Office could also account for over $54 million given to EcoHealth Alliance for 13 projects executed from 2014 through 2023 but suggested that none of this funding went to China or its affiliates for gain-of-function research.
After accounting for the top of the Pentagon funding iceberg, the report indicated what lies below the surface is wholly “unknown.”
Why is the answer to this question not ‘zero dollars’?
Citing “significant challenges in searching for awards” due to “limitations in the DOD’s systems used to track contracts and grants,” the Inspector General’s Office concluded, “The full extent of DOD funds provided to Chinese research laboratories or other foreign countries for research related to enhancement of pathogens of pandemic potential is unknown.”
The report noted that when it came to funding Chinese gain-of-function experiments, the DOD neither used “a budget line item or any other consistent indicator, such as assistant listing codes, that makes databases of grants, contracts, and other transaction agreements easily searchable or reviewable” nor tracked “funding at the level of detail necessary” to make accurate determinations.
Apparently, the Government Accountability Office reached a comparable conclusion in a 2022 report.
Similarly troubling was the Office of the Inspector General’s admission that found it impossible “to identify a single source that encompasses all pathogens of pandemic potential.” In other words, the Pentagon does not appear to have an accessible authoritative list detailing just how many deadly diseases it has funded the creation of in China.
Despite the acknowledgement the Pentagon hasn’t tracked its spending on the manufacture of killer viruses in China, DOD officials reassured the Inspector General’s Office that “DOD organizations did not actively participate in or knowingly fund research or experiments that could have reasonably resulted in the enhancement of pathogens of pandemic potential from 2014 through 2023.”
The report was not well received.
Molecular biologist Dr. Richard H. Ebright of Rutgers University wrote, “Your tax dollars on fire.”
Stanford University epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya tweeted, “The Biden DOD has lost track of how much money it has given to Chinese laboratories for ‘enhancing’ pathogens. Why is the answer to this question not ‘zero dollars’?”
“Deadly coverup. Deadly incompetence,” wrote Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson. “What’s the difference? But this ‘I dunno’ may as well translate as: we (YOU) paid for the creation of covid.”
Blaze News columnist Auron MacIntyre responded, “US agencies can track and censor your social media posts about the pandemic but can’t track how much they spent to manufacture it.”
“It wasn’t the Pangolin,” wrote Mike Benz, executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online. “It was the Pentagon.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Virus, Covid, Gain of function, Gof, Gain-of-function, China, Wuhan, Deadly, Experiments, Pentagon, Department of defense, Experimentation, Grants, Funding, Politics
